Attachment 2 Requriement Matrix_July2020_Amendment 02.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 75 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JRTC tower replacements/JMRC tech. refresh Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-20-R-0058
About this file
This document contains a requirements matrix and performance work statement for a federal solicitation seeking offers to replace four tactical communication towers and shelters at Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and perform a technology refresh at one tower at JRTC and two tower sites at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC). Offerors must demonstrate how their technical approach meets the requirements defined in the performance work statement such as designing new towers consistent with geography, regulations and the existing fiber optic network; conducting certified modeling analysis; and considering standard tower hardware. Submission requirements include past performance references for relevant contracts within the past three years and describing experience with FCC, FAA and spectrum management requirements. The closing date is not specified due to technical difficulties in releasing the amended solicitation under number W900KK-20-R-0058 from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W900KK-20-R-0058 Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 PPQ_Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Cost Workbook_Amendment 02.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Responses to CTC Tower Efforts Questions_Jul2020_Amendment 02.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 JRTC and JRMC Tower PWS_25 JUN 20_Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| W900KK-20-R-0058 Amendment 02 Conformed Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4_ Cost Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 8_DBA_Wage_Determination_LA20200006.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3_ CDRLs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 LT2 Instruction.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5_ PPQ.PDF | ||
| Attachment 7_Industry_Comment Form.doc | DOC document | |
| W900KK-20-R-0058 Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Requirement Matrix_20200610v1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1_ PWS_PWS_2019_031_CTC_Tower_ Replacement.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JRTC_Technical
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Technical Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| A | JRTC - TECHNICAL | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | PWS 3.1.2 - The offeror's solution is consistent with the geography of Fort Polk, JRTC CTC operational schedule, Ft. Polk and County/State regulations, current tower locations, and current existing fiber optic network (FON) ring when designing the new towers and locations (see Appendix A of PWS). | Spec Para 3.1.2 | |||
| 2 | PWS 3.1.3 - The offeror's proposed approach for site surveys at each tower location is viable considering the existing conditions, the scope of the work intended for the project, the new tower locations (within 500 meters of the existing locations), and construction, demolition and removal of construction debris is considered. | ||||
| 3 | PWS 3.1.4 - The offeror's approach in conducting certified modeling tool's analysis output provides 98% overall network (LTE and P25 radio) coverage of the maneuver area under the full load of a training rotation; historical model analysis data from past Tower programs that demonstrates correlation shall be included. | ||||
| 4 | PWS 3.1.5 The offeror's approach considers the JRTC Standard Tower Hardware, Appendix C of PWS. | ||||
| 5 | PWS 3.1.6 The offeror's solution provides an additional capability to handle 75% more equipment antenna space on the towers and 50% more shelter rack space, for potential future tower/shelter upgrades. | ||||
| 6 | PWS 3.1.7 The offeror's approach complies with: 1) FAA Regulatory Policy Title 14 CFR Part 77 for all new Towers; 2) the latest revision of Advisory Circular 70/7460-1L - Obstruction Marking and Lighting; and 3) with FAA regulations and requirements for all new and existing Towers. | ||||
| 7 | PWS 3.1.9 The offeror's solution is in accordance with ACI 318 and AISC-LRFD, for all new and existing Towers. | ||||
| 8 | PWS 3.2.1 The offeror's tower design is a self-supporting (three platform minimum) galvanized (no guy wires) Class III structure per TIA-222-H and includes the use of UFGS 09 97 13.25 Part 2. | ||||
| 9 | PWS 3.2.2 The Offeror's proposed Tower and site design sustains environmental conditions of 95 mph winds, and 30 mph winds with ½ inch of ice as defined by TIA-222-H (Vernon Parish, LA). | ||||
| 10 | PWS 3.2.2 The Offeror's tower and site design provides climbing provisions consistent with TIA-222-H, complete with anchorages and platforms for regular periodic maintenance or trouble shooting of antenna systems. | ||||
| 11 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a grounding system in accordance with the IEEE Standard 142. The proposed total resistance of the structure’s connected primary grounds as referenced to remote earth does not exceed 10 ohms. | ||||
| 12 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a lightning arresting system in accordance with NFPA 780: Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems. | ||||
| 13 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower design provides a FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5345-43 compliant obstruction light system for night-time operation installed in accordance with Chapter 5 of FAA Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-1, and painted in accordance with Chapter 5 of FAA Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-1 and ASTM A123 and A153. | ||||
| 14 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a four (4)-sided perimeter FE-6 security fence around the tower with one key control entrance that provides code measurement layout of facilities and access capability within. | ||||
| 15 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a Transient Voltage Surge Suppressor (TVSS); sized to the amperage and/or voltage required of each panel, grounded, wired to the panel, and also connected to the grounding system. | ||||
| 16 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a back-up Power Generator that seamlessly converts and operates to provide power to the tower site for 48 hours of uninterrupted operations. The Generator is the same model as used in construction of the newest towers at JRTC (North Fort / Land Expansion). (See Appendix C of the PWS) | ||||
| 17 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's tower and site design provides a Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) that provides continuous power to all communication equipment during the time interval between the loss of commercial power source, detection, and start of back-up generators, provides line surge and over voltage protection for all core equipment, and provides full load operations for a minimum of 1 hour until equipment can be safely brought down or power restored. The UPS system shall have sufficient capacity to power any alarms, modems, multi-coupler, amplifier, and/or other ancillary equipment for 1 hour, at a maximum design load plus twenty-five (25 %) future growth. | ||||
| 18 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's approach provides a Asentria S550-6 Siteboss alarm/monitoring system (temperature, UPS/loss of power/shelter access at a minimum) with communication to Building 1560. | ||||
| 19 | PWS 3.2.2 The offeror's approach provides a shelter to house and protect electrical and electronic equipment installed in meeting the PWS requirements. The shelter design shall maximize commonality with the newly established JOC Tower and Land Expansion Towers. The shelters shall be concrete pre-cast with stone aggregate exterior, installed on a reinforced poured concrete slab secured with metal tie-down plates and contain an integrated grounding system that meets the guidelines of Motorola R56. A single point ground is provided for all equipment and systems within the shelter and each equipment rack shall have a sub- system ground bar (SSG) that provides a location for racked equipment to be properly grounded. The shelter shall be sized to accommodate all equipment with additional square footage to accommodate an additional 50% more racks for future growth. | ||||
| 20 | PWS 3.2.3 The offeror's tower design provides an additional capability to handle 50% more cabling and antennas for future upgrades. | Spec Para XXX | |||
| 21 | PWS 3.2.4 The offeror's approach provides a 100% equipment replacement design to make the new tower’s subsystems match the old tower’s capability. | ||||
| 22 | PWS 3.2.4.1 The offeror's tower design approach takes into consideration a future IC3NS OPFOR Cell Phones capability. | ||||
| 23 | PWS 3.3.1 The offeror's Southern tower and foundation loads analysis approach defines the new future capability upgrade margins. The design goal at the mimimum is the ability to support the subsystem identified in Attachment 1, PWS-2019-031, Section 3.3.4 and the additional capability of the IC3NS OPFOR Cell Phones Section 3.2.4.1. | ||||
| 24 | PWS 3.3.2 The offeror's foundation design approach provides how it meets the geotechnical report and the structural concrete in accordance with ACI 318-11. The foundation design approach brings the tower structure and foundation back into regulatory compliance. | ||||
| 25 | PWS 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 The offeror's solution provides a technology refresh of all of the equipment required to make the Southern Tower match the capability of the four new tower’s subsystems. |
JRTC_Management
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Techncial Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| B | JRTC - MANAGEMENT | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | The Offeror's technical approach/solution meets the technical requirements as defined in Section 3.1.1 of the Performance Work Statement, PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. The plan includes how the Offeror will accomplish the work while maintaining deconfliction with the JRTC rotation schedule. | ||||
| 2 | The Offeror's technical approach/solution meets the technical requirements as defined in Section 3.3.1 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | ||||
| 3 | The Offeror's technical approach/solution meets the technical requirements as defined in Section 3.3.2 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | ||||
| 4 | The Offeror's technical approach/solution meets the technical requirements as defined in Section 5.4.3.3 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. The Offeror's solution runs in parallel the legacy systems and the new systems during the two rotation period. The Offeror's solution specifically addresses the switchover design, back to the legacy systems if the new systems fail, so that the training rotation is not interupted. | ||||
| 5 | The Proposed Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule identify a plan for critical paths to be used to assess project progress, schedule risk, and corrective actions required to mitigate risk in compliance with the requirements in section 5.1 of the Performance Work Statement, PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0; dated 25 June 2020. | Spec Para XXX | |||
| 6 | The Offeror's approach adheres to the guidelines of Cybersecurity in compliance with the requirements in Section 5.8.1 and Section 5.8.2 of the Performance Work Statement, PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
JRTC_Logistics
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Techncial Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| C | JRTC - LOGISTICS | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | PWS 5.3 The Offeror's approach towards maintenance actions and support structure are aligned with the current two level LCCS maintenance concept (field and sustainment). | ||||
| 2 | The Offeror's technical approach/solutions in meeting the standardization requirement of the system and subsystems meets the requirement identified in PWS 3.2 and 5.3.4. | ||||
| 3 | The Offeror's approach in meeting the removal and disposal of legacy equipment requirement is in accordance with PWS 3.4 and 5.9.11 |
JRTC_PP
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Techncial Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| D | JRTC - PAST PERFORMANCE | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | The Offeror's past performance demonstrates their capability to provide technical and/or management expertise against the knowledge and skill sets required to fulfill the requirements as defined in the Attachment 1, PWS-2019-031, Section 3.0. | ||||
| Offeror's shall submit a list of at least a minimum of THREE (3) Government and/or commercial contracts in performance or awarded, during the past 3 years, from the issue date of this solicitation, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Minimally, 1 contract shall be submitted for the prime contractor. The remaining two contracts submitted may be for the prime contractor or major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor who is expected to spend 10% or more from the proposed effort. | |||||
| a. Offeror has submitted the Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code, DUNS Number, and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers) for proposed past performance contracts. | |||||
| b. For the proposed contracts, the contract type (specific type such as Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time and Materials (T&M)), Awarded price/cost, Final or projected final price/cost, Original delivery schedule, and Final delivery projected schedule or date has been provided. | |||||
| c. For the proposed contracts, the Government’s technical representative/COR, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers, if applicable have been provided. | |||||
| 2 | PWS 3.1.7 and 3.1.8 The Offeror has demonstrated their prior approach and their prior experience interfacing with the FCC and FAA and successfully meeting the FCC, FAA, and NOTAM’s requirements | ||||
| 3 | PWS 5.3.5 The Offeror's prior their approach and their prior experience interfacing with coordination obtaining DoD spectrum approval and successfully meeting the JF12/1494 requirements. | Spec Para XXX |
JMRC_Management
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Techncial Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| B | JMRC - MANAGEMENT | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | The Offeror' solution meets the technical requirements as defined in Section 4.1 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | ||||
| 2 | The Offeror's proposed Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule to identify a plan for critical paths to be used to assess project progress, schedule risk and corrective actions required to mitigate risk in compliance with the requirements in section 5.1 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | Spec Para XXX | |||
| 3 | The Offeror's solution adheres to guidelines of Cybersecurity in compliance with the requirements in Section 5.8.1 and Section 5.8.2 of the Performance Work Statement PWS-2019-031, Revision 1.0, dated 25 June 2020. | Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
| Spec Para XXX |
JMRC_PP
| Tactical Communication Tower Replacement at the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Techncial Refresh at Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) | |
| Offeror Requirements Matrix | |
| Company Name: | Company Name: |
Instructions to Evaluator: Use this matrix to determine compliance with the requirements of the Solicitation. You shall evaluate each requirement 'Acceptable' or 'Unacceptable' against each specified section of the Tactical Communication Tower Replacement Performance Work Statement Document PWS-2019-031 dated 9 Mar 2020. If determined 'Unacceptable' you shall provide justification in the Notes Section.
Note to Offerors: All proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has an understanding of the requirements and associated risks as well as possesses the resources and acumen in providing the solutions necessary to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation. The Government considers statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof, to be inadequate and unacceptable. The Government further considers mere reiteration of the requirement or standard reference material to also be inadequate and unacceptable. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.
In the reference section you shall provide a page number of your proposal which shows your compliance with the requirements identified below. If the page contains a significant amount of information, then you shall include the specific section/paragraph of the page. Only input data in the reference section. Data input in the acceptable, unacceptable or notes sections will not be considered.
| D | JMRC - PAST PERFORMANCE | Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Reference Section (Offeror) |
| 1 | The Offeror's past performance demonstrates their capability to provide technical and/or management expertise against the knowledge and skill sets required to fulfill the requirements as defined in the Attachment 1, PWS-2019-031, Section 4.0. | ||||
| Offeror's shall submit a list of at least a minimum of THREE (3) Government and/or commercial contracts in performance or awarded, during the past 3 years, from the issue date of this solicitation, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Minimally, 1 contract shall be submitted for the prime contractor. The remaining two contracts submitted may be for the prime contractor or major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor who is expected to spend 10% or more from the proposed effort. | |||||
| a. Offeror has submitted the Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code, DUNS Number, and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers) for proposed past performance contracts. | |||||
| b. For the proposed contracts, the contract type (specific type such as Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time and Materials (T&M)), Awarded price/cost, Final or projected final price/cost, Original delivery schedule, and Final delivery projected schedule or date has been provided. | |||||
| c. For the proposed contracts, the Government’s technical representative/COR, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers, if applicable have been provided. | |||||
| 2 | PWS 5.3.5 The Offeror's prior their approach and their prior experience interfacing with coordination obtaining DoD spectrum approval and successfully meeting the JF12/1494 requirements. | Spec Para XXX |
Sheet1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .