Attachment_0005_ITES-3SPPQ_12Feb2016.docx

DOCX document 37 KB Posted

Attached to
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS-3 SERVICES (ITES-3S) - ***Update to Estimated Award Date***
Solicitation number
W52P1J15R0096
Issued by

About this file

Att 0005 ITES-3S PPQ 12 Feb 2016

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ITES-3S_Awardees.pdf PDF
Attachment0002PRS_21Mar2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_ITES-3SPWS_22_Mar_2016.pdf PDF
Attachment0002PRS_21Mar2016.pdf PDF
ITES-3S_Awardees.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_ITES-3SPWS_22_Mar_2016.pdf PDF
W52P1J15R0096-0005.pdf PDF
W52P1J15R0096-0004.pdf PDF
Attachment0001ITES-3SPWS_22_Mar_2016.pdf PDF
W52P1J15R0096-0003.pdf PDF
Attachment0001ITES-3SPWS_21_Mar_2016.pdf PDF
Attachment0002PRS_21Mar2016.pdf PDF
W52P1J-15-R-0096_conformed_copy_through_Amendment_0002_unsecured.pdf PDF
W52P1J15R0096-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_0008_ITES_3S_Price_Model_11_MAR_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0001ITES-3SPWS_11_Mar_2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_0008_ITES_3S_Price_Model_03_MAR_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W52P1J15R0096-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_0002_PRS_12Feb2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_0003_MSForm_Instructions_12Feb2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_ITES-3SPWS_12Feb2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_ITES-3SMSForm_12Feb2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0007_ITES-3SContractParticipationMatrix_12Feb2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0008_ITES_3S_Price_Model_12_FEB_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0006_ITES-3SContractParticipationMatrixInstructions_12Feb2016.pdf PDF
W52P1J-15-R-0096_FINAL_RFP_12Feb2016.pdf PDF
W52P1J-15-R-0096_FINAL.DRFP2.pdf PDF
Attachment0008ITES_3S_Price_Model-_DRFP2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0003MSForm_Instructions_DRFP2.pdf PDF
Attachment0007ITES-3SContractParticipationMatrix_DRFP2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0004ITES-3SMSForm_DRFP2.pdf PDF
Attachment0002PRS_DRFP2v3.pdf PDF
Attachment0001ITES-3SPWS_DRFP2.pdf PDF
Attachment0006ITES-3SContractParticipationMatrixInstructions.pdf PDF
Attachment0005ITES-3SPPQ_DRFP2.pdf PDF
DRFP.Responses_FBOv2_12022015.pdf PDF
CHESS.ID.Registration_FINAL.pdf PDF
ITES-3S.ID.Briefing.Charts_FINAL.pdf PDF
DRFP.Responses_FBOv1_07092015.pdf PDF
W52P1J-15-R-0096_FINAL.DRFP.pdf PDF
ITES-3SContractParticipationMatrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Viable_ITES_3S_AMS.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 0005

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RFP W52P1J-15-R-0096 for ITES-3S

OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:

SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE

Introduction: Under solicitation W52P1J-15-R-0096 for Information Technology Enterprise Solutions - 3 Services (ITES-3S), the Army Contracting Command at Rock Island, IL (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information.

Instructions:

· Offerors are to –

· Complete Section IIA, IIB, and IIC, then e-mail entire PPQ to the identified PPQ Respondent.

· Instruct the PPQ Respondent to complete Sections III and IV.

· Respondents to the PPQ are to –

· Complete Section III entirely, to include comments as necessary; and Section IV with contact information.

· Send the completed PPQ to the Government Contract Specialist, Mr. Stuart Honn, via email at: usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil. Phone number: (309) 782-2997.

· Recommended format for email with subject: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”.

· Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.

· Send the completed PPQ to the Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.

In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, Respondents may receive follow-up phone calls to clarify information submitted on the PPQ response. This is a critical acquisition and your time and support is sincerely needed and appreciated.

Rating Description: Please use the following rating descriptions for the performance questions below:

RATING
DESCRIPTION
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory (UN)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable (NA)
Not Applicable (N/A) to this contract.

SECTION II – Contractor’s Performance Information (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:

Role / Title:
Name
Phone:

( ) xxx-xxxx

Email
Agency / Organization

PPQ Respondent POC:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:

OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:

NAME of Contractor being Evaluated:

Contract /Project Reference Information: (enter applicable information)

Prime Contractor Name

CAGE/DUNS+4

Subcontractor (if the reference contract was as sub under the prime contract)

CAGE/DUNS+4

Contract / Project Title

Customer / Agency

“X” Predominance / Estimated Percentage
Services: __% [ ]
Hardware: __% [ ]
Software: : __% [ ]
Subcontracted: __%

Details Number(s) (include dashes) Award Date

MM/DD/YYYY

Start Date

MM/DD/YYYY

Date Complete

MM/DD/YYYY

Award Value (round) $$$.$K, M or B) Current or Final Value (round)

Contract

New (follow-on) Contract

Order Number(s)

Subcontract Number(s)

Performance Locations:

Contact Information: (provide current names of person(s) having knowledge of the work effort)

Role / Title:
Name
Phone:

( ) xxx-xxxx

Email
Agency / Organization

Contract Specialist POC:

Contracting Officer:

COR/Technical Representative:

Other POC/identify or N/A:

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED:

Brief Description: (limited to a 250 word narrative for PPQ only)

SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE (to be completed by PPQ Respondent / POC)

GENERAL INFORMATION: Using the rating definitions and abbreviations above, please read the statements below, and rate the contractor with your relative level of agreement (check mark the applicable box):

E
VG
S
M
UN

N/A

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements.

(b) Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

(d) Contractor understands contract scope and complexity of requirements.

2. SCHEDULE:

(Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

(a) The tasks were performed in a timely manner and on schedule.

(b) Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner)

(a) Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates

(d) If applicable – as a prime contractor were its subcontractors paid in a timely manner?

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) Contractor maintained an open line of communication and kept you apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(d) Contractor demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

(e) Contractor communication and working relationship with contracting officers, contracting officer technical representatives, end users, other contractors, etc.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) Contractor proposed personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly qualified.

6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE TASK AREAS: (check all that apply)

(a) Cybersecurity Services

(b) Information Technology Services

(c) Enterprise design, integration and consolidation

(d) Network/System Operation and Maintenance

(e) Telecommunications/System Operation and Maintenance

(f) Business process reengineering

(g) IT Supply Chain Management

(h) IT Education and Training

(i) Other (please identify)

Please provide a narrative to support the above ratings.

Comments/Notes:

SECTION IV

Performance Information provided by:

Role / Title:
Name
Phone

( ) xxx-xxxx

Email
Agency / Company

PPQ Respondent POC:

Estimated time (years/months) working with this contractor/tracking of the contractor’s performance:

Reminder:

· Email this form to the Government Contract Specialist, Mr. Stuart Honn, at:

usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil

· Email SUBJECT line should be: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”

· PPQ Filename structure: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.

2 | Page

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .