The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Question RFP Page OR Pre-Proposal Conference OR Site Visit/GFP/GFE Review/Inspection
| RFP Para Reference (if question relates to RFP) |
| Government Response |
| 88 |
| Contract shall perform all services during first and second shifts Monday-Saturday however Para 5.8G outlines shifts including 3rd shift and Sunday coverage. Please clarify minimum required coverage? |
| PWS Pg. # C-4 & 5 and Pg. #C-47-50 |
| PWS 1.2.4A |
| This has been corrected in the PWS. |
| 89 |
| Are deviations from Key Personnel categories acceptable with justification? |
| PWS Pg. # C-6-8 |
| PWS 1.4 |
| Yes. |
| 90 |
| The Contractor shall designate a 3PL Project Manager who will be required to work onsite. Please advise if this is on-site at WR-ALC or on-site at Contractors Facility? |
PWS. Pg. #C-6-7
| PWS Para 1.4.A2-3PL Manager |
| See C-1.4A2. |
| 91 |
| Please advise if the ESOH Compliance specialist is expected to be on-site at WR-ALC? |
| PWS Pg. #C-7 |
| PWS Para 1.4.A3- ESOH Compliance Specialist |
| The place of work for the ESOH Compliance Specialist is at the Contractor’s discretion. |
| 92 |
| Are these labor categories expected to work on-site at WR-ALC? |
| PWS Pg. #C-6-8 |
| PWS 1.4.2A, B, C |
| Labor categories may be for on-site or off-site personnel. |
| 93 |
| Please confirm shifts with varying lengths 8 hours, 8.65 hours, 8.83 hours, 10 hours, 7.67 hours is correct? |
PWS Pg. #C-47-50
| PWS 5.8 |
| The shifts are correct. |
| 94 |
| Does the Government expect the Production Shops to be manned 100% of the shift requiring coverage for breaks and lunches? |
| PWS Pg. #C-47-50 |
| PWS 5.8 |
| Yes. |
| 95 |
| To establish a training plan, what type of equipment will be made available for contractor use? |
PWS Pg. #C-25
| PWS 3.1.2C &D |
| The only equipment available for on-base use will be forklifts. |
| 96 |
| Does the Government have a minimum requirement for pallet locations, cubic space for climate controlled, and refrigeration and freezer storage? |
| PWS Pg. #C-26-27 |
| PWS 4.1.1 |
| This is at the discretion of the Contractor based on their demand supported inventory that will be stored in their facility; however, storage space should be optimal for the 3PL inventory. |
Pre-Proposal Conference OR Site Visit/GFP/GFE Review/Inspection
| RFP Para Reference (if question relates to RFP) |
| Government Response |
| 97 |
| It seems as though the Contractor POS System and EESOH-MIS will hold duplicative information such as inventory levels at the contractor facility (receipts and inventory) and customer requisitions. Please confirm if the contractor bears responsibility for updating both systems for the following transactions? |
| PWS Pg. #C-34 |
and Pg. #C-41
| PWS 5.2A, 5.6.2B |
| ESSOH-MIS is the program of record. It is up to the Contractor to determine the data that will be managed in their POS System. |
| 98 |
| Procurement receipts at the contractor facility? |
PWS Pg. #C-34 and Pg. #C-41
| 99 |
| Customer requisitions to be filled in both POS and EESOH-MIS? |
PWS Pg. #C-34 and Pg. #C-41
| 100 |
| Receipt of material at Government work site in EESOH-MIS? |
| 101 |
| Will the EESOH-MIS system be accessible from the Contractor facility? |
| PWS 5.2A, 5.6.2B |
| The Government will provide access to the Air Force Portal. |
| 102 |
| What is the expectation for the POS System and EESOH-MIS system in terms of interoperability or data feeds? |
| PWS 5.2A, 5.6.2B |
| The Government has no expectation as long as all data is maintained in ESSOH-MIS as the program of record. |
Pre-Proposal Conference OR Site Visit/GFP/GFE Review/Inspection
| RFP Para Reference (if question relates to RFP) |
| Government Response |
| 103 |
| There is a liability with holding stock levels to service the Customer per the APL towards the end of the period of performance. Are there any plans for existing stock not determined to be excess, to be purchased or transitioned (if needed) to another contractor? |
| C-37 & 38 |
| PWS 5.4.3.A |
| Any plans for the future is procurement sensitive information. |
| 104 |
| PWS 5.8 Outlines FTE support for building 89 however there was no technical exhibit for this particular building. Can this be provided? |
| C-47 |
| PWS 5.8 |
| C-5.8 in the PWS is revised to eliminate support to Building 89. |
| 105 |
| TE 5.12, 5.13, 5.15 and 5.4 provide information and building drawings (42, 38, B0042, 44, 47, 48, 49, 81, 82, 83, 86, 91, 110, 103, 114, 119, 131, 364, 2316, 2390) not covered in the charts under PWS 5.8. Does the Government anticipate that the FTE counts outlined in the charts under PWS 5.8 will cover these locations or does the Government expect the Contractor to propose FTE count to operationally cover these locations? |
| Technical Exhibits 5.12, 5.13, 5.15 & 5.4 |
| Technical Exhibits 5.12, 5.13, 5.15 & 5.4 |
| These TEs are provided for information only. Issue Centers to be operated are identified in C-5.8 and is the projected level of effort. |
Pre-Proposal Conference OR Site Visit/GFP/GFE Review/Inspection
| RFP Para Reference (if question relates to RFP). |
| Government Response |
| 106 |
| During the Site Visit, we did not have the opportunity to visit the DLA HAZMAT Warehouse. What is the size of current storage area that is being utilized? |
| Site Visit |
| n/a |
| The DLA HAZMAT warehouse is not in the scope of this requirement. This is a new requirement. |
| 107 |
| Will the contractor be required to dispose of expired HAZMAT left behind at the start of performance? |
| PreProposal Conference |
| n/a |
| No. The Government is responsible for disposing expired Government-owned HAZMAT. |
| 108 |
| T.E. 5.1 Provides annual order information. Given the shelf life consideration for these materials, is there a monthly breakdown to allow for more accurate procurement planning and storage requirements? |
| RFP |
| T.E. 5.1 |
| No. The Offeror is responsible for determining this based on their inventory stocking plan. |
| 109 |
| Para C-4 of the PWS states that the contractor will provide all MHE. Does that include MHE at the POU/Pharmacies? If so, can the government provide the types, locations and numbers currently in use? |
| PWS |
| Para C-4ACI |
| PWS Section C-4.1.1E is revised to state that the Contractor may be required to provide vehicles to deliver HM from the issue centers to the outer locations where POUs are located. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to determine the types of equipment required. |
| 110 |
| T.E.1.1 “Environmental Requirements” para. 2.2.7.h states that a “Hazardous Material Purchase Request for Contractors” must be submitted and approved prior to transporting and HAZMAT onto Robins AFB. As the contractor can expect to make daily deliveries to the Pharmacies/POUs, is this process (to include approval by 78 CEG/CEIER) required for every shipment of previously approved materials for daily use? |
| RFP |
| C-1 T.E.1.1 |
| No. Access to the base for regular and recurring deliveries will be approved at contract award. |
| 111 |
| What is the current square footage requirement for storing temperature controlled refrigerated and frozen materials? We were not afforded the opportunity to see these current storage facilities during the site visit. |
| PWS |
| C-4 para. 4.1.1.D |
| The Offeror is responsible for determining square footage requirements for controlled refrigerated and frozen materials based on their inventory stocking plan. The Government’s storage facilities are not pertinent to the scope of this requirement. |
| 112 |
| Can you please clarify that the RFP due date for SP330019R5002 has been removed? The Draft RFP is calling for April 30th, but all information has been removed from the cover page. I do not see an amendment to clarify if the date has been changed. |
The RFP due date will be posted with the Final RFP.
| 113 |
| Is the government prepared to furnish a final RFP for this solicitation at this time? If not, when does the government anticipate furnishing industry with a final RFP? |
The Government anticipates issuing a Final RFP the week of April 29, 2019.
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution