Attachment_0024_RMF_Package_Deliverables_Rev002.docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-22-R-0026
About this file
This document package includes a federal solicitation for the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program and instructions for related classified and controlled unclassified information requests.
The solicitation seeks proposals for Phase 3 and 4 of the OMFV program, including detailed design, prototype build and testing efforts. The solicitation is identified as W56HZV-22-R-0026 and released by the Army Contracting Command - Detroit Arsenal in support of the Program Manager Maneuver Combat Systems. The document provides guidance for requesting classified and controlled unclassified information related to the solicitation, including required organizational information and security clearances. Additionally, it references attachments to the solicitation but notes all previous OMFV attachments are now obsolete.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 0024 – RMF Package Deliverables Instructions Solicitation No.: W56HZV-22-R-0026
Attachment 0024 RMF Package Deliverables Instructions
Solicitation No.: W56HZV-22-R-0026 Revision 002 Date: 23 June 2022
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
All data on this worksheet is subject to the contractor's disclosure statement(s) found on the "Contractor Coversheet"
Metadata Reference
| File Name |
| 1.a |
| Attachment 0024 RMF Package Deliverables Instructions |
| Reference Attachment |
| 2.a |
| Attachment 0024 |
| Contract Number |
| 2.b |
| W56HZV-22-R-0026 |
| Last Date Updated |
| 2.c |
| 23 June 2022 |
| Revision # |
| Date |
| Change Description |
| 000 |
| 3/29/2022 |
| a. Base Document |
| 001 |
| 5/27/2022 |
| a. Merged instructions with Attachment 0096. |
b. Updated KCMP
| 002 |
| 6/23/2022 |
| a. Changed Line Replacement Unit to the Line Replacement Component |
Introduction:
This purpose of this document is to provide instruction and formats for the RMF Package Deliverables.
The RMF Package Deliverable data will be used to satisfy the requirements of the RMF. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data product resulting from the work task described by the contract.
Reference documents. DoDI 8500.01, DoDI 8510.01, Trusted System Network per DoDI 5200.44, NIST 800-53r5 (Unclassified), DoD Cybersecurity Test and Evaluation Guidebook, version 2.0 change 1 (Unclassified).
The RMF package artifacts shall be delivered in a format approved by the Government’s Authorizing Official (AO) or Information Systems Security Manager (ISSM). The package components shall be made up of those in the package components list in the proceeding section.
The content of the RMF package artifacts shall contain the necessary artifacts required by the AO or ISSM to successfully achieve and maintain Authority to Operate (ATO).
Package Components:
(a) Authority to Operate (ATO) Requests
a. The ATO Request shall use the approved AO or ISSM format. The ATO Request shall use identify the ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘why’, ‘where’, ‘when’, and ‘how’ of the requested authorization. The ATO Request shall include the System Security Implementation Plan (SSIP), artifacts asserting NIST 800-53 control compliance and any supporting artifacts which attest to that compliance. An ATO Request may be submitted in-lieu of an IATT Request.
b. The ATO Request shall be delivered prior to the start of the Operation or Limited User Testing to the Program Office.
c. The purpose of this request is to deliver supporting artifacts to the Information System Security Engineer and Information System Security Manager to assist in receiving approval from the Authorized Official (AO) prior to testing.
(b) Assessment and Authorization (A&A) Project Plan
a. The A&A Project Plan shall be used to establish and executable Risk Management Framework activities to achieve and maintain an ATO and shall be completed prior to ICR. The A&A Project Plan shall establish timelines for documentation within the RMF Package Deliverables. The A&A Project Plan shall define the Tasks and Milestones needed to achieve and maintain IATT and/or ATO.
b. The purpose of this document is to assist the contractor, and corresponding government official, in planning their documentation deliveries and timelines
(c) A&A Tasks and Milestones
a. The A&A Tasks and Milestones shall be a list of tasks, deliverables, events, and milestones with status, risk, and schedule for achieving the A&A Project Plan. The A&A Tasks and Milestones shall have a section for schedule which identifies each task, deliverable, event, and milestone as on schedule, complete, behind schedule, and any dependencies required to achieve the schedule.
b. The contractor shall provide and update this document with every delivery of this DID. The A&A Tasks and Milestones shall be used to track tasks, events, deliveries, and schedule for achieving the A&A Project Plan.
c. The purpose of the document is to identify potential risks to meeting the A&A Project Plan and assign action to people for completing tasks.
(d) System Security Implementation Plan –
a. The SSIP shall contain System Information, Mission Description, Concept of Operations (CONOPS), Environment, Operating and Computing Environment, Physical Security Measures, Facilities Descriptions, Threat Analysis, System Architecture Description, Components, Configurations, Subsystem Configuration Files, Platform Diagrams, Accreditation Boundaries, External Interfaces and Data Flow, Internal Data Flow, Security Roles, Cybersecurity Countermeasures associated with Program Protection, Hardware Lists, Software Lists, Countermeasures, and Ports, Protocols, and Services (PPS).
b. The format shall be the template in the appendix of this document.
c. The SSIP shall include appendices for the RMF Implementation Plan (RIP), Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Plan, Key and Certificate Management Plan, Assessment and Authorization (A&A) Project Plan, and A&A Tasks and Milestones.
d. The purpose of the SSIP is to be a central authority which supports an ATO. The SSIP is intended to identify the system security practices and implementations.
(e) RMF Implementation Plan (RIP)
a. The RIP shall document compliance to all NIST 800-53 controls. The RIP shall identify all scoping and tailoring of controls for the system. . The RIP shall document NIST 800-53 controls as ‘Compliant’, ‘Inherited’, ‘Non-Compliant’, or ‘Not Applicable’.
b. The purpose of this deliverable is to document compliance to NIST 800-53. The document should trace to subsystem requirements and cyber resiliency requirements.
(f) Software Code Vulnerability Scans –
a. The software code vulnerability scans should be enabled through the DevSecOps environment.
b. The purpose for this deliverable is to provide the latest software code vulnerability scans at the time of ATO assessment.
(g) Operating System Vulnerability Scans –
a. The Operating System Vulnerability Scans should be enabled through the DevSecOps environment.
b. The purpose for this deliverable is to provide the latest software code vulnerability scans at the time of ATO assessment.
(h) Software/Firmware Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Plan –
a. The IAVM Plan shall address the NIST 800-53 Risk Assessment Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning control (RA-5).
b. The IAVM Plan shall document how the contractor monitors and scans for vulnerabilities in the system and hosted applications with frequency, events, and/or randomly defined and when new vulnerabilities potentially affecting the system are identified and reported. The IAVM Plan shall document vulnerability monitoring tools and techniques that facilitate interoperability among tools and automate parts of the vulnerability management process. The IAVM Plan shall document the process for remediating legitimate vulnerabilities for both operational and development environments. The IAVM plan shall document how, what, when, and where to share vulnerability information to help eliminate similar vulnerabilities in other systems and subsystems. The IAVM Plan shall be submitted in conjunction with the System Security Implementation Plan.
c. The purpose of this deliverable is to document compliance to NIST 800-53 control RA-5.
(i) Key and Certificate Management Plan (KCMP) –
a. The KCMP shall have sections for description and purpose of each cryptographic implementation, classification of information being protected by each cryptographic implementation, a list of keys and certificates, maintenance plan for deprecation and replacement of keys and certificates, description of where and how keys and certificates are generated, description of where backup keys and certificates are stored, and future upgrades. The list of keys and certificates shall uniquely identify each key and certificates with the following information: key or certificate type (ex: Test Keys, Operational Keys, Contingency Keys, Certificates, or Tokens), key specification, algorithm, size, date generated, date expired, location in operation (Examples: on maintenance device, in a specific Line Replaceable Component, or in production environment), and unique key identification if it’s part of a key pair.
b. KCMP shall document all information related to system keys and certificates.
c. The purpose of the KCMP is to provide all necessary information related to system keys.
(j) Plan of Action and Milestones –
a. The POA&M shall be considered a ‘living’ document and shall regularly be updated throughout the entire lifecycle of the System through Decommission. The POA&M shall contain all Not Applicable (N/A) IA Controls, All Non-Compliant IA Controls, and all Vulnerability Findings as identified in the Vulnerability Scans, STIGs, SRGs, and SCAP Benchmarks.
b. The purpose of the POA&M is to track plans of action for issues.
(k) Cyber Security Waiver –
a. Cyber Security Waivers shall include justification for waiver, cost to implement, length of time the waiver is applicable or the period of time to achieve compliance, identification of systems the waiver is applicable to, any analysis of alternatives, any information on tradeoff analysis performed, and other relevant information.
b. Cyber Security Waiver Requests shall be IAW with the Request for Variance Form, DD Form 1694, from https://www.esd.whs.mil/Directives/forms/
c. Acceptance of this deliverable shall not constitute acceptance nor concurrence of the waiver and does not free the contractor of any contractual obligations.
d. Cyber Security Waiver Requests provide capability for acknowledgement by the PM that compliance to a cybersecurity or set of cybersecurity requirements will not or cannot be achieved for a period of time for the System due to technology or Programmatic constraints.
Appendix A: SSIP Template
System Security Implementation Plan
Solicitation No.: W56HZV-22-R-0026 Date: DAY MONTH YEAR
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
SECURITY NOTICE: Contractor responses to the data requirements are likely to be at the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) level. For security related guidance and procedures on how to mark, handle, and transmit classified information, contractors should refer to the NISPOM Rule, supporting DD 254, and the OMFV Security Classification Guide (CUI) signed by PEO GCS on 18 February 2021.
All CUI responses should be marked with the following CUI Designation Indicator and Distribution Statement:
Controlled by: the name of the Offeror Company (not required if identified in the letterhead) Controlled by: identification of the office creating the document CUI Category(ies): CTI, EXPT Distribution Statement: D POC: name and phone number or email of POC
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only; Administrative or Operational Use; Export Control; date of determination is 18 February 2021. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the attention of the PM MCS Security Manager at: Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), ATTN: SFAE-GCS-C, 6501 E. 11 Mile Road, Detroit Arsenal, MI 48397-5000.
WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq.) as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate IAW provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.
1. SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
1.1. System Name/Title: [State the name of the system. Spell out acronyms.]
1.1.1. System Categorization: [Identify FIPS 199 categorization. Spell out acronyms.]
1.1.2. System Unique Identifier: [Insert the System Unique Identifier]
1.1.3. Systems Operational Status: [Operational, Under Development, Major Modification]
1.2. Responsible Organization:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
1.2.1. Information System Owner (Government point of contact responsible for providing and/or receiving CUI):
Name:
Title:
Office Address:
Work Phone:
e-Mail Address:
1.2.1.1. Program Manager:
Name:
Title:
Office Address:
Work Phone:
e-Mail Address:
1.2.1.2. Information System Security Manager:
Name:
Title:
Office Address:
Work Phone:
e-Mail Address:
1.3. General Description/Purpose of System: What is the function/purpose of the system? [Provide a short, high-level description of the function/purpose of the system. Include System Information, System Architecture Description and Diagram, Mission Description, and Concept of Operation.]
1.3.1. End users and privileged users: [In the table below, provide the users and administrators of the system. Include all those with privileged access such as system administrators, database administrators, application administrators, etc. Add rows to define different roles as needed. And define their roles / purpose.]
Roles of Users:
| User Type |
| Role / Purpose |
| [Identify User Type: End User, Crew, Gunner, Driver, Maintainer, Administrator, Privileged User] |
| [Identify the Role and Purpose for the user] |
1.4. General Description of Information: CUI information types processed, stored, or transmitted by the system are determined and documented. For more information, see the CUI Registry at https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-list. [Document the CUI information types processed, stored, or transmitted by the system below].
2. SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT
Include a detailed topology narrative and graphic that clearly depicts the system accreditation boundaries, system interconnections, and key devices. (Note: this does not require depicting every workstation or desktop, but include an instance for each operating system in use, an instance for portable components (if applicable), all virtual and physical servers (e.g., file, print, web, database, application), as well as any networked workstations (e.g., Unix, Windows, Mac, Linux), firewalls, routers, switches, copiers, printers, lab equipment, handhelds). If components of other systems that interconnect/interface with this system need to be shown on the diagram, denote the system boundaries by referencing the security plans or names and owners of the other system(s) in the diagram.
[Insert a system topology graphic. Provide a narrative consistent with the graphic that clearly lists and describes each system component.]
2.1. Include or reference a complete and accurate listing of all hardware (a reference to the organizational component inventory database is acceptable) and software (system software and application software) components, including make/OEM, model, version, service packs, and person or role responsible for the component. [Insert reference/pointer for data location and access.]
2.2. List all software components installed on the system. [Insert reference/pointer for data location and access.]
2.3. Hardware and Software Maintenance and Ownership - Is all hardware and software maintained and owned by the organization? [Yes/No - If no, explain:]
2.4. Countermeasures [Define any countermeasures associated with program protection. If none, write N/A:]
2.5. Ports, Protocols, and Services (PPS) [Define Ports, Protocols, and Services used by the system. include access control lists as applicable.]
2.6. Internal Interfaces and Data Flow [Define all internal interfaces and data flows for the system]
2.7. External Interfaces and Data Flow[Define all external interfaces and data flows for the system. Identify any and all ISA/MOA/MOUs on file and the stakeholders for these ISA/MOA/MOUs.]
2.8. System and Subsystem Configuration Files [Identify and append system and subsystem configuration files]
2.9. Physical Security Measures [Define physical security measures, ex: locks, doors, traps]
3. RECORD OF CHANGES
| Date |
| Description |
| Made By: |
4. RMF Implementation Plan
(Note: The source of the controls is NIST Special Publication 800-53)
| Control Number |
| Type |
| Control Title |
| Applicability |
| Evidence of Compliance |
| [Ex: AC-17(1)] |
| [Administrative, |
Technical, Policy]
| [Ex: Remote Access | Automated Monitoring / Control] |
| [Compliant, Non-Compliant, Inherited, Not Applicable] |
| [Justification for compliance / referenced documentation] |
Provide a thorough description of how all of the security requirements are being implemented or planned to be implemented. The description for each security requirement contains: 1) the security requirement number and description; 2) how the security requirement is being implemented or planned to be implemented; and 3) any scoping guidance that has been applied (e.g., compensating mitigations(s) in place due to implementation constraints in lieu of the stated requirement). If the requirement is not applicable to the system, provide rationale. The table may contain all NIST 800-53 controls, or be split into multiple tables by control family.
5. Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Plan
6. Assessment and Authorization (A&A) Project Plan
7. A&A Tasks and Milestones image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .