RFP 3.pdf

APPENDIX E

ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION:

FINAL SITE CONDITION REPORT for:

FY09 PN 69308 GTF INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

FINAL SITE CONDITION REPORT for:

FY09 PN 68786 ENGINEER UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

FACILITIES

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

FINAL SITE CONDITION REPORT

FY09 PN 68821 MP UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

FACILITIES

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

FINAL SITE CONDITION REPORT

FY09 PN 68822 EOD UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

FACILITIES

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

FINAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION OF VARIOUS SOUTH RANGE

SITES, SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

SURVEY FOR DUCK FIELD RUBBISH DEPOSIT, SCHOFIELD

BARRACKS, ACTO 4 PROGRESS REPORT 2-27-09

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information W9128A-10-R-0003 Page E-1

FINAL

SITE CONDITION REPORT

FY09 PN 69308

GTF INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, OAHU, HAWAII

May 23, 2008

Prepared for:

U.S. Corps of Engineers

Honolulu Engineer District Contract No: W9128A-07-P-0049

Prepared by:

62-180 Emerson Road Haleiwa, Hawaii 96712

Page E-2

Site Condition Report

MP Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii i May 23, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW

1.2 PURPOSE

1.3 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.4 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

1.5 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

1.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1.7 USER RELIANCE

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY

2.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON

THE SITE

2.5 CURRENT USES OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS

3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE

3.3 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLE ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION

3.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

3.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION

3.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE SITE CONDITION REPORT

3.7 OTHER INFORMATION

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.1.1 Overview

4.1.2 U.S. EPA National Priorities Site List

4.1.3 U.S. EPA Delisted NPL Site List

4.1.4 U.S. EPA CERCLIS List

4.1.5 U.S. EPA CERCLIS NFRAP Site List

4.1.6 U.S. EPA RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List

4.1.7 U.S.EPA RCRAInfo List for TSD Facilities

4.1.8 U.S. EPA RCRA Generators

4.1.9 U.S. Institutional / Engineering Control Registries

4.1.10 U.S. EPA ERNS List

4.1.11 State of Hawaii Hazardous Waste Sites List

4.1.12 State of Hawaii Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Site List

4.1.13 State of Hawaii LUST List

4.1.14 State of Hawaii Registered UST List

4.1.15 State of Hawaii Institutional Control Registry

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-3

MP Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii ii May 23, 2008

4.1.16 State of Hawaii Voluntary Response Program Sites

4.1.17 State of Hawaii Brownfield Sites

4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES

4.3.1 USGS Topographic Map Coverage

4.3.2 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting

4.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

4.4.1 Historical Review Sources

4.4.2 History of Schofield Barracks

4.4.3 Past Uses of the Subject Property and Adjoining Properties

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING

5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH

IDENTIFIED USES

5.4 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM CONTAINERS (NOT NECESSARILY

IN CONNECTION WITH IDENTIFIED USES)

5.5 UNIDENTIFIED SUBSTANCE CONTAINERS

5.6 STORAGE TANKS

5.7 INDICATIONS OF PCBS

5.8 INDICATIONS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

5.9 MIGRATION OF OFF-SITE CONTAMINATION

5.10 OTHER CONDITIONS OF CONCERN

6.0 INTERVIEWS

6.1 INTERVIEW WITH CURRENT OWNER / FORMER OWNER / OCCUPANTS

6.2 INTERVIEW WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS

7.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

9.0 DEVIATIONS

10.0 REFERENCES

11.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

12.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

LIST OF ACRONYMS

APPENDICES

Appendix A Figures

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck®

Appendix D Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals

Appendix E Interview Notes and Requests for Information

Appendix F Records Review Checklist

Page E-4

Page E-5

Page E-6

Page E-7

Page E-8

FY09 PN 68786

ENGINEER UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES

Page E-9

Engineer Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW

1.2 PURPOSE

1.3 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.4 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

1.5 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

1.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1.7 USER RELIANCE

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY

2.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON

THE SITE

2.5 CURRENT USES OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS

3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE

3.3 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLE ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION

3.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

3.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION

3.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE SITE CONDITION REPORT

3.7 OTHER INFORMATION

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.1.1 Overview

4.1.2 U.S. EPA National Priorities Site List

4.1.3 U.S. EPA Delisted NPL Site List

4.1.4 U.S. EPA CERCLIS List

4.1.5 U.S. EPA CERCLIS NFRAP Site List

4.1.6 U.S. EPA RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List

4.1.7 U.S.EPA RCRAInfo List for TSD Facilities

4.1.8 U.S. EPA RCRA Generators

4.1.9 U.S. Institutional / Engineering Control Registries

4.1.10 U.S. EPA ERNS List

4.1.11 State of Hawaii Hazardous Waste Sites List

4.1.12 State of Hawaii Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Site List

4.1.13 State of Hawaii LUST List

4.1.14 State of Hawaii Registered UST List

4.1.15 State of Hawaii Institutional Control Registry

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-10

Engineer Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii ii May 23, 2008

4.1.16 State of Hawaii Voluntary Response Program Sites

4.1.17 State of Hawaii Brownfield Sites

4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES

4.3.1 USGS Topographic Map Coverage

4.3.2 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting

4.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

4.4.1 Historical Review Sources

4.4.2 History of Schofield Barracks

4.4.3 Past Uses of the Subject Property and Adjoining Properties

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING

5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH

IDENTIFIED USES

5.4 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM CONTAINERS (NOT NECESSARILY

IN CONNECTION WITH IDENTIFIED USES)

5.5 UNIDENTIFIED SUBSTANCE CONTAINERS

5.6 STORAGE TANKS

5.7 INDICATIONS OF PCBS

5.8 INDICATIONS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

5.9 MIGRATION OF OFF-SITE CONTAMINATION

5.10 OTHER CONDITIONS OF CONCERN

6.0 INTERVIEWS

6.1 INTERVIEW WITH CURRENT OWNER / FORMER OWNER / OCCUPANTS

6.2 INTERVIEW WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS

7.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

9.0 DEVIATIONS

10.0 REFERENCES

11.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck®

Appendix D Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals

Page E-11

Page E-12

Page E-13

Page E-14

Page E-15

FY09 PN 68821

MP UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES

Page E-16

MP Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW

1.2 PURPOSE

1.3 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.4 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

1.5 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

1.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1.7 USER RELIANCE

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY

2.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON

THE SITE

2.5 CURRENT USES OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS

3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE

3.3 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLE ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION

3.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

3.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION

3.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE SITE CONDITION REPORT

3.7 OTHER INFORMATION

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.1.1 Overview

4.1.2 U.S. EPA National Priorities Site List

4.1.3 U.S. EPA Delisted NPL Site List

4.1.4 U.S. EPA CERCLIS List

4.1.5 U.S. EPA CERCLIS NFRAP Site List

4.1.6 U.S. EPA RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List

4.1.7 U.S.EPA RCRAInfo List for TSD Facilities

4.1.8 U.S. EPA RCRA Generators

4.1.9 U.S. Institutional / Engineering Control Registries

4.1.10 U.S. EPA ERNS List

4.1.11 State of Hawaii Hazardous Waste Sites List

4.1.12 State of Hawaii Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Site List

4.1.13 State of Hawaii LUST List

4.1.14 State of Hawaii Registered UST List

4.1.15 State of Hawaii Institutional Control Registry

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-17

MP Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii ii May 23, 2008

4.1.16 State of Hawaii Voluntary Response Program Sites

4.1.17 State of Hawaii Brownfield Sites

4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES

4.3.1 USGS Topographic Map Coverage

4.3.2 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting

4.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

4.4.1 Historical Review Sources

4.4.2 History of Schofield Barracks

4.4.3 Past Uses of the Subject Property and Adjoining Properties

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING

5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH

IDENTIFIED USES

5.4 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM CONTAINERS (NOT NECESSARILY

IN CONNECTION WITH IDENTIFIED USES)

5.5 UNIDENTIFIED SUBSTANCE CONTAINERS

5.6 STORAGE TANKS

5.7 INDICATIONS OF PCBS

5.8 INDICATIONS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

5.9 MIGRATION OF OFF-SITE CONTAMINATION

5.10 OTHER CONDITIONS OF CONCERN

6.0 INTERVIEWS

6.1 INTERVIEW WITH CURRENT OWNER / FORMER OWNER / OCCUPANTS

6.2 INTERVIEW WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS

7.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

9.0 DEVIATIONS

10.0 REFERENCES

11.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck®

Appendix D Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals

Page E-18

Page E-19

Page E-20

Page E-21

Page E-22

FY09 PN 68822

EOD UNIT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES

Page E-23

EOD Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW

1.2 PURPOSE

1.3 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.4 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

1.5 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

1.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1.7 USER RELIANCE

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY

2.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON

THE SITE

2.5 CURRENT USES OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS

3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE

3.3 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLE ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION

3.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

3.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION

3.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE SITE CONDITION REPORT

3.7 OTHER INFORMATION

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.1.1 Overview

4.1.2 U.S. EPA National Priorities Site List

4.1.3 U.S. EPA Delisted NPL Site List

4.1.4 U.S. EPA CERCLIS List

4.1.5 U.S. EPA CERCLIS NFRAP Site List

4.1.6 U.S. EPA RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List

4.1.7 U.S.EPA RCRAInfo List for TSD Facilities

4.1.8 U.S. EPA RCRA Generators

4.1.9 U.S. Institutional / Engineering Control Registries

4.1.10 U.S. EPA ERNS List

4.1.11 State of Hawaii Hazardous Waste Sites List

4.1.12 State of Hawaii Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Site List

4.1.13 State of Hawaii LUST List

4.1.14 State of Hawaii Registered UST List

4.1.15 State of Hawaii Institutional Control Registry

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-24

EOD Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii ii May 23, 2008

4.1.16 State of Hawaii Voluntary Response Program Sites

4.1.17 State of Hawaii Brownfield Sites

4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

4.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES

4.3.1 USGS Topographic Map Coverage

4.3.2 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting

4.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

4.4.1 Historical Review Sources

4.4.2 History of Schofield Barracks

4.4.3 Past Uses of the Subject Property and Adjoining Properties

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING

5.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH

IDENTIFIED USES

5.4 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND PETROLEUM CONTAINERS (NOT NECESSARILY

IN CONNECTION WITH IDENTIFIED USES)

5.5 UNIDENTIFIED SUBSTANCE CONTAINERS

5.6 STORAGE TANKS

5.7 INDICATIONS OF PCBS

5.8 INDICATIONS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

5.9 MIGRATION OF OFF-SITE CONTAMINATION

5.10 OTHER CONDITIONS OF CONCERN

6.0 INTERVIEWS

6.1 INTERVIEW WITH CURRENT OWNER / FORMER OWNER / OCCUPANTS

6.2 INTERVIEW WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS

7.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

9.0 DEVIATIONS

10.0 REFERENCES

11.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck®

Appendix D Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals

Page E-25

Page E-26

Page E-27

Page E-28

Page E-29

Final Site Characterization of Various South Range Sites.

PN 68786 – Engineer Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities; PN 68821 – MP Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities; PN 68822 – EOD Unit Operations and Maintenance Facilities; and PN 69308 – GTF Infrastructure Schofield Barracks Oahu, Hawaii

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Honolulu Engineer District Contract No: W9128A-07-P-0049

62-180 Emerson Road Haleiwa, Hawaii 96712

July 2009

Prepared by:

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-30

Project Report Site Characterization of Various South Range Sites Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii

TOC

July 2009 i

Table of Contents Section Page List of Acronyms iv

Section 1 Introduction 1-1

1.1 Project Identification and Approvals...........................................................................1-1

1.2 Project Purpose .........................................................................................................1-2

1.3 Report Organization...................................................................................................1-2

Section 2 Location, Description and Site Setting 2-1

2.1 Site Location and Description ....................................................................................2-1

2.2 Site Setting.................................................................................................................2-1

2.2.1 Climate ................................................................................................................2-1

2.2.2 Geology...............................................................................................................2-1

2.2.3 Hydrogeology ......................................................................................................2-2

Section 3 Conceptual Site Model 3-1

3.1 Project Background and Historical Site Use ..............................................................3-1

3.2 Conceptual Site Model...............................................................................................3-1

3.3 Sampling Rationale....................................................................................................3-2

3.3.1 Former Pineapple Field Decision Units ...............................................................3-2

3.3.2 Utility Crossing Decision Unit ............................................................................3-11

Section 4 Site Characterization Field Tasks 4-1

4.1 Characterization Activities..........................................................................................4-1

4.1.1 Utility Clearance and Underground Toning .........................................................4-1

4.1.2 Sample Location Layout and Site Preparation....................................................4-1

4.1.3 Soil Sample Collection and Analysis...................................................................4-1

4.1.4 Site Restoration...................................................................................................4-4

