Attachment_B-_Past_Performance.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
ISN/ECC Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SAQMMA16R0502
Issued by
Department of State Office of Acquisition Management

About this file

Attachment B- Past Performance.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to ISN/ECC Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
16R0502Questions_Revised_12_07_2016_(2).docx DOCX document
SAQMMA16R0502-A007.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_Observer_Evaluation_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_G_-_Monthly_Report_Template_-_ECC_Services_IDIQ.docx DOCX document
Attachment_A_Pricing_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DD254.pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502-A005_(1).pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502-A004.pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502-A003.pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502-A002.pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502-A001.pdf PDF
SAQMMA16R0502.pdf PDF
Attachment_D-_Sample_Task_Order_1.docx DOCX document
RFPCoverLetter.doc DOC document
Attachment_H_-_Participant_Course_Evaluation_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_F-_Sample_Task_Order_3.docx DOCX document
Attachment_G_-_Monthly_Report_Template_.docx DOCX document
Attachment_E-_Sample_Task_Order_2.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment B—Past Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order Delivery Schedule

Timeliness in Meeting Milestones

Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—(timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork and customer satisfaction)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing SOW)

INVOICING—

(accuracy and timeliness of submission)

FORECASTING/MANAGEMENT/COST CONTROL

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

_____________________________________________________
Assessor’s SignatureDate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .