Attachment_0025_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 154 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Light Engineer Utility Trailer (LEUT) Type II
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-16-R-0210
About this file
Attachment 0025 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND
TACOM CONTRACTING CENTER
6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD
WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF: CCTA-HTA-A
CCTA-HTA-A
26 February 2018 PCO Letter: 18-002 Subject: Solicitation W56HZV-16-R-0210, Light Engineer Utility Trailer Type II, Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
LIGHT ENGINEER UTILITY TRAILER SOLICITATION
1. Product Director Light Tactical Vehicles (PD LTV) and the United States Army Contracting Command-Warren (ACC-WRN) has a need to procure Light Engineer Utility Trailers (LEUT) to be used for hauling construction equipment. Currently, there are no trailers in the Army’s inventory that has the characteristics to satisfy the Army’s need. ACC-WRN is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.
2. Offerors interested in proposing on this work have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in Section L of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude that the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic mail to the LEUT mailbox: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.wrn-leut@mail.mil. Please confirm receipt of the submitted questionnaire via email response from the aforementioned email address. Please submit questions or comments regarding this letter to James Jones at (586) 282-3493 or by e-mail at james.r.jones3.civ@mail.mil or the undersigned at (586) 282-6076 or by e-mail at charley.g.jackson2.civ@mail.mil.
4. Please complete and submit your questionnaire by 28 March 2018. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, //s// Charley G. Jackson, Jr.
Charley G. Jackson, Jr.
Contracting Officer [Encl(s)] (1) Past Performance Questionnaire Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to James Jones at usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.wrn-leut@mail.mil by 28 March 2018. Thank you for your assistance.
PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. RELEVANT CONTRACT
Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Contract Award Date:
Contract Period of Performance End Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:
B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II - EVALUATION
(To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) Please check off all items that were included in the Statement of Work:
· Manufacturing of a Trailer
· Development and Delivery of a Technical Manual
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS
Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.
Table 1
1. Quality:
a. Trailer Hardware. Assess the quality and workmanship of the contractors’ deliverable product in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. (i.e. testing deficiencies, effective and timely corrective action plans, etc.)
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
b. Technical Manuals. Assess the quality of the contractors’ Technical Manual in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
2. Delivery Schedule:
a. Trailer Hardware. Assess the contractor compliance to the contractual delivery schedule. Please include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule. Please provide in the comments section if any Delivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed (i.e. the extent of the fault of the contractor).
Exceptional Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
b. Technical Manuals. Assess the timeliness of contractor performance and completion of the Technical Manuals. This assessment of the contractor’s adherence to the required performance schedule should include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule. Please provide in the comments section if any Delivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed (i.e. the extent of the fault of the contractor).
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
3. Management / Business Relations:
a. Trailer Hardware. Assess the efforts of contractor’s management and business relations for the manufacturing effort. (i.e. timely and effective communication, effective management of staff levels, etc.)
Exceptional Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
b. Technical Manuals. Assess the efforts of contractor’s management and business relations for the Technical Manual development and deliverable. (i.e. timely and effective communication, effective management of staff levels, etc.)
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
4. Regulatory Compliance. Assess the contractor’s compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes, considering aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract terms and conditions Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.
5. General Comments.
Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.
Comments:
PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.
Organization:
Address:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Once Filled In, this document is considered
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it.