7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 133 KB Posted

Attached to
Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for Enterprise Classroom Program (ECP)
Solicitation number
W911S024R0005
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and draft request for proposal for an enterprise classroom program. The past performance questionnaire is a form to be completed by a contractor and federal point of contact to evaluate the contractor's performance on prior contracts in areas such as meeting requirements, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and other relevant information. The draft RFP seeks a single-award IDIQ contract for recurring enterprise classroom sustainment and technology services at Fort Eustis, Virginia. The contract would have a one-year base period and two option years, with firm-fixed price CLINs and an 8(a) set-aside competitive scope. Anticipated services include turnkey classroom support.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

APPENDIX D – ENCLOSURE 2

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor: Contract No.:

Subcontract No. (if applicable):

POC: Title:

(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., & E-mail Address)

The following questions pertain to the Contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with

Contractor performance were experienced for which the Contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with Contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to

Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Good

Acceptable

Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

Acceptable

Acceptable

Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’

Interest

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Acceptable

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .