W56HZV16R0210-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0002 2018MAR28

W56HZV

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

JAMES R. JONES III

EMAIL: JAMES.R.JONES3.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-16-R-0210

2018FEB26

X

X

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 27

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: JAMES R. JONES III

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HTA-C/(586)282-3494

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. The purpose of Amendment 0002 is to change language to Section C and Section M, as well as, update Attachment 0029.

2. Paragraph C.6.2.1 is changed

FROM:

C.6.2.1 Topcoat. Topcoat shall be CARC paint per MIL-DTL-64159 Coating, Water Dispersible Aliphatic Polyurethane, and Chemical

Agent Resistant. Army Technical Bulletin 43-0209, Color, Marking, and Camouflage Painting of Military Vehicles, Construction

Equipment and Materials Handling Equipment shall be used for registration marking IAW AR 750-1, Chapter 7, Section 8, component surfaces. Component surfaces that exceed 400 degrees Fahrenheit (204 degrees Celsius) shall be coated with heat resistant paint.

The Type II LEUT and its accessories shall be prepared, treated, and painted per best commercial practice. There shall be no over spray on informational components such as instruction plates. All internal and external threads shall be greaseless and free from paint before painting. The finish and quality assurance testing for all painted surfaces shall be IAW MIL-DTL-53072.

TO:

C.6.2.1 Topcoat. Topcoat shall be CARC paint per MIL-DTL-53039, MIL-DTL-64159, or MIL-PRF-32348 Type III Topcoat. Army Technical

Bulletin 43-0209, Color, Marking, and Camouflage Painting of Military Vehicles, Construction Equipment and Materials Handling

Equipment shall be used for registration marking IAW AR 750-1, Chapter 7, Section 8, component surfaces. Component surfaces that exceed 400 degrees Fahrenheit (204 degrees Celsius) shall be coated with heat resistant paint. The Type II LEUT and its accessories shall be prepared, treated, and painted per best commercial practice. There shall be no over spray on informational components such as instruction plates. All internal and external threads shall be greaseless and free from paint before painting.

The finish and quality assurance testing for all painted surfaces shall be IAW MIL-DTL-53072.

3. Paragraph M.4.3.1 is changed

FROM:

M.4.3.1 The Past Performance Factor will assess the risk that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on recent and relevant past contract performance information relevant to the statement of work activities listed in Section

L.4.3.1(b).

TO:

M.4.3.1 The Past Performance Factor will assess the expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on recent and relevant past contract performance information relevant to the statement of work activities listed in Section

L.4.3.1(b).

4. Attachment 0029 Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B is revised to supersede language in ATDP-2414B Paragraph 3.9a. Revision date is

20 March 2018.

5. The closing date remains unchanged. The deadline for Government receipt of Pre-Proposal questions has closed.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0004 ***

2 27

W56HZV-16-R-0210 0002

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATION INDEX

C.1 General

C.2 Hardware and Material

C.3 Meetings, Reviews and Conferences

C.4 Integrated Master Schedule

C.5 Configuration Management

C.6 Corrosion

C.7 Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)

C.8 Integrated Product Support (IPS)

C.9 Test Service Representative (TSR)

C.10 Modeling and Simulation (M&S)

C.11 Government Furnished Equipment and Information

C.12 Warranty

C.13 Transportability Report

C.14 Production Database

C.15 Federal Retail Excise Tax (FRET) Expenses

C.16 Security Requirements

C.17 Program Protection Plan (PPP)

C.18 Contractor Manpower Reporting

C.1 GENERAL

C.1.1 INTRODUCTION. This scope of work (SOW) is for the production of the Light Engineer Utility Trailer (LEUT), M1269, Type II.

C.1.2 System Requirements. The contractor shall be responsible for the overall component selection, integration, design, development, fabrication, contractor testing, logistics product development, configuration management to meet the requirements of the Automotive

Tank Purchase Description (ATPD) 2414B (Attachment 0001) and Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B (Attachment 0029), providing test support for Government conducted production qualification, logistics demonstration, technical manual validation/verification, and special test events.

C.1.3 Data. The contractor shall prepare deliverable program data IAW the format and content specified in the Data Item Descriptions

(DID) and deliver data IAW the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (Exhibit A). Data submitted by e-mail shall not exceed 10 megabytes (MB) in file size. The contractor shall transmit Data over 10 MB on a CD via regular mail or AMRDEC Secure Access File

Exchange (SAFE) Web application.

C.1.3.1 Applicable Documents. The contractor shall utilize the most recent versions of all DIDs, regulations, specifications, and standards listed throughout this contract. The DIDs, Military specifications, and Military standards are located at:

https://assist.dla.mil .

C.2 HARDWARE AND MATERIAL

C.2.1 Type II LEUT. The contractor shall manufacture the Type II LEUT IAW the requirements of Attachment 0001 and Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B. The Government will maintain Attachment 0001 and Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-

2414B.

3 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.2.2 Product Support Package (PSP). The contractor shall deliver a PSP (as detailed in Section C.8.7) for PQT, Logistics Demonstration

(LD) and TM verification site support no later than 30 days prior to testing. The contractor shall package the PSP IAW packaging and preservation requirements in Section D of this document. A PSP shall be delivered to the following locations:

C.2.2.1 Aberdeen Proving Ground IAW section C.9.1.1.

C.2.2.2 Reserved.

C.2.2.3 U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) IAW section C.9.1.4.

C.2.2.4 Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) IAW Section C.8.5.1.

C.2.2.5 Follow-on Production Testing sites IAW section C.9.1.5 and E.9.1.

C.2.3 Basic Issue Items (BII). The contractor shall procure and over-pack the BII and inventory list IAW Attachment 0001 and Attachment

0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B, with each Type II LEUT produced under this contract.

C.2.4 Authorized Stockage List (ASL). The contractor shall package and deliver ASL.

C.2.5 Technical Manuals (TM). The contractor shall over-pack a GFI TM with each trailer produced during FRP in accordance with section

C.8.5.6.

C.3 MEETINGS, REVIEWS, AND CONFERENCES

C.3.1 Participation and Administration. The contractor shall participate in all meetings, reviews, audits, and assessments required in this scope of work. Where possible, the contractor shall schedule face to face meetings in tandem, or groups, to minimize personnel resources and travel expenses. The contractor shall submit an agenda and read-ahead package in contractor format for all meetings, audits, assessments, and reviews IAW CDRL A024. The contractor shall record and provide minutes for all meetings, audits, assessments, and reviews called out in this contract IAW CDRL A025. The contractor shall identify the recorder at the beginning of each event. The contractor shall coordinate arrangements for all meetings with the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) no later than 10 days in advance of all meetings. Arrangements shall include meeting date, time, in person, or via teleconference and location.

C.3.1.1 Meeting and Conferences. The contractor shall make the following available for the Governments use when meetings or conferences take place at the contractors facility

a. Required technical, logistical or other documentation (including drawings, computer data bases, publications, and other required data).

b. Restrooms.

c. Access to standard office equipment including copy, fax machines and internet access.

C.3.2 Start of Work Meeting (SOWM). The contractor shall conduct a SOWM with Government attendees within 20 business days after contract award, at the contractors production facility. At the SOWM, the contractor shall identify to the Government how they will manage all design, integration, fabrication, supportability, and risk throughout the production phase. The SOWM will consist of a scope of work and CDRL review, an Integrated Product Support In-Process Review (reference C.3.8), an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) review

(reference C.4), and a System Requirements Review (SRR). The SRR will be a line by line review of Attachment 0001 and Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B. The contractor shall also conduct a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) (See Section C.3.2.2) at the

SOWM. For planning purposes, the SOWM meeting is anticipated to be a five day event.

C.3.2.1 SOWM Presentation. At the SOWM, the contractor shall provide a detailed description of the procedures, actions, events and organization the contractor intends to employ to accomplish the mission.

C.3.2.2 Preliminary Design Review. The contractor shall host the PDR during the SOWM. The purpose of this PDR is to ensure the preliminary design and basic system architecture are complete, and that there is technical confidence in the designs ability to meet the requirements of the ATPD. The PDR shall be determined to be complete by the Government Technical Review Chair.

C.3.2.2.1 PDR Completion Criteria:

a) Technical data for the allocated baseline are complete, satisfy the system specification, and provide a sufficient foundation for detailed design to proceed

b) Risks have been balanced and are acceptable with any risk mitigation plans

c) Feasibility and schedule are determined to be within acceptable risk margins

4 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

d) IMS is updated (including systems and software critical path drivers) and includes all activities required to complete Critical

Design Review (CDR) (assuming same developer responsible for PDR and CDR)

e) Corrective action plans for issues in the PDR have been identified or resolved

f) Quality management system has been deemed acceptable by the Government Technical Review Chair or COR

C.3.3 Critical Design Review. The contractor shall host a CDR no later than 30 days after start of the PDR. The primary purpose of the meeting is to formalize the initial product baseline, assess design maturity and evaluate risks. The contractor shall present their configuration design and meet all completion criteria identified by the Government for this review. This meeting serves as the decision point for the Government to allow the contractor to begin assembly of the LRIP test trailers upon approval of CDR. The CDR shall be determined to be complete by the Government Technical Review Chair.

C.3.3.1 CDR Completion Criteria:

a) An established system initial product baseline

b) Acceptable risks with mitigation plans approved

c) The program development schedule has been updated to include; fabrication, test and evaluation, software coding (if applicable), and critical path drivers

d) The program sustainment development efforts and schedules have been updated based on current budgets, test evaluation results and firm supportability design features

e) Quality management system has been updated to include changes post-PDR and deemed acceptable by the Government Technical Review

Chair or PCO

C.3.4 Test Readiness Review (TRR). The contractor shall attend and provide supporting information related to the Government conducted

TRR at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, which shall be held no more than 30 days after delivery of the first LRIP. The purpose of the TRR is to verify that all required resources and plans are ready so that the Government can commence test activities.

C.3.5 Production Readiness Review (PRR). Following the completion of PQT, the contractor shall conduct a PRR to allow the Government to determine if the design is ready for full rate production and if the contractor and major subcontractors have accomplished adequate production planning without incurring unacceptable risks that will breach thresholds of schedule or performance. The PRR shall be conducted no later than 45 days after PQT completion.

C.3.6 Program Management Integrated Product Team (IPT) Meetings. The contractor shall conduct a weekly teleconference Program

Management IPT meeting. The primary purpose of this meeting is to review the contract performance plan, provide progress assessments, review technical and other specialty area status, and review open action items.

C.3.7 Program Management Reviews (PMR). The contractor shall conduct quarterly PMRs at the contractors facility with the Government.

The exact date of each meeting shall be mutually agreed upon by the contractor and the Government. The first PMR is estimated to occur

90 days after the SOWM. At a minimum, the topics shall include: schedule, performance, production status, logistics, engineering, quality, contracting, risk status, and corrective actions. The contractor shall prepare meeting minutes and include identification of items requiring specific actions, response dates and responsible organization. Other Government agencies and contractors may be in attendance which will be coordinated prior to the PMR.

C.3.8 Integrated Product Support In-Process Reviews (IPSIPRs). The contractor shall host, at their facility, IPSIPRs. IPSIPRs commence in conjunction with the SOWM and will repeat on a monthly basis for the duration of Logistics Demonstration. IPSIPRs shall consist of reporting progress on logistics products development to include schedule, present logistics products for review, discuss, and track issues and actions items for resolution. The contractor shall have available supportive material and maintenance rationale for all logistics data presented for the Governments review. The contractor shall provide a meeting place, administrative support and office equipment as required until all required data is delivered and approved. The contractor shall brief the Integrated Product Support Team a provisioning performance schedule IAW CDRL A048 at the Initial Logistics IPSIPR.

C.3.8.1 Provisioning Conference. The contractor shall host, at their facility, Provisioning Conferences. Provisioning Conferences shall be included as part of CDR, and will repeat on a monthly basis until the end of product verification. The contractor shall brief the

Integrated Product Support Team a provisioning performance schedule with updates IAW CDRL A048 at every Provisioning Conference.

C.3.9 Test Meetings. Test meetings shall be held IAW section E.7.3.

C.3.10 System Safety and Environmental Working Group. System Safety and Environmental Working Group meetings shall be held IAW section

C.7.7.

5 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.4 INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE. The contractor shall develop, maintain, and deliver an IMS (CDRL A013) throughout the life of the contract. The contractor shall maintain the IMS, present the IMS at the SOWM and at each PMR, explain all delays in meeting contract requirements, and provide get-well plans within 30 days of discovery.

C.5 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

C.5.1 Configuration Management (CM). The contractor shall implement a CM program for configuration planning, identification, control, status accounting, verification, audit, and data management of the Type II LEUT and document the CM program in a CM Plan. To maximize return on investment and reduce life cycle costs, the contractor shall use best practices to implement the technical and program management principles fundamental to CM detailed in C.5.1.1 below. The contractor shall deliver the CM Plan IAW CDRL A005.

C.5.1.1 Configuration Management Standards. The contractor shall perform CM as required by this contract and as extracted from the SAE-

EIA-649-1, Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts. SAE GEIA-HB-649, Implementation Guide for CM, may be used for guidance.

C.5.2 Configuration Identification and Data Management (DM). The contractor shall perform data management, provide the configuration documentation to document the physical and functional characteristics of the Type II LEUT, establish baselines for configuration control, and assign product and document identifiers as required by sections C.3.3, C. 5.2.1, C.5.2.2, C.5.2.3, C.5.2.4, and C.5.2.3.1.

The contractor is responsible for all original data in its possession, including drawings, models, and associated documents. The contractor shall flow down CM and DM requirements to subcontractors and suppliers to provide an appropriate application of CM and DM functions and principles to the entire supply chain.

C.5.2.1 Data Management. The contractor shall possess an authoritative product data, engineering or configuration management system and the processes to effectively manage, securely store, release, validate, and track multiple versions and iterations of the Type II LEUT:

as-designed, as-integrated, as-built, and as-delivered configuration baselines; this includes management of product structures, product definition documents and data, contractor test and analysis data, GFI and other related technical documents.

C.5.2.2 Version Control and Traceability. The contractor shall assign a unique identifier to product data and utilize disciplined version control in managing digital data. Each revision (version) shall be a new master, and the contractor shall retain all approved revisions of each document and model representation to provide a traceable history in order to access the correct revision when needed.

Numerical revisions are not allowed. The contractor shall ensure that all representations (i.e., Adobe PDF, CAD, etc.) of a single version or revision of data, delivered to the Government for approval and subsequently maintained by the contractor for the term of this contract, are identical. The content of a document and model revision is fixed once approved by PD LTV.

C.5.2.3 Configuration Baseline and Release. The contractor shall have a process in place for initial release of design information, release of approved changes to the design information, and delivery of released data to the Government. The contractor shall be responsible for creating and maintaining the design release configuration (e.g., developmental baseline, design release baseline) up to date, by incrementally releasing new design data and incorporating approved engineering changes to the Type II LEUT design as they occur. The contractor shall maintain an up to date incremental developmental baseline for the Type II LEUT. At completion of the CDR, the contractor shall establish and maintain the Initial Product Baseline (IPBL) (e.g., initial production configuration baseline). This

IPBL shall identify and document the functional and physical characteristics of the Type II LEUT. The design release configuration shall then be incrementally updated to incorporate approved changes resulting in a Final Product Baseline (FPBL) as an output of PQT approval, Logistics Demonstration, PRR, and Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). The contractor shall maintain an updated product baseline for the entire period of performance and submit the IBOM IAW CDRL A047.

C.5.2.3.1 Design Freeze for Test. The Type II LEUT design shall be frozen upon delivery of the first test asset(s) to the test site; all test assets delivered shall be identical in configuration. The contractor shall not incorporate changes without prior Government approval.

C.5.2.4 Product and Enterprise identifiers. The Part or Identifying Number (PIN), in combination with the Commercial and Government

Entity (CAGE), establishes unique item identification of products. A PIN and CAGE shall be used to uniquely identify all Type II LEUT products. The Government is the design activity (i.e., design authority, customer, procuring activity) for all products (e.g., hardware, software, models, drawings, associated documents) newly developed, or altered or modified from already developed products. The contractor shall assign a Government PIN for the product identifier when TACOM is the design activity, assigning CAGE 19207 as the enterprise identifier. Design documents (e.g., CAD models, drawings) for new or modified or altered items shall be numbered the same as, or included within, the part number.

C.5.2.5 Existing Products. Already developed products used in the Type II LEUT, including commercial products, products defined by

Government or non-Government standards, and products for which a Government organization is the design activity, shall retain the existing identifiers (document number, PIN and CAGE), unless modified to the extent that interchangeability is affected. Already developed Army items having a Government PIN and CAGE that are modified for the Type II LEUT Trailer shall not be re-identified with the contractor's or other vendor PINs. The item and its product data shall reflect a new Government PIN with CAGE 19207. The contractor shall maintain configuration records that link or otherwise retain history of the original Government PIN-CAGE to the new Government PIN-

CAGE and include this information IAW CDRL A002, Configuration Status Accounting (CSA) Information reports.

6 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.5.2.6 Re-identification. The contractor shall not re-identify or re-mark supplier or purchased parts or related product data with its own PIN and CAGE. The contractor shall not use supplier PINs for items that can be defined by Government or industry standards or specifications. The only parts reflecting the prime contractor's PINs and CAGE shall be those items for which the contractor is the design activity. The contractor's product data, including Bill of Material (BOM), drawings, models, parts lists, and reports, shall be consistent in identifying the correct design activity PIN and CAGE.

C.5.2.7 Military and Industry Standard Parts. In lieu of contractor, Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), supplier, or other commercial and vendor PINs, the contractor shall use the military, industry, or specification-identified PINs in the product data for all fasteners, standard hardware, bulk material, and other items that can be defined by Government and non-Government standardization documents, and international or foreign standardization documents adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for use in the U.S., paired with the CAGE of the corresponding standardization document.

C.5.2.7.1 The contractor shall use the part-numbering convention defined by these Government, non-Government, or adopted international or foreign standardization documents in all product data prepared under this contract. The product data shall cite the PIN established by the standardization document as the part call out, in the parts list, etc. The standardization document number shall also be shown on the product data (in the parts list, notes, etc.) if it is not discernible from the PIN.

C.5.2.7.2 The contractor shall investigate and convert any Contractor, Supplier, Vendor, or other PINs to the above required standardization document PIN-CAGE format. The contractor can download the Public Logistics Data (PUB LOG) Federal Logistics Information

Services (FLIS) Search at: http://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/LogisticsInformationServices/FOIAReading.aspx , for researching part numbers, or contact the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) customer service at: http://www.dla.mil/CustomerSupport.aspx , for assistance with web access, accounts, or assistance in finding part numbers for products defined by standardization documents.

