RFP Attachment 6 - Past Performance Cover Letter and Assessment Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fixed Wing Flight Training Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9124G22R0002
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a fixed wing flight training services solicitation. The U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command - Fort Eustis is seeking these services to support Fort Rucker, Alabama under a single firm fixed price contract with a 12-month phase-in period, one 12-month base period, and seven 12-month option periods. The designated NAICS code is 611512 for flight training with a $30 million small business size standard. Offerors must submit any questions by February 24th, 2022 and final proposals are due by March 21st, 2022. The questionnaire is sent to references provided by offerors to evaluate their past performance on recent and relevant government or commercial contracts. References are asked to assess offerors' performance and provide rationale using defined rating criteria.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER AND ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W9124G22R0002
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) – Fort Eustis) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 611512. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure by 21 March 2022 to Ms. Maily Pham, Contract Specialist, at anna.m.pham2.civ@army.mil, Klinton West, Contract Specialist, at klinton.c.west.civ@army.mil, and Ms. Drena McIntosh, Contracting Officer, at drena.j.mcintosh.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the individuals identified above.
Sincerely, DRENA J. MCINTOSH
Contracting Officer
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror competing for the requirement)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance and timeliness of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements, and Standards of Good Workmanship
· |_| Exceptional
· |_| Very Good
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness and knowledge of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Effectiveness of Staffing and Management Plan to Provide Qualified Personnel to Deliver Service Outcomes that Met Requirements.
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness to Provide a Stable Contractor Workforce that Minimizes Disruption to Contract Performance.
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Effectiveness to Provide Qualified Personnel to Support Surge/Short Requirements Through Recruitment or Cross Utilization Without Disrupting Support to Ongoing Requirements.
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· |_| Satisfactory
· |_| Marginal
· |_| Unacceptable
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
I. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
image1.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .