Attachment 5 PPQ_Amendment 02.pdf

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-ORLANDO

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32826-3224

2 July 2020

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W900KK-20-R-0058, Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Technology Refresh at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC).

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command (ACC) Orlando is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 333318. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the 12211 Science Drive Orlando FL 32826-3224, no later than 4:00pm EDT on 13 July 2020. Submit your completed questionnaire to shonna.l.ayers.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to Shonna Ayers at 407-208-3336 or the undersigned at 407-208-3079 or by email at jason.c.graham8.civ@mail.mil.

Sincerely, JASON C. GRAHAM

Contracting Officer mailto:shonna.l.ayers.civ@mail.mil mailto:jason.c.graham8.civ@mail.mil

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Specialist and the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Acceptable

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Acceptable

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Acceptable

Comments:__________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Acceptable

Comments:__________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Sepcialist identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.