B08 W9123822R0006-0006 - 20220721.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0006 is issued to:

1. Incorporate revised Specification Volumes 1 and 2 to versions dated 20220719. Revisions include updates to sections 01 00 00, 01 10 10, 01 35 26, 01 45 35, 01 50 00, 01 57 19, draw ing E-603, addition of ST 73 to Appendix G, and removal of Appendices J and M.

2. Add FAR clause 52.236-14, Availability and Use of Utility Services.

3. Extend the contract period of performance from 730 days to 910 days for all contract line item numbers.

4. Extend solicitation closing date from Monday, 25 July 2022, to Monday, 01 August 2022.

5. Extend the DoD SAFE link request deadline in solicitation section 00 21 00 to 11:00 A.M. MST, 26 July 2022.

6. Update section 00 22 00 to Increase the page limit for section XVIII Tab 5 and correct typos in section XIX.

6. Update solicitation section 00 73 00, Srap Material and GFP Information.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 23

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Jul-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9123822R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Mar-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Jul-2022

CODE

USACE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9123822R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 HAFB B1286 Steam

Plant Plans

27 18-MAR-2022

Attachment 10 B1286 Existing UST Drawings

4 13-JAN-1993

Attachment 11 B1286 Price Schedule 1 27-MAY-2022 Attachment 12 Site Visit Map 1 18-MAY-2022 Attachment 13 Appendix K HAFB Boiler

Repair Feasability Report

776 16-SEP-2019

Attachment 2 HAFB B1286 Steam Plant Specifications Vol 2

424 18-MAR-2022

Attachment 3 HAFB B1286 Steam Plant Specifications Vol 1

460 18-MAR-2022

Attachment 4 Contractors Project Experience

2 28-JAN-2022

Attachment 5 Pre-Award Survey 4 20-JAN-2022 Attachment 6 Past Performance

Questionnaire

4 28-JAN-2022

Attachment 7 DoL CWRR UT20220083

- 20220401

6 01-APR-2022

Attachment 8 B1286 KRSM As-Built Drawings pages 51 - 102

50 16-AUG-1984

Attachment 9 B1286 KRSM As-Built Drawings pages 1 - 50

52 16-AUG-1984

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 HAFB B1286

Specifications Vol 1

425 19-JUL-2022

Attachment 10 Appendix L - B1286 Existing UST Drawings

4 13-JAN-1993

Attachment 11 B1286 Price Schedule 1 27-MAY-2022 Attachment 12 Site Visit Map 1 18-MAY-2022 Attachment 2 HAFB B1286

Specifications Vol 2 Appendices

431 19-JUL-2022

Attachment 3 Appendix K - HAFB Repair Boilers Final Feasibility Report

776 16-SEP-2019

Attachment 4 Contractors Project Experience

2 28-JAN-2022

Attachment 5 Pre-Award Survey 4 20-JAN-2022 Attachment 6 Past Performance

Questionnaire

4 28-JAN-2022

Attachment 7 DoL CWRR UT20220083

- 20220401

6 01-APR-2022

Attachment 8 B1286 KRSM As-Built Drawings pages 51 - 102

50 16-AUG-1984

Attachment 9 B1286 KRSM As-Built Drawings pages 1 - 50

52 16-AUG-1984

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 25-Jul-2022 09:00 AM to 01-Aug-2022 09:00 AM.

The contractor period of performance end date has increased by 180 days from 730 days to 910 days.

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

FOB: Destination

W91238

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

910 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

CAGE

910 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

CAGE

730 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

CAGE

910 dys. ANP 1 UTAH AREA OFFICE

7227 6TH STREET (COE) BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. SOLICITATION AVAILABILITY

(a) The solicitation, solicitation attachments, and amendments are posted on the Government-wide Point of Entry, the System for Award Management (SAM - www.sam.gov/SAM).

(b) The point of contact for this solicitation is:

Contract Specialist: Harold Teague Telephone: (801) 243-2721 E-Mail: harold.e.teague@usace.army.mil

(c) Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals. An award notice will be posted on SAM following contract award.

II. AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCED PUBLICATIONS

(a) USACE publications can be found at: https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/

(b) Construction Criteria Base (CCB). The CCB system, available through the National Institute of Building

Sciences, includes copies of USACE methods and specifications. CCB information can be obtained from:

http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ccb.php

III. OFFEROR QUESTIONS

(a) Prospective Offerors must submit all questions regarding the solicitation, requirement, or other Requests for

Information (RFIs) through the ProjNet Suite Bidder Inquiry System: https://www.projnet.org/projnet.

(b) Please review the solicitation, plans, and specifications in their entireties, and review previous questions and answers in ProjNet, before submitting a new inquiry.

(c) To submit and review inquiries, prospective Offerors must be a registered user or self-registered user in ProjNet. To self-register: from the ProjNet homepage, click on the ‘Quick Add’ link. Select USACE as the agency, enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed below, enter your e-mail address, and then click ‘Continue’. Fill in all required information and click ‘Add User’.

(i) From this page you can view all current inquiries or add a new inquiry.

(ii) ProjNet will e-mail an acknowledgement that a new question has been submitted and will send a subsequent e-mail when the answer to their question has been posted.

(iii) The Solicitation Number is: W9123822R0006

(iv) The Bidder Inquiry Key is: Q8Z56ZS6QI4A

(d) ProjNet will be closed to new inquiries seven (7) calendar days from the start of the site visit to ensure adequate time is available to respond to questions and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

(e) The ProjNet call center operates weekdays from 0800 / 8:00 A.M. to 1700 / 5:00 P.M., U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago); they can be reached by calling 1-800-428-HELP.

IV. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY

(a) FAR Subpart 9.1 requires that contracts be awarded only to responsible prospective Contractors.

(b) To be determined responsible, a prospective Contractor must meet the standards in FAR 9.104 and any other standards set forth in the solicitation.

(c) To be determined responsible, Offerors must provide a statement regarding previous experience completing comparable work as well as information about the business organization, financial resources, and equipment to be used in performing the contract, by completion of a Pre-Award Survey (see solicitation Attachment 6).

(d) If the Offeror does not demonstrate sufficient resources in the completed Pre-Award Survey, acceptable evidence of "ability to obtain" the required adequate resources normally consists of a commitment or explicit arrangement that will be in existence at the time of contract award to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel.

(e) Additionally, Offerors shall provide letter(s) from banks or other financial institutions with which the Offeror conducts business. The letters should contain information about your firm's accounts, loans, lines of credit, etc.

to assist the Government in determining financial stability, history of timely payments, the length and nature of the relationship between the firm and the financial institution, and the firm's financial ability to perform the contract. The letters should also provide the name and telephone number of the bank representative the Government may contact. If responding to the solicitation as a Joint Venture (JV), provide this information for each JV participant.

V. CONTRACTOR TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS

(a) “Offeror” may include a group of two (2) or more entities that have formed a “Contractor team arrangement”

(CTA) as defined in FAR 9.601; this includes partnerships, JVs, and Subcontractor agreements.

(b) In the case of entities that have formed a CTA, the experience and performance history of any member of the team, whether or not gained while working with the other member(s) of the currently proposed CTA, may be considered as a part of the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal.

(c) In the case of CTAs involving a prime Contractor and Subcontractor(s), where the prime Contractor submits the proposal in response to this IFB, the prime Contractor must have completed at least two (2) of the total projects submitted for Factor 3, Past Performance.

(d) An Offeror that relies upon the experience or past performance of a CTA member must maintain that CTA throughout contract performance. The Government must approve any changes to CTAs.

VI. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

(a) Media Limits. Only submit the electronic files specifically requested in this section. Do not submit excess information, audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. Do not include links to information on websites in lieu of incorporating the information in the offer.

(b) Page Limits. There is not a page limit for the overall offer; however, page limits may be imposed at the Volume and/or Tab levels.

(c) Page Definition. For Volumes and/or Tabs with page limitations, pages will be counted as follows: One (1) side of the paper is one (1) page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper is two (2) pages.

Where authorized, a foldout sheet will count as one (1) page. Pages furnished for organizational purposes, such as Volume Coversheets and Table of Contents or divider tabs, are excluded from page limits.

(d) Page Size, Margin, and Font Limitations. Except where another size is specifically authorized for a submission, submit only 8.5” x 11” pages. Use at least 1-inch margins; headers and footers may be outside the 1-inch margins. Do not justify the right margin. Do not use a font size smaller than 10-point. Do not use unusual font styles such as script or condensed fonts; all text and graphics must be clearly legible.

(e) Volume Tabs. Volume Tabs directly correlate to evaluation factors. Although the Government may evaluate information contained anywhere in an Offeror’s proposal, the Government is not obligated to search for or consider information that is not located in the specified Tab. For electronic proposals, Tab means a PDF bookmark. If a Tab is not applicable to your proposal, omit that Tab but do not renumber subsequent Tabs.

(f) Conditioning of Offer. Offerors may not propose exceptions to the solicitation. Inclusion of any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the solicitation may result in a determination that the offer is unacceptable and thus ineligible for award. Questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements must be resolved through ProjNet prior to offer submission.

(g) Restrictions on Offeror-Provided Information. Offers shall not contain classified data. “Confidential” projects may be submitted to demonstrate capability if all information required for evaluation can be provided to the Government. Offerors that include data in their proposals that they do not want disclosed or used except for evaluation purposes must redact the data in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors -

Competitive Acquisition.

VII. BONDING BY INDIVIDUAL SURETIES

(a) Offerors utilizing individual sureties in support of a bid bond shall include a Standard Form (SF) 24, Bid Bond, SF 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety, the bond, and a pledge of acceptable assets from each individual acting as an individual surety (see FAR 52.228-11, Pledges of Assets).

(b) Pledges of acceptable assets shall be in the form of (1) evidence of an escrow account and/or (2) a recorded lien on real estate.

(c) Failure to provide all required bonding documents will render the Offeror non-responsible and thus ineligible for award.

VIII. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS

Funds are not presently available for this acquisition. No contract award will be made until appropriated funds are made available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an Offeror for any costs.

IX. SUBMITTING OFFERS

(a) The Government will NOT accept offers submitted in hard copy, by telegraph, or by facsimile.

(b) Offers MUST BE submitted electronically using the DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE):

https://safe.apps.mil/

(c) Offers submitted through SAFE require an Offeror-unique link sent by the Contract Specialist to an Offeror point of contact and associated e-mail address. Registration with DoD SAFE is not required to upload files.

Submissions are limited to 8 GB.

(d) Please request a SAFE link from the Contract Specialist by e-mail to harold.e.teague@usace.army.mil

(e) To ensure request receipt and processing, Offerors must request a DoD SAFE invitation link from the Contract

Specialist by 1100 / 11:00 A.M. MST, Tuesday, 26 July 2022.

(f) Only one (1) SAFE submission is allowed per Offeror.

(g) Once sent by the Contract Specialist, a SAFE invitation link is only active ONCE (i.e., multiple sessions or versions are not allowed - if the link is clicked, it will not be active at a later date for changes to be made).

(h) The Contract Specialist can verify proposal submission receipt upon request; e-mail requests for confirmation are preferred.

(i) Offerors are encouraged to submit proposal files early to mitigate potential issues that may include (but are not limited to) coordinating and accessing the DoD SAFE link, correcting data entry errors, or encountering system issues or technical difficulties.

(j) Late proposals will not be accepted for any reason.

X. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER

(a) A written award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the SF 1442, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

XI. AWARD BASIS

(a) The Government intends to award one (1) firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract to the responsive and responsible

Offeror that provides the best value to the Government, considering all price and non-price factors.

XII. EVALUATION OVERVIEW

(a) This requirement will be solicited and awarded using the two-phase DB source selection process for construction services, as outlined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 36.3, Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 236.3, Army FAR Supplement (AFARS) Subpart 5136.3, and USACE Acquisition Instructions (UAI) Subpart 5136.3.

(b) Evaluation will be conducted as follows:

(i) All eligible Offerors are invited to submit Phase 1 proposals, which consists of non-price technical factors.

(ii) The Government will select the most highly qualified Offerors from Phase 1; these Offerors will be given the opportunity to submit Phase 2 proposals, which will consist of price and technical factors.

(iii) The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the tradeoff process described in FAR Part 15. This process permits tradeoffs between price and technical (“non-price”) factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer when determined to be in the best interest of the Government. The award decision will be based on a comparative analysis and an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

(c) In accordance with FAR 15.306, the Government does not intend to conduct discussions during either solicitation phase but reserves the right to do so if in the best interest of the Government.

XIII. BEST VALUE TRADEOFF PROCESS

(a) Offers will be evaluated using the subjective best value tradeoff (BVTO) procedures outlined in FAR Part 15

(Contracting by Negotiation), DFARS Part 215, DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) Part 215, the Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures (dated 31 March 2016), AFARS Part 5115, AFARS Appendix AA, the Army Source Selection Supplement (AS3), and UAI Part 5115.

(b) The BVTO process allows the Government to award to other than the lowest-priced offer and other than the highest-technically rated offer based on an integrated assessment and comparative analysis of proposals against all source selection criteria, including price and technical (“non-price”) factors.

XIV. EVALUATION FACTORS AND SIGNIFICANT SUBFACTORS

(a) Phase 1 proposals will be evaluated based on the following factors and subfactors:

Factor 1: Past Performance Subfactor 1: Past Experience Subfactor 2: Past Performance

Factor 2: Technical Experience and Capability

Subfactor 1: A&E Design Firm (or Teaming) Capability Subfactor 2: Design-Build Experience Subfactor 3: USACE Project Experience Subfactor 4: United States Air Force (USAF) or Navy Project Experience Subfactor 5: Concurrent Project Execution

(b) Phase 2 proposals will be evaluated based on the following factors and subfactors:

Factor 1: Cost / Price Factor 2: Technical Approach / Proposal (including risk)

Subfactor 1: Design Concept Subfactor 2: Technical Information Subfactor 3: Schedule Subfactor 4: Identified Challenges and Risk Mitigation

(c) All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price.

(d) Evaluation Factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

Phase-One Factor 1 – Past Performance Phase-One Factor 2 – Technical Experience and Capability Phase-Two Factor 2 – Technical Approach / Proposal Phase-Two Factor 1 – Cost/Price

(e) Each subfactor will be independently rated using the rating scale for the factor, and an overall rating will be generated for the factor using the same scale. All subfactors are approximately equal.

(f) The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between technical merit (i.e., quality) and cost to the Government (i.e., price). If competing technical proposals are determined to be essentially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

(g) The Source Selection Authority will consider only the Phase 1 proposals during Phase 1, however both the

Phase 1 and the Phase 2 proposals, and all relative strengths and weaknesses identified in both phases will be used in determining the best value to the Government in Phase 2.

(h) Approximately up to five (5) of the most highly qualified Offerors will be selected and invited to participate in Phase 2; the offers not selected will be excluded from Phase 2 competition.

XV. PHASE I, VOLUME I - NON-PRICE FACTORS

(a) This Volume will be reviewed to determine whether offers comply with the instructions and requirements of the solicitation; only proposals that conform to the solicitation are considered responsive, and therefore eligible for award.

(b) Failure to complete or provide any of the documentation required in this section may result in the offer being determined non-responsive and excluded from further evaluation.

XVI. PHASE I, EVALUATION FACTOR 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE

(a) The Government will evaluate the Past Performance factor to determine a Performance Confidence Assessment rating.

(b) The submitted material MUST be organized sequentially under tabs for each numbered section to facilitate evaluation. All narratives must contain sufficient detail to demonstrate recency and relevancy.

(c) The Offeror shall submit “example projects” (either commercial or institutional) that demonstrate the prime and key Subcontractor(s) experience that meets the evaluation criteria and demonstrates their ability to successfully perform under the resulting contract.

(d) The Offeror must provide a narrative to explain how the past experience shown by the example projects is relevant to this project and shows the Contractor’s and key Subcontractor’s understanding of the risks, work requirements, and approach necessary to successfully complete this project.

(e) The Offeror shall submit a minimum of three (3) up to six (6) example projects that are individually or collectively demonstrate the recent and relevant capabilities of the prime Contractor and key Subcontractors.

(f) Recent projects are those that have been substantially completed within the past five (5) years.

(g) Relevant projects are of similar scope, square footage, and complexity as this project.

Scope - projects that include similar work tasks, deliverables, deadlines, and project cost.

Square Footage - projects completed with an approximate size of 23,000 square feet.

Complexity - the degree of complexity that determines the overall approach to a project, including required resources as well as tools and techniques.

(h) Each project narrative shall:

1) Explain the Offeror’s experience as a prime Contractor that demonstrates their ability to successfully perform this contract.

2) Explain how the experience shown by the example projects is relevant to this project and show the Contractor possesses an understanding of the risks and requirements necessary to successfully act as the prime Contractor for this project.

3) Explain how the experience shown by the example projects are relevant to this project and demonstrates that the Contractor’s and/or key Subcontractors possess an understanding of the risks, and requirements necessary to successfully manage the design-build elements of this project.

4) Explain how the experience shown by the lead designer is relevant to this project and show the Contractor and/or the key Subcontractor possesses an understanding of the risks and requirements necessary to successfully act as the lead designer for this design-build project.

(i) Offeror should submit project experience data using the format in Attachment 4, Contractors Project

Experience. Failure to provide all information requested in this format (except the BGSD and DART Rate fields, which are not required) may result in the proposal being determined unacceptable for award. The project information submitted in this section shall be the same projects as those submitted in Factor 2.

(j) Offeror must validate performance ratings of the presented projects by providing a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS - https://cpars.cpars.gov/) evaluation or Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ, Solicitation Attachment 6, PPQ-0, PPQ Form) for each submitted project.

(k) Offerors must organize all Past Performance Information in the same project number order in which the projects are submitted.

(l) PPQs must be completed by a Project Client POC that can provide an opinion of the Offeror's performance on the project. Contact information for POCs must be current.

(m) Offerors should submit completed PPQs with their proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a Client POC before the proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit the first page of the PPQ with the proposal, which will provide contract and contact information for the respective project(s). At the Client’s discretion, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist.

(n) Previously completed PPQs may be submitted if they do not reference any other solicitation number.

(o) Offerors must provide reports or questionnaires for all DUNS number(s) and CAGE code(s) whose experience is relevant to the project. While the Government may consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(p) The Government plans to contact and interview Client POCs and may interview other individuals acting for Clients or any other sources.

(q) Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government including, but not limited to, CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or any other databases; interviews with Owners, Program Managers, Contracting Officers, Fee Determining Officials, and/or the Defense Contract Management Agency

(DCMA).

(r) Projects that are not recent or relevant in terms of project size, scope, complexity, dollar value, or that demonstrate low past performance evaluation ratings will be interpreted as indicators of no confidence that the Offeror can successfully perform the work. More recent and relevant projects reflecting high past performance evaluations are typically a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. Higher confidence assessments will be given for higher past performance evaluation ratings.

(s) In the case of Offerors for which no recent and relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance report is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, an Offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably; the Offeror’s past performance is unknown and will be assigned a rating of Neutral Confidence.

(t) Past Performance will be evaluated using the following rating scales:

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings:

Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance Confidence Assessments:

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(u) There is no page limit for this Factor.

XVII. PHASE I, EVALUATION FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITY

(a) The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical experience, as demonstrated in their project portfolio and through other resources, to determine the level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform based on the Offeror’s demonstrated record of project completion and performance.

(b) Proposals that demonstrate Contractor and Key Subcontractor experience and capabilities similar to this requirements, an ability to clearly articulate project risks and successful risk mitigation, compelling approaches to project management or completion, long-term teaming arrangements, extensive design-build experience, significant project complexity, extensive experience with USACE, Air Force, and Navy contracts, and/or the ability to manage multiple projects in multiple disciplines and multiple locations concurrently, may be more favorably rated.

(c) Offeror must provide information that describes the Offeror’s Technical approach to completing projects of similar size and scope. Clearly describe the approach beginning with the Offeror’s capability to design and construct a building to ensure project requirements and milestones are met.

(d) Offerors shall outline the challenges associated with their sample projects and their approach to mitigate those challenges (some examples may be ability to obtain materials, meet key personnel requirements, meet key Subcontractor requirements, maintaining lines of communication, and meet major milestones on time). In addition, Offerors shall describe how they have previously successfully managed design-build projects with boiler replacement and seismic upgrade capability requirements and any lessons learned. Offerors shall discuss any risks identified in their approach and describe how they will mitigate those risks.

(e) Offeror should submit project experience data using the format in Attachment 4, Contractors Project

Experience. Failure to provide all information requested in this format (except the BGSD and DART Rate fields, which are not required) may result in the proposal being determined unacceptable for award.

(f) This factor will be evaluated using the following combined technical / risk rating scale:

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

(g) This Factor is limited to twenty-five (25) pages.

XVIII. PHASE II, EVALUATION FACTOR 1 - COST / PRICE

(a) The Government will evaluate Offeror pricing to determine whether the project will be awarded at a fair and reasonable price.

(b) Proposed prices will be evaluated using price analysis, in accordance with FAR Part 15, which typically includes examining and evaluating an Offeror’s proposed price without evaluating separate cost elements and proposed profit/fee. Price analysis may involve comparison with other proposed prices received in response to this solicitation, comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid, comparison of proposed prices to the independent Government estimate, analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data provided by the Offeror, or any other techniques mentioned in FAR 15.401-1(b)(2).

(c) Price analysis, cost analysis, and/or cost realism analysis techniques may be used to ensure that the Offeror’s cost/price proposal is fair and reasonable.

(d) Offeror strengths, weaknesses, and the cost/price of the competing proposals will be comparatively assessed to determine which proposal represents the best value to the Government.

Response to this Factor MUST include the following tabs and documentation:

(e) Tab 1 - Completed Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award (Construction, Alteration, or

Repair) with continuation pages and acknowledgement of all Amendments, duly executed by an official authorized to bind the company.

Offeror must fill out SF 1442 blocks 14, 15, 17, 20A, 20B, 20C, 30A, 30B, and 30C.

Block 14 - Must include the Offeror’s name, address, and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and/or EIN or DUNS.

Offeror may complete SF 1442 block 19 to acknowledge amendments. Alternatively, Offeror may submit page one (1) of all issued SF 30s to acknowledge amendments. Offeror must acknowledge all amendments using one of these methods.

Block 30A, 30B, and 30C - Must be duly executed and signed by an official authorized to bind the Offeror.

Note: If the SF 1442 and/or the Price Schedule are changed by amendment, Contractors must submit the amended versions with their proposal.

If the Offeror is proposing based on a CTA, include a copy of the JV agreement or other supporting documentation identifying the legal name(s) of all entities, describing the nature of each entity’s relationship (teaming/partnering, JV, etc.) and their role on the contract, and including signatures from all parties.

There is no page limit for this tab.

(f) Tab 2 - Completed SF 1442 Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule (solicitation section 00 10 00), and completed Price Schedule, with proposed CLIN prices and proposal breakout provided where indicated.

Offeror should use the pricing breakout structure provided in solicitation Attachment 11, Price Schedule.

Prices must be proposed for all CLIN(s).

Unit prices must be extended to “dollar and cents” amounts, i.e., two (2) decimal places; do not round prices to the nearest dollar.

Check the pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

Tab is limited to five (5) pages.

(g) Tab 3 - Completed Representations and Certifications

In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.11, Offerors must be registered in SAM (www.SAM.gov), and have completed annual representation and certification requirements, at the time an offer is submitted.

Offeror may include all of SF 1442, Section 00 45 00.

Offeror must include FAR provision 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, checked as appropriate in paragraph (b)(2).

(h) Tab 4 - Bid Guarantee, i.e., Standard Form 24, Bid Bond

Offeror must provide a completed and certified SF 24.

Bond must include evidence of authority to bind the surety, e.g., power of attorney documentation.

(i) Tab 5 - Pre-Award Survey

Offeror should use the structure provided in solicitation Attachment 5, Pre-Award Survey.

Tab is limited to fifteen (15) pages.

XIX. PHASE II, EVALUATION FACTOR 2, TAB 1 - TECHNICAL APPROACH / PROPOSAL

(a) Tab 1 – Technical Narrative

(b) Offerors shall provide a technical approach / proposal narrative in sufficient detail to clearly demonstrate the

Offeror’s understanding of the principal components of work described in the project specifications and drawings, and the Offeror’s understanding of conditions that could impact the project or schedule. The narrative must be a comprehensive, start-to-finish discussion on the significant features of this work to including, but not be limited to discussion of the project design concept, technical information, schedule overview, and identified challenges and risk mitigation.

(c) The narrative must include sufficient detail to clearly:

(1) Demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the principal components of work described in the project specifications and drawings;

(2) Demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the site and other conditions that could impact schedule;

(3) sufficient information to allow the Government to perform an analysis of the proposed design and construction approach;

(4) Describe the Offeror’s integrated approach to design the building 1286 steam plant upgrades;

(5) Clearly distinguish the roles and involvement of the Architect-Engineer design firm in the project;

(6) Describe the role of the prime construction Contractor, Subcontractor(s), and vendors in the design process, and address any design effort that will be performed “in-house” by the key Subcontractor; and,

(7) Describe the roles and planned interaction between the Independent Technical Reviewers and various Contractor and Government personnel.

(8) Describe any significant problems or major difficulties anticipated in performing or accomplishing the work, challenges associated with this project, and the Offeror’s plan for avoiding problems and mitigating difficulties which could adversely impact project schedule. Or, if no problems and difficulties are anticipated, state so, and why.

(d) Proposals must include information related to: (1) site preparation; (2) security requirements; (3) secure facility construction; (4) utilities; (5) construction work discipline sequencing; (6) site work, and (7) clean-up.

(e) Offeror Phase 2 proposals that identify different Key Subcontractors than those identified in Phase 1 proposals are not allowed and will be eliminated from competition.

(f) The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical proposal to evaluate compliance with the terms of the solicitation and specifications, whether the Offeror is able to identify and mitigate project risks, and the degree to which the Offeror proposes an acceptable performance approach and schedule to meet the requirement.

(g) Tab is limited to twenty-five (25) pages.

(h) Tab 2 - Schedule

(i) Offerors must provide an electronic copy of the Project Schedule or GANTT chart (not a PERT Chart), broken down to the “Feature of Work” level, that graphically illustrates the proposed integration, scheduling, and phasing of the major features on the critical and near-critical path for this project, including final close-out.

(j) The schedule must include activities on and near the critical path(s), including:

(1) NTP

(2) Charrette Meetings

(3) Submittals

(4) Government Design Reviews

(5) Contractor Design Reviews

(6) A&E Firm Design Reviews

(7) Independent Technical Reviews

(8) Design review conferences

(9) Construction activities broken down to the “Feature of Work” level

(10) Adverse weather that reflects information from solicitation section 01 00 00

(11) Pre-Commissioning System Testing (if applicable)

(12) Final Commissioning System Testing (if applicable)

(13) Mechanical System Testing (if applicable)

(14) Electrical System Testing (if applicable)

(15) Test and Balancing (if applicable)

(16) As-Builts

(17) Contractor Punch-out Inspection items

(18) Pre-final Inspection

(19) Correction of pre-final inspection items

(20) Final Inspection

(21) Correction of Final Inspection items

(22) Project Complete

(23) Long Lead Item(s) (if applicable)

(k) Clearly identify the critical path.

(l) Clearly indicate the following time frames:

(1) The durations of the principle components of work with anticipated start and finish dates.

(2) The total number of calendar days allocated to design.

(3) The total number of calendar days allocated to construction.

(4) The total number of calendar days from NTP to Project Complete.

(5) For the purposes of proposal analysis only, Offerors should assume:

(i) Contract award date of 05 SEPTEMBER 2022

(ii) Notice to Proceed date of 26 SEPTEMBER 2022

(m) The milestone schedule cannot exceed the contract performance period specified in item specified in box 11 of the SF1442 and must be in compliance with any contractually required interim completion dates specified in the solicitation for separate parts or stages of work. Should the Offeror discover during proposal preparation that the project cannot be completed within the required contract performance period, the contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer immediately.

(n) The project schedule is a preliminary schedule for pre-award evaluation purposes only and will not be incorporated into the contract. The successful Offeror will be required to submit a schedule after contract award that fully complies with all contract requirements, whether or not all pre-award schedule discrepancies were noted or corrected during proposal evaluation.

(o) Formatting. Page size for this tab may be up to 11” x 17” Offerors must ensure the font size is legible so each activity and its duration can be read. Offerors must Number line items on the Project Schedule for easy reference.

(p) Tab is limited to ten (10) pages.

(q) Tabs under this factor will be evaluated using the following combined technical / risk rating scale:

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

(End of Section)

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

The following have been added by reference:

52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services APR 1984

SECTION 00 73 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION AND FINGERPRINTS

If employee identification is required for security or other reasons, the Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing to each employee and for requiring each employee engaged on the work to display such identification as may be approved and directed by the Contracting Officer. All prescribed identification shall immediately be delivered to the Contracting Officer, for cancellation upon the release of any employee. When required by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall obtain and submit fingerprints of all persons employed or to be employed on the project.

MINIMUM INSURANCE

In accordance with FAR 52.228-5, Insurance -Work on a Government Installation, the Contractor shall procure and thereafter maintain during the entire period of his performance under this contract the following minimum insurance.

T Type and Amount Worker's compensation and employer's liability: At least $100,000 General liability: Bodily injury liability of at least $500,000 per occurrence Automobile liability: Coverage of at least $200,000 per person; $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage.

SAFETY AND HEALTH REQUIREMENTS MANUAL

a. The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of the U.S. Army Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual, EM 385-1-1, entitled, “Safety and Health Requirements Manual” is available by searching https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Manuals/

b. Whenever the Contracting Officer becomes aware of any noncompliance with these safety and health requirements or any condition which poses a serious or imminent danger to the health or safety of the public or Government personnel, the Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor orally, with written confirmation, and request immediate initiation of corrective action.

c. This notice, when delivered to the Contractor or the Contractor's representative at the work site, shall be deemed sufficient notice of the noncompliance and that corrective action is required. After receiving the notice, the Contractor shall immediately take corrective action. If the Contractor fails or refuses to promptly take corrective action, the Contracting Officer may issue an order stopping all or part of the work until satisfactory corrective action has been taken. The Contractor shall not be entitled to an equitable adjustment of the contract price or extension of the performance schedule based on any stop work order issued under this authority.

WORK DAYS AND HOURS

a. Federal law (5 U.S.C. 6103) establishes the following public holidays for Federal employees. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the holiday is generally observed on the preceding Friday. When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the holiday is generally observed on the following Monday.

b. The normal work days and hours for this project will be Monday through Friday, excluding the observation of federal holidays, from 07:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Access to the work site may be restricted to these hours and days. Work during other than normal hours and days must be coordinated in advance with the Administrative Contracting Officer.

This work may require multiple crews, multiple shifts, and working weekends and holidays. The Government recognizes the short duration of the time allowed to complete the work and relies upon the Contractor’s experience and expertise to properly plan, staff, and execute the work. In addition, the Contractor may be called upon to provide emergency construction services in the event of unusually severe weather, high river stages, or other circumstances that could threaten life or property.

ALTERNATE STRUCTURED APPROACH TO WEIGHTED GUIDELINE METHOD

The following alternate structured approach shall be used.

Factor Rate Weight Value

Degree of risk 20 Relative difficulty of work 15 Size of job 15 Period of performance 15 Contractor's investment 5 Assistance by Government 5 Subcontracting 25

Total 100%

Based on the circumstances of the procurement action, each of the above factors shall be weighted from .03 to .12 as indicated below. “Value” shall be obtained by multiplying the rate by the weight. The Value column when totaled indicates the fair and reasonable profit percentage under the circumstances of the particular procurement. The profit percentage should be multiplied by the total contract costs, including general and administrative costs.

(1) Degree of risk. Where the work involves no risk or the degree of risk is very small, the weighting should be .03; as the degree of risk increases, the weighting should be increased up to a maximum of .12. Lump sum items shall generally have a higher weight than unit price items; other things to consider include the nature of the work and where it is to be performed. Consider the portion of the work to be done by Subcontractors, amount and type of labor included in costs, whether the negotiation is before or after performance of the work, etc. Modifications settled before the fact have much greater risk than those settled after the fact. A weight of .03 is appropriate for after the fact equitable adjustments and/or settlements.

(2) Relative Difficulty of Work: If the work is difficult and complex, the weight should be .12 and should be proportionately reduced to .03 on the simplest of jobs. This factor is tied in to some extent with the degree of risk.

Some other things to consider are the nature of the work, by whom it is to be done (i.e., Subcontractors, consultants), what is the time schedule.

(3) Size of Job. Work of $100,000 or less shall be weighted at .12. Work estimated between $100,000 and $5,000,000 shall be proportionately weighted from .12 to .05. Work from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 shall be weighted at .04. Work in excess of $10,000,000 shall be weighted at .03.