C.5.2.8 National Stock Numbers (NSNs) and Part or Identifying Numbers (PINs)

C.5.2.8.1 The NSN for items may be cited in the product data in addition to the PIN-CAGE; however, NSNs do not establish unique item identification and shall not be cited within the product data in lieu of the PIN-CAGE.

C.5.2.8.2 NSNs placed within the product data either in lieu of a PIN-CAGE or that conflict with the PIN/CAGE data found in WEBFLIS will be reason for Government rejection of the product data containing the conflicting data, and will be returned to the contractor for correction and re-submittal.

C.5.2.9 Indentured Bill Of Material (IBOM). The contractor shall deliver IBOMs to the Government IAW CDRL A047. The IBOM reflects the parent-child relationship of levels of assembly. A numeric indenture level defines each part's place relative to the top of the structure, i.e., level 0 is the end item system, level 1 is all the first level parts and assemblies, level 2 items are the parts and assemblies under each separate level 1 assembly. IBOMs shall reflect the PIN not the NSN. IBOMs shall include the enterprise identifier

(CAGE) of the design activity for each item in the IBOM.

C.5.3 Configuration Status Accounting. The contractor shall provide CSA reports to the Government IAW CDRL A002. This information shall be recorded and maintained by the contractor for the term of this contract. CSA reports shall provide an audit trail for engineering changes, drawings, associated lists, quality data, logistics data and other technical documentation. CSA reports shall include status of changes and deviations, status of resulting action items, effectivity and incorporation status of approved changes and deviations. As part of the contractors design release configuration process, approved changes shall not be reported to the Government as completed or closed until the new or revised documentation (incorporating the approved change) has been incorporated into the baseline documentation and delivered to the Government IAW CDRL A004.

C.5.4 Change Management/Configuration Control

C.5.4.1 Configuration Control. The Government assumes configuration control of the Type II LEUT at Design Freeze for test in accordance with section C.5.2.3.1. All changes after CDR shall be submitted to the Government for informational purposes only. The contractor shall propose configuration changes to the Type II LEUT via the submission of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) or Requests for

Variance (RFVs) IAW the below requirements.

C.5.4.2 Engineering Changes. The contractor shall prepare and submit ECPs for changes to the approved configuration immediately upon determination of a need for such changes. The contractor shall deliver a Notice of Revision (NOR) for each document affected by a change. Specification changes shall also be described on a NOR. Alternatively, a NOR form is not necessary if the documentation (all sheets or pages) is provided and electronically red-lined or otherwise marked-up to clearly show original information and proposed changes IAW CDRL A004 and Attachment 0002 (Data Delivery Description (DDD)).

C.5.4.2.1 Value Engineering Change Proposal. For the life of the contract, when the contractor is interested in proposing a Value

Engineering Change Proposal (VECP), the contractor shall submit a VECP Request to the PCO. The VECP shall be prepared and executed IAW

Attachment 0002 with the additional information required in FAR 52.248-1(c). In accordance with FAR 52.248-1(f), the PCO will consider cost reductions proposed by the contractor and will consider increasing the contractors sharing rate up to 75% on a case by case basis.

(CDRL A004).

7 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.5.4.2.2 Supporting Data. Sufficient supporting data to evaluate each proposed change shall be submitted with each request. Each change request shall assign a change identifier, justify the need for change, identify the test incident or other event or action that prompted the engineering change, identify proposed effectivity, and all affected impacts (e.g., cost, schedule, requirements, documentation generated to date, tooling design, material orders, quality, provisioning, maintenance, packaging, training). The contractor shall incrementally update the design information, including the IBOM, to incorporate each approved change as it occurs, and deliver a copy of the resulting released documentation IAW CDRLs A004 and with IBOM IAW CDRL A047 to the Government for verification that the design release configuration has been updated. All configuration activity shall be reported IAW CDRL A002.

C.5.4.2.3 Government Proposed ECPs. In the event the Government wants to change the trailer configuration, the PCO will notify the contractor by a request for technical and price proposal which the contractor shall furnish at no cost. The contractor shall submit an

ECP IAW CDRL A004, to allow the Government to clearly understand the proposed change impact on the configuration item. The contractor's

ECP submittal shall include sufficient supporting data, together with other than certified cost and pricing data when applicable.

C.5.4.3 Government Review and Approval. The Government will require the contractor to perform additional tests to verify acceptability of any changes the contractor proposes prior to Government approval of the changes. The Government will determine the extent of testing up to and including a complete PQT. The Government may require additional Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) testing. The contractor shall perform validation tests at no additional cost to the Government. The Government will disapprove changes that will have an unacceptable adverse effect on performance, reliability, maintainability or repair. The PCO will notify the contractor of the

Government's approval of the changes and issue a modification to the contract to incorporate them.

C.5.4.4 Responsibility for Failure Due to Changes. The Governments approval of the contractors change(s) does not relieve the contractor from its responsibility to furnish all items in conformance with the contract performance requirements. The contractor shall accept full responsibility for any failure in the operation of the equipment that renders the Type II LEUT Not Operational Ready as a result of change(s) the Government approves.

C.5.4.5 Responsibility for Cost of Changes

C.5.4.5.1 The contractor shall be responsible for additional costs to the Type II LEUT, testing or software associated with any changes due to trailer deficiencies or non-compliance to the contract. Costs for contractor proposed changes to enhance trailer systems or performance, will be handled through the ECP process and contract modification.

C.5.4.6 Requests for Variance. Any need to temporarily deviate from or waive requirements of the Type II LEUT during production shall be submitted IAW CDRL A006. The contractor shall properly classify RFVs as Critical, Major or Minor as defined in Instructions for DD

Form 1694. The Government will reject recurring variances or variances effecting a change to the product baseline documentation and require resubmission as a formal ECP. The contractor shall maintain the original effectivity point information on file for all approved

RFVs. This information shall be reported to the PCO and shall be incorporated in CDRL A002.

C.5.5 Configuration Audits

C.5.5.1 PCA. The Government will conduct a PCA at the contractors facility within 45 days after completion of PQT to verify that the

Type II LEUT components hardware matches the design documentation. A successful PCA finalizes and verifies the product baseline for Full

Rate Production.

C.5.5.1.1 The contractor shall submit a PCA Plan IAW CDRL A045 prior to the PCA. The Government will review the IBOM and advise the contractor which items it intends to audit during the PCA. Actions by the Government will not be destructive, parts maybe disassembled and reassembled for use.

C.5.5.1.2 The contractor shall provide support for pre-audit, PCA, and post-audit activities. The Government estimates approximately five Government personnel will perform the PCA at the contractors facility for a period not to exceed 14 calendar days. The contractor shall have all necessary resources and materials in place for the Government to perform the PCA on the scheduled PCA start date and time.

The contractor shall:

a. Identify support personnel to include Configuration Management and Logistics functions

b. Have the latest validated, deliverable LRIP unit accessible to the audit team for verification throughout the PCA.

c. Provide a safe, indoor physical location at the production facility for the Government to conduct the PCA. The audit location shall not interfere with production or other shop floor activities.

d. Provide appropriate safety equipment.

e. Obtain all parts for the audit, deliver to the audit location, and return parts to their proper location after audit completion.

8 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

f. Participate with the Government in kick-off, audit activities, and close-out meetings, adhere to ground rules, daily schedule, audit and close-out actions.

g. Obtain and have readily available in the audit location:

1. Each part to be audited, at the latest version (i.e., revision), and identical to the part installed on the LRIP unit provided for the audit IAW section C.5.5.1. Parts shall be disassembled and mated with legible hard copies of the corresponding latest approved version of 2D drawing, pre-printed and set up in the audit room in advance of audit team arrival.

2. Access to CAD files, CAD software and CAD viewers to open, review, and manipulate CAD files.

3. PCA Plan.

4. All engineering changes and variances applicable to each part being audited.

5. Parts manuals.

6. Part shortages list.

7. Company manuals, specifications, standards, and other internal documents applicable to each part being audited.

h. Provide access to a copy machine for Government and contractor support personnel to utilize during the PCA.

i. Provide adequate outlets for plugging in laptops.

j. Provide appropriate, calibrated tools for use in verifying part dimensions.

C.5.5.2 Configuration Audit Summary Report. The contractor shall submit a PCA Summary Report IAW CDRL A046 after the PCA to identify discrepancies, deficiencies, and action items. The Contractor shall address each issue to include the verification activity that was accomplished to successfully resolve discrepancies and deficiencies and close-out each action item. PCA approval will occur when the

Government is satisfied that the PCA is complete and issues have been resolved.

C.5.6 Production Government Format Technical Data Package (TDP).

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Government Format Production Level Technical Data Package (TDP) for the LEUT, as described in

MIL-STD-31000A (Level III) reflecting the latest approved product design and IAW CDRL A047 and Attachment 0020. Prior to submission, the contractor shall conduct solid model data Geometric Validation Properties checks on CAD solid models for new or modified items to identify problems that will affect downstream applications, such as analysis, modeling and simulation, rapid prototype, and data exchange. Prior to submission, the contractor shall verify that the Top Level Assembly opens without errors from the deliverable storage device (e.g. hard drive or DVD). All technical data shall be appropriately marked with data rights legend. CAD data shall include relevant special tooling, interface data, and special test equipment data.

C.5.6.1 Identification and Assertion of Restrictions. Contractor shall identify all technical data and computer software including firmware to be furnished or delivered IAW DFARS 252.227-7017.

C.6. CORROSION

C.6.1. Materials. The contractor shall select substrate materials in accordance with Attachment 0001, ATPD-2414B and Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B. The contractor shall list by area in CDRL A007 Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan, component, subassembly and the substrate materials used. Inherently corrosion resistant materials such as aluminum and composites, or application of corrosion protection technologies such as galvanizing, shall be identified and matched to the service life of Type II LEUT or component. The use of non-standard or less corrosion resistant-materials shall be identified with supporting rationale. Contractor shall develop and submit a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan which describes the measures taken in design and production that will minimize the effects of corrosion on the Type II LEUT IAW CDRL A007.

C.6.2. Paint. The contractor shall paint Type II LEUTs Black or Tan as specified in individual delivery orders. The contractor shall ensure all substrates in their final, cleaned state are capable of being painted with Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) IAW MIL-

DTL-53072. This includes any pre-treatment or coating applied to the substrate prior to final application of the CARC system. At a minimum, the CARC system includes pretreatment, approved primer, and approved topcoat as listed in MIL-DTL-53072, and shall meet the quality control requirements set forth in the same specification. The contractor shall paint the Type II LEUT IAW Attachment 0001, Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B, and the following paragraphs:

C.6.2.1 Topcoat. Topcoat shall be CARC paint per MIL-DTL-53039, MIL-DTL-64159, or MIL-PRF-32348 Type III Topcoat. Army Technical

Bulletin 43-0209, Color, Marking, and Camouflage Painting of Military Vehicles, Construction Equipment and Materials Handling Equipment shall be used for registration marking IAW AR 750-1, Chapter 7, Section 8, component surfaces. Component surfaces that exceed 400

9 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

degrees Fahrenheit (204 degrees Celsius) shall be coated with heat resistant paint. The Type II LEUT and its accessories shall be prepared, treated, and painted per best commercial practice. There shall be no over spray on informational components such as instruction plates. All internal and external threads shall be greaseless and free from paint before painting. The finish and quality assurance testing for all painted surfaces shall be IAW MIL-DTL-53072.

C.6.2.2. Rustproofing of Interior Surfaces. The Type II LEUT shall have rustproofing compound A-A-59295 Type I applied to all interior surfaces within frame rails and cross members, tubular items such as axles and rails, and any other compartmentalized areas of the trailer which are not intended to be accessible by the user. Quality metrics for coating as described in Commercial Item Description

(CID) A-A-59295 Sec 3.3.1 Dried Film Thickness apply. Rustproofing compound shall not block drain holes for fording requirement.

Trailer operational functions shall not be affected as a result of the rustproofing of interior surfaces.

C.6.3 Steam and Water Jet Cleaning. The Type II LEUT and all its components shall withstand cleaning with high pressure steam or water jet cleaner (2500-3000 psi) at a distance no closer than 5 feet (1.5 meters) to any surface, compatible with CID A-A-59133 Cleaning

Compound, High Pressure (Steam) Cleaner without deterioration.

C.6.4. Corrosion Prevention and Control. The Type II LEUT shall meet the operational, logistical, and readiness requirements stated herein in all types of climate specified in ATPD 2414B paragraph 3.6.3. The Type II LEUT shall be resistant to the corrosive effects of a severe marine atmospheric environment consisting of seawater splash and spray, and occasional seawater immersion during operation, transport, and storage including fording of saltwater or freshwater. The Type II LEUT Trailer design, selection and use of materials and implementation of corrosion preventative methods should be such that maintenance to correct the effects of corrosion does not increase significantly over the course of the Type II LEUT life. Specific requirements for corrosion prevention are provided in the following subsections:

C.6.4.1. Corrosion Life. The Type II LEUT shall not have any corrosion exceeding 20% stage 1 or 5% stage 2 IAW Technical Bulletin 43-

0213 for a period of 20 years after date of production.

C.6.4.2 Collection and Entrapment. The Type II LEUT shall be designed to avoid the collection and entrapment of water, debris, dirt, grime, and other matter in operational, storage, and transportation orientations. The system shall be designed to minimize cavities and crevices where water and debris may collect. Where cavities are unavoidable, adequate drainage shall be provided. When drainage to an area outside of the system is not possible, the trailer design shall facilitate drainage to a location or locations which are accessible for cleaning by the operator. Drainage of a cavity shall not adversely affect the corrosion performance of other components or items.

Drainage shall not interfere with the structural integrity of the Type II LEUT.

C.6.4.3 Cleaning and Maintenance. The Type II LEUT shall provide access for corrosion-related cleaning and maintenance. Access is defined as a position and orientation which provides the space to reach, and perform cleaning and maintenance that does not require removal of equipment or machinery. If voids or cavities, which are not accessible for cleaning and maintenance are required due to other design considerations, special attention to corrosion resistance in these areas is required.

C.6.4.4 Dissimilar Metals. The Type II LEUT shall be designed to avoid the potential for galvanic corrosion. When possible, dissimilar metals (including fasteners, hardware or other items) shall be electrically insulated from one another to minimize or prevent galvanic corrosion. MIL-STD-889 shall be used to determine compatibility of dissimilar materials. Any commercial standard for Metallic Galvanic

Series in Seawater may be used to predict the effect that one metal can have upon another metal can when they are in electrical contact while immersed in an electrolyte.

C.7 ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (ESOH).

C.7.1 The contractor shall plan, develop and implement an ESOH Program consistent with: DoD Acquisition Directives, MIL-STD-882E, "Standard Practice for System Safety," AR 385-10, The Army Safety Program, DA PAM 385-16, System Safety Management Guide, AR 200-2, and

AR 40-10, "Health Hazard Assessment Program in Support of the Army Materiel Acquisition Process." The contractor shall ensure the Type

II LEUT meets the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR).

C.7.2 Environmental Compliance. The contractor shall ensure that all aspects of contract execution are in compliance with applicable

International, United States Federal, State, and Local environmental regulations and requirements; including activities associated with design, prototype build, test, storage, and disposal.

C.7.3 Safety Assessment Report (SAR). The contractor shall prepare and submit to the Government a SAR for the Type II LEUT based on the results of safety analyses, hazard evaluations, and any contractor or subcontractor independent testing on the Type II LEUT system or subsystems. The SAR shall identify all safety, health and environmental hazards associated with the Type II LEUT hardware design, the specific design features employed to eliminate or control the hazard; and shall provide verification of compliance to safety, health and environmental requirements. Each hazard identified, whether safety, health, or environmental, shall include the classification of hazard severity and probability of occurrence, IAW MIL-STD-882E. The contractor shall use structured tools (e.g. Failure Modes and

Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)) in hazard analysis and shall collect and summarize the results of those analyses into the Hazard Tracking System (HTS) (CDRL A020) and the SAR. The assessment shall report any special procedures or precautions to be observed by Government test agencies and system users or both. The contractor shall prepare the SAR IAW CDRL A008 Safety Assessment

Report.

10 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.7.4 Hazard Tracking System (HTS). The contractor shall document and track hazards related to hardware and software IAW MIL-STD 882E, using Task 106 as a guide. The contractor shall maintain the accuracy of the hazard reports at all times. The contractor shall add new hazard analyses data and changes to existing hazard analyses data to the HTS (IAW CDRL A020 Hazard Tracking System (HTS)). The HTS shall contain a description of each potential or actual environmental, safety and health hazard of the Type II LEUT, the cause and effects of the hazard, when the hazard may be expected to occur under usual and unusual operating or maintenance conditions, and status of each hazard. The contractor shall identify actions to mitigate the risk associated with the hazards and categorize the risk before and after mitigation IAW MIL-STD-882E. The contractor shall identify if the hazard is software related. Mitigation actions include recommended engineering controls, safety features or devices, warning devices and procedures and training. The HTS shall also include the findings from an Environmental Hazards Analysis (EHA) (MIL-STD-882E, Task 210).

C.7.5 Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Management

C.7.5.1 Radioactive materials shall not be used on the LEUT system. Radioactive material is defined as Thorium or any other source material, as defined by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 40, "Domestic Licensing of Source Material", in excess of 0.05 percent by weight. Also per 49 CFR, as any material that has a specific activity greater than 0.002 uCi/gm or 70 Bq/gm or any material which emits spontaneous nuclear disintegrations, corpuscular or electromagnetic emanations.

C.7.5.2 For the purposes of this contract, hazardous materials shall be defined by FED-STD-313, Section 3.2. Hazardous materials usage is restricted IAW Section 3.8.1.1 of Attachment 0001 and Attachment 0029, Superseding Revisions to ATPD-2414B. Hazardous materials restrictions shall apply to all components, parts, and materials provided under this contract, including items purchased through a subcontractor or supplier, Commercial off-The Shelf (COTS) components, OEM parts, and manufactured parts. Waivers from the hazardous materials requirements shall not be permissible except where a suitable alternative does not exist. The contractor shall provide a list of anticipated waiver requests no later than the SOWM. The contractor shall submit waiver requests to the COR no later than the PDR IAW

Attachment 0027, Request for Use of Prohibited Materials. Waiver requests shall include detailed technical justification for the use of prohibited hazardous materials.