A0001_Attachment 10 PPQ.pdf

PDF 242 KB Posted

Attached to
Test Engineering and Analysis Services (TEAS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9115124R0030
Issued by
Department of the Army

About this file

The document is a Performance Questionnaire related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Test Engineering and Analysis Services (TEAS) issued by the U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), Theater Support Center (TSC).

The RFP is seeking offers for a Cost-Plus Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract with Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost, and CPFF Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for a 30-day contract phase-in, 11-month base period, and four one-year option periods. The requirement is an 8(a) set-aside competition conducted as a Best Value Tradeoff source selection. Offerors must submit proposals by 3:00 PM EST on November 26, 2024 and can submit Requests for Information (RFIs) up to 3:00 PM EST on November 6, 2024. The questionnaire requests the respondent to provide a past performance assessment and rating (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence) with rationale for the offeror across several criteria including compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, and customer satisfaction.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

THEATER SUPPORT CENTER

HQ MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND (MICC)

October 24, 2024

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W91151-24-R-0030

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), Theater Support Center (TSC), is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government contracts as compared to solicitation W91151-24-R- 0030. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

The prospective Offeror will complete Part I. I respectfully request you complete Part II with BOTH a rating and rationale for the rating.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the MICC-TSC Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist herein, no later than five (5) days after receipt of request or by 10:00 AM EDT on November 15, 2024, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the undersigned, ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialist, avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Any questions may be directed to the undersigned.

Sincerely, Ingrid V. Smith Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Government Contract Specialist, Avangela Ligons-Sutton via avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror competing for the requirement)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent Point of Contact) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

F. Comparison to TEAS scope. Please check if your contract included any (or all) of the following services:

Test planning Software analysis Foreign National / Media Escorts

Coordination, execution, and reporting of test results

Software development Access control monitors

Data collection, entry, and analysis

Data management Program and Project Management

Engineering and technical support

Manpower and Personnel Integration

(MANPRINT)

Flight safety and systems engineering support services

Technical writing and editing

Process automation support

Comments:

G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments:

H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): Telephone Number:

I. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Points of Contact identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .