Attachment_L__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 264 KB Posted

Attached to
Full Food Services - Key West
Solicitation number
W9124J18R0026
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_G_KWFL_FFS_Pricing_Matrix_4.9.19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9124J18R0026_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
W9124J-18-R-0026_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_KWFL_FFS_Pricing_Matrix_4.4.19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
190403_Key_West_FFS_updated_PWS.DOCX DOCX document
Attachment_H_KWFL_FFS_Staffing_Matrix_update_4.2.19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_C_Dining_Facility_Drawing_4.3.19_.pdf PDF
W9124J-18-R-0026_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
W9124J18R0026_Amendment_0001_Key_West.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_KWFL_FFS_Pricing_Matrix_update_4.2.19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_N_Key_West_Technical_Q&A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_E_Expendable_Durable_Supplies.docx DOCX document
Attachment_H_KWFL_FFS_Staffing_Matrix_28JUN18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_F_Estimated_Workload.DOCX DOCX document
Attachment_J__Consent_Forms_for_Release_of_Past_Performance_Info.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_Equipment_Listing.docx DOCX document
Attachment_M_Key_West_DFAC_Pictures.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_A_Dining_Facility_Location.docx DOCX document
Attachment_I_Supplmental_Agreement_8._2018.docx DOCX document
Attachment_C_Dining_Facility_Drawings.docx DOCX document
Attachment_F1_Headcount_data_FY_17.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_B_DFAC_Capacities_28_June_18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_K__Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Reference_Sheet.pdf PDF
W9124J-18-R-0026_Key_West_FFS.docx DOCX document
Attachment_F2_Headcount_FY_18.pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Note: Questionnaire submitted by some other entity other than the reference will not be accepted.

When filled in, this document is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor __________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code _________________________________________________________________

C. Contract Number ____________________________________________________________

D. Contract Type _______________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance ________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost $__________________________________________________________

H. Current/final contract cost $____________________________________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs

J. Description of service provided _________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name _____________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description _________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name ___________________________________________

B. Title ____________________________________________

C. Phone/Fax

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an X in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Level

S Satisfactory – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M Marginal – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA Not Applicable – Unable to provide a score.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S M US NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Technical Performance S M US NA

T1. Overall Contract Management.

T2. Adequacy of Contractor Workforce to Perform Contract.

T3. Quality Control.

T4. Government Furnished Property Administration.

T5. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

T6. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

T7. Understand/complied with contract objectives and technical requirements.

T8. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

T9. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

T10. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T11. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US

(Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contract Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes _____ Default _____ Convenience _____ Pending Terminations _____ No _____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire via email to the following Contracting Officer and

Contract Specialist at: samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and juan.juarez.civ@mail.mil.

mailto:Christina.m.mokrane.civ@mail.mil mailto:Karina.s.haddix.civ@mail.mil

Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter

Letterhead

Date

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Mission and Installation Contracting (MICC) – Fort Sam Houston (FSH) Contracting Center is in the process of selecting a contractor for Army Food Services. The services required are for the Army Sustainment Command’s Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) at Key West Dining Facilities in support of the installation food services program that support the Warfighter with flexible, efficient and cost effective service. The service encompasses dining facility management functions, food preparation, facility sanitation, and janitorial duties.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort.

We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than (INSERT DATE) after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at:

samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and juan.juarez.civ@mail.mil. Please email or call the

Contracting Officer or Contract Specialist at: 210-466-2251 or 210-466-2235 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a apart of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

mailto:Christina.m.mokrane.civ@mail.mil mailto:Karina.s.haddix.civ@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it.