Attachment0005ITES-3SPPQ_DRFP2.pdf

1 | P a g e

ATTACHMENT 0005

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RFP W52P1J-15-R-0096 ITES-3S

OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:

SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE

Introduction: Under solicitation W52P1J-15-R-0096 for Information Technology Enterprise Solutions - 3 Services (ITES-3S), the Army Contracting Command at Rock Island, IL (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information.

The completed PPQ serves as a source of information to evaluate the Offerors recent and relevant performance of the submitted project/contract reference (listed in Section IIB below) as it relates to the solicitation.

Instructions:

Offerors shall – o Complete Section IIA and IIB, then e-mail entire PPQ to the intended PPQ Respondent.

o Instruct the PPQ Respondent to complete Section III and to include comments.

Respondents to the PPQ shall – o Complete Section III entirely, to include comments; and Section IV with contact information.

o Send the completed PPQ to the Government Contract Specialist Mr. Stuart Honn, email usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil.

o Recommended format for email subject: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror

Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”.

o Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-

3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.

o Send the completed PPQ to the Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.

Narrative comments are appreciated for all ratings and comments are required for EXCELLENT, MARGINAL, or UNSATISFACTORY ratings. If discrepancies are identified in the submitted information from Sections IIA and IIB, please provide the discrepancies in your PPQ submission.

In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, Respondents may receive follow-up phone calls and/or e-mails from the Government to either confirm or clarify information submitted on the PPQ response. This is a critical acquisition and your time and support is sincerely needed and appreciated.

Rating Description: Please use the following ratings descriptions for the performance questions below:

RATING DESCRIPTION

Excellent The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

This rating requires a narrative.

Very Good The Offeror’s past performance exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

Satisfactory The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements.

Marginal The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Narrative appreciated.

Unsatisfactory The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements. This rating requires a narrative.

Not Applicable Not Applicable (N/A) to this contract mailto:usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil

2 | P a g e

SECTION II – Contractor’s Performance Information (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:

Role / Title: Name Phone ( ) xxx-xxxx ext. Email .civ@ Agency / Organization

PPQ Respondent POC:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor being Evaluated:

Contract /Project Reference Information: (enter applicable information)

Prime Contractor Name CAGE/DUNS+4

Subcontractor Name CAGE/DUNS+4

Contract / Project Title

Customer / Agency

“X” Predominance / Percentage

Services: % [ ] Hardware: % [ ] %Software: : % [ ] Subcontracted: %

Details

Number(s) (include dashes)

Award Date

MM/DD/YYYY

Start Date

MM/DD/YYYY

Date Complete

MM/DD/YYYY

Award Value (Round)

$$$.$K, M or B)

Current or Final Value

Base Contract

Follow-on Contract

Order Number(s)

Subcontract Number(s)

Performance Locations:

Contact Information: (provide current names of person(s) having knowledge of the work effort)

Role / Title: Name Phone ( ) xxx-xxxx ext. Email .civ@ Agency / Organization

Contract POC:

Contracting Officer:

COR/Technical Representative

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED:

Brief Description: (limited to 250 word narrative for PPQ only; a detailed description in the proposal is limited to 3 pages for each reference)

SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE (to be completed by PPQ Respondent / POC)

GENERAL INFORMATION

Please read the statements below, and rate the contractor with your relative level of agreement E =Exceptional; VG =Very Good; S =Satisfactory; M =Marginal; UN =Unsatisfactory; or N/A E VG S M UN

N/A

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements.

(b) Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

(d) Contractor understands contract scope and complexity of requirements.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks were performed in a timely manner and on schedule.

(Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

3 | P a g e

(b) Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner)

(a) Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) Contractor maintained an open line of communication and kept you apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(d) Contractor demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

(e) Contractor communication and working relationship with contracting officers, contracting officer technical representatives, end users, other contractors, etc.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) Contractor proposed personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly qualified.

6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE TASK AREAS:

(a) Cybersecurity Services

(b) Information Technology Services

(c) Enterprise design, integration and consolidation

(d) Network/System Operation and Maintenance

(e) Telecommunications/System Operation and Maintenance

(f) Business process reengineering

(g) IT Supply Chain Management

(h) IT Education and Training

Please provide a narrative to support the above ratings. Elaborate on exceptional, marginal, and unacceptable performance, give examples. Use corresponding numbers above to reference areas of performance (i.e. 1(b) xxx; 5(a) xxx; 5(b) and 6(a))

Comments/Notes:

SECTION IV

Performance Information provided by:

Role / Title: Name Phone ( ) xxx-xxxx ext.

Commercial and DSN

Email .civ@ Agency / Organization (ie Army, Navy, AF, MC)

PPQ Respondent POC:

Length of time in this role: (How long have you monitored the contractor performance?)

4 | P a g e

Date of this PPQ Submission

Reminder:

Email / Return this form to ONLY the Government Contract Specialist, Mr. Stuart Honn at usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil.

o EMAIL SUBJECT LINE should be: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror Name or

Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]” o PPQ FILENAME structure: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.

IMPORTANT: The response you are providing must be your OWN evaluation and OWN comments, and NOT pre-populated by the Offeror. If you receive a pre-populated PPQ with more than Sections IIA and IIB complete, contact the Contract Specialist and report the incident immediately.

It is suggested to save as a PDF format before sending to the Contract Specialist. A digital signature is also acceptable.

mailto:usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil