W56HZV17R0106-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0002 2018JAN29

W56HZV

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

ANITA B. STANFORD

EMAIL: ANITA.B.STANFORD.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-17-R-0106

2017DEC14

X

X 2018FEB20 01:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 16

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: ANITA B. STANFORD

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HTA-A/(586)282-0443

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Solicitation Number: W56HZV-17-R-0106

Amendment Number: 0002

1. Amendment 0002 to Solicitation Number W56HZV-17-R-0106 is issued to incorporate the following revisions:

A. Section L: Revised L.4.1.1(b) as follows:

FROM:

Relevant Past Performance will consider the extent to which the submitted contract efforts are comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the following statement of work requirements:

i. Building or Assembling Protection Kits to a Government Technical Data Package (TDP) for Military Vehicles that includes both

Transparent and Opaque Armor and;

ii. Building or Assembling of Protection Kits to include Transparent and Opaque Armor at a rate of 40 kits per month and;

iii. Provide similar or like packaging of Protection Kits in accordance with a Government TDP.

TO:

Relevant Past Performance will consider the extent to which the submitted contract efforts are comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the following statement of work requirements:

i. Building or Assembling Protection Kits to a Government Technical Data Package (TDP) for Military Vehicles (Air, Land, or Sea) that includes both Transparent and Opaque Armor and;

ii. Building or Assembling of Protection Kits to include Transparent and Opaque Armor at a rate of 20 kits per month and;

iii. Provide similar or like packaging of Protection Kits in accordance with a Government TDP.

B. Section M: Revised M.4.1 as follows:

FROM:

M.4.1 Past Performance Factor (Factor 1)

The Offerors Past Performance Volume will be evaluated utilizing three (3) considerations:

i. Building or Assembling Protection Kits to a Government Technical Data Package (TDP) for Military Vehicles that includes both

Transparent and Opaque Armor and;

ii. Building or Assembling of Protection Kits to include Transparent and Opaque Armor at a rate of 40 kits per month and;

iii. Provide similar or like packaging of Protection Kits in accordance with a Government TDP

TO:

M.4.1 Past Performance Factor (Factor 1)

The Offerors Past Performance Volume will be evaluated utilizing three (3) considerations:

i. Building or Assembling Protection Kits to a Government Technical Data Package (TDP) for Military Vehicles (Air, Land, or Sea) that includes both Transparent and Opaque Armor and;

2 16

W56HZV-17-R-0106 0002

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

ii. Building or Assembling of Protection Kits to include Transparent and Opaque Armor at a rate of 20 kits per month and;

iii. Provide similar or like packaging of Protection Kits in accordance with a Government TDP

C. Section M: Revised M.4.1.1 as follows:

FROM:

M.4.1.1 The Past Performance Factor will assess the expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on recent and relevant past contract performance information relevant to the requirements listed in L.4.1.1(b). This assessment will result in the application of a Confidence Rating.

TO:

M.4.1.1 The Government will use the contracts submitted IAW L.4.1.1 and may use other available information in the evaluation of Past

Performance. The Past Performance Factor will assess the expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on recent and relevant past contract performance information relevant to the requirements listed in L.4.1.1(b). This assessment will result in the application of a Confidence Rating.

D. Section J : Update Attachment 0009 - Special Packaging Instructions - Protection Kits as follows:

FROM:

Revision N

TO:

Revision M

E. Extend RFP:

FROM:

1:00PM - 6 FEB 2018

TO:

1:00PM - 20 FEB 2018

2. Except as provided Amendment 0002 to Solicitation Number W56HZV-17-R-0106, all other terms and conditions of this Solicitation remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

3 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Attachment 0009 SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS - PROTECTION KITS 21-DEC-2017 EMAIL

4 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 General Proposal Information________________________________

The Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) Protection Kits may consist of any of the following: 58-gallon B-Kits, 78-gallon B-Kits, Underbody Armor Kits, and Underbody Counterweight Kits. FMTV Protection Kits provide optimal Crew Compartment Occupant Protection.

L.1.1 The proposal, subject to the Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal paragraph of Instructions to Offeror(s)

Competitive Acquisitions (FAR Provision 52.215-1) contained in Section L of the solicitation, shall be submitted in the format and quantities set forth below. All information necessary for the review and evaluation of a proposal is to be contained in the proposal volumes set forth below. Section M of the solicitation sets forth the evaluation criteria and delineates the Factors to be evaluated and their relative order of importance. The Offeror's proposal, as required by this section, shall be evaluated as set forth in Section M of this solicitation.

L.1.2 Export Controlled Information

This solicitation contains Export Controlled information in Controlled Unclassified Attachments. It is the responsibility of the

Offeror, not the Government, to obtain the appropriate export licenses, or process appropriate export license exemption, necessary for authorization to share any such information with subcontractors who are foreign persons as defined in applicable export laws and regulations, or to obtain access to the files themselves. The Government may consider the failure or inability of an Offeror to obtain the appropriate export compliance documentation as grounds for rejection in accordance with M.2.

L.1.3 Facility Clearance Documentation

The Offeror shall submit a copy of the Offerors current Facility Clearance issued by the Defense Security Service (DSS) for any Offeror or subcontractor facility where classified documentation will be stored in performance of the contract. Offerors who are considering a subcontractor to handle classified material shall also submit documentation indicating that its subcontractor has obtained the necessary clearance in order to be considered for award. If the Offeror currently possesses an interim Facility Clearance issued by DSS, this shall be included with the proposal.

L.1.3.1 Requirement For Facility and Information System Security Clearance (SECRET).

The Offeror is notified that there is a classified specification in the PD MTV B-Kit TDPs. Offerors must have a copy of the classified specification, prior to proposal submission, in order to meaningfully respond to the solicitation. In order to receive the classified specification, offerors must possess appropriate Facility and Information System Security Clearances (SECRET) and have the ability to receive, view, house and safeguard SECRET materials. Unless the Offeror already possesses the classified specification, the Offeror shall request access to this document through the Contracting Officer. Offerors requesting access to the classified specification shall be certified in the Joint Certification Program (JCP), have an active System for Award Management (SAM) account, and submit a signed Non-

Disclosure Agreement (NDA) via e-mail to the usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.wrn-fmtv-b-kits@mail.mil. The Offerors requests shall include verification of their Facility and Information System Security Clearance, industrial facility security clearance (up to Secret, as a minimum), the name and phone number of the offeror's security officer, and an address for mailing the classified document.

L.1.4 Minimum Acceptance Period.

ACCEPTANCE PERIOD means the number of calendar days available to the Government for awarding a contract from the date specified in this solicitation for receipt of offers.

L.1.4.1.The Government requires a minimum acceptance period of 180 calendar days.

L.1.4.2. The offeror shall clearly state in its proposal Terms and Conditions volume the acceptance period. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the Government's minimum acceptance period stated above.

L.1.4.3. An offer allowing less than the Government's minimum acceptance period may be rejected.

L.2 Proposal Content, Format and Instructions_____________________________________________

L.2.1 Proposal Content

The Offeror's proposal shall include a cover letter and be submitted in three separate volumes as set forth below: The Offeror shall adhere to both the DOD 5220.22-M (NISPOM) and the governing "PEO CS&CSS Armoring Security Classification Guide", Attachment 0004, when marking, storing, and mailing classified material.

(a) The Cover Letter. The Offeror shall include a cover letter with the proposal. The Offeror shall ensure the cover letter identifies all volumes, documents, and enclosures provided on CD-ROMs or DVD's as described below. The cover letter shall be prepared on the companys letterhead.

5 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(b) Volume 1: Proposal Terms and Conditions Volume.__________________________________________________

Submit two identical sets of CD-ROMs or DVDs. In Volume 1, the Offeror shall provide the following:

A. A scanned image of a signed copy of the Standard Form (SF) 33 cover page of the RFP, signed by a person authorized to sign and commit the contractor to this proposal on behalf of the Offeror. The contractor shall provide the name, e-mail, and phone number of the person authorized to sign and commit the contractor and communicate with the Contracting Officer for this proposal. The Offeror shall ensure the proper completion of blocks 12, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 16, 17, and 18 on the SF 33.

B. One copy of this solicitation (Sections A-K) with all clause and other fill-ins completed, including Representations and

Certifications in Section K. The Offeror need not to separately submit System for Award Management (SAM) certifications.

C. The Offeror shall submit a statement of acknowledgement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation.

D. Assumptions. The offeror shall consolidate and identify all offeror's generated "assumptions" contained anywhere in the proposal.

Also, include a statement that none of the "assumptions" contradict or take exception to any terms, conditions, or requirements of the solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be grounds for the Contracting Officer to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference

M.2.1(d)) or determined to be a deficiency and render the proposal ineligible for award (Reference M.1.1.3(b)).

E. Offerors shall provide an affirmative statement that the Offeror does not have an Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) as it applies to this solicitation. (Reference L.2.5).

F. Offerors shall provide the offerors proposal acceptance period in terms of calendar days from the date for receipt of offers specified in the RFP. (Reference Section L.1.4)

G. Provide a main point of contact (POC) for the Government to communicate proposal related matters. Include the POC's name, title, phone number, email address, and mailing address

(c) Volume 2: Past Performance Factor. Submit two identical sets of CD-ROMs or DVDs.

(d) Volume 3: Price Factor. Submit two identical sets of CD-ROMs or DVDs.

L.2.1.1 All proposals shall be in English (American Standard) and shall be in US dollars. Proposals not in English (American Standard) or in US Dollars may be rejected. The proposal shall include all information specified and shall address all requirements outlined in

Section L.

L.2.1.2 Offerors are not authorized to include in the proposal citations for, or linkages to websites.

L.2.2 Proposal Format and Instructions

L.2.2.1 The Offeror shall submit each volume listed above on a separate set of CD-ROMs or DVDs. The offeror shall submit two identical sets of CD-ROMs or DVDs for each volume. The Offeror shall label one set of media as the primary copy and signed by a representative of the company authorized to submit proposals. In the case of defective file(s) on the primary disc, the second copy will be utilized only to retrieve and review the defective file(s) in question. If the primary disc is entirely defective, the second copy will be used entirely. All other data on the primary disc will take precedence. No hard copies or email proposals will be accepted.

L.2.2.1.1 Each CD-ROM or DVD shall be labeled so it is easily identifiable for evaluation purposes (example: Volume 3, Price Factor, Set

1 of 2, CD 1 of X), and shall also include the offeror's name and the solicitation number. Each volume shall include a (i) title page,

(ii) table of contents, and (iii) list of tables and figures. The Offeror shall number each page of the proposal, and each paragraph of the proposal shall have a reference number. A list of all attachments and substantiating data shall be provided in the table of contents. The Offeror shall organize the table of contents as set forth below. The table of contents shall include the following information for each Factor, attachment, and for all substantiating data listed:

(a) Cross-reference to related Section L paragraph number

(b) Page number

(c) CD-ROM or DVD Volume and number

(d) File name

(e) Classification

L.2.2.1.2 Electronic Files. The proposal electronic files names should not exceed 50 characters in length (not including the file extension). The file name shall not contain any periods.

6 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.2.2.1.3 Acceptable File Formats. The Offeror shall provide all electronic information provided in response to the solicitation in

Microsoft (MS) Office 2013 or PDF compatible format or except as noted in instructions for individual volumes. For files in Adobe

Portable Document Format (PDF), scanners should be set to 200 dots per inch. The proposal shall not contain active links to live

Internet sites or pages. All linked information shall be contained within the electronic proposal. Any linked information that is not contained in the proposal will not be accepted.

L.2.2.1.4 Unless otherwise specified, proposals shall be formatted for 8.5" x 11" paper with a minimum font size of 10 pt. and with a minimum of 0.5" margins. Schedules, drawings and other documents more appropriate to larger size shall be formatted for no larger than

8.5 x 14 dimensions. All spreadsheets must include all formulas, function, macros, computations, or equations used to compute the proposed amounts. For each workbook, all Rows, Columns, Cells, and Worksheets must be visible. Zero height and zero width rows and columns in Worksheets are not acceptable. Worksheet cells formatted with the font color equal to the fill color are not acceptable. The

Offeror shall provide passwords if Workbooks or Worksheets are password protected. Print image files, pictures, or files containing only values are not acceptable. Failure to provide fully functional excel spreadsheets in the proposal may result in your proposal being rejected.

L.2.2.2 Submission Due Date

The offeror must ensure its proposal, in its entirety, reaches its intended destination before the date and time set for closing of the solicitation set forth in Block 9 on the Standard Form (SF) 33, front page of the solicitation.

L.2.2.2.1 Lateness

The lateness rules for submitted proposals are outlined in FAR 52.215-1 "Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition", and are incorporated in to this solicitation.

L.2.3 Proposal Submission Address

UNCLASSIFIED proposals shall be submitted to the address below. The Offeror shall address all proposals delivered in response to this solicitation, whether hand-carried or submitted via U.S. mail, as follows:

U.S. Army Contracting Command - Warren

Attention: FMTV Proposal, Marc Landoy

Bldg 231, Mail Stop 303

6501 E. Eleven Mile Rd.

Warren, MI 48397-5000

Solicitation Number: W56HZV-17-R-0106

Date & Time: Refer to SF 33 (Pg. 1), Block 9

TO BE DELIVERED UNOPENED (Offerors name)

Exterior envelopes must identify the solicitation number, as well as the time and date specified for receipt of proposals in block nine of the SF 33.

L.2.4 Method of Proposal Submission

Proposals submitted via e-mail will not be accepted. Proposals shall either be hand-carried or submitted via US mail. The unclassified proposal must be received and time stamped by the time and date specified for receipt of proposals in block nine of the Standard Form

(SF) 33, subject to the late proposal conditions in FAR Provision 52.215-1. The Government does not authorize electronic mail or facsimile of proposals and amendments. Hand-carried submissions* include proposals delivered by commercial carriers such as FedEx, UPS, or services other than the US Postal Service. Offerors shall deliver hand-carried proposals to the Detroit Arsenal (DTA) Mail Handling

Facility (Building 255) between the hours of 8:00AM and 1:00PM local Warren, MI time. The package will be dated, time stamped at the

Mail Handling Facility, and the Government will be responsible for forwarding the package to the appropriate personnel. If the proposal is hand-carried by other than a commercial carrier, the delivery person (even if an employee of the Offeror) must be a US citizen, and must obtain a signed receipt, indicating date and time of delivery, from the Mail Handling Facility personnel. The delivery person must provide the receipt since the Mail Handling Facility personnel do not have them.

**Directions to DTA: From Van Dyke Avenue, travel west on East Eleven Mile road to railroad track. Immediately after crossing railroad track turn right into DTA main gate and follow security officer directions to the Mail Handling Facility (Building 255). It may be necessary for the delivery person to obtain a visitors badge prior to being allowed to enter the installation. If so, the security officer will advise the delivery person of the procedures to follow.

The Government cautions Offerors that each Offeror shall obtain approval to enter the installation from Detroit Arsenal security prior to the closing date and time for receipt of proposals.

7 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Due to security procedures, delays are probable at the entry point and Offerors must plan to accommodate them. It is the Offerors responsibility to plan sufficient time to clear Detroit Arsenal security and ensure proposals reach the intended destination.

L.2.5 Organizational Conflict of Interest

L.2.5.1 The provisions of FAR 9.5, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI), apply to any award under this RFP.

Potential offerors should review their current and planned participation in any other Government contracts, subcontracts, consulting, or teaming arrangements where they may be in a position of actual or perceived bias or unfair competitive advantage. A common example with the potential for OCI is where an entity performs work both as a system contractor/subcontractor and as a Government support contractor for Government offices involved in this solicitation effort.

L.2.5.2 Offerors should disclose any potential OCI situations to the PCO as soon as identified including prior to proposal submission.

The disclosure should include the facts and an analysis of the actual or perceived conflict and a recommended approach(es) to neutralize or mitigate the potential conflict. The preferred approach to potential conflicts is to negate/obviate the conflict. Mitigation is considered only if it is not practical to negate/obviate the conflict. The PCO will promptly respond to resolve any potential conflicts.

L.2.6 Single Proposal Submission

Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting the requirements of this solicitation. An offeror is defined as an entity competing independently that does not share a common parent, does not have a parent/subsidiary relationship with any other offeror, and is not affiliated with any other offeror (as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 19.101).

L.3 All or None_______________

Offers in response to this solicitation must be submitted for all the requirements identified in the solicitation. Offers submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation may be rejected or ineligible for award.

L.4 Evaluation Factors______________________

Offeror proposals shall address the following two Factors:

a. Past Performance

b. Price

L.4.1 Volume 2 Past Performance Factor_______________________________________

L.4.1.1 For the Past Performance Factor, provide information for up to four recent and relevant contracts, including contracts performed by the Offeror as the prime and not more than two recent and relevant contracts performed by a significant sub-contractor.

These may include foreign, federal, state, local and private industry commercial contracts. Failure to provide recent and relevant

Contract(s) performed by the Offeror as the prime may result in a decreased relevancy and confidence rating. The Government will not consider any individuals or key personnel; only corporate past performance will be considered. Recent contracts are those performed within three years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

(a) For the purposes of this Volume, contract shall be defined as:

(i) a single task or delivery order placed under a single-award or multiple-award Indefinite-Delivery contract (FAR 16.501-1) that does not contain multiple work directives or similar instruments which contain separate statements of work; or,

(ii) a single work directive or similar instrument which contains a separate statement of work issued under a broader contract; or,

(iii) a single order placed under a basic ordering agreement (BOA) (FAR 16.703); or,

(iv) a single task order placed under a federal supply schedule (FSS) (FAR 8.405-2); or,

(v) a single task order placed under a single-award or multiple-award blanket purchase agreement (BPA) (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303

(vi) a single Government or private industry contract which does not include any of the types of instruments described in (i)-(v) above.

(b) Relevant Past Performance will consider the extent to which the submitted contract efforts are comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the following statement of work requirements:

(i) Building or Assembling Protection Kits to a Government Technical Data Package (TDP) for Military Vehicles (Air, Land, or Sea) that includes both Transparent and Opaque Armor and;

8 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(ii) Building or Assembling of Protection Kits to include Transparent and Opaque Armor at a rate of 20 kits per month and;

(iii) Provide similar or like packaging of Protection Kits in accordance with a Government TDP.

L.4.1.2 Significant subcontractors are defined as team members or first or second tier subcontractors performing more than $10M or 10% of the total value of the Offeror's proposal, whichever is less.

(a) With respect to the prime, submit the L.4.1.1 specified information on at least two recent/current contracts that you consider most relevant to that portion of this RFP that you propose to perform.

(b) With respect to each significant subcontractor, submit the L.4.1.1 specified information on no more than two recent/current contracts performed by the subcontractor that are relevant to that portion of this RFP that you propose for performance by that subcontractor.

L.4.1.3 Contract Information: For each of the up to four recent and relevant contracts submitted under L.4.1.1 and L.4.1.2 above, provide the following information:

(a) Contract Number (and delivery/task order number if applicable);

(b) Contract Type;

(c) Total Value of the Contract (beginning & ending value);

(d) Delivery or Performance Schedule;

(e) Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;

(f) Procuring Contracting Officers (PCO) and/or Contract Specialists name, or point of contact for private industry entity responsible for signing or administering the contract, telephone number and e-mail;

(g) Government (DCMA) or commercial administrative contracting officer (ACO), contracting officers representative (COR), performance certifier, and/or quality assurance representative (QAR), name, telephone number and email;

(h) IAW L.4.1.4, Past Performance Questionnaire, specify the Government or Contractor Point of Contact(s) for which the Past

Performance Questionnaire, Attachment 0016 was sent, and provide the date(s) it was sent.

(i) A description of past contract scope of work requirements and a discussion of the similarities between the cited contract scope to each of the statement of work requirements identified above in L.4.1.1(b) that the Offeror believes is relevant including complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel and extent of subcontracting or teaming. In its description, the Offeror should specify the location in the proposal (to include filename or document reference with page and paragraph of the past contract information) that substantiates the relevance;

(j) Contract period of performance;

(k) A description of work performed by the Offeror

(l) For each of the contracts listed, provide a brief self-assessment of contract performance. The self-assessment must address performance to meet the requirements set forth in Section L.4.1.1(b)

(m) Copies of the Statements of Work from each of the submitted contracts to establish the relevance of the contract to the scope of work activities listed in L.4.1.1(b) above.

L.4.1.3.1 Note: Regarding L.4.1.3 (l) above, and in evaluating each Offeror's performance history, the Government will look at the

Offeror's delivery performance against the contract's original delivery schedule unless the delay was Government caused. Schedule extensions that were the fault of the Offeror, even if consideration was provided, will be counted against the Offeror.

L.4.1.4 Past Performance Questionnaire. A past performance questionnaire is provided in Attachment 0016, Past Performance Questionnaire.

For each of the recent/relevant contracts submitted by the Offeror, and based on identification of your most recent and relevant contracts, the Offeror shall send a copy of the past performance questionnaire directly to the appropriate PCO and/or COR or other appropriate technical and contracting individuals. The Offeror shall request that these individuals complete the questionnaire and forward it electronically directly to the Government at usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.wrn-fmtv-b-kits@mail.mil as soon as possible and prior to the RFP closing date (See Block #9 of the SF33 cover page to this solicitation) with the subject heading PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

FOR [Offeror name and Solicitation Number, W56HZV-17-R-0106].

L.4.1.5 Corporate Entities. If any contract submitted as part of the Past Performance factor was performed by a corporate entity or division other than the Offeror that would perform work under this RFP, please identify the entity and how they are related to the

Offeror, and explain how the resources of the other entity will be utilized in the performance of this effort.

L.4.1.6 Predecessor Companies. If you only have recent and relevant performance history as a part of a predecessor company, we may consider that past performance in our evaluation of past performance. Please provide the information for those recent and relevant contracts of that predecessor company and explain how the resources of the predecessor company will be utilized in the performance of this effort. Offerors must also briefly document the history of the evolution from the predecessor company.

L.4.1.7 Past Performance Information.

L.4.1.7.1 The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The burden of providing

9 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

thorough and complete past performance information remains with the Offeror. It is the Offeror's responsibility to submit detailed and complete information as required so the Government may evaluate its past performance volume. The above instructions are provided to advise Offerors as to the information required by the Government to assess the contractors recent and relevant past performance. Since this information constitutes a basis of the Government's review, it is imperative that the Offeror present its past performance in a clear and complete manner. Failure to provide the information requested under paragraph L.4.1.2 above may result in an assessment that the referenced past performance record lacks relevance or recency.

L.4.1.7.2 Offerors are advised that the Government may contact any of the references the Offeror provides, may contact internal or external sources regarding past contract performance information, and reserves the right to use any information received as part of our evaluation that may include the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) to search for past contract performance information. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from internal and external sources other than the proposal, the burden on providing thorough and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

L.4.2 Volume 3 Price Factor____________________________

L.4.2.1 Offerors shall submit electronic spreadsheet files (Workbooks) in MS Excel 2013 compatible format. Offerors shall submit

Workbooks in a format that includes all formulas, functions, macros, computations, or equations used to compute the proposed amounts.

There can be no cell references to data or files, which are not included in the Price Volume. For each Workbook, all Rows, Columns, Cells and Worksheets must be Visible (object. Visible=True). Zero height/Zero width rows/columns in Worksheets are not acceptable.

Worksheet cells formatted with the Font color equal to the Fill color are unacceptable. If Workbooks or Worksheets are password protected, then the Offerors shall provide password(s). Print image files or pictures (for example a picture of an Excel spreadsheet embedded in a word document) or files containing only values are not acceptable. Offerors shall provide supporting narratives in MS

Excel or MS Word 2013 compatible format. Text or spreadsheets used as supporting rationale may not be included as a picture.

L.4.2.2 Table of Contents:

The Offeror shall provide a Table of Contents showing each file submitted as a part of the L.4.2 Volume 3, Price Factor with a short description of the contents of the file. Each of these entries in the Table of Contents shall be hyperlinked to the respective files.

L.4.2.3 Attachment 0018 Pricing Spreadsheet:

The offeror shall submit its completed Attachment 0018- Pricing Spreadsheet. The Offeror shall complete the attachment in accordance with the instructions included within the attachment. The Government will not consider partial proposals.

L.4.2.4 Top-Level Spreadsheets:

For each B-Kit and Underbody Armor Kit, the Offeror shall provide a top-level spreadsheet, time-phased by year, and organized by cost element (i.e. Direct Labor Hours, Direct Labor Rates, Direct Labor Costs, Subcontracts, Material, Other Direct Costs, Overhead/Indirect rates, Overhead/Indirect costs, Profit, etc) that supports the proposed unit price. The proposed unit price for the B-Kit and Underbody

Armor Kit, in the top-level spreadsheet shall equal the proposed unit price included in Attachment 0018 - Pricing Spreadsheet.

For each labor category, the top-level spreadsheet shall include formulas showing the calculation of direct labor dollars from the direct labor hours and direct labor rates. In addition, for each indirect cost category, the top-level spreadsheet shall include formulas showing the calculation of the indirect cost from the base and indirect rates. The cost breakdown must be consistent with your cost accounting system. Provide the following information in support of each top-level spreadsheet:

L.4.2.4.1 Direct Labor:

Support for costs related to direct labor shall include the following:

(a) An annual time-phased breakout of the direct labor hours, by labor category, appropriate to the Offeror's accounting system.

(b) A description of each labor hour category. This description shall include sufficient information to allow the reader to distinguish between the different labor categories used in the proposal.

(c) For each labor category, provide the proposed direct labor rate by year, and include the basis for the rates and any escalation used.

L.4.2.4.2 Subcontracts:

For each subcontracts, the Offeror shall provide the subcontractors name, the proposed subcontract cost, a brief description of work to be performed, the contract type, and the method used for determining the prices fair and reasonable.

L.4.2.4.3 Material:

For all material, the Offeror shall provide a narrative, which explains the method used to develop proposed cost, including information

10 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

about the extent to which the cost is based on vendor quotes, purchase order history, estimates, or any other information necessary to substantiate the proposal.

The Offeror shall provide a complete Bill of Material (BOM) with the following information:

(1) National Stock Number (NSN), as applicable

(2) Part Number

(3) Item Name/Description

(4) Vendor

(5) Unit Cost (purchase price to Offeror)

(6) Quantity used

(7) Extended Cost (unit cost multiplied by quantity used)

(8) Basis for cost (engineering estimate, vendor quote, purchase history, etc.)

(9) For material and subcontract costs based on engineering estimates, please provide rationale and methodology for how the estimate was developed

(10) Indicate whether component is sole-source, competitive, or commercial

L.4.2.4.4 Other Direct Costs (ODCs):

The Offeror shall identify each category of proposed ODC, and provide the proposed cost for each category. Provide an explanation of what is included in each category and how the cost was estimated.

L.4.2.4.5 Rates:

Provide a list of the direct and indirect rates, by category and by year, used in the development of the proposal. Support for the proposed direct and indirect rates shall include the following:

a. The ending month for the Offeror's fiscal year;

b. A narrative explaining the basis for the proposed direct and indirect rates (including whether they represent a Forward Pricing Rate

Proposal, Forward Pricing Rate Recommendation, or Forward Pricing Rate Agreement), specifically identifying any escalation factors used;

c. For each of the indirect rate categories, provide the Incurred Cost rates for the current and prior two fiscal years. . Indicate if prior year rates have been audited. For the current year's Incurred Cost rates, provide the month ending for those rates.

L.4.2.4.6 Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM):

The Offeror shall state the total amount estimated for FCCM by category and by year, if applicable. For each FCCM category, include a formula showing the calculation of FCCM from the base and the FCCM rate.

L.4.2.4.7 Profit:

The Offeror shall identify the proposed profit rate, as applicable, and the total dollar amount included.

L.4.2.5 Top Level Spreadsheets:

For each Underbody Counterweight Kit, 58-Gallon Fuel Tank Fire Suppression (FTFS), and Kit 78-Gallon FTFS Kit, the offeror shall provide a top-level spreadsheet, time-phased by year, and organized by cost element (i.e. Direct Labor Hours, Direct Labor Rates, Direct Labor

Costs, Subcontracts, Material, Other Direct Costs, Overhead/Indirect rates, Overhead/Indirect costs, Profit, etc) that supports the proposed unit price. The proposed unit price for the Underbody Counterweight Kit, 58-Gallon FTFS Kit, and the 78-Gallon FTFS Kit in the top-level spreadsheet shall equal the proposed unit price included in Attachment 0015 - Pricing Spreadsheet. Provide the following information in support of each top-level spreadsheet:

L.4.2.5.1 Material:

For all material, the Offeror shall provide a narrative, which explains the method used to develop proposed cost, including information about the extent to which the cost is based on vendor quotes, purchase order history, estimates, or any other information necessary to substantiate the proposal.

The Offeror shall provide a complete Bill of Material (BOM) with the following information:

(1) National Stock Number (NSN), as applicable

(2) Part Number

(3) Item Name/Description

(4) Vendor

(5) Unit Cost (purchase price to Offeror)

(6) Quantity used

11 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(7) Extended Cost (unit cost multiplied by quantity used)

(8) Basis for cost (engineering estimate, vendor quote, purchase history, etc.)

(9) For material and subcontract costs based on engineering estimates, please provide rationale and methodology for how the estimate was developed

(10) Indicate whether component is sole-source, competitive, or commercial

L.4.2.5.2 Profit:

The Offeror shall identify the proposed profit rate, as applicable, and the total dollar amount included.

L.4.2.6 For each ISO Container, Tricon II Container, Special Packaging for B- Kits, Pre-Production Kit for Inspection, Pre-Production

Kit Install, CFAT and PPAP, the offeror shall provide its proposed unit price in Attachment 0018 - Pricing Spreadsheet.

L.4.2.7 Proposal Structure and Instructions. The Government does not intend for the instructions contained within L.4 to be all-inclusive. An Offeror may submit any other price and financial information it considers helpful in the evaluation of the price proposal.

L.4.2.8 DCMA and DCAA Information:

The Offeror shall provide the address, email, and telephone number of the cognizant DCAA Field

Audit Office and the cognizant Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office, if available.

L.4.2.9 Contract Deliveries: For proposal preparation and evaluation purposes, assume the delivery requirements in accordance with

Section F of the contract.

L.4.2.9.1 The Government will award a single five-year IDIQ contract. The estimated ordering quantities for each FMTV Armor Protection

Kit and corresponding Ordering Year are described in section B.

L.4.2.10 In accordance with FAR 15.306, the Government reserves the right to request additional or more detailed information to support its evaluation of the price in addition to the information requested in this Section L.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

12 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis of Award__________________

M.1.1 General. As a result of this solicitation, the Government plans to award, on a Small Business Set Aside basis, one Firm-Fixed

Price Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for FMTV Armor Protection Kits subject to the provisions contained herein.

The Government will select for award the proposal, which best represents the best value to the Government as described below:

M.1.1.1 There are two evaluation factors:

a. Past Performance Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these Factors are described in Section M.4 below.

M.1.1.2 Selection of the proposal, which is most advantageous and represents the best value to the Government, will be determined on a best value source selection trade-off basis from offeror proposals.

M.1.1.3 Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be determined responsible (see M.3.5); and

b. The offerors proposal shall not be assessed with any Deficiency(ies) (per FAR Part 15.001); and

c. The offeror must have a Final Facility Clearance (FCL); and the ability to receive, view, house and safeguard SECRET materials;

and

d. The offeror shall be registered in the System for Award Managemen(SAM) - see clause 52.204-7.

M.1.2 Importance of Price

Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal (1) is otherwise eligible for award under M.1.1.3, and (2) represents the best value to the Government. This may not be offeror with the lowest evaluated Price Factor. However, the closer the offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important the Price Factor becomes in the decision. Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the two evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

a. Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

b. The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.2 Rejection of Offers_______________________

Offerors shall carefully read, understand, and provide all the information requested in the Proposal Preparation Instructions and

Content contained in Section L. In accordance with clause FAR 52.215-1 contained in this solicitation, the Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government's interests. The circumstances, which may lead to the rejection of a proposal, include, but are not limited to, the following:

(a) The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the Proposal Preparation Instructions specified in Section L of this solicitation.

Examples of failure to meaningfully respond include:

(1) When a proposal merely offers to perform work according to the RFP terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the RFP terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

(2) A proposal fails to provide any of the data and information required in Section L.

(3) A proposal merely repeats the contract statement of work without elaboration.

(b) The proposal contains unbalanced pricing as defined in Clause 52.215-1 and paragraph M.4.2.3. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques.

(c) The proposal offers a product or service that does not meet all stated material requirements of the solicitation.

(d) The Offeror proposes exceptions to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other RFP terms and conditions.

(e) The Offeror fails to provide a copy of the Offerors current Facility Clearance as defined in L.1.3.

(f) The proposal contains one or more Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Refer to

Section L paragraph L.2.5 of this solicitation, "Organizational Conflict of Interest."

13 16

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(g) The proposal price is unreasonable

(h) The proposal proposes exceptions to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other RFP terms and conditions.

(i) The offeror failed to obtain the classified specification of the Armor Kit specifications, IAW Attachment 0012, ATPD 2352T.

M.3 Evaluation and Source Selection Process___________________________________________

M.3.1 Evaluation Process

Evaluated proposals which are eligible for award will be subject to the Source Selection Trade-off process, considering both the evaluation factors and their relative order of importance as cited in Section M.4, to identify the proposal which represents the best value to the Government.The Government will weigh the evaluated proposals (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the Government. As part of the best value determination, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each offeror's proposal shall be considered, as specified below, in addition to the other evaluation methods described below. Selection of the successful

Offeror shall be made following an assessment of each proposal, based on the response to the information requested in Section L of this solicitation and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described in Section M.

M.3.2 Source Selection Authority (SSA)

The SSA is the official designated to direct the source selection process and select the Offeror for contract award.

M.3.3 Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB)

The Government has established a SSEB to evaluate proposals in response to this solicitation. The SSEB is comprised of technically qualified individuals who the Government has selected to conduct an evaluation in accordance with the evaluation criteria listed for this solicitation. The SSEB will give careful, full, and impartial consideration to all proposals received in response to this solicitation.

M.3.4 Award Without Discussions

This RFP includes FAR Provision 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition in Section L which advises offerors that the

Government intends to make award without conducting discussions. Where awards will be made without discussions, exchanges with offerors are limited to Clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306(a). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a Price and non-Price Factor standpoint. However, under FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the

Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

M.3.5 Determination of Responsibility

Per FAR 9.103, the Government will place a contract only with an Offeror that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. A prospective Offeror, in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate it meets the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. The prospective Offeror must be able to demonstrate that they have a Final Facility Clearance and the ability to receive, view, house and safeguard SECRET materials in order to be deemed responsible, per L.1.3.