W912HV21R0001-AM-0001_APSI RFI_Eval.pdf

W912HV21R0001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FY20 MCAF ZNRE2031002 Asia Pacif ic Stability Iniative (APSI) - Fuel Receipt and Distribution Upgrades, Yokota AB

See continuation page(s).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 29

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Dec-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HV21R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Nov-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Dec-2020

CODE

CONSTRUCTION BRANCH

USACE-JAPAN DISTRICT

BLDG. 250

CAMP ZAMA

ZAMA-CITY, KANAGAWA 252-8511

JAPAN

W912HV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

(AM-0001)

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

CONTINUATION PAGE-AM-0001

A. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS – The amendment mark “(Am-0001)” is shown on each page of the amended page(s).

(1) Revised Section(s) to Project Specifications. Attached hereto are the following revised section(s) to the specifications. Revised section(s) will replace like-numbered section(s) in the subject solicitation specifications.

Changes are indicated by a red line in the left margin or in red font of revised areas. All portions of the revised section(s) shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

Revised Section(s) Section 00 21 16 - Will not be issued in its entirety, changes are shown below Section 00 22 00 Section 00 22 16

(2) Revised Section Attachment(s) to Project Specifications. Attached hereto are the following revised section attachment(s) to the specifications. Revised section attachment(s) will replace like-numbered section attachment(s) in the subject solicitation specifications. Changes are indicated by a red line in the left margin or in red font of revised areas. All portions of the revised section attachment(s) shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

Revised Attachment(s) Section 01 11 00.00 10-B

B. All questions and the Government responses regarding this solicitation are to be submitted and viewed through the web-based program "Bidder Inquiry Module". This program is located on the world-wide internet and can be accessed at https://www.projnet.org/projnet. Answers provided to the respective questions through the ProjNet do not amend the solicitation (specifications, drawings, etc.) unless revision to the specifications or drawings is specifically noted and incorporated into the solicitation via an amendment.

C. The Proposal Due Date and Time remains unchanged.

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

00 21 16

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

1. METHOD OF PROCUREMENT. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Japan District, intends to solicit this requirement using the source selection procedures in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Request For Proposal (RFP). See Sections 00 22 00 and 00 22 16. A Firm-Fixed Price construction contract will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection procedures.

2. DELIVERY OF BIDS/OFFERS.

a. Proposals shall be submitted electronically via email. See Section 00 22 00 for proposal submission instructions.

b. Firms are solely responsible for ensuring their electronic proposal is received by the Government by the date and time established in the solicitation for receipt of electronic proposals.

c. Physical or paper proposals WILL NOT be accepted.

3. CONTRACTOR APPLICATIONS. Firms which have not submitted a Contractor Application to this office are requested to go to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Japan Engineering District, Contracting Division website:

https://www.poj.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/ to download the Contractor Application. Such firms shall be required to complete the aforementioned application and submit documents indicating they are registered with the Government of Japan to perform construction in Japan and possess both the necessary construction licenses and permits required to perform the requisite work identified in the solicitation. This documentation should be submitted prior to proposal submission.

4. SOLICITATIONS FOR LOCAL SOURCES ONLY. This contract will be performed in its entirety in the country of Japan and is intended only for local sources. (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 5.202(a)(12) and Paragraph titled, “Offeror Eligibility”)

5. SUBMISSIONS OF OFFERS IN JAPANESE YEN. Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in terms of Japanese Yen, including any required bid guarantee. Offers received in other than Japanese Yen shall be rejected.

6. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.

a. Physical Characteristics: Expand and upgrade the existing liquid fuel unloading facility to accommodate rail cars (existing capability) and fuel delivery trucks, and comply with current requirements. The system includes replacing the existing 32 rail station headers with 24 new headers, plus adding 8 truck offload headers. The new offload facility will include two drop tanks in below-ground concrete vaults with pumps and piping to connect to an existing nearby fuel facility. In addition, the existing back-up generator will need to be upgraded. Secondary containment with remote spill containment basin will be added. Truck access roads and an offload parking area with bypass lane and entry/exit gates will also be added. Nearby on-base roads will require improvements to accommodate the trucks. Lighting, utilities, yard piping, rail lines, and other components will be replaced or improved as needed to ensure a complete and usable facility. Demolition or relocation of some components of the existing facility will also be required, to include removing excess rail lines.

https://www.poj.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/

b. Magnitude of the Proposed Project. The estimated price range of this work is between ¥1,000,000,000 and ¥2,500,000,000 [DFARS 236.204].

7. BIDDER INQUIRIES.

a. Prospective Bidders shall submit all questions or requests for information (RFI) regarding this solicitation through the PrjoNet website, which can be accessed at https://www.projnet.org/projnet/. The “Bidder Inquiry Module” in ProjNet will allow contractors to submit questions and/or RFIs, and display previously submitted questions and/or RFIs posted by other prospective Bidders. Telephonic and email questions sent directly to Government representatives will not be accepted. All questions and/or requests for information (RFI) shall be submitted Bidder Inquiry Module by the due date and time identified herein.

b. All questions or RFIs shall be submitted within the ProjNet, Bidder Inquiry Module no later than January 7, 2021 December 9, 2020 at 4:00 PM, Japan Standard Time (JST).

c. To submit and/or review questions related to this project, prospective Bidders must use a Bidder Inquiry Key and follow the instructions listed below for access.

d. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 7MU9Q4-5GFTT4

e. Prior to submitting questions or RFIs, prospective Bidders are encouraged to thoroughly review the Solicitation and all attachments (i.e. specifications and drawings) and the Bidder Inquiry Module to confirm other Bidders have not previously submitted the same question or RFI, in order to avoid repeat inquiries.

f. For specification questions, select “Specifications,” then list the Section, Paragraph and Page Number to correspond to your inquiry. For Plans questions, select “Plans” and list the sheet and detail number for the inquiry.

g. ProjNet Access Instructions:

a. Go to the website: https://www.projnet.org/projnet/.

b. At the home page, select USACE for the “Managing Agency” field.

c. At the home page, enter your email address under the “EMAIL” field (do not enter a password in the

“Regular Accounts” Section).

d. At the home page, enter the Bidder Inquiry Key under the “KEY ACCESS” field.

e. Read and check “I agree to the privacy & security notice.”

f. Press Sign-in button.

g. A page will open requesting user account information and will ask you to create a new account (if you don’t have an existing account in the system). Enter all data fields required for account creation.

When you log back in, you will need to answer your security question.

h. Press “add user” to continue.

i. Upon completion of account creation, you will have access to the ProjNet system and project page.

j. Review and submit questions regarding this project. An offeror who submits a question will receive an automated email notification that their question has been received. All questions can be viewed from this program.

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/ https://www.projnet.org/projnet/

k. For specific Step-by-Step for POSTING YOUR INQUIRIES, see the Reference link in the Contract

Viewer.

l. For questions about ProjNet, please contact the Call Center help desk toll free number at 1-800-428- HELP, which operates from 8 am to 5 pm (U.S. Central Time Zone). Questions can be emailed to the helpdesk at staff@rcesupport.com.

h. The Government reserves the right to answer questions after this deadline, but is not obligated to provide a response to late questions. The Government will respond to inquiries in ProjNet. Government responses to inquiries are intended to provide clarity and may or may not result in an amendment to the solicitation. All revisions to the specifications and/or drawings will be specifically noted and incorporated into the solicitation via an amendment. Any information given a prospective Bidder concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective Bidders, if that information is necessary in submitting proposals or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective Bidders.

8. PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR – DEFINED. For the purpose of Clause entitled, "PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR", of Special Contract Requirements, work on the site with the Contractor's own organization means physical activities at the site other than work performed by subcontractors, procurement of materials for installation by subcontractors, or providing equipment to be used solely by subcontractors.

9. PRORATED COSTS. All costs pertaining to the performance of work under the contract over and above the direct costs for the work shall be prorated to and included in the price quoted for each item in the Bidding Schedule.

10. SPECIAL TREATMENT OF PACKAGING OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL. Bidders are cautioned that equipment and material requiring ocean transportation may be subjected to inordinate dangers and special treatment or packaging may be necessary to assure arrival in a condition conforming to contract requirements.

11. SIGNATURE ON OFFERS. Offers must be signed by an officer of the company or an individual who is authorized to sign offers for and on behalf of the company. An individual, other than an officer of the company, who signs an offer must submit evidence of his authority to sign such offer. This evidence must accompany the offer. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer. Corporations that previously submitted a Contractor Application to USACE – Japan District, which clearly authorizes the officer signing the offer to sign offers on behalf of the corporation, do not need to complete the Corporate Certificate located in Section 00 45 00.

12. JOINT VENTURE. In the event the offeror is a joint venture, the offer must be signed by an authorized representative of each participant in the joint venture. The joint venture as an entity shall also have an active System for Award Management registration – See FAR 52.204-7 System for Award Management. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

13. OFFEROR ELIGIBILITY. Only local sources will be considered under this solicitation. Local sources are sources (e.g. corporations, partnerships, or Joint Ventures [For a Joint Venture, the Joint Venture as an independent entity must satisfy the local source requirements or, in the alternative, each member of the Joint Venture must individually satisfy the local source requirements]) that are physically located in Japan and authorized (i.e. licensed and registered) to perform in Japan, the type of construction work specific in this solicitation. Specifically, a prospective offeror must be duly authorized to operate and conduct business in Japan and must fully comply with all applicable laws, decrees, labor standards, and regulations of Japan during the performance of the resulting contracts. In addition, prior to award of the contracts, offerors must be registered with the Government of Japan to do construction work in Japan and possess necessary construction licenses and permits to perform work required under this solicitation. The U.S. Government will not offer “United States Official Contractor” status under Article XIV of the US-Japan Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to U.S. contractors normally resident in the United States; nor will the U.S. Government certify employees of such contractors as “Members of the Civilian Component” under Article I(b) of the SOFA.

14. JAPANESE CONSUMPTION TAX. By virtue of Article XII of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), materials, supplies, equipment and services procured for official purposes in Japan by the United States armed forces, or its authorized procurement agencies are EXEMPT from various Japanese Taxes, including Consumption Tax. The exemption from the Japanese Consumption Tax applies not only to Japanese prime contractors, but also to Japanese subcontractors or suppliers at every level regardless of the nationality of the prime contractor whether a Japanese or a Foreign firm. The instruments listed hereinafter have been agreed to by both governments of Japan and the U.S. as "Proof of Purchase by U.S. Forces in Japan.”

Standard Form 1034 Public Voucher for Purchases and Services other than Personal

DD Form 1155 Order for Supplies or Services

Standard Form 44 Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher

ENG Form 93 Payment Estimate

Therefore, Japanese Consumption Tax shall NOT be included in your bid, proposal or quote.

15. ACCEPTABLE SURETIES.

a. Notwithstanding the statement contained in paragraph (d) of the clause, FAR Clause 52.228-15, "Performance and Payment Bonds - Construction", concerning the acceptable corporate sureties appearing on the Treasury Department Circular 570, a corporate surety that has received official approval to execute bid bonds (Standard Form 24) and performance bonds (Standard Form 25) on United States Forces Japan construction projects from the Ministry of Finance, Government of Japan will be considered an acceptable surety. Banks are not acceptable sureties; bid bonds and performance bonds executed by banks will be rejected.

b. Not withstanding the statement contained in paragraph (d) of clause FAR 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction, the performance bond must be supported by good and sufficient corporate surety or sureties acceptable to the Government

16. PRE-AWARD SURVEYS. The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey of any firm under consideration to confirm any part of the information furnished by the offeror, or to require other evidence of managerial, financial, technical, and other capabilities, the positive establishment of which is determined by the Government to be necessary for the successful performance of the contract.

17. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE.

a. Offerors are strongly urged and expected to attend and participate in the pre-proposal conference. The purpose of this conference is to promote uniform interpretation of the solicitation documents and work requirements and can include discussions of any problems with interpretations of the solicitation documents and work execution identified by potential offerors through written questions. In no event will a failure to attend the pre-proposal conference constitute grounds for a claim after award of the contract.

b. Offerors are encouraged to ask questions at the conference. Any questions made at the conference may or may not be addressed at the conference, but will be addressed in the minutes of the conference.

c. This Pre-proposal Conference will be conducted concurrently with the pre-proposal site investigation.

Please see 52.236-27 SITE VISIT section for information regarding the meeting.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

00 22 00

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 Offerors shall strictly adhere to the requirements in this Section when preparing the proposal to be submitted in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP). All proposals shall be in English. The Government will not reimburse any Offeror any cost incurred in response to this RFP. Proposals that fail to comply with the proposal submittal requirements addressed in this section of the solicitation may be deemed unacceptable. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, inclusive of terms and conditions, representations and certifications and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this section of the Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation at or before the exact time specified. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Copies of the RFP are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All RFP documents will be posted to and made available for viewing in beta.SAM.gov. All amendments will be posted to and made available for viewing in beta.SAM.gov. It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the website for any amendments.

1.2 The Government seeks award of one contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government utilizing the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures.

1.2.1 The Government will determine which offeror demonstrates the required competence for performing the requirement described herein and offers the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal to the Government.

Offerors are advised the Government intends to make an award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with the offerors (other than communications conducted for the purpose of clarification); however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer determines it necessary. Therefore, the initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms with respect to capability and price.

1.2.2 The Government reserves the right to discuss aspects of proposals with offerors in the competitive range, if one is determined to be necessary, upon completion of the evaluation. Offerors are advised that the Government may make award without discussions, clarifications, or any contact concerning the proposals received. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

1.3 Time and Date Due. Both Volume I (Technical Proposal) and Volume II (Price Proposal) are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13a. of the Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer and Award, for this solicitation.

1.3.1 Proposals received by the Government after the date and time set for receipt of proposals will be handled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition”.

1.4 It is the offeror’s responsibility to provide information and evidence that clearly demonstrates that it meets the capability requirements of this solicitation. Proposals that fail to comply with the proposal submittal requirements addressed in this section of the solicitation may be deemed unacceptable. Note: The Government may contact references submitted and may use information contained in its files or from other sources to verify information provided with the offeror’s proposals.

2.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 General Requirements: The proposal shall be clear, concise and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet the requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

2.2 Electronic submission: Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist, Ms. Jennifer Knutson at Jennifer.H.Knutson.civ@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer, Ms. Tristin Suetsugu at Tristin.N.Suetsugu.civ@usace.army.mil and must be received by the due date and time indicated for submission of proposals. The Government will only accept electronic proposals. Physical or paper copy proposals will not be accepted.

2.2.1 Proposals shall be prepared and submitted electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF). Other formats or file types will not be accepted. The PDF Files submitted should be marked with the Offeror’s name, solicitation number, and volume number. Electronic proposals shall be submitted in two (2) separate PDF files for two (2) separate volumes, as indicated below:

2.2.1.1 Volume I shall contain the Technical Proposal and shall be clearly marked Volume I – Technical Proposal.

In addition, follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(1) and(c)(2) of Section 00 21 16, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

2.2.1.2 Volume II shall contain the Price Proposal and shall be clearly marked Volume II – Price Proposal. In addition, follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(1) and (c)(2) of Section 00 21 16, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

2.2.2 Each volume shall be separate and complete in itself so that evaluation of one may be accomplished independently from evaluation of the other. It is recommended that the pages be formatted to standard letter size 8- 1/2” x 11” or A4 using 12 characters per linear inch or equivalent as the minimum size standard for text. Volume I, Technical, shall not contain any reference to cost for this project. The total pages submitted for Volume I, Technical Proposal shall not exceed sixty (60) pages. Each page should be numbered. Any pages over the prescribed limit will not be considered for evaluation.

2.2.3 The Government recognizes that offerors go to considerable expense to prepare proposals for this solicitation, so the Government prefers that proposals be practical. In short, the proposal shall completely and adequately address the requirements stated in solicitation. Proposal legibility, clarity, coherence, and contents are important.

The technical proposal, Volume I of the Offeror’s proposal shall not exceed sixty (60) pages. Do not include the front and back cover of the technical proposal in the sixty (60) page count. However, all other pages, including Past Performance Questionnaire, will be included in the count. Since only the first 60 pages of the offeror’s technical proposal will be evaluated by the Government, it is highly recommended that the offeror number each page of the proposal. Proposal legibility, clarity, coherence, and contents are important.

2.2.4 Revised Proposal. Revised proposals will not be accepted unless specifically requested by the Contracting Officer. If the Contracting Officer decides to conduct discussions and requests revised proposals from the offerors;

offerors shall ensure that all replacement pages are clearly marked “REVISED”, shall show the date of revision. All proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g. bold face print or underlining.

2.3 Proposal Content

2.3.1. Volume I – Technical Proposal – Submit one (1) electronic PDF copy.

2.3.1.1. Submit one (1) electronic PDF of the documents shown in the table below. The Technical Proposal shall not contain any reference to cost for this project. The total pages submitted for the Technical Proposal shall not exceed sixty (60) pages. Each page should be numbered. Any pages over the prescribed limit will not be mailto:Jennifer.H.Knutson.civ@usace.army.mil mailto:Tristin.N.Suetsugu.civ@usace.army.mil considered for evaluation. Do not include the front and back cover of the technical proposal in the sixty (60) page count.

2.3.1.2. The submittals should be formatted as follows:

Volume I – Technical Proposal one (1) Electronic PDF copy

Tab Documents to be Submitted 1 Cover Sheet. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.1 below

2 Construction Experience: Section 00 22 00, Attachment I “Construction Experience Sheet.” Submit one Construction Experience sheet per project. Proposal shall include at least one (1) two (2) projects but not more than three (3) projects. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.2

3 System Supplier Subcontractor Experience: Section 00 22 00, Attachment II “Subcontractor Experience Sheet – System Supplier.” Proposal shall include at least five (5) projects but no more than seven (7) projects. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.3

4 Past Performance: Section 00 22 00, Attachment III “Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).”

Submit one Past Performance Questionnaire for each project submitted under Factor 1 – Past Experience. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.4

2.3.1.3 Additional Submittal Instructions

2.3.1.3.1 Cover Sheet. Follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(2) in Section 00 21 16, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

2.3.1.3.2 Factor 1, Construction Experience. The Construction Experience Sheet (Attachment I) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor 1, Construction Experience.

Use Attachment I – Construction Experience Sheet to submit a minimum of one (1) two (2) but not more than three

(3) construction projects. Each submitted project information sheet should not exceed five (5) pages per project.

Offerors should ensure all minimum acceptability criteria for the factor are addressed (See Section 00 22 16). The Government will not evaluate more than three (3) projects under this factor for each offerors' proposal. If more than three (3) projects are submitted for this factor, the Government will only evaluate the first three (3) projects submitted for this factor in the order presented in the proposal submitted by the offeror.

2.3.1.3.3 Factor 2, System Supplier Subcontractor Experience. The Subcontractor Experience Sheet – System Supplier (Attachment II) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor 2, System Supplier Subcontractor Experience.

Use Attachment II – Subcontractor Experience Sheet to submit a minimum of five (5) but not more than seven (7) construction projects. Each submitted project information sheet should not exceed four (4) pages per project.

Offerors should ensure all minimum acceptability criteria for the factor are addressed (See Section 00 22 16). The Government will not evaluate more than seven (7) projects under this factor for each offeror’s proposal. If more than seven (7) projects are submitted for this factor, the Government will only evaluate the first seven (7) projects submitted for this factor in the order presented in the proposal submitted by the offeror. Per specification Section 33 57 55, para 2.2: “System Supplier must be a company whose regular, normal, and primary business is representing manufacturers in the distribution and start-up of aviation fueling facilities, and have no affiliation with the Contractor other than as a seller to the Contractor. Supplier must provide all system components and appurtenances regardless of manufacture, be a factory authorized certified representative, and be responsible to the Contractor for satisfactory operation of the entire system, and must oversee the installation of the system components.”

2.3.1.3.4 Factor 3 Past Performance. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) – Attachment III, included in this solicitation, is provided for the offeror to obtain past performance information for each project submitted for Factor 1, Construction Experience on the Construction Experience Sheet – Attachment I.

i. The government requires the offeror to send out a PPQ to EACH of the Points-of-Contact (POCs) identified on the submitted Project Information Sheet. The offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ. The offeror shall send out the PPQ with the Past Performance Evaluation Cover Letter, to each of its references.

ii. THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND OUT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RESTS

SOLELY WITH THE OFFEROR. OFFERORS SHOULD FOLLOW-UP WITH

CLIENTS/REFERENCES TO ENSURE TIMELY SUBMITTAL OF QUESTIONNAIRES. PPQ’s ARE

DUE BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT BY THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND TIME LISTED IN

BLOCK 13 OF THE SF 1442.

iii. The POCs shall forward their completed questionnaires directly to the Government – NOT BACK TO THE

OFFEROR.

iv. PPQs shall be sent directly from your references to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Knutson via e-mail at Jennifer.H.Knutson.civ@usace.army.mil and Ms. Tristin Suetsugu via e-mail at Tristin.N.Suetsugu.civ@usace.army.mil.

v. Offerors may submit Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) generated from the Past

Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and other official contract performance assessment records in lieu of the PPQ, Attachment III for any project.

vi. The Government reserves the right to obtain or verify an Offeror’s past performance information using CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary affiliate firm) identified in the offeror’s proposal, from other sources, including, but not limited to Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Evaluators in determining the offeror’s past performance confidence rating. Government evaluators may contact your points of contact/references for the projects submitted to verify an Offeror’s past performance on these projects. The Government may consider relevant past performance data obtained from any source in determining the performance confidence rating.

2.3.2 Volume II – Price Proposal– Submit one (1) electronic PDF copy.

2.3.2.1. Submit one (1) electronic PDF of the documents shown in the table below.

Volume II – Price Proposal one (1) Electronic PDF copy

Tab Documents to be Submitted

1 Cover Sheet. See Paragraph 2.3.2.2.1.

2 Standard Form (SF) 1442. Front and back page.

3 Section 00 10 00 – Proposal Schedule mailto:Jennifer.H.Knutson.civ@usace.army.mil mailto:Tristin.N.Suetsugu.civ@usace.army.mil

4 Section 00 45 00

5 Joint Venture Agreement (If proposing as a Joint Venture): If a Joint Venture (JV) is identified in Block 14 of the SF 1442, then a signed joint venture agreement must be submitted with the proposal.

6 SF30 – Front page for each amendment (if issued) – Completed and Signed

2.3.2.2. Additional Submittal Instructions

2.3.2.2.1. Cover Sheet. Follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(2) in Section 00 21 16, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS—COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

--End of Section--

SECTION 00 22 00

ATTACHMENT I

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE INFORMATION SHEET

SOLICITATION NO. W912HV21R0001

Provide information for projects to be used for CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE evaluation purposes. For each project, provide the following information (use additional sheets as necessary) – Not to Exceed five (5) pages:

a. Name of Offeror on this solicitation: ___________________________________________________

b. Contract or Task Order Number & Project Title:

c. Location/Site (Include Country, Prefecture, and City where the project was constructed):

d. Name of Company/Firm Involved in this completed project as the prime contractor (if this project was performed by a Joint Venture (JV), also indicate all JV members and copy of joint venture agreement).

e. Your Role (role of offeror on completed project; such as, Prime Contractor, Subcontractor or Joint Venture member) and key work disciplines your company performed on this completed project:

f. General Scope of Project/Project Description. Describe how this project meets each and every minimum acceptability criteria listed in RFP Section 00 22 16 - Factor 1. If additional room is needed, attach a separate sheet:

g. Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted:

h. Period of Performance:

Date Construction Began: ____________________________________________________________

Date Physically Completed: __________________________________________________________

If not Completed, percentage of construction progress currently completed: ____________________

i. Total Contract or Task Order (if a task order) Value: ¥_______________________________

j. Total value of liquid petroleum fuel receiving or distribution system related work:

k. If this project was performed by the offeror’s parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm, describe the nature of the affiliation and describe how the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm’s resources (workforce, management, facilities or other resources) will significantly contribute to the execution of this project.

Provide two Points of Contact for Client/Agency (if client is the U.S. Government, provide name and address of contracting office, contract number, name and telephone number of Contracting Officer):

(1)

Name: _______________________________________________________________________ Telephone No. _________________________________________________________________

E-mail: ______________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________

(2)

Telephone No. _________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT II

SUBCONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE SHEET – SYSTEM SUPPLIER

SOLICITATION NO. W912HV21R0001

Provide the following information for proposed System Supplier Subcontractor (use additional sheets as necessary)

– Not to exceed four (4) pages per project.

1. Name of Offeror on this solicitation:

2. Name of Proposed System Supplier Subcontractor on this solicitation:

3. Contract or Task Order Number & Project Title:

4. Name of Company/Firm Involved on this completed project as the system supplier:

5. Project Location/Site:

6. Period of Performance:

Date Construction Began: ____________________________________________________________

Date Physically Completed: __________________________________________________________

If not Completed, percentage of construction progress currently completed: ____________________

7. General Scope of Project/Project Description. Describe how this project meets each and every minimum acceptability criteria listed in RFP Section 00 22 16 - Factor 2. If additional room is needed, attach a separate sheet:

8. Provide two Points of Contact for Client/Agency (if client is the U.S. Government, provide name and address of contracting office, contract number, name and telephone number of Contracting Officer):

(1)

Telephone No. _________________________________________________________________

(2)

Telephone No. _________________________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT III

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. W912HV21R0001

Once the questionnaires are received by the Government, the information contained therein will be considered source selection sensitive and will not be released outside the Government in accordance with FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104.

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is submitting a proposal for project: FY20 MCAF ZNRE2031002 APSI – Fuel Receipt and Distribution Upgrades, Yokota Air Base. Please complete this form in its entirety to the best of your ability as the results will be used to evaluate the contractor.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. Upon completion of this survey, please send it directly to this office marked to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Knutson via e-mail at Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil and Ms. Tristin Suetsugu at Tristin.N.Suetsugu.civ@usace.army.mil no later than: 26 February 2021, 1400 Hours, Japan Standard Time (JST) .

If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Ms. Jennifer Knutson by email at Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil.

// SIGNED //

TRISTIN N. SUETSUGU

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:david.delgado.6@us.af.mil mailto:david.delgado.6@us.af.mil

ATTACHMENT III

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

業者の評価の為の評価基準と定義

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional 特に優れている

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/ Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

仕事が契約内容と合致しており、顧客の希望

を上回る点が多い。修正可能な範囲の軽微な

不具合を含め、契約通りの内容である。修正

箇所は非常に満足な結果である。

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/ Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses Identified.

(VG) Very Good 優れている

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/ Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

仕事が契約内容と合致しており、顧客の希望

を多少上回る。修正可能な範囲の若干の不具

合を含め、契約通りの内容である。修正箇所

は満足な結果である。

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/ Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory 満足

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

仕事が最低限の契約内容と合致している。修

正可能な若干の不具合を含め、契約通りの内

容である。修正箇所は特に問題ない結果であ

る。

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal 問題あり

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

仕事が契約内容と合致していない。修正可能

な不具合があるかどうかも把握できておら

ず、深刻な状態である。業者から提案される

方法は効果的とは言えない、またはその方法

を実行されてもいない。

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory 不満足、問題あり

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

仕事が契約内容にほとんど合致しておらず、

不具合の復旧も迅速ではない。不具合の修正

も全く効果的ではなく、深刻な状態である。

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable 該当なし

No information or did not apply to your contract 評価材料がない、または該当せず。

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

該当する評価基準に○を付けて下さい。

1. QUALITY（仕事の質）:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts 技術データやレポートの質はよかったか？

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance 工事又は提供されているサービスの品質は仕様書で要求されている技術基準に適

合していたか？

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance 詳細な客先の助言無しで問題を適時/適正に解決ができたか？

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) 品質管理プログラムは適切かつ有効で実際にその品質管理プログラムに基づいて

品質管理が実施されていたか？（仕事に悪影響が出ることなく）

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE（期日の遵守）:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) 契約全体及びその中に含まれる重要な中間又は完了期限/期日は遵守されていた

か？（もし損害賠償金が発生、または期限が遵守されていなかった場合、詳しく

お書き下さい）

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract 契約を遂行するための業者の資材調達、活用能力は？

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION（顧客の満足度）:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

どの程度の顧客満足度か？

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) 業者は御社の担当者に協力的であったか？（業者との意見の相違、論争を有効に

解決する能力、及びそれらへの書類での対応、真摯なコミュニケーション能力）

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

業者の協力姿勢、ビジネスライクな態度、顧客の希望を考慮したかどうかについ

ての満足度は？

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction 総合的な顧客満足度は？

E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR（ 人員の管理）

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

現場と人員の管理、 下請け業者、 取引業者、 メ ーカー等との連携能力は？

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort この工事又はサービスを提供できる適任者を雇う ことができたか？

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control 軍の土地や所有物に対する管理は？

E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel 専門知識の活用はなされていたか？

E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns (Not applicable to contracts performed in Japan) スモールビジネスの契約方法の活用度（ 日本での契約にはあてはまらない）

E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines 同時にいく つかの現場を平行して管理できていたか？

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes 要求の変更に対しての、 優先順位の把握、 計画、 遂行の対応能力は？

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) 仕事全体の管理は効果的に実施されていたか？（ 計画、 管理、 指導が的確に実

施されていたか？）

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT（ 資金の管理）

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

資金面で同意された内容の範囲において契約内容は遵守されたか？

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client 御社に利益をもたらす資金削減の提案や、 先進的でより よい方法の提案はされ

たか？

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) この仕事が、 公共または米軍政府とのコスト タイプの契約の場合、 月々の請求

書が裏付けになる書類とともに定期的に提出されていたか、 月々の進捗状況と

資金のレポート 提出が予算を上回る、 または下回ることなく 正し く 提出されて

いたか？

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

業者の資金管理方法は適当であったか？ そう でない場合、 詳し く お書き下さ

い。

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

この仕事が、 公共または米軍政府との契約の場合、 部分的に、 又は全体が業者

の責任（ 又はその他の理由） で解約されたり 、 又は解約手続き中であるか？ もし 、 上記の解約等に関連する警告文書等がすでに業者に出されている、 もし

く は何らかの解約手続きが進行中であれば、 詳し く お書き下さい。

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems?

If yes, please explain below.

この仕事を行った業者が財政/金融等の問題を抱えているよう な兆候はあった

か？ もしあれば、 下記に詳し く お書き下さい。

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY（ 安全面）

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

どの程度業者は承認された安全計画に基づく 安全の管理ができていたか？

（ 御社との取り 決めや法律、 現場の特徴、 安全、 不具合に対する対応等を含

む）

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

人員に対する安全は確実に守られていたか？

7. GENERAL（ 総合評価）

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

緊急時の仕事又は仕事量の急増に十分に対応できたか？（ 軍の担当各所への適

切なタイミ ングでの連絡を含む）

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) 総合的に契約内容は遵守されていたと思う か？（ そう でない場合、 詳し く お書

き下さい）

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm…