ACC DTA GROUND MANEUVER CSO_Amendment 34.docx

Ground Maneuver Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO)

PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT 34:

1. In Section 6, Areas of Interest (AoI):

0. Add AoI “COUNTER-UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) DETECTION”.

0. Add AoI “MOBILE CAMOUFLAGE SYSTEM (ARMOR FORMATION)”.

1. General Information

1.1 Notification:

Authorized under DFARS Subpart 212-70, this CSO enables the Department of the Army to competitively procure solutions through a streamlined acquisition process, allowing for rapid award decisions. This approach underscores our mission to expedite the award and delivery of critical technologies, ensuring that the Army can leverage advancements in manufacturing swiftly and efficiently. By prioritizing speed in our contracting efforts, we aim to support the timely integration of cutting-edge technologies that enhance operational readiness.

Contracts or agreements awarded under this authority will be structured as fixed-price, including fixed-price incentive fee contracts. Through this initiative, the Army reaffirms its commitment to fostering innovation and enhancing manufacturing operations, ultimately delivering superior capabilities to our warfighters.

White Papers/Proposed Solutions that may meet needs of other Federal Agencies may be shared, as appropriate.

1.2 CSO Procedure:

ACC-DTA seeks to award the following, but is not limited to: FAR contracts under FAR Part 12, Commercial Procedures; or non-FAR agreements such as transaction agreements under 10 U.S.C 4022; and Cooperative Agreements under 31 U.S.C. 6305 for ACC-DTA and/or its customers that are directly relevant to enhancing the effectiveness of development, integration, demonstration, and sustainment of ground vehicle systems capabilities to support Army modernization priorities and improve readiness.

This CSO may result in awards to proposals for commercial products, commercial services, and non-developmental items through multi-phased, competitive processes through 2028. The Government reserves the right to extend this CSO beyond the open until date by amendment if the authority is extended. This CSO may include awards for but are not limited to commercially available technologies immediately available, commercially available technologies fueled by commercial or strategic investment, concept demonstrations, pilots, and agile development activities that can incrementally improve commercial technologies, existing government- owned capabilities, or concepts for broad defense application.

The CSO solicitation process may include a multi-phased solicitation and evaluation approach that is dependent upon specific Areas of Interest (AoIs). The AoIs are focused topic(s)/categories specified in Section 6.1. The following phases may be used:

Phase 1 – Submission of written solution brief, Phase 2 – Presentation (if applicable), and Phase 3 – Request for Commercial Solution Proposal (Request for CSP)

The Government may add AoIs against this CSO with or without closing dates at any time throughout its duration. Interested companies are encouraged to frequently check www.SAM.gov for new AoI postings.

The CSO outlines the procedures that are available for utilization by the Government for AoIs to ensure a competitive process is followed. The competitive process under this CSO may result in a two or three phase approach (written solution brief, presentation (if applicable), and a request for CSP proposal):

Phase 1 Solution Briefs: A solution brief must be submitted as specified in Section 3.2 of this CSO. The Government will evaluate solution briefs against the criteria stated in this CSO. The Government will not pay companies for the costs associated with solution brief submissions.

Phase 2 Presentations (if applicable): Companies whose solution briefs are evaluated to be of merit may be invited to provide a Presentation following the instructions provided in Section 3.3 of this CSO. In the event that the Government requires a Demonstration in addition to a Presentation, additional information will be provided in the specific AoI highlighting those procedures; otherwise, Phase 2 will be comprised solely of the Presentation. The Government reserves the right to request additional technical information to determine if a company has a viable solution for the government’s specific AoI. The Government will not pay companies for costs associated with Presentations, unless otherwise stipulated.

Phase 3 Request for Commercial Solution Proposal (Request for CSP): Those companies that are evaluated to be of merit through Phase 1 or Phase 2 or a combination of both, may be invited to submit a full written proposal following the instructions provided in Section 3.4 of this CSO.

Requests for a CSP under this CSO are subject to the availability of Government funds. The Government will not pay companies for costs associated with developing submissions in regard to this CSO or resulting AoI, unless otherwise stipulated within the AoI.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to forgo Phase 1 and Phase 2 based on the individual merits. The Government also reserves the right to move expeditiously through the phases based on the merit of submissions if urgent requirements arise.

NOTE: Entities may elect to forgo Phase 1 and Phase 2 and submit a written proposal, however, due to Government budget uncertainties, no specific dollars have been reserved for awards under this CSO. The participating DoD agencies will provide no funding for direct reimbursement of white paper or proposal development costs.

NOTE: During any step of the CSO, the Government may send written questions or comments for the offerors to address via email, or other suitable communication methods as determined by the Government.

NOTE: The Government may engage in discussions with companies during any phase of the process including development of the formal proposal phase

2. Definitions

1. “Area of Interest” (AoI) means an announcement posted on the Government Point of Entry (GPE) website, which may result in the award of various types of contracts that will be dependent on the specific AoI requirement.

2. “Commercial Solutions Opening” (CSO) is a competitive procedure contracting officers may use to acquire commercial products, commercial services, or non-developmental items through a competitive selection of proposals resulting from a general solicitation and the peer review, technical review, or operational review (as appropriate) of such proposals.

3. Commercial Solution Proposal (CSP): is a commercial proposal that is submitted in response to an AoI that is governed by a CSO. CSPs may be requested as a result of solution briefs and/or presentations/presentations.

4. “Nontraditional Defense Contractor” is defined in 10 U.S.C. § 3014 as an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for a least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the DoD for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract for the DoD that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 1502 and the regulations implementing such section. This includes all small business concerns under the criteria and size standards in 13 C.F.R. § 121.

5. “Nonprofit Institution” as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 3703 as an organization owned and operated exclusively for scientific or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which ensures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

6. “Small Business Concerns” is defined in the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C 632).

3. Guidelines for Solution Briefs, Presentations, and Proposals

3.1 General Guidelines

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or proposals are not desired.

When applicable, use of a diagram(s) or figure(s) to depict to the essence of the proposed solution is strongly encouraged.

Companies may submit multiple solution briefs in response to any single AoI if each submission represents a separate and distinct concept. Individual solution briefs may only address one concept based on the stated AoI.

Specific period of performance or delivery requirements will be indicated in the AoI.

Technical data with military application may require approval, authorization, or license for lawful exportation.

All solution briefs, presentations, and proposals must be Unclassified. Do NOT mark any documents as “CONFIDENTIAL”. Solution briefs, presentations, and proposals containing data that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose or use by the Government except for evaluation purposes shall include the following general disclaimer on the cover page:

“This [select one: solution brief, Presentation, or Proposal] includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the government, except to non-government personnel for evaluation purposes, and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed - in whole or in part - for any purpose other than to evaluate this submission. If, however, an agreement is awarded to this company as a result of - or in connection with - the submission of this data, the government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent agreed upon by both parties in the resulting agreement. This restriction does not limit the government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]”

Recommend marking (header or footer) for portions of business plans and/or technical information that are to be protected for a period of five years from FOIA disclosure. Codified at 5 U.S.C. §552, FOIA provides that disclosure of certain types of information (i.e. trade secrets and commercial or financial information) is not required, and may not be compelled, for five years after the date on which the information is received by the Department of War.

NOTE: Foreign-Owned businesses may independently submit a solution or do so as part of a teaming arrangement with one or more United States-owned businesses. However, the ability to obtain an agreement based upon a submission may depend upon the ability of the Foreign-Owned business to obtain necessary clearances and approvals to obtain proscribed information.

Questions regarding the objectives or preparation of the solution brief should be addressed to the Points of Contact (POCs) listed in the respective AoI.

Submissions must be submitted electronically.

Entities submitting solution briefs that are not chosen for the presentation phase or the CSP phase will be notified in writing as soon as practicable. Further verbal feedback may be provided, upon request, at the Contracting/Agreements Officer’s discretion.

3.2 Phase 1 Solution Brief:

3.2.1 Phase 1 Solution Brief Content:

Unless otherwise stated on the subject AoI, solution briefs shall not exceed five single-sided written pages using 12-point font or, alternatively, solution briefs may take the form of briefing slides which shall not exceed 15 slides.

Solution briefs must include the following:

1. Company Name, Title, Date, Point of Contact Name, E-Mail Address, Phone, and Address. Specifically identify the AoI for which the solution brief is submitted.

2. Executive Summary: Provide an executive summary of the technology or service. (This is included in the five written pages limit).

3. Technology Concept: Show and/or describe how your proposed solution or potential new capabilities represent an application of innovative commercial products, innovative commercial technologies and services or adaptations/modifications of existing commercial product technologies and services to the AoI. Describe the unique aspects of your technology and the proposed work as it relates to the AoI. Identify whether the effort includes the pilot or demonstration of existing commercial technology (identified as commercially ready and viable technology), or the development of technology for potential defense applications. If development or adaptation is proposed, identify a suggested path to mature the technology. Identify aspects of your proposal, to include date and software, which may be considered proprietary.

4. Price: Provide a rough order of magnitude price for the proposed solution and include desired payment terms.

NOTE: The title page does not count against page limit, however, the executive summary does.

3.2.2 Phase 1 Solution Brief Basis of Evaluation:

Individual solution briefs will be evaluated against the evaluation criteria described below:

1. Responsiveness of the solution brief in addressing the AoI with a commercially available product and/or process readily available to meet the immediate needs;

2. The technical merit of the proposed solution, including the extent to which the proposed solution is unique, and/or innovative to government application; and

3. The affordability of the proposed solution.

Solution briefs will be evaluated based on the evaluation criteria listed above, not against other solution briefs submitted in response to the same AoI. Additional technical evaluation criteria specific to a particular project may be used. In these instances, the additional criteria will be posted within or as an attachment to the AoI on the GPE website. Based on the results of the Phase I evaluation, the Government may elect to invite “all, some or none” of the proposed solutions into Phase 2 Presentations or directly into Phase 3 by requesting a CSP.

