Attachment 21 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 70 KB Posted

Attached to
Global Anti-Terrorism Assistance (GATA II) Training Services
Solicitation number
SAQMMA17R0163
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 21 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 30 - SPEAR Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 27 - EUR Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 26 - EAP Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 19 - Domestic Training Venue Specifications A003.pdf PDF
SAQMMA17R0163_A003_full_text_with_highlights.pdf PDF
Attachment 31 - WHA Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
GATA_II_compiled_Q&As_A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 25 - AF Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 22 - Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 21 - Past Performance Questionnaire A003.pdf PDF
Attachment 29 - SCA Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 28 - NEA Price Proposal Worksheet A003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SAQMMA17R0163_A002.pdf PDF
SAQMMA17R0163_A001.pdf PDF
SAQMMA17R0163_A001.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - 360 peer review.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10 - Opening Day Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 27 - EUR Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 16- Participant Data.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 12 - Incident Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Historical Workload.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Course Descriptions and Level of Effort.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 24 - Sample DR Consults.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Code of Conduct.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - Bio Submission Form.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 - Screening Completion Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 22 - Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 - Arrival Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 30 - SPEAR Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - Positions Descriptions.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 - Domestic Training Venue Specifications.pdf PDF
SAQMMA17R0163_solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Closing Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 After Action Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 29 - SCA Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 15 - Student Critique Form.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Billable Travel Days by Country.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 11 - Weekly Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 28 - NEA Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 26 - EAP Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 31 - WHA Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 25 - AF Price Proposal Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 33 - Small Business Subcontracting Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 - Sample DR Course.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S-AQMMA-17-R-0163 Department of State Global Anti-Terrorism Assistance (GATA II)

ATTACHMENT 21

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

Handwritten responses are sufficient.

Indicate, based on the codes below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL CODE

EXCELLENT (E) Indicates that the contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation clearly exceeds contractual requirements.

GOOD (G) Indicates no problems exist in the area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions are in hand.

MARGINAL (M) Indicates the area of evaluation contains an existing problem for which there is doubt whether the identified solution is adequate but the problem appears to be within the contractor’s ability to solve.

UNACCEPTABLE (U) Indicates a serious problem exists in the evaluation area which may be outside the contractor’s ability to solve. The contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery in not likely.

NEUTRAL (N) Performance did not include such efforts or performance was not observed.

Please circle a letter corresponding to your rating or ‘N/A’ if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.

FOR ANY RATING BELOW SATISFACTORY, A CLARIFICATION AND EXPLANATION IS

REQUESTED. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

You are urged to supplement your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

Return the completed questionnaire to the requestor in a sealed envelope with the responder’s signature over the seal or direct to email address listed below.

If you have any questions, please contact Patty Washington: Washington-sicherp@state.gov.

ATTACHMENT 21

PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor Name/Division:

B. Contract Number:

C. Contract Effort or Program Title:

D. Contract Type:

E. Estimated Amount/Annual Volume of Service:

F. Period of Performance:

G. Brief Description of contract effort or task:

I. MANAGEMENT ABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS

1. The contractor provided experienced executives, including project manager and supervisors and replacements with the technical and administrative qualifications required to meet the contract requirements.

E G M U N

2. The contractor’s delegation of authority to project manager and supervisors met contract requirements.

3. The contractor provided adequate resources (personnel/equipment) in each specialty necessary to fulfill contractual requirements.

4. The contractor provided effective emergency response actions and corrective actions to cover incidents such as: disruption of utilities, accidents, material shortages, safety, security, and hazardous materials handling incidents.

II. QUALITY

1. Contractor provided effective Quality/ Inspection procedures and personnel to meet contract requirements.

2. When deficiencies were reported, the contractor took effective corrective actions pursuant to their Quality Control procedures.

3. Contractor completed projects and subsequent corrective actions, including punch-list items, in a timely manner.

4. Overall quality of the services provided under the contract E G M U N

III. COST/PRICE

1. The contractor provided accurate and timely proposals for changes.

ATTACHMENT 21

IV. GENERAL

1. Compliance with contract terms and conditions. E G M U N

2. Willingness to cooperate with and assist the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.

3. Business integrity and business conduct. E G M U N

4. Given the opportunity, would your organization enter into another contractual relationship with this contractor in the future?

Yes No

V. COMMENTS

NOTE: Additional comments are appreciated:

VI. RESPONSE INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. This information will be kept confidential.

Name of Evaluator Phone Number Email Address Date Questionnaire Completed:

Source of Information/Documentation utilized to rate Performance Level

May we contact you to discuss/validate ? Yes or No (circle one)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .