Amendment_0001_W912DW19R0018_dated_3-29-2019.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

W912DW19R0018, Fence-to-Fence (F2F) Environmental Compliance Services at Mountain Home Air Force Base (MHAFB), Idaho, and Malmstrom Air Force Base (MAFB), Montana.

(see continuation page)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 50

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 29-Mar-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW19R0018

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Mar-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

29-Mar-2019

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW19R0018

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001

1. This amendment one (0001) provides for the following changes:

a. Inclusion of the following supporting documents identified in Appendix B of the Performance Work Statement:

Mountain Home Air Force Base

a. Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) National Pollutant Discharge Elimitation System

(NPDES)

b. Air Quality Tier I Permit

c. Air Quality Tier I Statement of Basis

d. Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP)

e. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Waste Water Permit

f. Waste Water Reuse Permit

Malmstrom Air Force Base

g. Storm Water Management Program (SWMP)

h. General MS4 Permit

i. Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP)

j. Industrial Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Storm Water

k. Industrial Wastewater Permit

l. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

m. Title V Air Permit

b. Inclusion of Excel version of the Section B, Price Schedule to assist Offerors in compiling their offers.

c. Revised Section M to remove language from Past Performance, Factor B, Paragraph 6.1.

2. The proposal submittal time and date of April 15, 2019 at 2:00:00 p.m. LOCAL TIME remains the same.

3. The attached revised sections are to be replaced in their entirety. Specifications changes are generally identified, for convenience, either by strikeout for deletions, and double underlining of text for additions or a single dark line in the margin. All portions of the revised sections shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

4. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment by number and date on offer.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

PRICE SCHEDULE

MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE

BASE PERIOD (May 21, 2019 – April 30, 2020)

CLIN PWS

Para Description

Unit of Issue Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 11

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Daily 11

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.2

SAM, WASTE

CHARACTERIZATION

Months 11

SAM, WASTE

Daily 11

5.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 11

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Daily 11

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.4.1

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

WATER

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

Daily 11

TOTAL BASE PERIOD

CLINS 0101 - 0108

Optional Requirements

0109 5.1.4 PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT PLAN Job 1

0110 5.3.2 INVENTORY, AEI DATA MGT Job 1

0111 5.4.2 SAM, STORM WATER Job 1

0112 5.4.3 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP Job 1

0113 5.4.4

SURVEY, STORM WATER

PERMIT COMPLIANCE

Job 1

0114 5.4.5

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

RESUBMISSION

0115 5.4.6

SAM, NPDES / OTHER WASTE

WATER, SEEPAGE TEST

Job

0116 5.5.1

PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION

PLAN

0117 5.5.2 RECORDKEEPING, EMS Job 1

TOTAL BASE PERIOD OPTION

REQUIREMENTS

CLIN 0109 - 0117

OPTION YEAR 1 (May 1, 2020 – April 30, 2021)

CLIN

PWS

Para

Description Unit of Issue

Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.2

SAM, WASTE

Months 12

Months 12

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.4.1

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 –

BASE REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 1101 - 1104

5.1.4 PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT PLAN

5.3.2 INVENTORY, AEI DATA MGT

5.4.2 SAM, STORM WATER

5.4.3 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP

5.4.4

SURVEY, STORM WATER

5.4.5

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

5.4.6

SAM, NPDES / OTHER WASTE

WATER, SEEPAGE TEST

5.5.1

PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION

5.5.2 RECORDKEEPING, EMS

Contractor Manpower Reporting

0118 8.0 Contractor Manpower Hours 3

TOTAL BASE PERIOD AND

OPTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 0101 - 0118

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 -

OPTIONAL

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 1105 - 1113

Contractor Manpower Reporting

8.0 Contractor Manpower

Hours 3

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 - BASE

AND OPTIONAL

CLINS 1101 - 1114

OPTION YEAR 2 (May 1, 2021 – April 30, 2022)

CLIN

PWS

Para

Description Unit of Issue

Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.2

SAM, WASTE

Months 12

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.4.1

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 –

CLINS 2101 - 2104

5.4.3 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP

SURVEY, STORM WATER

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

SAM, NPDES / OTHER WASTE

PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 2105 - 2113

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 -BASE

AND OPTIONAL

CLINS 2101 - 2114

OPTION YEAR 3 (May 1, 2022 – April 30, 2023)

CLIN

PWS

Para Description

Unit of Issue Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.2

SAM, WASTE

3103 5.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT Months 12

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.4.1

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 –

CLINS 3101 - 3104

3108 5.4.3 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP

SURVEY, STORM WATER

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

SAM, NPDES / OTHER WASTE

PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 3105 - 3113

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 –

BASE AND OPTIONAL

CLINS 3101 - 3114

OPTION YEAR 4 (May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024)

CLIN

PWS

Para

Description Unit of Issue

Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

5.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

5.1.3 SUPPLIES, HW

5.1.2

SAM, WASTE

4103 5.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

5.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

5.4.1

SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 –

CLINS 4101 - 4104

4107 5.4.2 SAM, STORM WATER Job 1

4108 5.4.3 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP Job 1

5.4.4

SURVEY, STORM WATER

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

SAM, NPDES / OTHER WASTE

PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 4105 - 4113

Contractor Manpower Reporting

4114 8.0 Contractor Manpower

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 –

BASE AND OPTIONAL

CLINS 4101 - 4114

TOTAL BASE PERIOD ______________________________________

TOTAL OPTION PERIOD 1 ______________________________________

TOTAL OPTION PERIOD 2 ______________________________________

TOTAL OPTION PERIOD 3 ______________________________________

TOTAL OPTION PERIOD 4 ______________________________________

GRAND TOTAL – MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE ______________________________________

MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE

Base Year (June 1, 2019 – April 30, 2020)

CLINS

PWS

Para

Description Unit of Issue

Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

0201 4.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT Months 11

4.1.2 SUPPLIES, HW

0202 4.1.4 SAM, WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Months 11

4.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 11

4.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

4.3.4 RECORDKEEPING, AIR

4.4.2 SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE WATER

TOTAL BASE YEAR

CLINS 0201 - 0205

4.1.3

PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT,

TSDF/NON-TSDF

4.3.2 INVENTORY, AEI DATA MGT

4.3.3.2

SAM, AIR - TITLE V COMPLIANCE

TESTING

4.3.3.3

SAM, AIR, BOILER MACT

PERFORMANCE TESTING

4.4.1 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP

4.4.3

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

4.4.4 PLAN UPDATE, SWMP

4.5.1 PLAN UPDATE, EMS, ACTION PLAN

4.5.2 RECORDKEEPING, EMS

TOTAL BASE PERIOD OPTIONAL

CLINS 0206 - 0214

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL BASE YEAR AND

OPTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 0201 - 0215

Option Year 1 (May 1, 2020 – April 30, 2021)

CLINS

PWS

Para

Description Unit of Issue

Quantity Unit Price Price ($)

1201 4.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT Months 12

4.1.2 SUPPLIES, HW

4.1.4 SAM, WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Months 12

1203 4.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 12

4.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 – BASE

CLINS 1201 - 1205

4.1.3

PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT,

1207 4.3.2 INVENTORY, AEI DATA MGT Job 1

4.3.3.2

SAM, AIR - TITLE V COMPLIANCE

SAM, AIR, BOILER MACT

1210 4.4.1 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP Job 1

4.4.3

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

1212 4.4.4 PLAN UPDATE, SWMP Job 1

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 –

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 1206 - 1214

Contractor Manpower Reporting

1215 8.0 Contractor Manpower

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 1 – BASE

AND OPTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 1201 - 1215

Option Year 2 (May 1, 2021 – April 30, 2022)

CLINS PWS

Para Description

Unit of Issue Unit Price Price ($)

2201 4.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT Months 12

4.1.2 SUPPLIES, HW

4.1.4 SAM, WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Months 12

4.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 12

4.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

2204 4.3.4 RECORDKEEPING, AIR

2205 4.4.2 SAM, NPDES/OTHER WASTE WATER Months 12

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 – BASE

CLINS 2201 - 2205

4.1.3

PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT,

SAM, AIR - TITLE V COMPLIANCE

SAM, AIR, BOILER MACT

2210 4.4.1 PLAN UPDATE, SWPPP Job 1

4.4.3

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 2206 - 2214

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 2 – BASE

CLINS 2201 - 2215

Option Year 3 (May 1, 2022 – April 30, 2023)

CLINS PWS

Para Description

Unit of Issue Unit Price Price ($)

4.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

4.1.2 SUPPLIES, HW

4.1.4 SAM, WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Months 12

4.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 12

4.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 – BASE

CLINS 3201 - 3205

4.1.3

PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT,

SAM, AIR - TITLE V COMPLIANCE

SAM, AIR, BOILER MACT

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 3206 - 3214

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 3 – BASE

CLINS 3201 - 3215

Option Year 4 (May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024)

CLINS PWS

Para Description

Unit of Issue Unit Price Price ($)

4.1.1 HW CONTRACT SUPPORT

Months 12

4.1.2 SUPPLIES, HW

4.1.4 SAM, WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Months 12

4.2.1 IHMP SUPPORT

Months 12

4.2.2 IHMP SUPPORT SUPPLIES

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 – BASE

CLINS 4201 - 4205

4.1.3

PLAN UPDATE, HW MGT,

4207 4.3.2 INVENTORY, AEI DATA MGT

SAM, AIR - TITLE V COMPLIANCE

SAM, AIR, BOILER MACT

PLAN UPDATE, SPCC

RECERTIFICATION / FRP

4212 4.4.4 PLAN UPDATE, SWMP Job 1

4214 4.5.2 RECORDKEEPING, EMS Job 1

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 -

REQUIREMENTS

CLINS 4206 - 4214

Contractor Manpower Reporting

TOTAL OPTION YEAR 4 – BASE

CLINS 4201 - 4215

Total Base Period

Total Option Period 1

Total Option Period 2

Total Option Period 3

Total Option Period 4

Grand Total for Malmstrom Air Force Base

PHASE-IN / PHASE-OUT PERIODS

OPTIONAL ITEMS

3.2 Phase-In Period

3.2 Phase-Out Period

Total Phase-In and Phase-Out Periods ________________________________

TOTAL – MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE ________________________________

TOTAL – MALMSTROM HOME AIR FORCE BASE

GRAND TOTAL – MOUNTAIN HOME/MALMSTROM AFB

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work

Statement - Attachment 1

74 14-MAR-2019

Attachment 2 QASP 10 13-MAR-2019 Attachment 3 CEAL Security Document for MAFB

1 11-MAR-2019

Attachment 4 Mountain Home AFB Map

1 11-MAR-2019

Attachment 5 Malmstrom AFB Map 1 11-MAR-2019 to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work

Statement - Attachment 1

74 14-MAR-2019

Attachment 10 MT Home AFB_Air Quality Tier I Permit (T1- 2012.0062)8may15

50 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 11 Malmstrom Title

V_OP1427-12_FINAL

53 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 12 Malmstrom Requirements Doc_T5_TRD1427-

12_FINAL

27 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 13 Malmstrom Final Standardized HWMP 2019 Update

45 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 14 Malmstrom AFB_Storm Water MSGP 2018_MTR000000_Permi t

115 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 15 Malmstrom AFB_MS4_SWMP_18De c17

59 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 16 Malmstrom AFB_Industrial Wastewater Permit 2017- 2022 v2

42 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 17 Malmstrom AFB_Industrial

SWPPP_SIGNED_2018-

03-28

28 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 18 Malmstrom AFB_FINAL MS4 General Permit 2017

63 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 19 FINAL_Mt Home_HWMP - 1 Jun 17

128 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 2 QASP 10 13-MAR-2019 Attachment 3 CEAL Security Document for MAFB

1 11-MAR-2019

Attachment 4 Mountain Home AFB Map

1 11-MAR-2019

Attachment 5 Malmstrom AFB Map 1 11-MAR-2019 Attachment 6 MT Home AFB_Waste

Water Reuse Permit 2017

34 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 7 MT Home AFB_Storm Water Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP)

376 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 8 MT Home AFB_NPDES Wastewater ID0027642-final-permit

22 27-MAR-2019

Attachment 9 MT Home AFB_Air Quality Tier I Statment of Basis (T1-2012.00

235 27-MAR-2019

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the technically acceptable responsible Offeror submitting the technically acceptable, lowest priced offer – Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). This acquisition will result in the award of a firm-fixed price contract.

The technical evaluation of each proposal will be solely on the basis of Technical Evaluation Factors found in this section. The Government will evaluate each proposal on a technically acceptable/unacceptable basis only with respect to the technical evaluation factors (criteria) described herein. Award will be to the Offeror who presents the technically acceptable proposal with the overall total lowest price. It is the intent of the Government to award off initial offers without discussions.

2.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

2.1 Technical Evaluation

Technical acceptability will be based on an assessment of non-priced factors. The proposal will be evaluated according to the Criteria for Non-Price Evaluation Factors of this section.

Proposals will receive either an ACCEPTABLE or an UNACCEPTABLE rating for each of the evaluation factors.

Find the description of these ratings in Table 1.

TABLE 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating: Description:

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2.2 Pricing Evaluation

Pricing will be evaluated for award purposes by adding the total price for all line items identified on the Contract Line Item Schedule, Section B of this Solicitation.

3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS

The evaluation process consists of three parts:

Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete and that a complete proposal is received. An initial review of each of the proposals will be conducted to check for apparent errors, omissions and areas that require clarification. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will ensure that each proposal contains the Price Volume II and the correct number of copies.

Relevant Experience and Past Performance. Relevant Experience and Past Performance will be evaluated according to the Criteria for Non-Price Evaluation Factors found in this section.

Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate price for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. Price will also be verified for unbalancing of line items.

3.1 Definitions

Clarification is a limited exchange with an Offeror for the sole purpose of eliminating minor irregularities, informalities, or apparent clerical mistakes in the proposal or to address adverse past performance not previously addressed with the Offeror. Clarifications do not give an Offeror the opportunity to revise of modify its proposal and are used, as necessary, when not opening discussions.

Communications are a limited exchange with an Offeror used to assist in determinations of the competitive range. Communications are limited to enhancing Government understanding of proposals and addressing adverse past performance information not previously addressed if said information is the determining factor preventing an Offeror from being included in the competitive range. Such communications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, or otherwise revise the proposal.

Discussions offer the opportunity to resolve deficiencies or weaknesses in the proposals, based on the requirement and the evaluations factors set forth in the solicitation. If the Contracting Officer determines it is necessary to open discussions, they must discuss with all Offerors in the competitive range. Offerors have the opportunity to revise their proposals at the conclusion of discussions.

Relevant is defined as having a logical connection with the requirements in this request for technical proposals; that is, featuring work that is similar in complexity, function, magnitude, and scope to the current requirement. To be acceptable, there must be an explanation of how the provided project information is relevant to the proposed work.

Year is defined as 365 consecutive days.

3.2 Submission Format

Please refer to Section L for number of required copies. All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders separately with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below. In Volume I, Technical Proposal, there shall be a tabbed section for each Non-Price Evaluation factor. Volume II, Price Proposal, shall be submitted in a clearly marked envelope.

3.2.1 Volume I

The Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the general format specified below:

Table of Contents for Volume I – (Listing of all sections of the technical proposal) Tab A/Factor A – Relevant Experience.

Tab B/Factor B – Past Performance, Attachment 1.

3.2.2 Volume II

The Offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

SF33 and Price Schedule, Section B (fill out both schedules in its entirety) Pre-Award Information found at back of Section K, Representations and Certifications (filled out in its entirety)

NOTE: Offeror’s Price Proposal is due AT THE SAME TIME as Technical Proposal.

4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.1 Criteria for Non-Price Evaluation Factors

Proposals shall concisely, accurately, and completely provide the information required for each of the following non-price evaluation factors. NOTE: Absence of complete information will be deemed as if no support information was provided for that factor. Proposals that do not meet the minimum requirements of all of the non-price evaluation factors shall be determined to be UNACCEPTABLE and are not eligible for award consideration.

NO assumptions may be made by the Government. Your proposal must CLEARLY demonstrate the requisite technical experience and qualifications to receive an ACCEPTABLE rating for each of the following criteria:

TABLE 2: EVALUATION FACTORS LOCATION DESCRIPTION

FACTOR A VOLUME 1, TAB A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

FACTOR B VOLUME 1, TAB B PAST PERFORMANCE

5.0 FACTOR A – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

5.1 Submission Requirements for Factor A

Offeror shall provide information in their proposal that demonstrates the following. (*Note - Recent within the following factor discussion means within the last five (5) years, from the date of solicitation issuance). For each project submitted, must identify the month, day and year the project started and ended to determine the 365 days or the year. Offerors shall provide no more than five (5) projects that when considered together reflect all eleven (11) elements for the four (4) medias below, i.e., Air Quality, Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Material, and Water Quality.

(For example, Project 1 fulfills three (3) elements of Air Quality and (2) elements of Hazardous Waste and Project 2 fulfills three (3) elements of Hazardous Material and three (3) elements of Water Quality, and so forth until some combination of projects demonstrate the required relevant experience.)

Definitions:

Similar – Not necessarily identical but showing a resemblance in qualities or characteristics of the proposed project.

Scope – Containing many of the elements of the environmental operations and services activities in support of the Environmental Agencies to meet the State and Federal Regulations or compliance of the State and Federal requirements.

Air Quality:

One recent project where the Offeror successfully completed a technically acceptable Stationary Air Emissions Inventories (AEIs). The project shall document the Offeror’s experience completing a Stationary AEI using the Air Program Information Management System (APIMS). Work should be at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility.

One recent project that demonstrates the experience with data entry, management, and reporting of data using the Air Program Information Management System (APIMS) and Enterprise Environmental Safety and Occupational Health Management Information System (EESOH MIS).

One recent example of the Offeror successful completion of Stack Testing. Work should be at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility.

Hazardous Waste:

One recent project that demonstrates experience effectively managing and characterizing waste for a large quantity generator for hazardous waste containers at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility without incurring State or Federal violations.

One recent project that demonstrates experience effectively managing RCRA permits and submitting in a timely manner biennial and other permit-required reports on behalf of a large quantity generator.

Hazardous Material:

One recent project that demonstrates successfully managing a hazardous materials operation at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility. Includes experience with data entry, management, and reporting via the use of EESOH-MIS.

Describe recent experience performing hazardous material inventory audits at a similar in size and scope installation/facility. This includes assuring data relationship between hazardous material inventory and process authorizations, and reporting requirements as dictated by State and EPA regulators.

One recent project that demonstrates successfully managing a Toxic Release Inventory report and a Tier II Report showing locations of hazardous materials and maximum stored quantities in any one area over a year’s time at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility. Includes experience with data entry, management, and reporting via the use of EESOH-MIS and APIMs data collection systems.

Water Quality:

One recent project that demonstrates knowledge and experience performing industrial storm water audits, including identifying industrial processes and their respective discharges, at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility. Includes experience with discharge monitoring/sampling, reporting, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) preparation.

One recent project that demonstrates experience with state MS4 requirements at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility. Includes experience with Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) preparation.

One recent project that demonstrates experience with the preparation of Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans, Facility Response Plans (FRP), and associated requirements, at a similarly sized and scoped installation/facility.

Relevant Experience Matrix. Provide a table similar in format to the table below that identifies the key specialty(ies) demonstrated by each project sheet.

Key Specialties Project 1 Project 2 Project 3

M ed ia

Ai r Q ua lit y

Stationary Air Emissions Inventories (AEIs) X

Experience with data management of APIMS and

EESOH MIS X

Stack Testing X

H az ar do us W as te

Managing waste for a large quantity generator X

Managing RCRA permits X

H az ar do us M at er ia l

Managing a hazardous materials operation X

Hazardous material inventory audits X

Managing a Toxic Release Inventory and Tier II reports X

W at er Q ua lit y

Storm water audits X

State MS4 requirements X

Preperation of SPCC/FRP plans X

5.2 Evaluation Method for Factor A

Factor A will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements of this factor. If any of the required information is not provided in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror will be evaluated as “Unacceptable.” The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) which includes the CPARS ratings, other DOD or Government appraisal systems. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

TABLE 1: FACTOR A – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF OFFEROR/PRIME

Acceptable The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

6.0 FACTOR B – Past Performance

6.1 Submission Requirements for Factor B

The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members or subcontractors to submit to the client for the five (5) relevant projects submitted with Volume 1, Factor A - Relevant Experience. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly by the client to the Government’s point of contact, Lorraine Laurente via email at Lorraine.Q.Laurente@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. In that case, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

The Government will evaluate the successful completion of all project examples submitted in the proposal for Factor B. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction.

The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.2 Evaluation Method for Factor B

The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from whom Past Performance Questionnaires have been received. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references, if the listed reference is not available.

The evaluation board will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment. At no time during this process, or during the debriefing, or after award, will the names of the individuals providing reference information about an Offeror’s past performance be revealed to the Offerors or to any other party. If discussions are held, Offerors may be afforded the opportunity to respond to adverse comments made by references in accordance with guidelines identified in FAR Part 15.3. In this case, comments will be extracted and provided to the Offeror. Copies of the questionnaires will not be furnished to the Offeror and will remain confidential.

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

The past performance evaluation will result in an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying services that meet the contract’s requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each Offeror after evaluating the Offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements.

In reviewing each past performance effort by the Offeror, the SST will first evaluate how relevant the recent effort is to the work required by this solicitation. An Offeror’s past performance effort will be considered recent and relevant to the extent it meets the criteria described in the Submission Requirements for Technical Factor 1, Experience.

Each past performance effort will be assigned one of the levels of relevancy shown in Table 2:

TABLE 2: FACTOR B – PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATING

Relevant Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

For each past performance effort, the evaluation team will then evaluate how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation will not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process will gather information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts.

In conducting the performance confidence assessment, the Offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in Table 3.

TABLE 3: FACTOR B – PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATING

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror’s past performance may not be evaluated as favorable or unfavorable. [Ref:

FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)]. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

7.0 PRICE

Price proposals will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items. The Offeror shall provide its pricing for all CLIN’s (Price Schedule for Mountain Home Air Force Base, CLIN’s 0101 through 4114; Price Schedule for Malmstrom Air Force Base, CLIN’s 0201 through 4215 and the Phase In/Phase Out Optional items, CLIN’s 9001- 9002)

It is the intent of the Government to award without discussions.

8.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

The following representations and certifications apply to this solicitation. The Offeror submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation shall fill in the appropriate information and/or check the appropriate boxes for each provision listed below and complete the Pre-Award Information which can be found in Section K. This information shall be submitted with the Offeror’s Proposal.

Contractors are required to be registered in the System for Awards Management (SAM) for awards resulting from solicitations.

This rule more efficiently implements the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, as it requires contractors to be registered in SAM for consideration of future solicitations, awards, and payment.

Registration is required prior to award of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchase agreement from a solicitation after May 31, 1998.

LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL MAKE AN OFFEROR INELIGIBLE FOR

AWARD.

The web site may be accessed at www.sam.gov.

Attachment 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the offeror. The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE. Please contact the offeror for USACE POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Ra Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BE

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PER

ST REFLECTS

FORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

(End of Summary of Changes)