Attachment_0006_PPQ_Letter_and_Questionnaire_revised.pdf

PDF 144 KB Posted

Attached to
Aerial Target Systems 2 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
w31p4q17r0004
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

PP Letter and PP Questionnaire instructions revised for clarity

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aerial Target Systems 2, newest first.
File Type Posted
W31P4Q17R0004-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_00011_-_ATS2_CLIN_STRUCTURE.pdf PDF
Government_Responses_to_Industry_Questions_(after_Final_RFP).pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_W31P4Q17R0004-0001_FBO.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_Attachment_0011_ATS_2_CLIN_Structure_Guide_Revision.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_ATTACHMENT_0008_Industry_Questions_prior.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_0001_SOW_IDIQ_17_AUG.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Attachment_0003_-_ATS2_DD254.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2__ATTACHMENT_0009_Industry_Questions_ID.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_Attachment_0006_PPQ_Cover_Letter_and_PPQ_.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2__ATTACHMENT_0007_Industry_Questions_from_Draft_RFP.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_Exhibit_A_-_ATS_2_CDRL_R1.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_Attachment_0002_DSL.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_Attachment_0012_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_Evaluation_Form.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2_Attachment_0005_Special_Provisions.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_ATS2__ATTACHMENT_0010_Industry_Questions_after_ID._docx.pdf PDF
ATS_Industry_Day_Information.pptx PPTX presentation
DRAFT_ATS2_Industry_Day_Information_Sheet.pptx PPTX presentation
DRAFT_SOW.pdf PDF
DRAFT_INDUSTRY_DAY_INFORMATION_SHEET.pptx PPTX presentation
DRAFT_RFP_EXHIBIT_A_CDRLS.pdf PDF
DRAFT_DSL.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP.pdf PDF
DRAFT_DD254.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF:

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - REDSTONE

BUILDING 5303, MARTIN ROAD

REDSTONE ARSENAL, ALABAMA 35898-5280

CCAM-OS-S

Dear Sir or Madam: January, 2018

The U.S. Army Contracting Command — Redstone (ACC-RSA) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors in response to solicitation # W31P4Q-17-R-0004 for the Aerial Target Systems 2 requirement. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of each offeror's past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, having had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts. An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance.

The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror's performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

Please complete and submit the Questionnaire within 3 days of receipt of this letter via e-mail to the undersigned at llane.c.mcgee.civ@mail.mil (Attention: Llane McGee, Contracting Officer).

If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Questionnaire, please contact myself at (256) 842-1702 your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

llsignedll Llane McGee Procuring Contracting Officer

1 Attachment Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire Aerial Target Systems 2 (ATS-2)

RFP W31P4Q-17-R-0004

ATTACHMENT 0006

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days of receipt of this questionnaire.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Acceptable

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Acceptable

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Acceptable

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Acceptable

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it.