Section 5 Sample Analysis and Characterization Results 5-1

5.1 Data Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................5-1

5.2 Soil Sample Analysis Results ....................................................................................5-1

5.2.1 Former Field 68 Decision Unit.............................................................................5-1

5.2.2 Former Field 67 Decision Unit.............................................................................5-3

5.2.3 Former Field 06 Decision Unit.............................................................................5-4

5.2.4 Utility Crossing Decision Unit ..............................................................................5-6

Section 6 Data Quality Assessment and Quality Control 6-1

6.1 Field Sampling Quality Control ..................................................................................6-1

6.1.1 Field Replicates...................................................................................................6-1

6.1.2 Sample Handling and Custody............................................................................6-3

6.1.3 Deviations of Field Standard Operating Procedures...........................................6-3

6.2 Analytical Quality Control/Procedures .......................................................................6-3

6.2.1 Laboratory Analytical Procedures .......................................................................6-3

6.2.2 Deviations from Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures .............................6-4

6.3 Data Validation...........................................................................................................6-4

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-31

Project Report Site Characterization of Various South Range Sites Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii

TOC

July 2009 ii

Section 7 Summary and Conclusions 7-1

7.1 Summary....................................................................................................................7-1

7.1.1 Decision Unit Analytical Results..........................................................................7-2

7.2 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................7-4

Section 8 References 8-1

Tables Table 4-1: Soil Sample and Analysis Summary..................................................................4-3 Table 5-1: Field 68 Soil Sample Results Summary ............................................................5-2 Table 5-2: Field 67 Soil Sample Results Summary ............................................................5-3 Table 5-3: Field 06 Soil Sample Results Summary ............................................................5-5 Table 5-4: Utility Crossing Soil Sample Results Summary .................................................5-6

Figures Figure 2-1: Former Fields Site Location..............................................................................2-5 Figure 2-2: Drainage Way and Streams Site Location........................................................2-7 Figure 3-1: Conceptual Site Model .....................................................................................3-3 Figure 3-2: Former Pineapple Field Decision Units ............................................................3-5 Figure 3-3: Utility Crossing Decision Unit ...........................................................................3-7 Figure 3-4: Former Pineapple Field Sampling Locations....................................................3-9 Figure 3-5: Utility Crossing Sample Locations ..................................................................3-13 Figure 5-1: Former Pineapple Fields Soil Sample Analytical Results Summary.................5-9 Figure 5-2: Utility Crossing Soil Sample Analytical Results Summary..............................5-11

Appendices Appendix A Project Photographs Appendix B Project Field Notes Appendix C Soil Sample Analytical Results Summary Tables Appendix D Analytical Laboratory Report – Soil Samples Appendix E RSD Evaluation Tables Appendix F Quality Control Summary Report

Page E-32

Page E-33

Page E-34

Page E-35

Page E-36

Survey for Duck Field Rubbish Deposit, Schofield Barracks

ACTO 4 Progress Report 2-27-09

We have surveyed the limits of the historic rubbish feature at the edge of Duck Field.

While a surface scatter of modern (bottle glass, plastic bags, razor wire, Styrofoam, sand bags, and comm. wire) and historic (glass bottle and window fragments, ceramic sherds, and metal fragments) rubbish, as well as construction debris, was observed along a portion of the slope on the western edge of Duck Field, shovel tests indicated that a buried layer of historic rubbish was confined to a small portion of the slope.

To identify the limits of the rubbish feature, the monitors:

1) Walked transects north along the mowed edge of Duck Field, and then back along the densely overgrown slope on the edge of Duck Field, looking for surface debris and for indications of buried materials eroding out of the slope.

2) Dug a series of shovel pits (following the methodology used by Bouthillier et al.

1997 that originally tested this area) to identify buried rubbish deposits, starting on Duck Field and testing down the slope to identify the up-slope and down-slope edges of the buried rubbish, then following the slope to either side to the edge of the surface scatter, testing at these scatter-edges for buried rubbish, then working back along the slope toward the center to identify the actual edge of the buried rubbish feature (Figure 1).

The surface scatter was distributed further along the slope and also higher and lower on the slope than the buried rubbish layer (while some buried material was identified eroding out of the slope, it was clear that the surface scatter was not simply the product of slope erosion exposing buried deposits).

The buried rubbish layer extended approximately 20 meters along the slope, and 9-12 meters down the slope, in each shovel pit tested the rubbish was mixed with Stratum I (the dark reddish clay loam found on Duck Field), the scattered nature of the rubbish in the test pits and the stratigraphy of the test pits suggest the “buried” rubbish was pushed onto the slope along with the clay loam from Duck Field.

Alex Hazlett Cultural Surveys Hawaii

Section: Appendix E Environmental Information

Page E-37

Figure 1

Page E-38

Appendix E