3.2.3 Phase 1 Solution Brief Submission:

Solutions briefs should be emailed to the points of contact listed under applicable area of interest.

NOTE: Additional points of contact may be defined for areas of interest that include closing dates.

3.3 Phase 2 Presentation (if applicable):

3.3.1 Phase 2 Presentation Content:

If invited into Phase 2, companies must provide a Presentation to demonstrate and provide further details on the technical and business viability of their proposed solution. In addition to the Presentation, the Government may request an additional written submission to supplement or clarify the information provided in the Phase 1 solution brief. Depending on the specific requirement, the Government may request an in- person, virtual or paper demonstration. In the event that the Government requires a demonstration, additional information will be provided in the specific AoI highlighting those procedures. During the Phase 2 Presentation, the company shall address the following in detail:

1. A description or demonstration of how the proposed solution represents an innovative application of commercial technology to the AoI.

2. A rough order of magnitude (ROM) price and notional schedule.

3. Any Intellectual Property (IP) involved in the effort and associated restrictions on the government’s use of that IP.

4. Additional information/detail from the company’s Phase 1 solution brief, as specified in the government’s invitation to Phase 2.

3.3.2 Phase 2 Presentation Basis of Evaluation:

Individual presentations will be evaluated against the evaluation criteria below and not against any other presentations held under the same AoI. Unless otherwise indicated in the AoI, presentation submissions shall be valid for a minimum of 120 days after notification of presentation evaluation as described below.

After completing the evaluation of presentation submissions, the Government will notify the company of one of the following:

1. Request a CSP for evaluation in Phase 3;

2. The proposed solution is not of continued interest to the Government and will not be considered for a CSP Phase 3 for the instant requirement (*see note below), or

3. The proposed solution is of continued interest to the Government but is not currently eligible for an invitation to Phase 3 CSP submission due to the current lack of Government resources and/or funding.

*Note: Based on results of Phase 1 and/or 2 submissions, additional Government offices may be interested in having offerors move into Phase 3.

Presentations will be evaluated/scored on the following factors, as provided in the AoI:

1. Level of relevancy of the solution in addressing the AoI with a commercially available product or process;

2. The technical merit of the proposed solution adequately addressed the AoI need(s) and demonstrated feasibility for the Government to pursue the proposed solution;

3. Level of uniqueness, or innovative approach to solve the Government’s need;

4. Level of technical risk or maturity;

5. Level of risk placed with the proposed ROM;

6. Level of risk in the proposed milestone schedule and its ability to meet the AoI need within a relevant time period;

7. Level of risk in the company’s viability and business solution; and

8. Level of potential risk in anticipated IP and data rights assertions

3.4 Phase 3 Proposal:

The third and final Phase of the CSO process is the CSP. Through Request for CSP, offeror(s) will be invited to submit a CSP based on the defined CSO phased approach that will be utilized, which may revise or include information learned from Phase 1 or 2 reviews. Offerors must ensure that the CSP is valid for at least 180 days from the submission date. If necessary, offerors invited to submit a CSP may be advised to schedule a meeting with the Government to address any feedback contained in the request for CSP. The CSP must be prepared in two separate Volumes as follows: Volume I Technical and Volume II Price. Each volume will have its separate related attachments.

3.4.1 Phase 3 Proposal Content

Based upon Government market knowledge, the results of Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 evaluation(s) above, the Government may Request a CSP. If that occurs, a company or companies will be invited to develop and submit a written proposal. The company may propose terms and conditions including but not limited to Service License Agreements (SLA) and/or User License Agreements (ULA) governing the requirement for the Government’s consideration and negotiation. At this stage, the selected companies may discuss proposal development details during the proposal writing process with their assigned Government expert(s) or Government teaming partner(s).

Companies should note that there are certain terms and conditions the Government may be unable to accept. However, projects awarded through the CSO may provide flexibility to adopt customary industry standards where it is otherwise legal and meets the Government’s general public responsibility.

Proposals containing data that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes shall include the following sentences on the cover page:

“This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government, except to non-government personnel for evaluation purposes, and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed -- in whole or in part -- for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, an agreement is awarded to this Company as a result of -- or in connection with -- the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent agreed upon by both parties in the resulting agreement.

This restriction does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]”

Each restricted data sheet should be marked as follows:

“Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title Page of this proposal.”

3.4.1.1 Section 1 Technical Proposal Volume:

The technical volume shall include a detailed work plan indicating how each aspect of the objectives is to be accomplished. The technical volume should be in as much detail as the offeror considers necessary to fully explain its proposed technical approach or method, including all assumptions utilized to develop its proposed solution and associated costs. The technical volume should reflect a clear understanding of the nature of the work being undertaken. The technical volume must include information on how the project will be organized, staffed, and managed. Information should be provided that demonstrates the offeror’s understanding and management of important events or tasks. The technical volume must include a list of suggested deliverables and deliverable dates.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the required technical proposal content based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.1.2 Section 2 Price Proposal Volume:

The price volume must contain sufficient information to allow the government to perform a basic analysis of the proposed cost or price of the work. If the proposal includes a time and materials contract line item, the proposal must include labor categories and corresponding number of direct labor hours; fixed hourly rates that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit; and costs for materials, supported by vendor quotes, supplier agreements or other bases of estimate. The Government reserves the right to request any other price data or supporting cost information the Government deems necessary to determine whether the total overall price is fair and reasonable. This can include but is not limited to commercial price catalog(s), previous commercial sales receipts, and/or other proprietary information to help the Government determine reasonableness and future budgetary cost estimates.

NOTE: The cost of preparing proposals in response to this CSO is NOT considered a direct charge to any resulting AoI award or any other contract.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the required price proposal content based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.2 Proposal Basis of Evaluation:

Proposals will be reviewed as received by a Government subject matter expert(s). In all cases, proprietary information shall be protected from competitors. The CSO will be evaluated in the order described below. The Government subject matter expert(s) will first review the proposal for adequacy and eligibility to determine the extent to which the following requirements are met:

1. The merit and risk elements of the proposed technical approach are acceptable and address the priorities outlined in the AoIs;

2. The proposal performance schedule is realistic and/or adequate; and,

3. The proposed price is affordable.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the basis for evaluation based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.3 Proposal Evaluation Rating:

1. The Technical Proposal Volume will be evaluated and assigned to one of the following ratings:

a. Acceptable: The proposal has been evaluated and deemed appropriate for additional consideration and discussion. An acceptable proposal is generally considered well-conceived, scientifically or technically sound, and important to program goals and objectives. An acceptable proposal may proceed into negotiations or directly to the award process.

NOTE: An acceptable rating does not guarantee contract award. The following will be taken into consideration: program priorities, outcome of negotiations, and availability of funds.

b. Unacceptable: The proposal has been evaluated and deemed inappropriate for additional consideration. An unacceptable proposal is generally considered not well-conceived, scientifically or technically unsound or does not meet program priorities. An unacceptable proposal will be rejected.

2. The Price Proposal Volume will be evaluated as follows:

a. Affordability: The proposed costs must also be affordable to the Government in order to be considered for award. A fair and reasonable price determination will not be made for each CSP if multiple offerors are invited to Phase 3 and does not guarantee contract award. The technical merit will dictate the level of scrutiny required for a price analysis. The following will be taken into consideration: program priorities, technical review, and availability of funds. A fair and reasonable determination will only be made for an offeror being selected for an award.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to negotiate directly with the company on the terms and conditions prior to execution of the resulting contract or agreement, including payment terms, and will execute the contract or agreement on behalf of the Government.

3.4.4 Proposals may be emailed directly to the Contracting Officer/ Agreements Officer– ACC DTA, stated in the specific Area of Interest.

4. Awards

4.1 General Guidelines

Upon favorable review and funds availability, the government may choose to make a fixed price award using FAR Part 12 Acquisition of Commercial Items or other authority such as 10 U.S.C. 4022.

In order to receive an award –

1. A company must have a Unique Entity ID (UEI) and shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to receiving an award. Companies are advised to commence SAM registration upon perusing an AoI announcement.

2. A company must also register in the prescribed government invoicing system (ex. Wide Area Work Flow).

3. A company must be determined to be responsible by the Contracting Officer and must not be suspended or debarred from award by the Federal Government nor be prohibited by Presidential Executive Order and/or law from receiving an award.

4. Receipt of a request for CSP does not guarantee that a company will receive an award and the Government reserves the right, at any point prior to award of a contract or agreement, to cancel the Request for CSP. The Government reserves the right to make awards to all, some, or none of the selected solutions.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to amend this CSO solicitation as necessary amendments for emerging requirements and changes in authority occur. Amendments to this CSO will be posted via SAM.gov.

4.2 Procurement Integrity Act (PIA)

The CSO solicitation process for FAR contracts is covered by the Procurement Integrity Act (PIA). PIA is implemented for FAR contracts through FAR part 3.104. Accordingly, the CSO competitive solicitation process and awards made thereby must adhere to the ethical standards required by the PIA.

5. Contact Information:

ACC-DTA CSO POC: Kim Nelson at kimberly.a.nelson86.civ@army.mil

6. General Area of Interest (AoI)

a. LOW COLLATERAL KINETIC INTERCEPTOR: Rapid and agile acquisition mechanisms remain essential for Joint Interagency Task Force (JIATF) 401 to deliver, test, evaluate, and scale emerging Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) capabilities needed to counter evolving UAS threats at home and abroad. JIATF 401 requires a rapid and flexible contract vehicle, to procure state of the art commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) C UAS capabilities for operational assessments at critical Department of War (DOW) locations and with Interagency partners. To support this mission, JIATF 401 will pursue iterative contract actions.

The C-UAS systems must be lightweight at no more than 20 pounds, have a diagonal size no greater than 25 inches, provide a range exceeding 20 miles, reach speeds of at least 60 mph, and offer a minimum endurance of 30 minutes. The Ground Control Stations must be mobile with limited difficulty for set-up and disassembly. The training shall be contractor presented, including all hardware and materials, to groups of soldiers from 15-20, completed in five days, consisting of both instruction and hands on-training at various CONUS locations.

The initial use of this contract vehicle will support the purchase of eight Ground Control Stations, 1,000 drone-to-drone interceptors, and two training courses. Seventy-five interceptors and three Ground Control Stations will be delivered no later than 31 March 2026, with the remaining quantities delivered by 1 July 2026. This phased delivery enables rapid user feedback and technology updates, with USASOC and the 82nd Airborne Division providing input on techniques, tactics, and procedures (TTP) development and system improvements. The first training course will occur no later than 31 March 2026, with follow on training completed before 1 July 2026. Successful execution of this effort may lead to additional quantities for distribution across multiple Services for Combat Evaluations and Operational Assessments.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to Contracting/Agreements Officer Dave DiRoma (david.j.diroma.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist Pasquale Lucci (pasquale.c.lucci.civ@army.mil).

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Technical Points of Contact: MAJ Cole Price (cole.s.price.mil@army.mil) SFC Art Dominguez (arthur.j.dominguez2.mil@army.mil)

b. INFANTRY SQUAD VEHICLE (ISV) COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE AND FIELDING SUPPORT: The Department of War (DoW) is seeking innovative commercial approaches to deliver comprehensive maintenance and fielding support for the M1301A0, M1301A1, and M1313 Utility Vehicle fleets. As these platforms are fielded, specialized on-demand contractor support is required to provide expert-level technical assistance, training, diagnostics, troubleshooting, material management, and maintenance of all fielded ISVs. The DoW also requires on-demand Total Package Fielding (TPF) support when Government fielding teams require assistance. The goal of this effort is to optimize vehicle readiness and reduce the Government's logistical burden by leveraging proven commercial best practices in sustainment and material management.

The fielding plan includes the equipping of approximately 13 Mobile Brigade Combat Teams (MBCTs) during the upcoming year at multiple CONUS or OCONUS locations. The anticipated number of vehicles per fielding event may range from 45 to 271 ISVs, depending on the specific requirements of the receiving MBCT. The DoW requires surge capabilities for unknown fieldings and unplanned maintenance activities.

The anticipated period of performance is from February 2026 through February 2027. The anticipated period of performance may increase based on future DoW requirements.

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Submissions shall be sent via email to the following Points of Contact:

Theodore Degraffenreid, theodore.l.degraffenreid.civ@army.mil Robert Meadows, robert.w.meadows2.civ@army.mil Jessica Brest, Jessica.r.brest.civ@army.mil Mathew Stocker, Mathew.m.stocker.civ@army.mil

Technical Point of Contact: Theodore Degraffenreid, (586) 214-5519, theodore.l.degraffenreid.civ@army.mil

c. TRANSPORTABLE C-sUAS PROTOTYPE: The Joint Interagency Task Force (JIATF) 401 was established to synchronize Counter-small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) efforts across the DoW and the broader interagency community. The proliferation of sUAS technology presents a rapidly evolving threat landscape, requiring a coordinated and adaptable approach to detecting, tracking, identifying, and defeating threats posed by malicious or unauthorized sUAS operations. JIATF 401 serves as the central hub for integrating C-sUAS activities, promoting information sharing, and driving innovation in this critical domain.

To effectively counter the growing sUAS threat, JIATF 401 requires advanced capabilities that can seamlessly integrate data from diverse sensors, provide real-time threat assessments, and enable coordinated responses across multiple agencies and jurisdictions. JIATF 401 is currently seeking prototype solutions that detect, identify, track and defeat Groups 1-3 UAS at locations within the US. Desired characteristics are:

· System of Systems with modular and configurable payloads: Payloads are palletized to be transportable and operable from the bed of vehicle or payload Capable of on the move operation

· Payload capable of operating unmounted (can transition to fixed)

· Payload can be lifted using commercial 4K forklift

· Power: Payload can operate off tactical generator, or Payload can operate off vehicle generated power and tactical generator

· Capable of elevated sensing through mast or variable height antenna (drone antenna)

· Sensing capability includes Radio Frequency (RF), InfraRed (IR), Radar

· Capable of conducting RF defeat or Low Collateral Defeat

· Data transport over unclassified networks or radio frequency

· Cost Target: Can procure kits capable of covering 4 simultaneous sites

· Quantity: Kits capable of supporting up to 12 US sites

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to Contracting/Agreements Officer, Matthew Fitzsimmons (matthew.t.fitzsimmons.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist, Megan Schuster (megan.l.schuster.civ@army.mil).

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Technical Points of Contact: Zachary Wisniewski (zachary.t.wisniewski.civ@army.mil) SFC Art Dominguez (arthur.j.dominguez2.mil@army.mil)

d. AS3 SURVEYOR INTERCEPTOR: Rapid and agile acquisition mechanisms remain essential for Joint Interagency Task Force (JIATF) 401 to deliver, test, evaluate, and scale emerging Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) capabilities needed to counter evolving UAS threats at home and abroad. JIATF 401 requires a rapid and flexible contract vehicle, to procure state of the art commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) C-UAS capabilities for operational assessments at critical Department of War (DOW) locations and with Interagency partners. To support this mission, JIATF 401 will pursue iterative contract actions.

The C-UAS systems must provide no less than a range of 30 KM, reach speeds of at least 145-285 km/h, and offer a minimum endurance of 20+ minutes. The Ground Control Stations must be mobile with limited difficulty for set-up and disassembly. The training shall be contractor presented, including all hardware and materials, to groups of soldiers from 15-20, completed in five days, consisting of both instruction and hands on-training at various CONUS locations.

The initial use of this contract vehicle will support the purchase of two sets (each set includes one launcher, one ground control station, and 48 drones) and two training courses to be delivered no later than 31 March 2026. An additional two launchers and two ground control stations will be delivered to CENTCOM, no later than 30 April 2026. This phased delivery approach enables rapid user feedback and iterative technology updates, with CENTCOM units contributing to techniques, tactics, and procedures (TTP) development and system enhancements. The first training course will occur no later than 31 March 2026, with an optional follow-on course available for completion at a later date. Successful execution of this effort may result in additional quantities being procured for distribution across multiple Services to support Combat Evaluations and Operational Assessments.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to Contracting/Agreements Officer Kim Nelson (kimberly.a.nelson86.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist Drew DePalma (drew.e.depalma.civ@army.mil).

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Technical Points of Contact: MAJ Cole Price (cole.s.price.mil@army.mil) SFC Art Dominguez (arthur.j.dominguez2.mil@army.mil)

e. INNOVATIVE PARTS MANAGEMENT AND LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS FOR THE INFANTRY SQUAD VEHICLE (ISV) FLEET: The Department of War (DoW) is seeking commercial solutions to provide comprehensive and responsive parts support for the M1301A0, M1301A1, and M1313 ISV and ISV Utility fleets. The primary objective is to leverage proven commercial best practices in material and supply chain management to optimize vehicle readiness, ensure parts availability, and reduce the Government's logistical footprint.

The DoW requires a partner capable of delivering a robust parts support program that includes, but is not limited to:

Comprehensive Material Management: Implementing and managing a complete supply chain for all parts and materials required to sustain the ISV fleets.

· On-Demand Parts Availability: Ensuring the right parts are available on-demand to support both scheduled maintenance and unplanned repair activities at multiple Continental United States (CONUS) and Outside Continental United States (OCONUS) locations.

· Support for Maintenance Operations: Providing the necessary parts to support maintenance of all fielded ISVs.

· Surge Capability: Demonstrating the ability to rapidly scale parts and material support to meet the demands of unplanned maintenance activities or accelerated fielding schedules.

The ideal solution will be agile, data-driven, and capable of integrating with DoW logistics systems to provide real-time visibility into parts inventory, consumption, and supply chain status.

The period of performance is anticipated to be from March 2026 to March 2027, with an option to extend into 2028 based on future requirements.

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Submissions shall be sent via email to the following Points of Contact:

Barry Jones, barry.l.jones65.civ@army.mil Jessica Brest, jessica.r.brest.civ@army.mil Mathew Stocker, mathew.m.stocker.civ@army.mil

f. OPTICAL THREAT DETECTOR: The Army has identified key components for an advanced, optical-based threat detection system—designed to detect white flashes from battlefield threats. Key components matured by the Government to date include a specialized optics unit from G&H Keene (formerly StingRay) and two programmable VNIR FPGA cameras from Concurrent EDA (hardware by MikroTron). Government-furnished software for camera operation and processing is also available for use and integration into this system. A capability gap exists in delivering a unified, ruggedized, manufacturable, and integrated system ready for ground vehicle platform integration.

Desired Solution: We are seeking a qualified system integrator to mature, assemble, test, and maintain the complete system. The desired partner will be responsible for integrating the optical and sensor components while implementing key design-for-manufacturability improvements beyond the Government configuration. These improvements include, but are not limited to:

· Developing a fixed-focus lens system to reduce complexity and part count.

· Developing and fabricating a housing to simplify assembly.

· Incorporating features for ruggedization, such as nitrogen and/or argon purging and sealing.

· Integrating software onto cameras and necessary processing hardware for system functionality. It is recommended that the integrator host any non-camera hosted software on the U.S. Army Product Manager Vehicle Protection System’s (PdM VPS) VPS Base Kit (VBK) Program of Record (POR).

· The integrator will serve as the central point for the system's lifecycle management, including managing and updating all system software, firmware, and hardware configurations.

Key Requirements/Deliverables:

· The integrator shall develop and deliver a Product Level (level 3) Technical Data Package (TDP) of the Optical Threat Detector (OTD) that incorporates the specified ruggedized, design-for-manufacturability, and assembly (DFM/A) improvements. The Government desires a TDP to be delivered with Unlimited Rights.

· The integrator shall establish, deliver, and manage the system's configuration baseline, reflecting the new housing, fixed-focus optics, and other design enhancements.

The integrator shall execute a comprehensive testing plan that meets ground combat vehicle environmental requirements.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to Contracting/Agreements Officer, Kim Nelson (kimberly.a.nelson86.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist, Katherine Shaffer (katherine.w.shaffer.civ@army.mil).

This AOI is now CLOSED.

Technical Points of Contact: Mr. Cody Wilson, cody.m.wilson18.civ@army.mil

Alternate Technical Point of Contact: Mr. Mark Radiwon, mark.w.radiwon.civ@army.mil

g. METROLOGY GRADE SIGNAL GENERATOR: Rapid and agile acquisition mechanisms remain essential for the U.S. Army Calibration Sets (CALSETS) to deliver, test, and evaluate emerging calibration capabilities needed to support Radio Test Sets, radio detection and ranging (RADAR), and Navigation systems across Army Calibration Laboratories. The Government is seeking state-of-the-art commercial capabilities in Signal Generation to modernize the aging legacy inventory and enhance the readiness of the Army’s test equipment.

The Government is interested in solutions that provide the following desired capabilities:

· Precision Frequency: Precision Output Frequency (≤ ±1 x 10-6) variable from ≤9 Kilohertz (kHz) to ≥3 Gigahertz (GHz).

· Radio Frequency (RF) Leveled Output Power: Low-distortion (≤-30 decibels relative to the carrier (dBc)) with precision variability from ≤-90 decibels relative to one milliwatt (dBm) to ≥+17 dBm with an accuracy of < ±0.8 dB (low power-low frequency) to < ±1.2 decibel (dB) (high power-high frequency) into 50Ω.

· Analog Modulation: A full suite of analog modulation capabilities, including Amplitude Modulation (AM), Frequency Modulation (FM), and Phase Modulation (PM), using internal or external sources.

· Instrument Control: Front panel and remotely through General Purpose Interface Bus (GPIB) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)-488 for automated processes.

· Comprehensive Self-Support: Complete manual set to enable support for operation, verification, adjustment, repair and parts using Army instruments and software (non-proprietary).

Offerors are encouraged to propose their best solutions, even if a proposed solution does not meet all desired capabilities.

The Government intends to utilize this contract vehicle to support the purchase of three hundred (300) Signal Generators, including a three (3)-year commercial warranty, with deliveries to be complete in 2031.

The deadline for the Phase 1 submission for this AoI is 12:00 pm Eastern on April 23, 2026.

All submissions shall be sent via email to the following Points of Contact:

Contract Specialist, Will Smith, Lloyd.w.smith8.civ@army.mil Contracting Officer, Jennifer Schneider, jennifer.a.schneider17.civ@army.mil

h. ADVANCED DIAGNOSTIC AND REPAIR SOLUTIONS FOR ACTIVE PROTECTION SYSTEM (APS) COMPONENTS: The Department of War (DoW) is seeking commercial solutions to provide a comprehensive repair and sustainment program for B-Kit Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) that are integral to the Army’s Active Protection System (APS). The desired partner will be responsible for the complete lifecycle of LRU repair and management. The ideal solution would include, but is not limited to, establishing a responsive and cost-effective program that leverages commercial best practices in receipt and in-processing, diagnostics and analysis, repair, testing and validation, and returning APS components to full operational readiness. This initiative is critical for enhancing equipment availability and ensuring mission success.

The DoW requires a partner capable of implementing and managing a stand-alone repair program for complex electronic devices and cables. Key performance objectives include, but are not limited to, minimizing repair cycle times, optimizing cost-per-repair, and maintaining the highest standards of quality and reliability.

The anticipated period of performance for this effort is from June 2026 to June 2027. Based on DoW requirements and successful program execution, this period may be extended.

All communications, including proposal information, shall be sent to Contracting/Agreements Officer, Kim Nelson (kimberly.a.nelson86.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist, Kayla Stewart (kayla.m.stewart18.civ@army.mil).

Suspense date for submittal under this AOI is 04/24/2026 no later than 1000 Eastern.

Technical Points of Contact: Mr. Jeffrey Stroker, jeffrey.e.stroker.civ@army.mil

i. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING FOR COMPONENT PRODUCTION: The Department of War is seeking commercial vendors with robust capabilities in advanced manufacturing, with an initial focus but not limited to Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technology. In addition to LPBF, interested parties should possess expertise in other additive manufacturing processes, including but not limited to arc wire DED. The scope of this effort requires proficiency at least one alloy including but not limited to: 17-4 stainless steel, Inconel 718, CP-1 aluminum, and Ti-64. A critical component of the requirement is the contractor's ability to provide comprehensive post-processing services for printed components. These services must include all steps required to deliver a ready-to-install component. The offering must encompass full logistical support, including the secure shipment of finished parts to Government-designated locations.

This initiative requires vendors to be flexible in their design and data handling processes. The contractor will be expected to manufacture components from 3D models provided by the Government, and critically, must also have the capability to generate new 3D models from either legacy 2D drawings or by reverse-engineering a physical part. As a contract data requirement, any 3D models created by the vendor under this effort shall be delivered to the Government upon completion. Furthermore, to maximize production efficiency, vendors are expected to demonstrate the ability to consolidate various National Stock Numbers (NSNs), moving beyond NSN-specific manufacturing runs.

The Government is particularly interested in companies that can clearly demonstrate their efficiency, experience, and technical merit in the field of metal additive manufacturing. Best-in-class vendors are expected to have a robust quality management system, such as ISO 9001, governing their processes. Furthermore, respondents should be prepared to provide comprehensive material datasets from testing conducted by third-party accredited laboratories for all alloys intended for production, representative of the equipment to be used. While in-house post-processing capabilities are not mandatory, companies must have established partnerships with providers who also maintain high-quality standards and possess extensive experience.

During Phase I, offerors shall submit a white paper that details capabilities in terms of materials, print volume, relevant post processing, and reverse engineering relative to the above.

During Phase II, vendors will be qualified by the Army's Ground Vehicle Systems Center (GVSC) to be designated as a "qualified" Army 3D printer vendor for ground vehicle applications only; this qualification does not extend to aviation or munitions components. Qualification will be conducted IAW drawing number 19207-12760074. May elect to qualify additional materials and modalities during this CSO process or during contract performance.

While this Area of Interest will remain Open, the Army will make initial award(s) based on White Papers submitted by 4 May 2026.

All communications, including proposal information, shall be sent to: Mr. Matthew Jewell (matthew.r.jewell.civ@army.mil)

j. TIGER HACKATHON – SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE AND ADVANCED MANUFACTURING: Please see attachments “Revision 03 Area of Interest - TIGER Hackathon” and “Critical and Sole Sourced Components List” for all information regarding this AoI.

Suspense date for white paper submittals under this AOI is 06/19/2026, no later than 1200 Eastern.

Industry Day Engagement Registration Deadline is 06/19/2026

All communications, including proposal information, shall be sent to:

· Jamie M. Waszak, jamie.m.waszak.civ@army.mil

· Christine Marr, christine.m.marr.civ@army.mil

· Jeffrey Sholy, jeffrey.r.sholy.civ@army.mil

· Jonathan Taylor, jonathan.s.taylor.civ@army.mil

k. DELIVERING NEXT-GENERATION LOGISTICS TO ENHANCE U.S. ARMY BRIDGING EQUIPMENT OPERATIONAL READINESS: PdM Bridging is offering a new opportunity for forward-thinking commercial partners to deliver innovative logistics and support solutions for a critical portfolio of U.S. Army bridging systems. The primary mission is to significantly increase the Operational Readiness Rates (ORR) of this equipment, ensuring it is mission-capable at all times.

Our current maintenance paradigm for low-density bridging equipment is reactive, focusing on critical repairs after a failure has occurred, rather than proactive, preventative maintenance. This approach leads to unacceptable long lead times for parts to make the necessary repairs. This initiative seeks to move beyond traditional logistics models and implement agile, data-driven strategies that enhance the availability and reliability of these key military enablers.

Core Mission Objectives

We are seeking a partner capable of achieving the following goals to ensure the right parts, tools, and personnel are always positioned to support the warfighter:

Areas for Innovative Solutions

To deliver these tangible outcomes, proposed solutions should leverage proven, cutting-edge strategies, specifically focusing on:

· Data-Driven Demand Forecasting

· Predictive Maintenance & Analytics

· Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) Frameworks

· Innovative Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)

Targeted Systems Portfolio

The proposed solutions will support the following critical systems:

· M1110 Joint Assault Bridge (JAB)

· M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle (ABV)

· M30 Bridge Erection Boat (BEB)

· Bridge Adapter Pallet (BAP)

· M1977 Common Bridge Transporter (CBT)

· Rapidly Emplaced Bridge System (REBS)

· Dry Support Bridge (DSB)

We invite you to submit an information paper presenting your comprehensive strategies to address this vital national security need.

The period of performance is anticipated to be from September 2026 to September 2027, with an option to extend into 2028 based on future requirements.

While this Area of…