Amd 0003_Solicitation W912BV20R0003_TX-LA Group ORC.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Texas/Louisiana Group Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) at Barksdale AFB, LA; Dyess AFB, TX; Goodfellow AFB, TX; Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Camp Bullis, TX; JBSA Ft Sam Houston, TX; JBSA Lackland, TX; JBSA Randolph, TX; Laughlin AFB, TX; and Sheppard AFB, TX

1. This Amendment is being issued to replace Section A, Bidder’s Inquiry Instructions; Section C, Performance Work Schedule (PWS); PWS Enclosure 2A Barksdale; PWS Enclosure 2A Dyess; PWS Enclosure 2A Goodfellow ; PWS Enclosure 2A JBSA FSH & Camp Bullis; PWS Enclosure 2A JBSA Lackland; PWS Enclosure 2A JBSA Randolph; PWS Enclosure 2A Laughlin; PWS Enclosure 2A Sheppard; PWS Enclosure 3, Lackland Government Furnished Property List; Section L, Instructions to Offerors; Section L Atttachment L-1 Price Schedule w ithout Cost; Section L, Attachment L-2 Price Schedule w ith Cost; Section L, Attachment L-4, Supple Price Info; and Section M, Evaluation Factors for Aw ard.

2. The proposal due date is extended to 3:00PM, CST, 14 April 2020. POC is Brenda Anderson, 918-669-7274.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 114

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Mar-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV20R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Dec-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Mar-2020

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912BV20R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 31-Mar-2020 03:00 PM to 14-Apr-2020 03:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

AMD #0003 BIDDER'S INQUIRY

AMENDMENT NO. 0003

INQUIRIES – OFFEROR’S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

USE OF BIDDER’S INQUIRY

Prospective offerors should submit questions and inquiries related to this solicitation in accordance with the following (collect calls will not be accepted):

a. For information related to amendments, and the dates set for receipt of proposals, please check http://www.fedbizopps.gov

b. Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet.

1. To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to the aforementioned web page and click on the BID tab. Select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

2. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.

3. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

4. The Solicitation Number is: W912BV20R0003, TX/LA Group ORCs

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: T5NZNI-3FT3V4

5. Address/enter only one comment per entry.

c. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries 3:00pm (Central) Tuesday, 21 January 2020 24 March 2020 in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

d. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

e. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

f. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

g. The point of contact for this solicitation is:

Contract Specialist: Brenda Anderson Telephone: 918-669-7274 E-MAIL: Brenda.K.Anderson@usace.army.mil

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been added by full text:

AMD #0003 PWS

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

FOR

TEXAS, LOUISIANA GROUP

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT (ORC)

AT

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO (JBSA) CAMP BULLIS, TEXAS

JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS

JBSA LACKLAND, TEXAS

JBSA RANDOLPH, TEXAS

LAUGHLIN AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

SOLICITATION NUMBER: W912BV20R0003

CONTRACT NUMBER: TBD

AMENDMENT #0003

13 MARCH 2020

5 DECEMBER 2019

SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Barksdale Air Force Base (AFB), Dyess AFB, Goodfellow AFB, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Camp Bullis, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, JBSA Lackland, JBSA Randolph, Laughlin AFB, and Sheppard AFB. This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration. The range of activities includes maintenance of established remedies, implementation of optimization to enhance remedial progress at applicable sites, and achievement of site specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at 100 98 sites, which include both Installation Restoration Program (IRP) and Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) sites.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the Air Force has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators”.

Introduction The following facilities are included in this Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). Note that permit renewals required during the ORC contract period of performance will be accomplished under a separate contract. However, the ORC Contractor would be expected to comply with the terms of any revised permit.

Barksdale AFB Barksdale AFB occupies approximately 22,000 acres in northwestern Louisiana within the Shreveport-Bossier City metropolitan area. The installation was first operated by the United States Army Air Corps and was later turned over to the US Air Force (AF). Barksdale AFB is divided into two principal areas, the Main Base Area and the East Reservation. The Main Base Area, located in the northwestern section of the base, is approximately 3,000 acres in size and includes the airfield, industrial shops, housing areas, and recreational facilities. The East Reservation comprises the remaining acreage and is mainly undeveloped. The majority of the formerly used range sites are located within the East Reservation. Remediation activities at Barksdale AFB are being conducted pursuant to both Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) and National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) requirements, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Regulatory oversight is provided by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), including their Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP) regulation. Barksdale AFB has a RCRA Hazardous Waste Corrective Action Permit that includes 5 Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) that are IRP sites; however, these sites follow the CERCLA remediation process. The RCRA Hazardous Waste Corrective Action Permit renewal application occurred in March 2018.

Dyess AFB Dyess AFB comprises 5,366 acres of land in north Central Texas within the city limits of Abilene. It serves as the home of the 7th Bomb Wing. Remediation activities at Dyess AFB are being conducted pursuant to the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The RCRA Permit for Dyess AFB was rescinded in 2008. Many of the IRP Sites are being administered under a Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (FFCA) dated 30 September 1991.

Goodfellow AFB Goodfellow AFB comprises 1,116 acres of land in west central Texas in Tom Green County within the southeastern limits of the City of San Angelo. Goodfellow AFB has the Lake Nasworthy Recreation Camp, an off-base privatized housing area, and an on-base privatized housing area. The primary mission of Goodfellow AFB is to train firefighting, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance personnel. Remediation activities at Goodfellow AFB are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

JBSA Camp Bullis Camp Bullis is located on 27,993 acres of land primarily in Bexar County, Texas. It is situated approximately 19 miles northwest of downtown San Antonio, Texas and Fort Sam Houston. The mission of Camp Bullis is to provide ranges, training areas, air space, and facilities to support federal, state, and local government activities. Portions of Camp Bullis are also used for recreational purposes. Seasonal hunting, shooting, and youth adventure sporting are among the featured recreations. In keeping with the Camp Bullis mission, the facility operates an explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) range for the destruction of waste ordnance. Various organizations use the range to explode ordnance found throughout south central Texas and elsewhere. The San Antonio Police Department also detonates explosives at the EOD Range for both emergency disposal and training purposes. Remediation activities at Camp Bullis are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA (MMRP) and under RCRA Permit IHW-50335(IRP). Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

JBSA Fort Sam Houston Fort Sam Houston (FSH) is located on 2,935 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas. It is situated entirely within the city limits of San Antonio, Texas and approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the downtown area. The Installation has five missions organized around five functions:

headquarters, logistical base, garrison, mobilization, and medical support. FSH serves as an administrative instructional/training and medical center. FSH provides support for the U.S.

Army Medical Command, the U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), the U.S. Army Fifth Recruiting Brigade (SW) Regional, the Southern Command and Headquarters, and the Fifth U.S. Army assigned/attached tenant units;

and smaller services and agencies. Camp Bullis is a sub installation under the command of FSH.

Remediation activities at FSH are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

JBSA Lackland AFB Lackland AFB is located on approximately 7,000 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas; and encompasses three land areas: Lackland Main Base (LMB), Lackland Training Annex (LTA), and Kelly Field Annex (KFA). It is situated entirely within the city limits of San Antonio, Texas and approximately 5 miles southwest of the downtown area. Lackland AFB gained responsibility for KFA sites as a result of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). Lackland

AFB is home to the 37th Training Wing (37 TRW) which operates a variety of training squadrons. Within the 37th TRW is the 37th Training Group (37 TRG) which oversees the 5 technical training schools on the base, and the 737 TRG which oversees the Basic Military Training squadron. Remediation activities at Lackland AFB are being conducted pursuant to both CERCLA and the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ. Most sites are regulated under the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP). Lackland AFB has a RCRA permit (originally issued to Air Force Real Property Agency [AFRPA]/Former Kelly AFB) covering KFA SWMUs.

JBSA Randolph AFB Randolph AFB is located on approximately 2,300 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas;

approximately 14 miles northeast of downtown San Antonio. The base is bordered by commercial and residential land to the north and agricultural land elsewhere. An additional 825-acre auxiliary airfield annex facility is located approximately 23 miles east of the base and is known as the Seguin Auxiliary Airfield. Randolph AFB is home to the 12th Flying Training Wing (12 FTW) assigned to the Air Education and Training Command (AETC). Remediation activities at Randolph AFB are being conducted pursuant to both CERCLA and RCRA.

Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

Laughlin AFB Laughlin AFB is located on 3,776 acres of land in southwestern Texas, in Val Verde County, approximately 7 miles east of Del Rio. The nearest metropolitan area, San Antonio, is 150 miles to the east. Laughlin AFB is a pilot training base and home to the 47th Flying Training Wing of AETC. Remediation activities at Laughlin AFB are being conducted under the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

Sheppard AFB Sheppard AFB is located on 5,736 acres of land in north central Texas, four miles north of downtown Wichita Falls. The base is bordered by agricultural lands, limited residential and commercial development, and a major highway with commercial development. Frederick Municipal Airport space is leased by the base for landing training. Lake Texoma Recreational Annex, a remote facility located 120 miles east, is also associated with the base. The mission at the base includes both technical and basic training. Remediation activities at Sheppard AFB are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities required to achieve the POs of this PWS. This PWS and enclosures listed below include general requirements of the project to meet the AF objectives:

Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI)

Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet Enclosure 2B – GFI CDs Enclosure 2C – Alternative Objective Site Consideration Summary

Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Property (GFP) NOT APPLICABLE

Attachment 1 – ORC Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance Attachment 2 – Draft Contractor Progress Status Management Report Attachment 3 – Optimization Benefit Template Attachment 4 – AFFF Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance Attachment 5 – Ensuring Chemistry Data Quality Fact Sheet – April 2013 Attachment 6 – Field Sampling Protocol for PFOA, PFOS, and PFBS Guidance – June

Attachment 7 – Interim Air Force Guidance on 1,4 Dioxane Attachment 8 – Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Template

The AF is required to implement remedies as necessary to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) mission, while effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost conscious framework. The AF desires all sites be cleaned up to standards that allow for the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance (POP) in the most efficient and cost effective manner as supported by a business case analysis that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. Hand in hand, accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are critical adjuncts to optimization success. In keeping with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-7020, the AF defines optimization, under the ORC, as the reduction of contaminant mass and concentrations, reduction in LCC, or any combination of activities leading to acceleration of Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC), as a result of remedial implementation the Contractor undertakes, above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved Decision Document (DD).

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission to include the sharing of information with USACE, other AFCEC Contractors and AF personnel; and cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the achievement of the POs in the Performance Period (PP) per Table 1 of this PWS, and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within PP specified for each site.

AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the POP.

Site specific POs are identified in Table 1: Performance Table below. POs that are in keeping with standard DERP milestones are defined in Enclosure 1. In addition, for certain categories of sites, the AF has set data-driven POs based on current site conditions in keeping with the POP of the contract and ORC goal. For this ORC, only one of these POs categories is applicable:

Alternate Objectives, which is described below.

The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub-Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both Government and regulator) per the Performance Standard are required in writing.

Performance Models The Contractor shall develop performance models for all sites listed in Table 1 of this PWS that do not have a PO of Long Term Management (LTM) and have a remedy planned or in place.

For all sites proposed to reach RC/SC during the POP, work planning documents shall contain the performance model. Final performance models, subject to be modified as needed during the life of the contract, shall be submitted as part of the Work Plan required under PWS section

6.1.2. For sites with a PO of Remedial Action - Operation (RA-O) which consists exclusively of inspection and maintenance of Land Use Controls (LUCs), a performance model would not be necessary. Performance models shall describe how site conditions are expected to change over time, using appropriate performance indicators, from current state through PO achievement. The Contractor shall provide monitoring reports, in accordance with the DD, that demonstrate whether the remedial response is progressing and performing consistent with the performance model.

Performance model and site management approach shall include the following:

Develop and document the approach to determine remedial progress relative to the defined performance indicators, associated decision criteria, and objectives consistent with the performance model. The documented approach is expected to facilitate decisions about optimization as well as provide a quantifiable understanding of how the response is progressing, list contingency options, and demonstrate when the objective has been reached. An individual site may have more than one performance model (e.g., different parts of the site that are addressed by separate remedies and represented by different sets of monitoring wells).

Demonstrate an understanding of the site-specific Conceptual Site Model (CSM) as it relates to the operation of existing systems, distribution of contaminates, and remedy effectiveness and degradation rates (see details on the definition of CSM in Section 8.1.3). Update the CSM using Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) as needed based on performance and monitoring data throughout the performance period and implement remedy contingencies as warranted by the evolving CSM. Submit updated CSMs subsequent to receipt of new information.

Develop an Exit Strategy that identifies and implements opportunities to improve remedy protectiveness, effectiveness, and cost efficiency, and to facilitate progress toward the end goal of the Exit Strategy, including innovative technologies (see details on the Exit Strategy preparation in Section 8.1.4). The goal is to accelerate contaminant reduction thereby minimizing future AF liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. Update the Exit Strategy as dictated by site progress throughout the PP. Submit updated Exit Strategies subsequent to receipt of new information.

Develop baselines and performance models representative of the extent of contamination being addressed that describe the historic and expected course of the remedial progress (i.e., how conditions are expected to change over time as demonstrated by appropriate performance indicators) from the current baseline state through PO achievement.

Define the baseline state for each contaminant of concern (COC). The baseline state is determined by using select monitoring wells that are representative of the site and with sufficient data to develop statistics based historic concentration trends for site COCs. A scientific approach that uses a line of best-fit (e.g., first order decay rate) is appropriate for estimating the baseline attenuation rate, The baseline attenuation rate, in turn, can be used to extrapolate a baseline concentration and measures of future performance.

Supporting information for the baseline concentrations shall include the rationale for the well selection and the time period used to develop the trends, justification for the selected line of best-fit, actual values used to define the trend, and extension of the line of best-fit to predict values for future years independent of future remedy implementation plans.

For additional detail on development of baselines, refer to the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance, Version 1, Section 2.

Using the baseline as a starting point (above), develop a scientifically-based remedial performance model for each COC. The performance model shall be representative of the contaminant extent being addressed and include performance indicators, decision criteria, and annual and final goals achievable within the performance period. Goals should be consistent with the performance model used to optimize remedial efficiency, quantify how the response is progressing, and demonstrate when the annual and final goals have been achieved. The performance model shall include demonstration of contaminant reduction, process improvement and corrective action level indicators, and process failure and contingency action level indicators that reconcile underperforming remedies when combined with the decision criteria.

Optimized Exit Strategy

NOT APPLICABLE

Alternate Objectives This section and the subparagraphs below describe the Alternate Objective Sites and a general overview of the work associated with these sites. Please see Table 1 for specific elements of work required for each site with an Alternate Objective PO.Table 1 of the PWS identifies Alternate Objectives as the PO for selected sites. These sites have complex attributes that have, to date, inhibited progress towards the achievement of RC. For Alternate Objective sites, as for all sites in Table 1 of the PWS where applicable, the Contractor shall maintain compliance throughout the POP of the contract with all existing requirements including but not limited to regulations, Federal Facility Agreements, RCRA Permits, final or interim Records of Decision (RODs), or other equivalent remedial DDs. The Contractor is responsible for implementing changes to the monitoring program based on activities conducted in the Advanced Site Characterization (PWS Section 1.2.3.1) including the addition and decommissioning of wells in the monitoring well network as agreed by the all parties and the addition of new delineation monitoring where new information indicates our understanding of the plumes is changed. Only JBSA Camp Bullis Site LF002 (Site 8) (Landfill 8) is identified as an Alternate Objectives site in Table 1 of the PWS.

Based on technical review of existing site conditions/activities, the AF placed sites in the category of Alternate Objective if one or more of the following conditions exist:

Achieving RC is expected to require substantially longer than 30 years.

Achieving RC is unattainable with standard characterization and/or existing remediation technology due to technical or other limitations related to site conditions.

Achieving RC is anticipated to require advanced site characterization technologies to improve the Conceptual Site Model (CSM), determine appropriate remedial technology, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants.

The AF will use data and information obtained during execution of this PWS to determine restoration potential and future investment strategies at Alternate Objective sites. Each Sub- CLIN for the Alternate Objective sites will only be awarded if the activities are needed to determine the future investment strategy for the site. The decision to award each Sub-CLIN resides solely at the discretion of the AF.

For each Alternate Objective site, a summary of site-specific considerations is provided in PWS Enclosure 2C. As with all GFI provided, this GFI is provided for informational purposes only;

the Contractor remains responsible for developing their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the PO. The Contractor shall conduct project scoping sessions before work plan development and throughout the planning and execution of the project to meet the PO including the Installation Point(s) of Contact (POC[s]), the AFCEC Program Manager, the AF technical support team, and USACE Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). After contract award and approval by the AF and USACE, the Contractor shall participate in scoping sessions with the regulators, as appropriate.

Advanced Site Characterization Based on existing data, the AF has determined that the existing remedial approaches at the Alternative Objective sites are not achieving satisfactory remedial progress towards their intended goals. In order for the AF to determine the best path forward for these sites, the Contractor shall conduct Advanced Site Characterization to collect data to update and refine the CSM in order to achieve the following goals: (1) Fill data gaps; and (2) Collect data needed to:

(A) Determine why existing and previous remedial actions are not effective at achieving remedial progress, (B) Determine appropriate remedial technology(ies) based on site conditions, and C) Develop remediation design parameters for recommended technology(ies).

Advanced Site Characterization includes the following three activities: (1) Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), (2) Revised CSM, and (3) Groundwater Monitoring Program Update.

Supplemental Site Investigation The Contractor shall conduct an SSI to collect data necessary to improve the CSM, determine appropriate remedial technology, support remediation design and construction, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants. The Contractor shall implement advanced characterization methods, both established approaches and state-of-science techniques consistent with AF, regulatory, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC), and Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program/Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (SERDP/ESTCP) guidance to attain these objectives. Data collection includes better definition of the geology, hydrogeology, geochemistry, and/or distribution of Contaminants of Concern (COCs), as required. The Contractor shall evaluate the need for, and collect the following data where appropriate: (1) Source zone delineation; (2) Source strength1,2,3 ; (3) Vertical and lateral extent of contamination, if not sufficiently defined; (4) Plume stability4; (5) Migration pathway, rates, and fluxes in 3-D; (6) Mass distribution; (7) Biogeochemical framework; (8) Impact of recent and historical remedies on site conditions; and

(9) Comprehensive risk including the vapor intrusion pathway.

The SSI report shall document data collection efforts to include a risk evaluation, if appropriate.

The Contractor shall evaluate and provide recommendations regarding whether additional source control is needed or whether the plume, or portions of the plume, is amenable to natural attenuation by conducting source strength and plume stability evaluations as needed.

Conceptual Site Model The Contractor shall develop a revised CSM in 3-D to include establishing or updating existing fate and transport models based on existing data and data gathered during the SSI. The CSM should cover the source area and the distal plume, to include the lateral and vertical extent of the contaminants in the context of geologic/hydrogeological parameters and the remedial actions conducted to date.

Groundwater Monitoring Program Update The Contractor shall evaluate the current horizontal and vertical well distribution to determine if the following can be properly evaluated:

Remedy performance in treatment areas.

Hydrogeology, plume geometry, horizontal and vertical plume stability, and matrix diffusion across site.

Plume migration through use of perimeter/boundary wells and sentinel wells.

Based on the well network evaluation, coordinated and approved by the Government and regulators (if required), the Contractor shall optimize the monitoring well network to include adjusting sample collection frequency and the addition of new wells as appropriate. The Contractor shall update the Basewide or Site-specific Monitoring Plan or other equivalent document, as appropriate.

1 ITRC. (2015). Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tool Selection.

2 SERDP/ESTCP. (2012). Matrix Diffusion Tool Kit.

3 USEPA. (2009). Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Sites with LNAPL.

4 USEPA. (2014). High Resolution Site Characterization for Groundwater Short Course, 23rd Annual NARPM Training Program.

Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation Based on all existing data and data gathered during the Advanced Site Characterization, the Contractor shall evaluate the existing active and/or passive remedy(ies)5,6,7. The Contractor shall provide recommendations to augment, modify, and/or replace the existing remedy8. The evaluation and recommendations will include a cost-benefit analyses and evaluation of the usability, expandability, and/or discontinued use of any existing infrastructure. All remedy recommendations must include a performance model addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to section 1.2.1, Performance Models.

Where necessary to evaluate the proposed technology, the Contractor shall conduct pilot scale technology demonstrations. The Contractor shall identify appropriate remedial technologies and target zones; and design, plan, conduct, and evaluate the pilot and/or field scale technology consistent with AF, regulatory, and ITRC guidance. The Contractor shall determine performance monitoring criteria and identify a control sub-site (current state) for comparison and to evaluate results.

In some instances, achievement of RC may not be feasible with currently available technologies within a reasonable timeframe (i.e., more than 30 years). If this is the case, the Contractor shall develop and evaluate alternatives for site management that will be protective of human and ecological health. If this recommendation is made, it must include the rationale, and recommended metric when active remediation can cease, and a strategy for obtaining regulatory buy-in.

Decision Document Amendment

Remedial Action – Operation and Reduce Life-cycle Cost/Long Term Management and Reduce Life-cycle Cost

Remedial Action – Operation and Long Term Management Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or LTM as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and LTM site:

Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the POP.

Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to section 1.2.1, Performance Models.

Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint).For RA-O sites, deliver an RA-O &

5 USEPA. (2010). Best Management Practices.

6 USEPA. (2014). Groundwater Remedy Completion Strategy.

7 ITRC. (2006). Performance-Based Management.

8 ITRC. (2010). Use and Measurement of Mass Flux and Mass Discharge.

Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report two years prior to the POP end date.

The Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report shall:

Document activities to date and identify activities and assumptions to further reduce

LCC 10 years post-PO.

Table 1: Performance Table

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard N/A Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Draft PMP within 60 calendar days of contract award, Final PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

PMP.

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

N/A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

(QASP)

Draft QASP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

QASP.

N/A Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule

(MPS)

Draft IMS/MPS within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final IMS/MPS within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

IMS/MPS.

N/A Basewide Quality Program Plans (QPP) for each Installation

Draft Basewide QPP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of Basewide QPP.

See Section 8.1.1.1.e for site list

1,4-Dioxane Sampling (Phase 1) One (1) Year AF and USACE approval of Technical Memorandum/Report (one per installation)

N/A Annual Contractor Manpower Reporting

Throughout the duration of the POP

Accepted Annual Report

Barksdale AFB

DP020

(SWMU 9),

(POL Bulk Storage Area), (Landfill No. 1)

Annual LTM in accordance with the Hazardous and solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) Corrective Action Permit

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

DP021

(SWMU 1)

(POL Pump House)

Annual LTM in accordance with the LDEQ No Further Action Notification (NFA) dated 9/11/2013

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF003

(Landfill No. 2

[SWMU 12]

and No. 3

[SWMU 13])

Annual LTM in accordance with the HSWA Corrective Action Permit

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF003

(Landfill No. 2)

Achieve Landfill Cap Replacement for Landfill No. 2

Three (3) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of Annual Remedial Action Status Report.

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

Annual LTM in accordance with agreement with state regulators and provisions in the Louisiana Administrative Code

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF034 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis LUCIP for MMRP Sites

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

MU055 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

MU056 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

SS049 Annual LTM in accordance with the LDEQ approval of Remedial Investigation (RI) Report dated 12/12/2013

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ST032 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODSC

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection ReportsSite Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

TS935 SC Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

TU502 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU503 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU505 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU509 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls

TU516 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU521 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

XU559 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU560 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562A Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562C Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562D Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAfter Action Report

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control

XU563 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU564 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU565 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU565A Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU643 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU936 Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the remaining duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

Dyess AFB N/A Establish a Basewide Land Use

Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP) for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

N/A Abandon wells associated with closed out IRP sites (approximately fivesix wells)

One (1) year from the award of the Well Abandonment Sub-

CLIN (0048AA)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of the well abandonment plan and completion report.

N/A Remove fencing associated with former IRP sites: OT008 (one fenced area), and FT003 (three fenced areas)

One (1) year from the award of the Fence Removal Sub-CLIN

(0048AB)

AF and USACE approval of removal action.

DP043

(POL Sludge Disposal Area No. 2)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

FT001

(Fire Protection Training Area

no. 1A)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation

FT002

(Fire Protection Training Area

no. 1B)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) Three (3) years

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

LF013

(Hardfill No. 1)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF013

(Hardfill No. 1)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

OT011

(DRMO)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

OT031

(Drum Storage Area Building 5017)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

OT035

(Golf Course Maintenance Shop)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD007

(South Diversion Ditch)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD020

(Oil Water Separator 4317)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD025

(Oil Water Separator 5204)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation

SD028

(Building 7040 Oil Water Separator)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD029

(Building 8007 Oil Water Separator)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS042

(Background Boring 2)

(BB2)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ST032

(Auto Hobby Shop)

Annual LTM in accordance with the approved RODAir Force Environmental Restoration Program requirements (AFI 32-7020 para.

15.2)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of…