Attachment_0009_Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf
PDF 509 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-16-R-0070
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The U.S. Army Contracting Command is requesting past performance information from a point of contact regarding an offeror's performance on similar federal, state, or commercial contracts within the past three years. The questionnaire includes questions about compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness, timeliness of performance, cost control, customer satisfaction, and other performance factors to be rated on an adjectival scale. Respondents are asked to provide their contact information and return the completed questionnaire via email to the contracting officer by May 14, 2018 for consideration in awarding the contract.
The related federal contract opportunity notice is for logistics support facility management services to provide modifications to aviation systems owned by the U.S. Army's Program Executive Office Aviation. The North American Industry Classification System code is 336411 for aircraft manufacturing. The Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal intends to award a multiple award task order contract using full small business set-aside competition. Questions on the draft solicitation are due by August 11, 2017. The contract will provide urgent modification services to Army aviation systems.
Attachment 0009 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 72 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-REDSTONE
BUILDING 5303 MARTIN ROAD
REDSTONE ARSENAL, ALABAMA 35898-5000
12 April 2018
CCAM-AM-B
Aviation Maintenance Directorate
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W58RGZ-16-R-0070
Dear Sir/Ma’am;
The US Army Aviation and Missile Command is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the solicitation requirements. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the U.S. Army Contracting Command, ATTN: CCAM-AM-B (Mr. Matthew Horst), Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898- 5280, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 14 May 2018, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-lsf5@mail.mil
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to Mr.
Matthew Horst or the undersigned at (256) 842-8069.
Sincerely, Sarah A. Shaffer
Contracting Officer
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC: Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible.
Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number: Address:
E- mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Acceptable
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
Acceptable
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization: Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
| APPENDIX D |
| PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM |
| PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) |
| PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
| 2018-04-12T11:05:47-0500 | |
| SHAFFER.SARAH.ANN.1078131744 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .