Attachment_0005_ITES-3SPPQ_12Feb2016.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS-3 SERVICES (ITES-3S) - ***Update to Estimated Award Date***
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J15R0096
About this file
Att 0005 ITES-3S PPQ 12 Feb 2016
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 0005
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
RFP W52P1J-15-R-0096 for ITES-3S
OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:
SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE
Introduction: Under solicitation W52P1J-15-R-0096 for Information Technology Enterprise Solutions - 3 Services (ITES-3S), the Army Contracting Command at Rock Island, IL (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information.
Instructions:
· Offerors are to –
· Complete Section IIA, IIB, and IIC, then e-mail entire PPQ to the identified PPQ Respondent.
· Instruct the PPQ Respondent to complete Sections III and IV.
· Respondents to the PPQ are to –
· Complete Section III entirely, to include comments as necessary; and Section IV with contact information.
· Send the completed PPQ to the Government Contract Specialist, Mr. Stuart Honn, via email at: usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil. Phone number: (309) 782-2997.
· Recommended format for email with subject: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”.
· Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.
· Send the completed PPQ to the Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.
In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, Respondents may receive follow-up phone calls to clarify information submitted on the PPQ response. This is a critical acquisition and your time and support is sincerely needed and appreciated.
Rating Description: Please use the following rating descriptions for the performance questions below:
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory (UN) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| Not Applicable (N/A) to this contract. |
SECTION II – Contractor’s Performance Information (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:
| Role / Title: |
| Name |
| Phone: |
( ) xxx-xxxx
| Agency / Organization |
PPQ Respondent POC:
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:
NAME of Contractor being Evaluated:
Contract /Project Reference Information: (enter applicable information)
Prime Contractor Name
CAGE/DUNS+4
Subcontractor (if the reference contract was as sub under the prime contract)
CAGE/DUNS+4
Contract / Project Title
Customer / Agency
| “X” Predominance / Estimated Percentage |
| Services: __% [ ] |
| Hardware: __% [ ] |
| Software: : __% [ ] |
| Subcontracted: __% |
Details Number(s) (include dashes) Award Date
MM/DD/YYYY
Start Date
MM/DD/YYYY
Date Complete
MM/DD/YYYY
Award Value (round) $$$.$K, M or B) Current or Final Value (round)
Contract
New (follow-on) Contract
Order Number(s)
Subcontract Number(s)
Performance Locations:
Contact Information: (provide current names of person(s) having knowledge of the work effort)
| Role / Title: |
| Name |
| Phone: |
( ) xxx-xxxx
| Agency / Organization |
Contract Specialist POC:
Contracting Officer:
COR/Technical Representative:
Other POC/identify or N/A:
C. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED:
Brief Description: (limited to a 250 word narrative for PPQ only)
SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE (to be completed by PPQ Respondent / POC)
GENERAL INFORMATION: Using the rating definitions and abbreviations above, please read the statements below, and rate the contractor with your relative level of agreement (check mark the applicable box):
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| UN |
N/A
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(a) Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements.
(b) Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
(d) Contractor understands contract scope and complexity of requirements.
2. SCHEDULE:
(Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)
(a) The tasks were performed in a timely manner and on schedule.
(b) Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
3. COST CONTROL:
(in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner)
(a) Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(b) Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(c) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates
(d) If applicable – as a prime contractor were its subcontractors paid in a timely manner?
4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(a) Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(b) Contractor maintained an open line of communication and kept you apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(c) Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(d) Contractor demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.
(e) Contractor communication and working relationship with contracting officers, contracting officer technical representatives, end users, other contractors, etc.
5. KEY PERSONNEL:
(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(b) Contractor proposed personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly qualified.
6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE TASK AREAS: (check all that apply)
(a) Cybersecurity Services
(b) Information Technology Services
(c) Enterprise design, integration and consolidation
(d) Network/System Operation and Maintenance
(e) Telecommunications/System Operation and Maintenance
(f) Business process reengineering
(g) IT Supply Chain Management
(h) IT Education and Training
(i) Other (please identify)
Please provide a narrative to support the above ratings.
Comments/Notes:
SECTION IV
Performance Information provided by:
| Role / Title: |
| Name |
| Phone |
( ) xxx-xxxx
| Agency / Company |
PPQ Respondent POC:
Estimated time (years/months) working with this contractor/tracking of the contractor’s performance:
Reminder:
· Email this form to the Government Contract Specialist, Mr. Stuart Honn, at:
usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.ites-3s@mail.mil
· Email SUBJECT line should be: “Completed PPQ for W52P1J-15-R-0096, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[contract reference number]”
· PPQ Filename structure: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-PPQ-ITES-3S-[contract reference number].docx” or “.pdf”.
2 | Page
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .