Solicitation Amendment W911S222R8001A001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Jan-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911S222R8001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jan-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Jan-2023

CODE

MICC-FT DRUM

925TH CBN & MICC FORT DRUM

FORT DRUM NY 13602-5434

W911S2 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911S222R8001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Contract Data

Requirements List

16 26-SEP-2022

Attachment 1 Statement of Work 65 04-APR-2022 Attachment 10 Confined Space Entry

Procedures

45 20-JAN-2015

Attachment 11 Fort Drum Exterior Utility Standards

33 28-MAR-2018

Attachment 12 Contractors Final Affidavit

1 13-JUL-2022

Attachment 13 Fort Drum Hazardous Waste Management Plan

51 01-AUG-2019

Attachment 14 Performance Assessment Questionnaire

4 14-SEP-2022

Attachment 15 AFFF Release SOP 6 09-JAN-2020 Attachment 16 HexFoam SOP 4 13-JUL-2022 Attachment 17 Construction Hold Point

Template

2 13-JUL-2022

Attachment 18 QCQA Report Template 4 13-JUL-2022 Attachment 19 DD Form 1354 Transfer and Acceptance of DoD

2 01-APR-2013

Attachment 2 Engineering Form 4025 2 01-MAY-2017 Attachment 20 Application and

Certificate for Payment AIA Docu

2 01-JAN-1992

Attachment 21 SPDES GP-0-20-001 69 29-JAN-2020 Attachment 22 AIA Document G703 1 01-JAN-1992 Attachment 3 IMDR-ES Form 2

Application for Sponsorship

2 01-JAN-2016

Attachment 4 Fort Drum's SOP for Electrical Outages

2 03-OCT-2022

Attachment 5 Endangered Species Act Requirements

2 29-DEC-2020

Attachment 6 Fort Drum Endangered Species Act Implementing Document

19 01-JAN-2021

Attachment 7 Water Supply Improvement Submittal Procedures

4 12-AUG-2020

Attachment 8 NYSDEC Sewer Submittal Procedures

6 04-OCT-2019

Attachment 9 Excavation Permit Policy 5 21-OCT-2021 to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Contract Data

Requirements List

16 26-SEP-2022

Attachment 1 Statement of Work 63 17-JAN-2023 Attachment 10 Confined Space Entry

Procedures

45 20-JAN-2015

Attachment 11 Fort Drum Exterior Utility Standards

33 28-MAR-2018

Attachment 12 Contractors Final Affidavit

1 13-JUL-2022

Attachment 13 Fort Drum Hazardous Waste Management Plan

51 01-AUG-2019

Attachment 14 Performance Assessment Questionnaire

4 17-JAN-2023

Attachment 15 AFFF Release SOP 6 09-JAN-2020 Attachment 16 HexFoam SOP 4 13-JUL-2022 Attachment 17 Construction Hold Point

Template

2 13-JUL-2022

Attachment 18 QCQA Report Template 4 13-JUL-2022 Attachment 19 DD Form 1354 Transfer and Acceptance of DoD

2 01-APR-2013

Attachment 2 Engineering Form 4025 2 01-MAY-2017 Attachment 20 Application and

Certificate for Payment AIA Docu

2 01-JAN-1992

Attachment 21 SPDES GP-0-20-001 69 29-JAN-2020 Attachment 22 AIA Document G703 1 01-JAN-1992 Attachment 23 Solicitation RFI

Responses, W911S222R8001, MATOC

14 17-JAN-2023

Attachment 3 IMDR-ES Form 2 Application for Sponsorship

2 01-JAN-2016

Attachment 4 Fort Drum's SOP for Electrical Outages

2 03-OCT-2022

Attachment 5 Endangered Species Act Requirements

2 29-DEC-2020

Attachment 6 Fort Drum Endangered Species Act Implementing Document

19 01-JAN-2021

Attachment 7 Water Supply Improvement Submittal Procedures

4 12-AUG-2020

Attachment 8 NYSDEC Sewer Submittal Procedures

6 04-OCT-2019

Attachment 9 Excavation Permit Policy 5 21-OCT-2021

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

PART I – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1. NOTICES TO OFFERORS.

1.1. COMPETITION. This acquisition is a 100% competitive 8(a) set-aside, pursuant to the requirements of FAR section 19.805, Competitive 8(a).

1.2. NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE. The NAICS code for this acquisition is 236220. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that its System for Award Management (SAM) registration includes this NAICS. If it does not, contract award may be delayed.

1.3. RESERVED.

1.4. OFFER ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. See Standard Form 1442, SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD, BLOCK 13 D AND BLOCK 17. Offerors providing less than 180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered for award and will be rejected. If the Offeror would like to provide more than 180 calendar days to be considered, the number of days must be inserted in BLOCK 17. Failure to insert a number into BLOCK 17 shall mean the Offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.

1.5. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. Offerors are reminded of the requirement for performance and payment bonds (SEE BLOCK 12A. of the STANDARD FORM 1442 – SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD and FAR Clause 52.228-15 -- Performance and Payment Bonds -- Construction).

1.6. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM). To be eligible for award of a Department of Defense (DoD) contract, Contractor registration in the SAM data base is required (see FAR Clause 52.204-7). Failure to register with SAM shall make the Contractor ineligible for award. New registration in SAM can take a few weeks. Therefore, it is critical that Offerors interested in this solicitation complete their SAM registration in sufficient time to meet solicitation representation and certification requirements.

1.7. AMENDMENTS. No Offerors mailing list will be maintained. It is the responsibility of all interested parties wishing to offer on this requirement to monitor SAM.gov for any/all amendments to this solicitation. The Offeror is required to acknowledge amendments in block 19 of the SF 1442. Failure to respond to an amendment shall render the offer ineligible for award and thereby rejected.

1.8. SOLICITATION PROVISIONS/REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS. The Offeror must have completed the Representations and Certifications section within their SAM record or in FAR 52.204-8 in this solicitation. Representations and certifications shall be updated within the SAM system as necessary, but as a minimum, an annual update is required.

1.9. Reserved.

1.10. VETS-4212. Federal Contractors and subcontractors who receive Federal contracts of $150,000 or more are required to annually file, no later than September 30th of each year, Form No. VETS-4212 entitled "Federal Contractor Veterans' Employment Report" with the Department of Labor. In addition, all Federal Contracting Officers are prohibited from awarding contracts or disbursing funds to Federal contractors or subcontractors that have not submitted a current VETS-4212 Report. For more information on this requirement, see the following website: http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm

1.11. SOLICITATION QUESTIONS. Questions shall be in writing and e-mailed to samara.e.johnson.civ@army.mil and alfredo.m.sanchez.civ@army.mil. Questions concerning this solicitation will be accepted up to 13 January 2023, 4:00PM EST. Fort Drum does not commit to providing responses to questions submitted after THIS DATE; however attempts to answer all relevant questions will be made.

1.12. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION. All offers must be received in hard copy and a digital copy on compact disk (CD) prior to the offer due date in block 13 of this solicitation (first page). All hard copies shall be executed with the original signature of the Offeror. The Request for Proposal (RFP) contains provisions and other items required to be completed by the Offeror and returned with its proposal. Failure to provide this information with the proposal shall render the proposal non-responsive and not eligible for award. The hard copy documents shall be clearly marked containing the solicitation number: Fort Drum Multiple Award Task Order Contract, Solicitation# W911S222R8001, and mailed or hand carried to:

Mission & Installation Contracting Command – Fort Drum 4205 Po Valley Rd.

Fort Drum, NY 13602

1.13. In addition to the formal name, address, and UEI number of the Offeror, Offeror shall submit the names, address, and UEI number for proposed subcontractors, all joint members, and all limited liability company members as applicable.

1.14. PROPOSALS. The Offeror shall submit a proposal that addresses all evaluation areas, specifically identifying how the proposed contractual requirements will be satisfied. A Government team will evaluate each proposal strictly in accordance with its content and will not assume that performance will include areas not specified.

1.15. FACTORS. The proposals will be evaluated on five factors: Management Capability, Experience, Bonding Capacity, Key Personnel, and Past Performance.

2. JOINT VENTURES. There are specific requirements that a Joint Venture (JV) must satisfy to submit an offer. Therefore, Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture shall provide the following information with its proposal: A description of who will have control over the JV and the percentage of control, the management structure of the Joint Venture, who will manage the contract, the relative amount of work to be performed by each party, and who will perform each contract task. The names, signatures, titles, and UEI number of each participant in the joint venture shall be set forth in the proposal.

2.1 VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF SMALL BUSINESS JOINT VENTURES. In accordance with the Class Deviation 2023-O0001, joint venture offerors must also comply with the following:

A small business joint venture offeror must submit, with its offer, the representation required in paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in accordance with 52.204-8(d) and 52.212-3(b) for the following categories:

(A) Small business;

(B) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business;

(C) Women-owned small business (WOSB) under the WOSB Program;

(D) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business under the WOSB Program; or

(E) Historically underutilized business zone small business.

3. PROPOSAL FORMAT. Written proposals shall be submitted in six Sections. Each section shall be in the format as follows:

Proposal Section TOTAL

MAXIMUM

ALLOWED

PAGES

Section I: Executed Request for Proposal (Filled out Section 00600 and Joint Venture and or Contractor Team Arrangement documentation, if applicable)

Section II: Factor 1: Management Capability 200 Section III: Factor 2: Experience 200 Section IV: Factor 3: Bonding Capacity 50 Section V: Factor 4: Key Personnel 200 Section VI: Factor 5: Past Performance No Maximum

*NOTE: Offerors are cautioned that any information beyond the maximum number of pages will not be evaluated.

3.1. Proposals shall be clearly and concisely written, indexed (cross-indexed, as appropriate) and logically assembled. All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered and identified with the solicitation number. Offerors shall include a cover page for each Section, which clearly identifies the Section Name (e.g., Section II, Management Capability), Solicitation Number, and Date of Submission.

3.2. The Offeror’s written proposal shall be submitted in Adobe Acrobat PDF format using standard 8.5 x 11 inch layout in portrait orientation. This applies to both hard copy and digital copy. The proposal pages shall be numbered. Each page must have a one-inch margin at the top, the bottom, and on each side. Page numbers, notations of proprietary information, and any other identifying information on each page are excluded from the margin requirement. Print must be spaced at six lines per inch. Text font shall be Times New Roman and no smaller than 11 point, but text included on figures and/or matrices may be reduced to 8 point. An Offeror’s proposal must meet the Government’s readability requirement and smaller type shall not be used to circumvent the proposal page limitations.

3.3. Section I, Executed Request for Proposal, shall be submitted both in hard copy and compact disk (CD). The second page of the SF 1442 shall be signed and dated, and the first page of all amendments to the solicitation shall be signed and dated (if applicable).

All hard copies shall be executed with the original signature of the Offeror. Digital copies shall be included with the hard copy proposal submission. Provisions, Representations and Certifications required by the solicitation as set forth in Section 00100, PART I – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, and NOTICES TO OFFERORS, Paragraph 1.8 shall be completed and submitted as part of the proposal. All required documentation, whether digital or hard copy, must be received no later than 4:00PM EST on 3 February 2023. Proposals received after solicitation closing date shall be considered ineligible for award.

3.4. Section II, Factor 1: Management Capability; Section III, Factor 2: Experience, Section IV, Factor 3: Bonding Capacity, Section V: Factor 4: Key Personnel, and Section VI: Factor 5: Past Performance, are required in both hard copy and compact disk (CD). They shall follow the format outlined in this paragraph.

3.5. The proposal should be specific, detailed, and complete to demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the solicitation requirements. Statements such as “the Offeror understands, assumes, can, or will comply with the Statement of Work,” statements that paraphrase the Statement of Work (SOW), or contain ambiguous phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” will be considered unacceptable.

4. FACTOR 1: MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY.

4.1. SUBFACTOR 1 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH. The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s proposed Management Approach to assess the Offerors knowledge and understanding of the technical requirements to successfully perform all the construction services described in the SOW. The Offeror must submit the following information/items in its proposal:

4.1.1. Its organizational structure delineating lines of management authority and where decision-making authority lies within the organization. The structure shall include subcontractors and/or contractor teaming arrangements, if applicable.

4.1.2. A final Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQCP) written in accordance with the requirements in SOW Part 8, paragraph 8.13.2.1.

4.1.3. A description of its management approach to construct simultaneously and successfully three (3) or more projects with an estimated value between $1M and $15M for each project.

4.1.4. A description of its management approach and the ability to design simultaneously and successfully three (3) or more design-build projects with an estimated cost of construction (ECC) between $1M and $15M for each project.

4.2. SUBFACTOR 2: SAFETY. The Offeror shall submit an Experience Modification Rate (EMR) from its Insurance Company for the past three years.

4.2.1. The EMR represents an Offeror’s historical cost of injuries and future risk, which correlates to the effectiveness of an Offeror’s safety program and its ability to provide a safe workplace for employees, subcontractors and government personnel on the worksite

5. FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE.

5.1. SUBFACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE. The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s construction experience and ability to successfully perform the construction services required in the SOW. The Offeror shall submit five (5) projects it has completed within six years from the release date of the solicitation that demonstrate its experience and ability to successfully perform the following construction disciplines:

1) HVAC.

2) Fire Protection.

3) Roads and Paving.

4) Earthwork and Grading.

5) Foundation and Site Work.

6) Communications.

7) Inside Electrical.

8) Utility Infrastructure.

5.1.1. The offeror shall ensure each of the above construction disciplines are represented in at least one of the five projects.

5.2. SUBFACTOR 2: DESIGN BUILD EXPERIENCE. The Offerors shall describe their design-build capabilities by providing written evidence of the experience of their architectural/engineering design personnel (to include subcontractors, and/or contractor teaming arrangements, if applicable) proposed for this contract. SF330 forms shall be provided to include all firms/team members of the design team with a minimum of five (5) example projects included, completed within six years from the release date of the solicitation (Offerors may submit projects used for the Construction Experience subfactor). Demonstration of capabilities will include the following design disciplines:

(1) Fire Protection Engineering.

(2) Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing Engineering.

(3) Structural Engineering.

(4) Civil Engineering.

(5) Architecture.

(6) Land Surveying.

(7) Environmental Engineering.

6. FACTOR 3: BONDING CAPACITY.

6.1. Performance and Payment Bond capacity shall be evaluated to ensure that an Offeror can provide adequate bonds to protect the interests of the Government and fulfill the requirements of the contract. Bonds will be considered acceptable when the Offeror provides documentation at the time of proposal, with verification from the Surety or Bond Company, to demonstrate an aggregate bonding capacity of $60,000,000.00. The corporate bond surety must appear on the Department of Treasury Listing of Approved Sureties (Department Circular 570).

7. FACTOR 4: KEY PERSONNEL.

7.1. SUBFACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL. The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s proposed Key Personnel to assess whether the Offeror has the personnel required to successfully perform all the construction services described in the SOW.

Key Personnel are identified in the SOW, Part 1, Paragraph 1.3. The Offeror shall submit resumes for each of its key personnel and identify their job titles, specific duties, responsibilities, and qualifications.

7.2. SUBFACTOR 2: DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL. The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s proposed key design team personnel to assess whether the Offeror has the personnel required to successfully complete designs for design-build projects. The Offeror shall submit SF 330s to be used to evaluate an Offerors qualifications and experience. Offerors may submit the same SF 330s submitted for Factor 2 Experience, Subfactor 2, Design-Build Experience if the resumes for their design team personnel are listed in those SF 330s.

8. FACTOR 5: PAST PERFORMANCE.

8.1. The past performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with an Offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by that Offeror’s record of past performance. In this context, “Offeror” refers to the proposed prime Contractor and contractor teaming arrangements, subcontractors, or joint ventures. Past performance shall be assessed by evaluating aspects of the Offeror’s relevant, and recent past performance, and how well they performed on prior contracts. Sources of past performance information for evaluation will be provided by the Offeror from the Performance Assessment Questionnaire, which will be tailored to this acquisition. Offerors are advised that the Government may use data provided in the Offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources, including but not limited to, other contracts or subcontracts (whether listed or not), and established performance reporting systems such as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Information may also be obtained from other sources such as the Defense Contract Management Agency, State Department Watch Lists, and interviews with Program Managers, and Contracting Officers.

Offerors shall, at a minimum, submit the same five (5) projects submitted for Factor 2, Subfactor 1, Construction Experience, for evaluation under this factor.

8.1.1. Relevant Assessment. A relevancy determination of the Offeror’s past performance will be made (including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s)). The past performance information provided in the proposal and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance information.

8.1.2. Recent Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information provided in the proposal and information obtained from other sources will be made to determine if it is recent.

8.1.3. Performance on prior contracts. The past performance evaluation is intended to determine how well the Offeror, subcontractor, joint venture partner(s), and/or contractor teaming arrangements performed on prior contracts. Offerors shall identify and submit a separate reference for five of the most similar/relevant federal, state, local government, and private sector contracts and subcontracts the firm has performed within the last six years, these references must be from the same projects submitted under Factor 1, Subfactor 1, Management Approach; Factor

2. Subfactor 1, Construction Experience; Factor 2, Subfactor 2, Design-Build Experience. To comply with this requirement. Offerors shall send the Performance Assessment Questionnaire found in Attachment 14 of the RFP to its references (individuals and organizations) request them to e-mail the completed questionnaires to samara.e.johnson.civ@army.mil and alfredo.m.sanchez.civ@army.mil on or before the due date. The Government will consider the information gathered from The Performance Assessment Questionnaire as well as information obtained from any other source when evaluating the Offeror’s past performance.

END OF PART I – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

PART II – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. BASIS OF AWARD.

1.1. The Government intends to award to all Offerors an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) Repair, Rehabilitation and Minor Construction (RRC) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) who are a responsible source, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation. Incomplete offers shall be considered ineligible for award. As set forth in FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offerors’ initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If negotiations are deemed necessary, and proposal revisions are requested, they shall be submitted as an edited version of the original PDF document(s) with revised text readily identifiable using bolded font, red in color. The proposals will be evaluated on five factors: Management Capability, Experience, Bonding Capacity, Key Personnel, and Past Performance.

1.2. The Government will evaluate each proposal under source selection procedures to determine the extent to which each proposal demonstrates both the capability to perform and a clear understanding of the MATOC IDIQ requirements.

1.3. Proposals shall meet solicitation requirements and will be evaluated to determine which proposal is technically acceptable based on the evaluation factors. Award will be made to the acceptable and responsible Offeror whose proposal meets the capability standards for non-cost factors in accordance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation and evaluation procedures set forth in Section 00100 of the solicitation.

1.4. The Government will assess the proposal against the evaluation factors to ensure they meet the minimum requirements of the evaluation factors. The Government will evaluate the information presented in the proposal. Where the Government has specified a maximum number of pages, any information above the maximum specified limitation will not be evaluated.

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA.

2.1. Evaluation criteria consists of factors and subfactors. The proposals will be evaluated under five evaluation factors: Management Capability, Experience, Bonding Capacity, Key Personnel, and Past Performance.

2.2. The Government’s primary objective is to select an awardee(s) for the proposed contract(s) that is technically acceptable based on the application of evaluation factors and analysis of the proposal submitted.

2.3. EVALUATION FACTORS.

2.3.1. FACTOR 1: MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. To be considered technically acceptable, Offerors must provide the information identified in the subfactors set forth below as required by the solicitation. Management Capability will be based on the following subfactors:

2.3.1.1. SUBFACTOR 1: MANAGEMENT APPROACH. The Management Approach sub-factor is met when an Offeror’s proposal contains the following:

2.3.1.1.1. A detailed description of the proposed organizational structure (to include subcontractors and/or contractor teaming arrangements, if applicable) delineating lines of management authority, where decision making for task order awards must reside at the local level.

2.3.1.1.2. A Final Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQCP) that meets the requirements in SOW

Part 8, paragraph 8.13.2.1.

2.3.1.1.3. A detailed description of its management approach demonstrating that it can simultaneously and successfully construct three (3) or more projects with an estimated value between $1M and $15M for each project.

2.3.1.1.4. A detailed description of its management approach demonstrating that it can simultaneously and successfully design three (3) or more design-build projects with an ECC between $1M and $15M for each project.

2.3.1.2. SUBFACTOR 2: SAFETY. This subfactor is met when the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an Experience Modification Rate of 1.0 or lower. An EMR of 1.0 is the industry average.

2.3.1.3. Each MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY subfactor will receive one of the ratings defined below. The subfactor ratings will be used to determine an overall rating for the factor. An Offeror receiving an unacceptable rating for any subfactor within the Management Capability factor will receive an unacceptable overall rating for the factor and will not be considered for award.

Management Capability Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

2.3.2. FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE.

2.3.2.1. SUBFACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE. This subfactor is met when an Offeror submits a minimum of five projects it has completed within six years from the release date of the solicitation, that demonstrate its experience and ability to successfully complete projects which contain the eight-construction disciplines found in Part I – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, paragraph 5. Factor 2 Experience, Subfactor 1 Construction Experience.

2.3.2.2. SUBFACTOR 2: DESIGN BUILD EXPERIENCE. This subfactor is met when an Offeror submits a minimum of five projects it has completed within six years from the release date of the solicitation, that demonstrate its experience and ability to successfully complete projects which contain the seven-design disciplines found in Part I – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, paragraph 5. Factor 2 Experience, Subfactor 2 Design Build Experience.

2.3.2.3. Each EXPERIENCE subfactor will receive one of the ratings defined below. The subfactor ratings will be used to determine an overall rating for the factor. An Offeror receiving an unacceptable rating for any subfactor within the EXPERIENCE factor will receive an unacceptable overall rating for the factor and will not be considered for award.

Experience Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings Adjectival Rating Description

2.3.3. FACTOR 3: BONDING CAPACITY. This factor is met when the Offerors submits bonding information in accordance with Part I – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, paragraph 6. Factor 3, Bonding Capacity.

Bond Capacity Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings Adjectival Rating Description

2.3.4. FACTOR 4: KEY PERSONNEL.

2.3.4.1. Subfactor 1: Construction Management Personnel. This factor is met when an Offeror satisfies the requirements of Part 1, Paragraph 1.3 of the SOW.

2.3.4.2. Subfactor 2: Design Team Personnel. This subfactor is met when an Offeror meets the minimum requirements stated in SOW Paragraph 1.3.4.

Key Personnel Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings Adjectival Rating Description

2.3.5. FACTOR 5: PAST PERFORMANCE.

2.3.5.1. Past Performance shall be assessed by evaluating aspects of the Offeror’s relevant, recent past performance, and how well they performed on prior contracts.

2.3.5.1.1. Relevant Assessment. To be relevant, the Offeror’s work experience must be similar in nature of work, size, complexity, and scope to that required under the solicitation. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine if it is the same/similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation. When determining the relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the Offeror, subcontractor, contractor teaming arrangement, and/or joint venture whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated.

2.3.5.1.2. Recent Assessment. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the six years prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation. Recent past performance is defined as not more than six years prior to the RFP release date.

2.3.5.1.3. Performance on prior contracts. For performance on prior contracts to be evaluated as acceptable, an Offeror, subcontractor, contractor teaming arrangement, and/or joint venture partner must be rated “Satisfactory Confidence” or higher on the Performance Assessment Questionnaire, and “Satisfactory” or higher in CPARS. Past performance information rated below the standards above shall be determined Unacceptable.

2.3.5.1.4. An Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can reasonably be assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (“neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.” IAW FAR Subpart 19.6 Certificates of Competency and Determinations of Responsibility, any Offeror determined “unacceptable” during evaluation of its proposal shall have the matter referred to the SBA Government Contracting Area Office in the area where the headquarters of the Offeror is located for a Certificate of Competency determination.

Past Performance Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

END OF PART II – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

(End of Summary of Changes)