24-R-A010_AMEND_02_AfdStp_Final_QA_20240613.pdf
PDF 227 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Re-Stripe Airfield Parking Pavements Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W50S8F-24-R-A010
- Issued by
- Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is a Question and Answer (Q&A) amendment to Solicitation W50S8F-24-R-A010 for the re-striping of the Main Aircraft Parking Apron at the 177th Fighter Wing in Egg Harbor Township, NJ. The solicitation is a total small business set-aside under NAICS code 237310, with a construction magnitude between $100,000 and $250,000. Key details from the Q&A include:
- Page limitations for the capability statement and other proposal sections
- Confirmation that email proposal submission negates the need for hard copies
- No minimum, maximum, or preferred number of past performance questionnaires required
- Flexibility to include past performance from key personnel's prior employers
- Confirmation on the scope of existing markings to be removed
- Limitations on providing geographic coordinates in CAD drawings
- Guidance on FOD cleanup methods and timing between project phases
The solicitation documents, including this Q&A, are available on SAM.gov for contractor review and adherence to all requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W50S8F-24-R-A010 Replace Airfield Striping Solicitation Amendment 02 - June 13, 2024 Final Solicitation Question & Answer
1. In RFP Section 00 21 00, Paragraph 7.2, the items required in Volume 2 of the proposal are identified with Page numbers. Should these be considered page limitations (i.e. the capability statement, etc. is limited to 3 pages)?
a. ANSWER: Yes, these should be considered page number limitations. This a Simplified Acquisition being conducted under FAR Part 13. Detailed and extensive is not requested or required.
2. RFP Section 00 21 00, Paragraph 7.2.3 states that proposals must include “Capability Statement / Technical Approach / Key Personnel / Representative Projects Complete…” The RFP provides no further instruction on this, and none of these items are included in the evaluation and award criteria. Can you please clarify whether offerors should include this section, and if so, what information the Government would like to see addressed?
a. ANSWER: This section is the offerors opportunity to describe to the Government their ability to meet the Past Performance requirements in item 01 of Attachment 04 Evaluation Factors. The offeror is encouraged to include what they deem relevant to successful completion of the project or provide information that would be helpful to the Government in determining if the offeror has the past performance as defined in Items
1.2.1 and item 1.2.2 of attachment 04
3. Please confirm that if proposals are submitted via email IAW Section 00 21 00, Paragraph 8.3, offerors are not also required to submit hard copies and digital copies on CD/DVD IAW Paragraph 7.3.
a. ANSWER: Confirmed. If proposal is submitted via email, hard copies are not required.
4. Is there a minimum, maximum, or preferred number of Past Performance Questionnaires that offerors should have submitted on its behalf?
a. ANSWER: There is no minimum, maximum, or preferred. Offeror should submit the Past
Performance questionnaires they feel are relevant to best illustrate they meet the requirements of Attachment 04 Evaluation Criteria item 01 – Past Performance.
5. May offerors submit a supplemental past performance / relevant experience outlining the relevant experience of crew leaders and laborers who have relevant experience while working for a business other than our existing business?
a. ANSWER: Yes. If your key personnel have the requisite experience and they will be assigned to this contract, the offeror may submit their resume as a Past Performance document.
6. Please confirm that removal of existing markings includes all markings within apron including those not previously measured such as the taxi shoulder markings in the “roadway” area?
a. ANSEWER: All quantities for removal are approximately, the contractor is responsible to measure their own quantity.
7. Is it possible to add geographic locations to CAD drawings to allow a surveyor to assist in layout?
ANSWER: No. Geographic locations cannot be added to CAD.
8. Please confirm there are no limitations to equipment used for FOD cleanup such as blower equipment as a means cleaning up reflective media?
a. ANSWER: As long as the FOD is picked up and not relocated elsewhere on the ramp, there are no limitations.
9. How much time is needed between phase 1 and phase 2 to allow for equipment to be relocated between phase 1 and phase 2?
a. ANSWER: That shall be determined by the General Contractor and approved by the
Government prior to mobilization
10. How much time can pass between removal of a markings and replacing those markings? For instance, are contractors able to remove all markings within a phase before completing the layout & painting of new markings?
a. ANSWER: Yes, contractor can remove everything within the phase and then perform a layout.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .