W912EF24R0010 Amend-0003.pdf

PDF 627 KB Posted

Attached to
Lower Snake River Navigation Lock Tainter Valve System Upgrades Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912EF24R0010
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Walla Walla

About this file

This document is Amendment 0003 to Solicitation W912EF24R0010 for the Lower Snake River Navigation Lock Tainter Valve System Upgrades project. The amendment revises Section 4 Performance and updates the specifications in response to bidder inquiries. The solicitation is for a firm-fixed-price hybrid construction with supply contract to replace tainter valves, associated mechanical equipment, and electrical systems at the Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite navigation lock projects. The work includes fabrication, removal of existing equipment, and installation of replacement equipment. Offerors must demonstrate relevant fabrication and installation experience, and possess American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) certifications. The award will be made to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer. Proposals are due by July 31, 2024.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Lower Snake River Navigation Lock Tainter Valve System Upgrades, newest first.
File Type Posted
24R0010 Amendment 0007.pdf PDF
24R0010_35 20 16.46 28_Amend-0007.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V4_Amend006.pdf PDF
24R0010_05 50 03.00 28_Amend-0006.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V3_Amend006.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V2_Amend006.pdf PDF
24R0010 Solicitation Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V1_Amend006.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V1_Amend005.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V3_Amend005.pdf PDF
24R0010_35 05 40.14 28_Amend-0005.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V4_Amend005.pdf PDF
24R0010 Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V2_Amend005.pdf PDF
24R0010_TechSpec_Amend-0004.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V4_Amend004.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V2_Amend004.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V3_Amend004.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V1_Amend004.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010_TechSpec_Amend-0003_v2.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010_SUBMITTAL REGISTER_Amend-0003.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010 Amendment 00002.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V3_Amendment002.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V4_Amendment002.pdf PDF
24R0010_TechSpecs_Amend-0002.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V1_Amendment002.pdf PDF
24R0010_Plans_V2_Amendment002.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010_TechSpec_Amend-0001.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010_SUBMITTAL REGISTER_Amend-0001.pdf PDF
W912EF24R0010 Amend 0001.pdf PDF
Copy of W912EF24R0010 Contractor Attendance List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912EF24R0010 OFFEROR EXPERIENCE FORM.pdf PDF
24R0010v1_SupplementalDrawings_LMA.pdf PDF
24R0010v3_SupplementalDrawings_LLA.pdf PDF
H.08.04 TechSpec_24R0010_LSR NL Tainter Vlvs.pdf PDF
H.08.01 24R0010_Plans_V1.pdf PDF
24R0010v2_SupplementalDrawings_LGA.pdf PDF
H.08.01 24R0010_Plans_V3.pdf PDF
H.08.01 24R0010_Plans_V2.pdf PDF
Attachment A PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM.pdf PDF
B.08.02 W912EF24R0010 LSR NL Tainter Valves Sys. Ugrades Solicitation.pdf PDF
24R0010v4_SupplementalDrawings_HLD.pdf PDF
H.08.01 24R0010_Plans_V4.pdf PDF
LSR-NavLock-Tainter Valves_JA Cisco (revised)_Signed 24R0010-1.pdf PDF
Show all 45

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Section 4 Performance in the solicitation (see change in green) and update the specif ications in response to bidder inquiries. See Summary of Changes and attachments.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 13

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Aug-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912EF24R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-Jul-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Aug-2024

CODE

USAED, WALLA WALLA - CONTRACTING DIV.

CYNTHIA JACOBSEN

201 N. THIRD AVENUE

WALLA WALLA WA 99362

W912EF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912EF24R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

Summary of changes for Amend-0003 LSR Navigation Lock Tainter Valve System Upgrades

1. Revised the following Specifications (See revised specification for details):

a. SECTION 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES.

Revised Submittal Register.

b. SECTION 26 05 00.00 28 GENERAL ELECTRICAL WORK.

Revised Paragraph 1.6 QUALIFICATIONS.

c. SECTION 35 05 40.14 28 HYDRAULIC POWER SYSTEMS FOR CIVIL WORKS STRUCTURES.

Revised Paragraph 2.5.3 “Pipe Fittings”.

Revised Paragraph 2.6.2 “Tube”.

Revised Paragraph 2.8.3 “Pressure Gauges”.

Revised Paragraph 2.8.4 “Low-Pressure Return Filters”.

Revised Paragraph 2.15 SPARE PARTS.

Revised Paragraph 3.2.1 “Welding”.

Deleted Paragraph 3.11.3 “Recording of Training Sessions”.

d. SECTION 35 05 40.15 28 HYDRAULIC FLUID.

Revised Paragraph 1.3 SUBMITTALS.

Revised and Renamed Paragraph 3.5.3 “Data Of Chemical And Physical Characteristics”.

Added Paragraph 3.5.4 “Fluid Quality Certificate”.

e. SECTION 40 60 00.01 28 PROCESS CONTROL.

Revised Paragraph 1.4.1 “PLC Vendor Qualifications”.

Revised Paragraph 3.2.3 “Pressure Instruments”.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

EVAL FACTORS

SOLICITIATION PROVISIONS

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

The award will be made based on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable proposal that is determined to be the best value to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Factor 1 Certification, Factor 2 Past Performance (includes Fabrication Experience and Installation Experience), and Factor 3 Price.

The following paragraphs B through E cover the Factors to be evaluated, the evaluation approach for each Factor to include factor rating tables, proposal submission requirements, and discussion guidance.

B. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal.

1. FACTOR 1 – Certification

Each offeror will be required to clearly demonstrate that the company and/or key personnel (as required) possess one or more of the required fabrication certification capabilities to complete the required scope of work and all requirements. Offeror will be evaluated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable for this factor, as detailed in the Evaluation Approach section.

2. FACTOR 2 – Past Performance

Each offeror’s current and past performance will be reviewed to determine recency, relevancy, and quality. In determining relevancy, the offeror’s performance of fabrication and installation work will be compared to the scope and complexity of the work required in the solicitation.

3. FACTOR 3 – Price

The resulting award will be a firm-fixed price contract. Price reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the proposal.

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals will be evaluated by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). The following sections define the information to be provided and describe how the information for each factor will be evaluated and rated.

The overarching evaluation approach will be based upon adequacy of response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP. Marginal levels of overall detail could indicate a lack of understanding concerning the requirements and may result in the entire factor receiving an unfavorable rating and/or being eliminated from the competitive range.

1. Factor 1 Certification

This factor evaluates the offeror’s required fabricator certification. Contractor submission must provide documentation proving that the company and/or key personnel (as required) will be performing the required fabrications (and other actions required) to furnish the completed supply items for installation. This factor is rated as acceptable or unacceptable. The certification(s) provided must be rated as acceptable for the offer to be considered for award. Contractor must prove the company and/or key personnel (as required) possess one or more of the following certifications under paragraph “a” below. Any copies of certification(s) provided must be legible to facilitate evaluation. Any certification documents submitted will not be returned, therefore it is requested that only copies be provided. Contractor must prove the company(s) and plant(s) performing fabrication of hydraulic steel structures possess one or more of the following certifications and the endorsement under this factor:

a. Certification by American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) as Certified Bridge Fabricator - Intermediate (IBR), Certified Bridge Fabricator – Advanced (ABR), or Certified Hydraulic Fabricator - Advanced (HYDA); and

b. The applicable certification has the Fracture Critical Endorsement (FCE or FCEH).

Evaluation Standard

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

2. Factor 2 Past Performance – This factor is comprised of the following:

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: Recency, Relevancy (including context of data), and Quality (including general trends in the contractor performance and source of information).

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the scope of work.

Offerors shall use Attached “Offeror Experience Form” to describe the projects in which the Offeror has relevant fabrication and installation experience. Offerors shall submit past experience that demonstrates the relevant projects listed below in the Relevancy section.

Limit your submissions to no more than 8 project examples performed within the past ten (10) years.

Proposals shall conform to the solicitation requirements to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation.

a. The Government will focus its inquiries on the offeror’s (and major subcontractor’s) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including price, schedule, performance, and management of sub-contractors. Major sub-contractors are defined as members of an offeror’s overall team who are expected to perform ten (10) percent or more of the proposed effort. A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, signed letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered.

Offerors are reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts (within the past ten years) in their proposal. Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be assigned a “neutral confidence rating” and its proposal will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government may use data provided by the offeror in its proposal and data obtained from other sources, including data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Federal, State, or Local government or commercial contracts for same or similar services as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. Data submitted by the offeror or gathered from other sources by the government in conducting performance risk assessments shall not extend past ten years prior to the issue date of the request for proposal but may include performance data generated during the past ten years without regard to the contract award date.

CPARS data is limited to the past six (6) years. Offerors should provide additional performance data for projects beyond six (6) years.

b. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contract numbers and descriptions for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past ten years, from the issue date of this request for proposal, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources but is not compelled to rely on all of the information available.

c. The past performance factor considers each offeror’s demonstrated record of recent and relevant past performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract requirements.

d. RECENCY: The Government will conduct a performance assessment based on the recency of the Offeror's relevant past performance, of which work shall be current and/or have been performed within the past ten years from the issue date of this RFP.

e. RELEVANCY: The Government will conduct a performance assessment based on the relevancy of the Offeror's current and past performance, as well as that of its major subcontractors and fabricators, as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the required effort. These efforts include all aspects of schedule, performance, and customer support, including the Offeror’s submitted subcontracting plan for this project and the Offeror’s record of:

1) Conforming to specifications and standards of good workmanship.

2) Maintaining program execution within price.

3) Adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance.

4) Ability to resolve technical and manufacturing problems quickly and effectively.

5) Businesslike concern for the interest of its customers.

6) Establishing and maintaining adequate management of subcontractors.

7) Compliance with subcontracting plans submitted on previous projects.

Relevant projects would include:

Fabrication and installation experience with large hydraulic steel structures operated by hydraulic systems.

Fabrication and installation experience with hydraulic power systems which included integrated low voltage Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) controls.

Installation experience performed in difficult and hazardous environments including confined space and fall protection.

* Note see: D. Proposal Submission Requirements (ii.VOLUME I, TAB 2- Past Performance;

(1) and (2)) below for more detailed information.

f. QUALITY: The third aspect of the past performance evaluation assesses the quality of the offeror's past performance on those recent efforts that were determined relevant by determining how well the contractor performed on the contracts. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

Evaluation Standard

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

3. Factor 3 – Price

Offerors must submit completed Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINS) with unit price, quantity, and extended price. All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the extended price, the unit price will govern. For evaluating proposals, the following will be used to resolve arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the pricing schedule as submitted by the offeror:

a. Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected.

b. In a discrepancy between unit price and extended price, the unit price will govern.

c. Calculation errors in extension of unit prices will be corrected.

d. Calculation errors in the addition of lump-sum and extended prices will be corrected.

An evaluation will be performed on the proposed prices. The evaluation will not be assigned an adjectival rating. However, it will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.305 and

FAR 15.404.

D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

1. Introduction. The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted electronically, as set forth below. The solicitation shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submission. Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

The Volumes are:

Volume I – Certificates; Past Performance (Fabrication Experience, Installation Experience).

Volume II - Price; Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents, Certifications/Representations, Subcontracting Plan and Bid Bond.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the technical requirements with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

Any costs related to proposal preparation and submission will not be reimbursed by the Government.

1. Proposal Submission Requirements

a. Each volume shall be submitted as a separate PDF or ZIP file. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated.

b. Printing shall be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required.

Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

VOLUME TITLE ELECTRONIC COPIES

Volume I 1

Volume II 1

d. Proposals may be rejected for failure to adhere to the proposal preparation requirements.

e. Proposals shall conform to the solicitation requirements to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required of this solicitation.

f. Submitting proposals electronically:

i. Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted via email to the following individuals by no later thatnt he date and time established in Block 13 of the Standard Form (SF) 1442, or Block 14 of the most recently issued SF 30 as applicable.

Primary Contract Specialist: Cynthia Jacobsen cynthia.h.jacobsen@usace.army.mil Alternate Contract Specialist: David Boone david.c.boone@usace.army.mil

Each email shall contain the following information:

Solicitation number – W912EF24R0010

ii. Offeror should enter a description for every file submitted. For files over 8 megabytes (MB) the Offeror shall break the file into smaller files sent via separate emails with each email marked to identify which number the email is relative to the total number of emails submitted (i.e. “email one of four”). Once all of the emails submitted have been received the Government will confirm receipt via responsive email. If an offeror submits multiple offers the Government will only consider the last offer submitted prior to the due date and time.

iii. Do not assume submission will be instantaneous. File size and number of files submitted shall be considered.

iv. Electronic submission of offers satisfies the requirement set forth in Block 13A of the SF 1442 (‘…in original and 0 copies…”). Additionally, electronic submission of the offer guarantee, when a offer guarantee is required, is due with the offer submission. Mailing an offer guarantee for submission is not allowed..

SUBMISSION DEADLINE – Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of the Standard Form (SF) 1442, or Block 14 of the most recently issued SF 30 as applicable

2. Proposal Files

a. Format The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date, and RFP number in the header and/or footer. Scans must be in color and at least 600 dpi. All files created in MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

c. Sub-Contractor Identification. Offerors are required to clearly identify the firm(s) that will be utilized during performance of the contract or work that will be self-performed. Ensure the proposal is clear as to which function the Offeror or subcontractor will be performing. If the prime contractor proposes to use a major subcontractor, the offeror shall submit a signed Letter of Commitment from the subcontractor with the proposal.

i. VOLUME I, TAB 1 – Certificates. This tab shall contain the certifications and endorsements required by Factor 1.

ii. VOLUME I, TAB 2– Past Performance. This tab shall contain current and past performance information regarding similar contracts. Offerors shall submit Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major contract currently in performance or awarded during the past ten (10) years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, signed letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered.

A PPQ is included in this solicitation at Attachment A. Submit one Attachment A for each project narrative submitted under Factor 2 that does not have a CPARS.

When completing the PPQ, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. However, if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal due date, the Offeror shall, at a minimum, submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ with blocks 1 through 5 completed. This will allow the Government an opportunity to contact the client directly.

Please contact the client to notify them of the Government's intent to contact them regarding Past Performance on the project listed. Additionally, if the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly from the client to the Government's point of contact listed in Block 7 of Standard Form 1442.Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal any PPQs previously submitted for other Solicitations/Requests for Proposals. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

This tab shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 – Fabrication Experience. This section shall include the following information in the following format. Ensure all information is current and accurate.

Proposals will be evaluated to determine experience with the fabrication of large complex and precise steel structures relevant with the scope and complexity required in the solicitation. Offerors shall provide sufficient information to clearly demonstrate the breadth and depth of the Offeror’s fabrication experience.

Offerors shall submit the following for Fabrication Experience:

I. Offerors must demonstrate fabrication experience of each of the elements identified below performed within the past ten (10) years.

a. At least 50% physically complete at the time of proposal submission or was completed within the last ten (10) years.

b. Provide information about the fabricated Hydraulic Steel Structures

(HSS) having a total weight of at least 10 tons and having a length, width, or height of at least 10 feet. HSS is defined as structures which control or regulate water and are typically part of a larger navigation, hydropower, or flood control project. Typical HSS are lock gates, dam spillway gates, Tainter gates, Tainter valves, bulkheads and stoplogs, vertical lift gates, components of hydroelectric and pumping plants, and miscellaneous structures such as lock wall accessories, flood protection gates, lifting beams used for installing other HSS, and outlet works gates.

c. Use Attached “Offeror Experience Form” to describe the projects in which the Offeror has relevant fabrication experience. Project experience shall include adequate detail such as configuration and dimensions to demonstrate the relevancy of the scope of work for comparison to that required in this solicitation.

II. Provide information to demonstrate which type of certification(s) the fabricator(s) had during fabrication of the HSS. Include certification by American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) in either Major Bridge Fabrication (CBR), Certified Bridge Fabricator - Intermediate (IBR), Certified Bridge Fabricator – Advanced (ABR), and/or Certified Hydraulic Steel Structure Fabricator - Advanced (HYDA) and the Fracture Critical Endorsement (FCE).

(2) Section 2 – Installation Experience. This section shall include the following information in the following format. Ensure all information is current and accurate.

Proposals will be evaluated to determine installation experience for relevant projects of the scope and complexity required in the solicitation. Offerors shall provide sufficient information to clearly demonstrate the breadth and depth of the Offeror’s installation experience.

Offerors shall submit the following for Installation Experience:

I. Offerors must demonstrate installation of each of the elements identified below performed within the past ten (10) years.

a. At least 50% physically complete at the time of proposal submission or was completed within the last ten (10) years.

b. Provide information about the installation of Hydraulic Steel Structure (HSS) having a total weight of at least 10 tons and having a length, width or height of at least 10 feet. HSS is defined as structures which control or regulate water and are typically part of a larger navigation, hydropower or flood control project. Typical HSS are lock gates, dam spillway gates, Tainter gates, Tainter valves, bulkheads and stoplogs, vertical lift gates, components of hydroelectric and pumping plants, and miscellaneous structures such as lock wall accessories, flood protection gates, lifting beams used for installing other HSS, and outlet works gates.

c. Describe any required demolition, installation, setup, and testing of mechanical equipment.

d. Use Attached “Offeror Experience Form” to describe the projects in which the Offeror has relevant installation experience. Project experience shall include adequate detail such as equipment types, ratings, capacities, and configuration to demonstrate the relevancy of the scope of work for comparison to that required in this solicitation.

(3) Section 3 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format. Ensure all information is current and accurate.

a. Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and

UEI CODE. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

b. Government contracting activity, (or private firm) and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’s name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

c. Technical representative/COR and current email address, telephone and fax numbers.

d. Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.

e. Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award point of contact name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

f. Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order/Task Order Numbers.

g. Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost

Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

h. Awarded price.

i. Final or projected final price.

j. Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

k. Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(4) Section 4 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each project submitted. that includes the following: contract listed in Section 3 - Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.

a. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence.

The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

b. For all contracts, the offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offeror’s delivered product.

(5) Section 5 – Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, UEI CODE and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government technical specification. This includes all subcontractors, fabricators, and suppliers who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% of the total proposed Price.

(6) Section 6 – New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited to demonstrate the relevancy of experience and past performance with this solicitation. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Signed Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

Letters of Commitment must be signed both by the company official and the employee.

(7) Section 7 -Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1 - Contract Descriptions, complete a Past Performance Questionnaire for any project that has not received a formal Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation. The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and E-mail the questionnaire to the technical representative responsible for the current and past contract. The Point of Contacts (POCs) shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire. and e-mail the The entire questionnaire should be included with the proposal. However,if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal due date, the Offeror shall, at a minimum, submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ with blocks 1 through 5 completed, submitted to the Contracting Office (no later than the proposal due date), to Attention of Cynthia Jacobsen at cynthia.h.jacobsen@usace.army.mil. The offeror must submit, with its proposal, a list of all the POCs who were sent questionnaires. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number; Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E- Mail to POC (month/day).

(8) Section 8-Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement.

Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency points of contact (POC) in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

iii.VOLUME II, TAB 1 – Price. This tab shall consist of all information, required to support proposed prices. Certified pricing data is not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. There are no page limitations for this tab.

The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this tab is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the SF1442 and continuation sheets.

iv. VOLUME II, TAB 2 – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS, CERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS, SUBCONTRACTING PLAN AND BID

BOND

Certifications and Representations – Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the RFP. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF1442 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.

Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation Section 00 21 00 – Attention to Offerors Section 00 45 00 – Representations, Certification and Other Statements of Offerors

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be submitted separately from that submitted in VOLUME II – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND

AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS /REPRESENTATIONS.

E. DISCUSSIONS

1. GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with FAR provision 52.215-1, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .