SAQMMA16R0029_QA_A004.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Service Transition Support (STS) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA16R0029
About this file
Questions and Answers #2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Reference | Questions | Answers |
| 1 | SOW on pages 42-51, RFP pg 69 | In the SOW on pages 42-51 it states that both tasks 9 and 10 are under Quality Management (QM). However in the RFQ under evaluation factor 1, pg. 69 states that only task 9 is under QM. Can you please confirm which is correct? | SOW page 47 has been revised to show Task 9 is Process Monitoring and Improving. Evaluation Factor 1 has been revised. |
| 2 | RFP page 69 & SOW page 6 | In the SOW on page 6 it states that both tasks tasks 4 - 8 are under IV&V yet under the RFQ pg. 69 - it states that tasks 4 - 7 with task 8 falling under Configuration Management. Can you please confirm which is correct? | SOW page 6 is revised. |
| 3 | SOW page 9 & 58 | The SOW makes reference to a Task 13 on page 9 but there is no other mention of a 13th task. Will the government please clarify? | SOW page 9 and 58 were revised. |
| 4 | General | We would like to know if this a new requirement or there’s an incumbent | This should be considered a new requirement. Some, but not all of the tasks which are to be performed by the resulting contract are currently being performed under several other requirements. There are currently 3 incumbent contractors |
| 5 | General | Whether a subcontractor currently supporting CA/CST systems precludes the award to a prime contractor with a team that includes that subcontractor? | Please see section H-004, "Organizational Conflict of Interest". |
| 6 | General | If the subcontractor currently supporting CA/CST systems is conflicted-out from participating as a subcontractor on a team preparing a proposal in response to this solicitation? | Please see section H-004, "Organizational Conflict of Interest". |
| 7 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 5 | ||
| Referring to the phrase “Key changes must be accomplished on a 24 hour basis” please clarify: Is a Key Management plan required? |
Also
| A Key Management Plan is not required as part of proposal responses. If necessary, further guidance will be provided post-award. | |
| 8 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 5 |
| What is the classification level of the “keys”? | Further guidance will be provided post-award. |
| 9 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 5 |
| Are the keys physical or virtual? | Further guidance will be provided post-award. |
| 10 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 5 |
| Who manages the keys? | Further guidance will be provided post-award. |
| 11 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 5 |
| Is destruction equipment necessary and a COMSEC account required? | Further guidance will be provided post-award. |
| 12 | SAQMMA16R0029, item H-001, bullet 12 and H-0003, H.3.1 Personnel Sequirity Requirements |
| Are Interim Clearances acceptable for program access to the OpenNet system, the contractor facility an the Department of State (DoS) facility? Recommend an Interim Secret Clearance for the Program Manager, Senior CM Specialist and Test Automation Specialist. And and Interim Top Secret clerance for Network Administrtor and Sr. Database Administrator. | Yes, Interim Clearances are acceptable as Security |
Clearances. Any recommended or proposed clearance levels for key personnel should be documented in the proposal.
| 13 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 25, item H-001, bullet 6 |
| Repeating FAM 629 appears to be an error, and if so, was a different regulation intended to be referenced? What are the levels of safeguarding for the entire space and various rooms, to include conference rooms, server room, lab space, etc. | |
| 1. FAM 623 |
2. Sensitive But Unclassified
| 14 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 26, item H-003 / H.3.1, Paragraph 2. |
| How is the visitor access request (VAR) process handled for the facility? | |
| The VAR process for the facilty shall send VARs to DS/IS/IND, SA20, 13th floor, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209. the contractor shall attach Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) Sumary Sheets issued by DSS to all VARs. Detail information is also stated in the Attachment E - DD 254. | |
| 15 | SAQMMA16R0029, Page 27, item H003 / H.3.2, bullet 3 |
| What level of Personnel Security Clearance is required for the contractor employees to be issued DoS building passes? | |
| Refer to Attachment E - DD 254 | |
| 16 | Statement of Work (SOW), General |
| The 12 Tasks contain a section for Deliverables. Please indicate if the Deliverables are developed in accordance with the contractor’s format or will additional information such as Data Item Descriptions be provided for guidance. | |
| The format for each deliverable will be provided to the Contractor, when applicable. For deliverables with no required CST format, the Contractor is responsible to develop it. | |
| 17 | SOW Paragraph 3.2 |
| Paragraph 3.2 states: The Contractor shall successfully plan and manage the transition from the existing STS test facility to a STS test facility (if transitioning to a facility different than current Arlington, VA location). Please advise if the current Arlington facility meets the requirements of 35,000 square feet with warehouse and test facilities as required by the current RFP? | |
| No, but the incumbent's facility in Arlington's capacity is not representative of the necessary capacity of this contract. | |
| 18 | SOW Paragraph 3.2.1 |
| Paragraph 3.2.1 states: Transition-In shall provide a continuity of service in the areas supported by the incumbent contractors while the new contractor learns how to support these services. Should we assume that the incumbent employees will continue working during this period? | Contractors should plan to staff the contract with |
employees and subcontractors knowledgeable in the work required. While the contracting officer may provide written notice to incumbent contractors whose contracts or task orders contain the FAR 52.237-3 Continuity of Service clause, there is no guarantee that the successfull contractor should expect that another contractor will be responsible for training their employees or that in every area of work covered by this new contract, services were provided under a predecessor contract. SOW has been revised to indicate FAR 52.237-3 is only applicable at the end of the contract, not at the beginning.
| 19 | SOW Paragraph 3.2.1 |
| Does the Government require the new contractor to price the continuity labor during transition? | Any cost for transitioning in of new contractor should |
be priced under Firm Fixed Price CLIN 002, Task 2:
Transition Activities. The continuity of services applicable to any contract awarded from this soliciation will be limited to those activites at the end of the contract that the contracting officer notifies the contractor of in writing that are necessary for continuity of operations.
| 20 | SOW Paragraph 3.2.2.3 | |
| This paragraph states: Managing the transition from the current facility to a different facility if necessary. Please indicate if the current facility is a viable option. | ||
| The current facility's building may be a viable option. Please conform to the requirements specified in attachment D, STS SOW. | ||
| 21 | SOW Paragraph 3.3 | This paragraph describes the facility |
with 35,000 square feet and a warehouse component. Please indicate if the warehouse component is included in the 35,000 square feet. Yes, the warehouse component is included in the 35,000 square feet.
| 22 | SOW Paragraph 3.3 |
| Please indicate what is stored in the secure storage area. | |
| Additional GFE that's not in use (i.e. spare computer equipment). This GFE is exclusive of the GFE listed in Attachment B. | |
| 23 | SOW Paragraph 3.3 |
| Hyperlink |
http://fam.a.state.gov/fam/12fah10/1 2fah100270.html does not connect.
| Please correct. | The link has been removed. The docuent is inlcuded as an attachment. | |||
| 24 | SOW Paragraph 3.8.1 | |||
| The first bullet in Section 3.8.1 (Task 8: Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) Support Services) states the following: “The Contractor shall provide continuous maintenance and support services to keep the existing ITSM system operational.” However, the second paragraph in Section 3.8.2 (Task 11: Tools and Repository Services) states the following: “CM is not responsible for the maintenance and management of BMC/ Remedy.” Please clarify the requirement as it relates to the BMC/ Remedy. | ||||
| The Contractor is responsible for providing continuous maintenance, support services, and management of BMC/ Remedy to ensure the existing ITSM system is operational. | ||||
| 25 | SOW Paragraph 3.5.2.8 | |||
| Regarding the Market Survey (Ad Hoc), will the Government provide any criteria or is this activity at the discretion of the contractor? | ||||
| The Government will provide any requirements for the contractor to perform a Market Survey on an Ad Hoc basis. The contractor will be responsible for completing a thorough analysis of product availability and features. | ||||
| 26 | SOW Paragraphs 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3 | |||
| Several references are made to SOPs in Task 11. Do the SOPs exist in the form of workflow processes in IBM Rational Team Concert or are they defined outside of Team Concert, e.g., Word documents? Are any build processes automated? | ||||
| The existing SOPs include workflow processes and are defined in Word documents. None of the build processes are automated. | ||||
| 27 | SOW Paragraph 3.11.2.4 | |||
| This paragraph states: The Contractor shall use BMC / Remedy to log/monitor issues and defects as they are identified through CRs or CCRs. The Contractor shall be able to interact with the tool and enter in defects. Defects also appear to be tracked in Team Concert. Please identify which defect repository is the authoritative repository. | ||||
| The authoritative repository is BMC/ Remedy. | ||||
| 28 | SAQMMA16R0029, Section F-007 Place of Performance | |||
| Please increase the radius from 15 miles to 25 miles for the distance from 600 19th St., NW, Washington, DC to the contractor’s facility. | ||||
| The distance remains unchanged | ||||
| 29 | SAQMMA16R0029, Attachment C – Price Schedule | |||
| Does the Bureau of Consular Affairs, Office of Consular Systems and Technology intend to supply position descriptions for labor positions listed in Solicitation SAQMMA16R0029 Attachment C – Price Schedule? | ||||
| No, Labor categories in Attachment C are not mandatory. Offerors may propose alternative labor categories consistent with Facor 3, Management Approach. | ||||
| 30 | SAQMMA16R0029 | Please provide a copy of the DD 254. | ||
| Refer to Attachment E - DD 254 | ||||
| 31 | L-015 Page Limitations 67 of 72 | The 50 page limit on the Technical Proposal makes it extremely difficult to address all the RFP-requirements against all 12 tasks described in the SOW. Will the government consider increasing the page limit to 70 pages for Volume I Technical Proposal? | No, the page limit remains the same. | |
| 32 | L-015 Page Limitations 67 of 72 | The 10 page limit for Volume V Transition-In Plan does not allow room for an adequate description of all required transition activities, in particular when including the required schedule. Will the government consider increasing this page limit to 15 pages for Volume V Transition-In Plan? | No, the page limit remains the same. | |
| 33 | RFP H.3.2 27 of 72 | This section requires the facility and the offeror’s performance be in accordance with the DD-254, which it says is attached. There is no DD-254 with the RFP documents. Please provide the relevant DD-254. | Refer to Attachment E - DD 254 | |
| 34 | RFP L-016 67 of 72 | In section L-016, it lists the Customer Satisfaction Surveys as part of Volume II – Past Performance. |
In Attachment_A_-_Past_Performance_Survey.xlsx, in the Introduction, it states that “…the survey will be held in confidence and will not be released or disclosed to the contractor or outside the Government.”
Please clarify whether or not offerors are to request our customers to provide us with a copy of the completed survey to include in our proposal.
| The RFP indicates that offerors must cite at least three past performance references and provide Attachment A to previous Government agencies. Attachment A instruction indicates that these forms should be mailed to the Contract Specialist. The solicitation and assiciated documents do not require that offerors submit these past performance questionaires with their proposals. | |||
| 35 | Att B GFE List | Will the Government provide a GFE software inventory, including the number and type of licenses provided as GFE? | Yes, upon contract award. |
| 36 | Att B GFE List 21-24 | Will the Government provide architectural layout drawings of the current environments supporting all three incumbent contractors, including all hardware and software inventory? | No, this information is not available. |
| 37 | SOW Table of Content 2 of 72 | Section D (Packaging and Marking) does not appear to have been included in the RFP? Will the Government provide it? | Section D is incorporated by amedment. |
| 38 | B. Supplies or Services Tables, CLIN 001 in Price Tables; and Section F-006 5 of 72 |
B. Supplies or Services Tables, CLIN 001 (Task 1) description identifies the PoP as “12 months from the completion of the transition period.” F-006 identifies the CLIN 001 PoP as “12 months from the date of award.” Please clarify the PoP for CLIN 001. RFP section B-001 has been updated to revise the Period of Performance to be 12 months from the date of award.
| 39 | RFP M-001 Factor 5 | This requirement includes working with the three incumbent contractors. Will the Government provide the existing Transition Out Plans for the three incumbent Contractors? | Yes | |
| 40 | RFP M-001 Factor 6 | If so, when will transtion out plans be available | Upon contract award | |
| 41 | B. Supplies or Services Tables,CLINs x013 (Travel) and x014 (ODCs) 5 of 72 through | |||
| 14 of 72 | In the interest of fair competition, will the Government consider providing a “Not to Exceed” value for Travel and ODCs? If not, does the Government have historical values to base our bid values upon? Or should all bidders bid $0 for these CLINs? | |||
| Not to exceed values will be given to all cost |
reimbursable CLINs. The NTE value will be used for price evaluation purposes so it will not have any positive or negative effect on pricing proposed by any offeror during evaluations.
42 RFP B-002 14 of 72 Please clarify how Offerors are to price these optional increases in OY2 through OY4? For example, is the 25% increase in OY2 hours to be made against the standard hours identified for OY1 or against the optional 25% increased hours of OY1? Increase in work is expected to be 25% each year.
OY1 should be 125% Base Period, OY2 should be 125% of OY1; OY3 should be 125% OY2, etc.
Langauge indicating these increases are optional will be removed from RFP/SOW.
43 RFP B-002 and Attachment C Price Schedule 14 of 72 And Price Schedule tab
B-002 identifies options of 25% increase for each option year. The Price Schedule identifies 25% for OY1 and 10% for the other Option Years. Please clarify what percentage increase offerors are to propose against for the option years. Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to indicate 25% increase is in each year and the increase is not optional.
44 RFP F-003 and SOW 3.1.2.1 18 of 72
| Is the Monthly Progress Report referenced in F-003 the same as the Contract Status Report and/or the Monthly Project Metrics Report in SOW 3.1.2.1? If so, can the Government modify Section F 003 to reflect that these “differing” reports are one and the same? | No, they are different reports. Attachment D SOW was updated to reflect "Monthly Progress Report". | ||
| 45 | RFP 652.242-70 20 of 72 | There appears to be an extraneous “(c) The GTM is TBD” at the end of this clause. Please clarify if this is a typo, or if there is some missing content. | RFP Far 652.242-70 is revised to remove the duplicate information |
| 46 | RFP H-001 (6) and (8) 25 of 72 | These requirements refer to 12 FAM 624 and 12 FAM 629. We think this is in error and should have referred to 12 FAM 623. Please clarify which FAM clause is applicable to this requirement. | RFP section H-001 is revised to correct references to 12 FAM 623. |
| 47 | RFP H-001 (7) in second numbered list 25 of 72 | This requirement refers to 12 FAM 622.1-3 regarding passwords. We think this in error and should refer to 12 FAM 634.1-4(B). Please clarify which document / clause this should refer to. | RFP section H-001 is revised to correct reference to 12 FAM 632.1-4(B). |
| 48 | RFP 52.222-42 and |
Attachment C Price Schedule 37 of 72 And Price Schedule tab
Does “Administrative (Entry Level)” and “Administrative (Journeyman)” reflected herein map to “Administration/Clerical (Entry Level)” and “Administration/Clerical (Journeyman)” from the Price Schedule in the costing spreadsheet? Attachment C has been revised to remove any refernce to any specific positions. Each offeror should determine the appropriate labor categories/labor mix in responding to this requirement.
49 RFP L-014 and L-015 66 and 67 of 72 L-014 identifies the cover letter as part of Volume I. L-015 refers to “the price proposal, including the cover letter.” Please clarify whether the Cover Letter is only part of Volume I, or if there is another cover letter with the Price Proposal. Reference to Volume I in L-014 has been changed to Volume VI.
50 RFP M-001 Factor 1 and SOW 2 and 2.2 RFP 69 of 72 SOW pages 4 and 6
The RFP and SOW 2 identify Task 8 as part of the Configuration Management group of tasks. SOW 2.2 identifies Task 8 as part of IV&V group of tasks. Please clarify in which group of tasks Task 8 belongs. Task 8: Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) Support Services is grouped in Configuation Management (CM). Attachment D - STS Statement of Work Section 2.2 and 2.4 has been revised to remove the information
| 51 | Att B GFE List | Will the Government provide a “role” that each piece of inventory is utilized for (e.g., the CA application being tested and/or hosted at that device)? | No, the role of each piece of inventory are ever changing and cannot be persistently defined. |
| 52 | Att B GFE List 16-21 | Are devices identified in the “Server Room” strictly limited to the IV&V Laboratory Server Room, or are some of these devices in the CA Data Center? | Strictly in the IV&V Laboratory Server Room. |
| 53 | Att B GFE List 16-21 | Are there any devices in a (presumably private) cloud that must be managed by the Contractor? | CST does not have access to a cloud yet. Additionally, |
when CST does have access to a cloud, it will not be the Contractor's responsibility to manage.
54 Att B GFE List 16-21 Will the Government identify IV&V devices that are in the Data Center and / or a cloud? See revised Attachment B.
| 55 | Att B GFE List 21-24 | Does “SITE” stand for Systems Integration and Test Environment? | Yes |
| 56 | Att B GFE List 21-24 | Is this environment associated with Task 6? | Yes |
| 57 | Att B GFE List 21-24 | Please verify if the servers associated with the SITE Lab are part of the equipment list identified as being in the Server Room. | Yes |
| 58 | Attachment C Price Schedule | Will the Government identify an annual historical workload associated with each of the major architectural entities (i.e., Passport applications, Visa applications, Citizen Services applications, CCD coordination, etc.)? | Attachment C has been revised to remove any refernce to any specific positions. Each offeror should |
determine the appropriate labor categories/labor mix in responding to this requirement.
| 59 | SOW 1.2 3 of 59 | “CA/CST is adopting an Agile / Lean approach for its SW development projects. The Contractor shall adhere to the CA/CST practices and guidelines that facilitate this approach.” Will the Government provide these “practices and guidelines…” for implementation of agile/lean? | Yes, after contract award. |
| 60 | SWO 2.3 Figure 2-3 and |
3.9 Task 9 8 of 59 and
42-47 of 59
Figure 2-3 seems to not match the Task 9 work description in Section 3.9. For instance, there are two data flows from the GTMs to the Task 9 blue block – Approved Process Implementation Plan and Approved Auditing Plan. There are no data flows in the other direction representing the deliverables for (draft and final) Process Implementation Plan and Auditing Plan. Please clarify these discrepancies between Figure 2-3 and the Task 9 work description. Note that Figure 2-3 inputs of Approved Process Implementation Plan and Approved Auditing Plan are called 'Approved'. This assumes that the draft plan and final approved plan tasks have been completed.
These artifacts are input to the processes in the Figure.
| 61 | SOW Figure 2.4 9 of 59 | What does “MIS” stand for? | Management Information System |
| 62 | SOW 3.1.2 11 of 59 | “Additional activities not explicitly listed will be required to meet the performance requirements for this task, see Section Error! Reference source not found.” Please validate that the referenced table should be Table 3-2, and if not, which table should be referenced. | SOW, Section 3.1.2 will be revised to correct the |
reference.
63 SOW Table 3-2
3.9 13 of 59
| 42 of 59 | Is there an expectation that testing staff will travel to Posts/Agencies to support this PWS, including the validation of requirements (documented and otherwise), development of business process improvements, and as a “conduit of information exchange” with CST and its customers? | Estimated travel is budgeted for $10,000/year. |
| 64 | SOW Table 3-2 |
3.9 13 of 59
| 42 of 59 | “Another objective of Transition Activities is to provide a fully functional STS test facility that meets or exceeds the performance characteristics (5 FAM and 12 FAM) of the former STS test facility at the end of the transition.” Please clarify which clauses in these standards provide the performance characteristics that should be met or exceeded. | See revised Attachment D, Section 3.2.1. | |
| 65 | SOW 3.1.2 20 of 59 | This section instructs the bidder to “…follow delineated SW evaluation guidelines, take advantage of automated tools authorized by the Government, utilize mobile and smart device testing solutions and analysis…” |
Will the Government provide its delineated SW evaluation guidelines and identify the automated tools authorized by the Government, as well as the mobile and smart device testing solutions referenced in this requirement?
| Yes, the Government will provide the delineated SW evaluation guidelines, identify automated tools and smart device testing solutions upon award. The awardee is expected to be up to date with the latest technologies and provide recommendations to the Government on new technologies. | |||
| 66 | SOW 3.4.2.1 21 of 59 | This requirement sound like there is one SWPRL for the entire CST environment. Is this correct? | The Government expects one SWPRL for the entire |
CST environment which the Contractor is expected to draft for Government approval.
| 67 | SOW 3.4.2.1 21 of 59 | Will the Government provide the current SWPRL? | As stated in Attachment D, Section 3.4.2.1," the Contractor shall develop the Software and Product Requirements List (SWPRL)…" The Government does not currently have a SWPRL drafted. |
| 68 | SOW 3.6 |
3.6.2.4 29 of 59
| In Task 6, it states: “The Government anticipates integration testing and development support services to be hosted in a cloud environment during the life of this contract.” Does CST already have data in the cloud at this time, or is the Government still in the planning stage to migrate there? | CST does not currently host integration testing and development support services in a cloud environment. |
| 69 | SOW 3.6 |
3.6.2.4 29 of 59
If CST is already using the cloud,
(a) what data is in the cloud,
(b) where is the cloud, (what cloud solution is being used)
(c) does the Contractor have responsibilities in the management of that cloud?
| See response to number 46. | |
| 70 | SOW 3.6 |
3.6.2.4 29 of 59
| If CST is not yet using the cloud, does the Government have an existing plan, or does part of Task 6 include contractor support of developing a cloud migration plan? | No, CST does not have an existing plan. Yes, CST requires the Contractor to develop a cloud migration plan. | ||
| 71 | SOW 3.9 42 of 59 | Will the government provide information on the current processes in use for which this Task 9 applies? | CST will provide current processes to the awardee when needed. |
| 72 | SOW 3.9.n 42-47 of 59 | Is the Process Monitoring and Improvement work already being done by someone? If so, who? | No |
| 73 | Statement of Work (SOW), Paragraph 3.1.2. | ||
| Last sentence of this paragraph, Please replace the phrase “Error! Reference source not found” with the correct section reference. | |||
| See response to number 54. | |||
| 74 | SOW Paragraph 3.3. | ||
| Please provide details regarding what is stored in the warehouse. | |||
| Please see Attachment D, Section 3.2. | |||
| 75 | SOW Page 16, Table 3-3, Deliverable 13. | ||
| This deliverable, Facility TP (Draft), is required with the proposal. No other information is supplied (document content and page count). Please supply the requested information if the Facility TP (Draft) is required with the proposal. | |||
| A draft TiP should be submitted with the proposal based on the contractors experience and expertise. And, upon award, the Contractor will coordinate to develop a final TiP | |||
| 76 | SOW Section 2. | ||
| “Concept of Operations”: To be consistent with Figure 2-3, the following changes are required: |
On page 4: “Task 8” needs to be under “Quality Management” bullet On page 4: “Task 8” needs to be removed from “Configuration Management” bullet
| In Figure 2-3, ITSM is an integral point of coordination for QM tasks. Task 8 remains under CM. | |
| 77 | SOW Section 2.3. |
| Current title is: “Tasks 9 and 10 Quality Management”. |
To be consistent with Figure 2-3 this section requires the following title: “Tasks 8 and 9 Quality Management”.
| SOW page 8 has been revised. | |
| 78 | SOW Section 2.4. |
| Current title is: “Tasks 11,12 and 13 Configuration Management”. |
To be consistent with figure 2-4, this section requires the following title: “Tasks 10,11and 12 Configuration Management”.
| SOW page 9 has been revised. | |
| 79 | SOW Section 3.10.3. |
| Table 3-20 title requires referencing Task 10 and not Task11. | |
| SOW page 51 has been revised. | |
| 80 | RFP Page 69; Section M; Factor 2-Past Performance. |
| Are CPARS allowed instead of past performance questionnaires? | |
| CPARS information will be used to supplement past |
performance information (questionares) recevied.
CPARS are acceptable where the offeror was the prime contractor on Federal work. If experience was as a subcontractor or under a teaming agreement, past performance questionaires should be completed.
| 81 | RFP Page 70; Section M; Factor 3. |
| Staffing mix per task including FTEs is provided in the RFP in the price spreadsheet. We are assuming that we should use this information. However, paragraph 2 on page 70 Factor 3 is asking the offerors to provide this information. Could you please clarify? | |
| Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to |
remove the FTE information to prevent any confusion. The information previously provided in Attachment C should not be construed as the optimum approach by the Government to meet this requirement. Offerors shall provide the labor categories/labor mix and FTE information for evaluation in RFP Section M Factor
| 82 | RFP Page 70; Section M; Factor 3. |
| Paragraph 4 seems to have a typo with "risk and issue management" mentioned a second time toward the end of the paragraph. Is this intentional or a typo? | |
| This is intentional since: |
1. The Offeror shall identify program assumptions and dependencies, program security, and risk and issue management.
2. The Offeror will be evaluated on its program management strategy, proposed staffing mix (including the bench of qualified personnel), management oversight, and risk and issue management.
The first is what the offeror shall propose and the second is how the Government will evaluate the risk and issue management.
| 83 | RFP Page 71; Section M; Factor 4. |
| Key personnel requirements are provided on page 71 of the RFP. We are assuming that the evaluation of key personnel resumes is a pass/fail criteria and that a resumes with additional experience with incumbent companies do not have advantage over non-incumbent personnel resumes. Could you please confirm? | |
| Each evaluation factor will be assigned an adjectival rating. For key personnel requirements, reference evaluation factor 4. | |
| 84 | RFP Page 71; Section M; Key personnel. |
| Network Administrator description contains "At least 10 years of PM experience". We are assuming that this is a typo and that this sentence belongs in Program Manager description. Could you please confirm? | |
| The language "at least ten (10) years of PM |
experience" is the minimum qualification of “Program Manager”.
RFP section M-001 has been revised to update the key personnel chart to eliminate any confusion.
| 85 | RFP Page 71; Section M; Factor 4. | ||
| Test automation specialist is listed as a key personnel. Is the test automation activity ongoing? | |||
| Automation testing in an ongoing activity that is integral to the Formal Independent Verification and Validation serivices. | |||
| 86 | SOW Page 5. | Figure 2-1 – how many GTMs will be assigned to STS? | GTMs will be designated after contract award. |
87 SOW Page 5. Figure 2-1 shows "Leasing". Could you please explain what this entails? The contractor shall lease their own facility to support the services in this RFP.
| 88 | SOW Page 5. | Figure 2-1 - we are assuming that Transition plans and facility management plan are prepared by the contractor and submitted to the GTM. Please confirm. | Reference the SOW |
| 89 | SOW Page 5. | Table 2-1 - Contractor Transition input seems to have a typo and should be "Approved Transition (In/Out) Plans". Please confirm. | This typo has been fixed (SOW Page 5 has been |
revised).
90 SOW Page 5. Table 2-1 - Contractor Transition shows "Leasing" as an input and "Partners" as the source. We are under the impression that the contractor is responsible for the lease. We do not understand what leasing is provided by the partners, namely GSA and CA/CST. Could you please explain? The Contractor is responsible for the lease.
'Partners' refers to the lessor.
| 91 | SOW Page 6. |
| Figure 2-2 - Could you please clarify if SWPRL is related only to the IV&V or is SWPRL an input to all four functions (IV&V, COTS, GOTS review, integration testing, UAT)? | |
| SWPRL is related to IV&V, COTS, and GOTS. | |
| 92 | SOW Page 9 . |
| Figure 2-4 - Please explain the "Requirements“ from IV&V (from the Service Clients box)? | |
| Requirements in this context refers to various user |
groups of the tools.
| 93 | SOW Page 11 - 3.1.2. | ||
| For better understanding, could the Government kindly publish sample progress reports, templates for weekly, monthly bi-weekly reports, portal screenshots and trends screenshots and a sample SWPRL? | |||
| The Government can only provide templates for the Weekly Activity Report and Contract Status Report as the templates for the remaining reports are contractor developed. For portal and trend reporting, CST currently uses Remedy and SharePoint. | |||
| 94 | SOW Page 11- 3.1.2.1. | ||
| What is meant by "SSPM-provided CSR template"? | Please see the Attachment E - CSR Template. | ||
| 95 | SOW Page 11- 3.1.2.1. | ||
| Could the Government publish a sample? | Please see the Attachment F - IVV Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. | ||
| 96 | SOW Page 11. | Does the "Portal Services" exist? If so, are we required to use it as-is or do we need to create it for the STS contract? | Portal services is a concept of providing |
configuration/change information across CST
| 97 | SOW Page 12 - 3.1.3. |
| How are the quarterly surveys done currently? | Quarterly surveys are SharePoint based currently. |
The types of questions include level of satisfaction for each task and room for comments on performance accomplishments or concerns.
| 98 | SOW Page 12 - 3.1.3. |
| Could the Government publish a sample? | |
| Please see the Attachment F - IVV Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. | |
| 99 | SOW Page 13 – Table 3-2. |
| “FTEs” row says “Compare staff versus key personnel” – what is meant by this? |
“FTEs” says “Track status of staff OCI/PCI” – what is meant by this?
a) This means the Contractor will be expected to show staffing levels being met or not for key personnel positions.
b) Track status of OCI/PCI means the Contractor shall ensure no OCI/PCI exists among staffing
| 100 | SOW Page 13- 3.2. |
| Since 35,000 sq. ft. is required, we are assuming that the current facility in Arlington cannot be used. Is this correct? | |
| Please see response to number 17. | |
| 101 | SOW Page 14 – 3.2.1. |
| Paragraph 1 says “ The Government has three (3) contracts for IV&V, Configuration Management and Remedy Services”. However, the SOW says IV&V, Configuration management and Quality management. So, does this mean that ‘Remedy Services’ is the current name of the quality management contract? Also, in what way is Remedy used? | |
| No, Remedy services is not the current name of the |
Quality Management contract. Reference SOW sections 3.8 and 3.11 to understand how Remedy is used.
| 102 | SOW Page 15 – 3.2.3. |
| 2nd Paragraph says “The new contractor shall follow FAR 52.237-3…”. Should this read “The three existing contractors shall follow FAR 52.237-3…”? | |
| SOW has been revised to indicate FAR 52.237-3 is only |
applicable at the end of the contract, not at the beginning. The extent the three existing contractors follow 52.237-3 depends on if their current contracts/task orders contain this clause and if their respective contracting officers notify them in writing that they must continue to provide services under this clause.
| 103 | SOW Page 16 – 3.2.3. |
| Deliverable 7 TiP row says “Submit with proposal”. However, Page 15 – 3.2.2.2 says “Coordination with the Government and incumbent Contractor to develop a draft TiP”. Please clarify if we should submit the draft TiP with the proposal. | |
| A draft TiP should be submitted with the proposal. |
On award, the Contractor will coordinate to develop a final TiP, which will require at least one additional draft in the process.
| 104 | SOW Page 16 – 3.2.3. |
| Deliverable 9 TiP row says “15 days after GTM/COR request”. However, Page 15 – 3.2.2.2 says “Submission of a final TiP within 15 business days following contract award”. Please clarify the timeline. | |
| SOW has been revised to clarify timeline. | |
| 105 | SOW Page 16 – 3.2.3. |
| Do deliverables 13, 14 15 and 16 belong in Task 3 (section 3.3) and not here in 3.2.3? | |
| Facility Transition is included under the Transition |
Activities task 2; it is not included under the Facility Management task 3.
| 106 | SOW Page 17 – 3.3. |
| Do “labs” imply places where people sit? | |
| A lab is certainly a place where people sit. It can be |
thought of as a computer lab, testing lab, etc.
| 107 | SOW Page 19 – 3.3.2.2 Facility Management. |
| RFP says “Coordinate and document IT services”. Please explain what is meant by IT services in the context of 3.3.2.2. | |
| The IT services that this STS contract will provide |
requires management of supporting GFE within the STS facility.
| 108 | SOW Page 19 – 3.3.2.3. |
| What is the existing method for NEPA inventory? What items are in the NEPA inventory? Can the Government provide samples/templates of federal purchase log and facility maintenance log? | |
| The existing method for NEPA inventory is manual |
count. Hardware and software are included in the NEPA inventory. No, samples/templates will not be provided.
| 109 | SOW Page 20 – Table 3-6 Facility Management Log. | Who places orders? | The awardee shall suggest guidance on orders, which the Government will place unless considered ODCs, in which the Government will approve the awardee to purchase through ODCs. |
| 110 | SOW Page 20 – Table 3-6 Facility Management Log. | Who receives the goods? | Usually the awardee will receive the goods. |
| 111 | SOW Page 20 – Table 3-6 Facility Management Log. | What is entailed in these orders? | Please see Attachment D, Table 3-6, metrics for Facility Management Reporting. |
| 112 | SOW Page 21 – 3.4.1. | ||
| Please explain the reference to ‘simulations’ and ‘prototypes’. | Please see revised Attachment D, section 3.4.1. Simulators refer to modeling things such as interagency data transactions. | ||
| 113 | SOW Page 21 – 3.4.1. | ||
| What are the automated tools authorized by the government? | The automated tools are ever changing depending on current Government review and authorization, and therefore, the Government is unable to provide a list of automated tools currently authorized. | ||
| 114 | SOW Page 21 – 3.4.1. | ||
| Do mobile and smart device testing solutions exist at this time? | Yes. | ||
| 115 | SOW Page 21 – 3.4.1. | ||
| What kind of testing is required in these tasks? | IV&V testing. | ||
| 116 | SOW Page 23 – 3.4.2.3. | ||
| SOW says “Contractor shall install the product to be tested…” |
Where is the installation to be performed?
The Contractor will be responsible to install products to be tested in the test and support environments, as described in SOW page 23 3.4.2.3.
| 117 | SOW Page 24 – Table 3-7. |
| Deliverable 22 – Based on what information does the contractor prepare SWPRL? | A SWPRL should be created for the entire CST |
environment.
| 118 | SOW Page 24 – Table 3-7. |
| Deliverable 26, 27 and 28 – how are these distinct from each other? | 26, 27, 28 - A TIR is a discrete piece of information |
regarding a specific error found during testing. An Advisory Notice includes information on all TIRs identified during a testing effort. A Findings and Recommendation Report is the full and final document detailing all aspects of the test, TIRs, and recommended adjudication of said TIRs.
| 119 | SOW Page 24 – Table 3-7. |
| Deliverables 26 and 27 say “1 day after completion of a test” whereas on page 23, it says “5 days after completion of a test”. | Please see revised Attachment D, Section 3.4.2.5. |
| 120 | SOW Page 24 – Table 3-8. |
| Please define all the metrics listed in this table. | |
| The Government will not specifically define the |
metrics included in Table 3-8. If there are any concerns, offerors should use industry standard definitions.
121 Atch A PP Survey "Initial Contract Value and Current (or Completed) Contract Value" Please clarify that if the bidder was a subcontractor that the values entered should be the values of the subcontract and not the values of the prime's contract. The prime contract values are irrelevant unless the offeror is the prime. Contract values that are submitted should be for the work that the contractor was responsible for only.
122 Atch A PP Survey Can bidder who is using a past performance citation for a contract for which they were a subcontractor send the Past Performance Customer Satisfaction Survey directly to the Government customer instead of the company to which they were a sub? No, because, the Government was not the customer.
If past performance evalautions are received in this manner they will be deemed non-responsive.
| 123 | Atch B GFE | "Attachment B GFE IV-V Government Inventory List" Are there additional GFE lists for other areas of what will be included in the STS Services, such as CM and ITSM? | Please see revised Attachment B. |
| 124 | Atch B GFE | Is it the Offeror's responsibility to purchase hardware and/or software licenses in support of the test environment and labs? If so, can the Government please provide a listing of the software licenses and their renewal dates and terms. Also, please identify the purchase dates for each hardware item in the GFE list as well as the technology refresh rate for each hardware class. | No, all hardware and/or software licenses in support |
of the test environment and labs will be provided as GFE. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to manage the GFE provided and to recommend/assess new GFE.
125 Atch C Price Sched "Chief Information Security Officer" and "Chief Security Information Officer" Both titles are listed in the price schedule under the Transition Activates and Facility Management tasks. Which title should be used? Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to remove the FTE information to prevent any confusion. The information previously provided in Attac hment C should not be construed as the optimum approach by the Government to meet this requirement. Offerors shall provide the labor categories/labor mix and FTE information for evaluation in RFP Section M Factor 3.
126 Atch C Price Sched Section H-011 indicates there are 5 key personnel labor categories (Program Manager, Network Administrator, Senior CM Specialist, Senior Database Administrator, and Test Automation Specialist) but Attachment C does not include any positions/hours for the Network Administrator, Senior Database Administrator and Test Automation Specialist. Please clarify. Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to remove the FTE information to prevent any confusion. The information previously provided in Attac hment C should not be construed as the optimum approach by the Government to meet this requirement. Offerors shall provide the labor categories/labor mix and FTE information for evaluation in RFP Section M Factor 3. The Key Personnel are the only positions specifically required by the Government. The Government is providing offerors some flexibility in how offerors can propose their pricing for these positions.
127 Atch C Price Sched Are we required to bid the FTEs as provided or are we free to adjust based upon our particular approach? Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to remove the FTE information to prevent any confusion. The information previously provided in Attac hment C should not be construed as the optimum approach by the Government to meet this requirement. Offerors shall provide the labor categories/labor mix and FTE information for evaluation in RFP Section M Factor 3.
128 Atch C Price Sched For pricing purposes, how does the Government wish to price 24/7/365 on call support? The Government is providing offerors some flexibility in how offerors can propose their pricing for these positions 129 Atch C Price Sched The FTEs allocated for Transition is not sufficient to effect a transition and staff to the levels required to be able to transition by the end of 120 days. Would the Government allow the offerors to bid the staffing necessary to reduce transition risk during the first 120 days in accordance with their Draft Transition Plan? Attachment C - Price Schedule has been revised to remove the FTE information to prevent any confusion. The information previously provided in Attac hment C should not be construed as the optimum approach by the Government to meet this requirement. Offerors shall provide the labor categories/labor mix and FTE information for evaluation in RFP Section M Factor 3.
130 Atch C Price Sched For pricing purposes, what is the estimated date of award? The estimated date of award is 90 days after the proposal due date.
131 Atch D STS SOW 3.2.2.4 "Demonstrate that the previous facility is closed (as necessary if transitioning to a new facility different than the current Arlington, VA location)." Please clarify the requirements of the successful STS offeror as it relates to the current facility to which a non-incumbent has no relationship with nor access to. Attachment D, SOW has been revised to remove this requirement as the incoming contractor will have no control over previous contractors operations.
132 Atch D STS SOW 3.3 "The facility shall total at least 35000 square feet in one building to include space for labs, conference rooms, server room, and secure storage space." Please clarify the requirements for the labs. Is raised flooring needed? How much power, space and cooling is needed? The requirements for the labs can be proposed based on Attachment B.
| 133 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3 | Is raised flooring needed? | No, the requirements fo the labs can be proposed based on Attachment B. |
| 134 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3 | How much power, space and cooling needed? | Power, space, and cooling requirements shall support the equipment listed in Attachment B, Contractor Site tabs 1 and 2. |
| 135 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3 | "The facility shall total at least 35000 square feet in one building to include space for labs, conference rooms, server room, and secure storage space." Please clarify the requirements for the conference rooms. How many are needed and how large do each need to be? | The Government requires a minumum of 4 |
conference rooms that can hold a range of 10-35 people per conference room.
| 136 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3 | "The facility shall total at least 35000 square feet in one building to include space for labs, conference rooms, server room, and secure storage space." Please clarify the requirements for the server room. How much power, space and cooling is needed? | Please see response to number 134. |
| 137 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3 | "The server room shall meet the guidelines found at FAH-10 H-270 or http://fam.a.state.gov/fam/12fah10/12fah100270.html" The web link goes to a dead end. A web search for the document (refers to Physical and Environmental Protection Policy) also leads to a dead end. Can the government provide an updated link or the document itself? | The link has been removed. The docuent is inlcuded as an attachment. |
| 138 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3.1 | "The Contractor shall maintain the Facility Management Service Level Agreement (SLA) to reflect the needs of the CA/CST STS test facility." Do SLAs currently exist, and if so will the Government please share the current SLA? | No, a SLA does not currently exist. Please see revised Attachment D, Section 3.3.1. |
| 139 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3.1 | "…manage and maintain the facility computing resources, communication and network infrastructure…remain operational and secure" What sparing methodology and spares inventory for the existing computing resources and communication and network infrastructure does the Government currently have? | The Government maintains a minimum of spares depending on the particulars of any computing resource. There is no explicitly defined methodology. |
| 140 | Atch D STS SOW 3.3.1 | Will it be made available post-award for the successful offeror to aid in transition? | Yes, existing computing resources and |
communication and network infrastructure will be available to the awardee.
| 141 | Atch D STS SOW 3.4 | Q1 – Section 3.4, Task 4: Formal Independent Verification and Validation Services (T&M), SOW Page 20: Please clarify whether the following are included in the IV&V Testing scope of work | ||
| a) Performance/Load testing – if yes, please provide a list of the current performance/load testing tools applied | Yes. The Government will identify performance and load testing tools upon award. The awardee is expected to be up to date with the latest technologies and provide recommendations to the Government on new technologies. | |||
| 142 | Atch D STS SOW 3.4 | b) Section 508/Accessibility Testing – if yes, please clarify whether tasking includes identification of issues, or identification and remediation of issues | Yes. The contractor will be responsible for |
identification of issues, and will be responsible to support the remediation of issues through performing the objectives as described in SOW 3.4.1.
143 Atch D STS SOW 3.4 c) Security Testing (Programmatic Code Quality, e.g., running HP Fortify to analyze code quality/security) – if yes, please clarify whether tasking includes identification of issues, or identification and support to remediation of issues Yes. The contractor will be responsible for identification of issues, and will be responsible to support the remediation of issues through performing the objectives as described in SOW 3.4.1.
| 144 | Atch D STS SOW 3.4 | d) Security (Information Assurance, per 5 FAM -11 Information Assurance Handbook) – if yes, please clarify whether the requirement is exclusive to securing test | No |
| 145 | Atch D STS SOW 3.6.2.3 | "Upon request, the Contractor shall provide restoration of an environments or environment artifacts as outlined in the SLA" Will the Government please share a copy of the referenced SLA? | The referenced SLA does not exist. Please see revised Attachment D, Section 3.6.2.3. |
| 146 | Atch D STS SOW 3.6.2.8 | "The Contractor shall also coordinate integration testing, both internal and external, so that all applicable designed integration tests can be performed prior to developer delivery of production build to formal IV&V." Will the Government please confirm that for Task 6 the developer delivers production builds for formal IV&V? | Confirmed, in Task 6, the developers deliver |
production builds for formal IV&V.
147 Atch D STS SOW 3.8 Will the Government please confirm if the current ITSM production is hosted on Government site or at contractor's site? The current ITSM production is hosted on a Government site.
| 148 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.1 | "BMC / Remedy are the current ITSM solutions" Will the Government please share what is the technology stack for the current Remedy (ITSM)? | Windows Server 2008R2 and Linux. |
| 149 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.1 | "Contractor shall provide training and support for CA/CST Support groups" How many members are included in the support group? | Training would almost be exclusively to CA/CST staff with perhaps some participation by others in CA. It is anticipated over the life of the contract that training will be provided to approximately 700 people across CST Government staff, contractor personnel, and CA business unit personnel. |
| 150 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.1 | What are their identities? | Training would almost be exclusively to CA/CST staff |
with perhaps some participation by others in CA
| 151 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.1 | Does training include contributing business units or only IT? | Please see response to 149. |
| 152 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.1 | "The goal of ITSM Support Services is to provide services that support the O&M of the CA/CST ITSM system." Is BMC/Remedy the sole component of support to ITSM or are there additional components in the scope of ITSM support? | There are additional components that make up the ITSM package. |
| 153 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.2 | Is there an Enterprise Architecture available that could be shared, which would provide insight into the "future technologies" that might be under consideration? | No |
| 154 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.2 | Is ITIL currently deployed as a service structure within CA/CST? | CST uses portions of the ITIL suggested framework |
| 155 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.2 | If so, what version is being used? | ITILv3 |
| 156 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.2.1 | "The Contractor shall adhere to CST guidelines for SLAs / agreements for Tier II and III support" Will the Government please share a copy of the referenced SLA? | Please see revised Attachment D, Section 3.8.2.1. |
| 157 | Atch D STS SOW 3.8.2.1 | "The Contractor shall administer ITSM application environments…." How many environments are currently in place for support to CA/CST? Are they virtualized environments or bare metal configured? | There is a primary site and a backup (different |
locations) along with a test environment. All virtual.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .