RFP AMLC APS Warehouse(KO).pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

CORPS OF ENGINEERS, HUNTSVILLE ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT CENTER

P.O. BOX 1600

HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35807-4301

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF

7 August 2026

CEHNC-CT-A

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: Initial Outfitting and Transition (IO&T) Services, Army Medical Logistics Command (AMLC), Buildings 765 & 955, APS-4 Warehouse at Camp Carroll, Republic of Korea.

TO: AtkinsRealis USA INC W912DY-26-D-A017

Bodwé Federal Services LLC W912DY-26-D-A018 Covalus LLC W912DY-26-D-A019 Deloitte Consulting LLP W912DY-26-D-A020 Endeavor Initial Outfitting, LLC W912DY-26-D-A021 GO Energistics, LLC W912DY-26-D-A022 Holitna Construction, LLC W912DY-26-D-A023 Mill Creek, LLC W912DY-26-D-A024 Renaissance Global Services, LLC W912DY-26-D-A025 SRM Group, LLC W912DY-26-D-A026 Strategic Initial Outfitting Transition W912DY-26-D-A027 Solutions, LLC (SIOTS) Strategic Medical Equipment Solutions W912DY-26-D-A028 Walsh Construction Company II, LLC W912DY-26-D-A029 Workplace Solutions, INC W912DY-26-D-A030 ROK Contractors

Dear IO&T Contractors:

This is a REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, Initial Outfitting and Transition (IO&T) Services, Army Medical Logistics Command (AMLC), Buildings 765 & 955, APS-4 Warehouse at Camp Carroll, Republic of Korea. This RFP will be open to all businesses.

It is the policy of the Huntsville Engineering and Support Center to ensure all MATOC Awardees and ROK Contractors. receive fair opportunity for competition of task orders in accordance with current regulation and guidance. A single task order award will be executed because of this RFP.

The Government intends to award a task order without discussions based on initial proposal received; therefore, the proposal shall contain the Offeror’s best value from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions, if necessary.

Your attention is called to RFO Subpart 9.5, Organizational and Conflicts of Interest (OCI).

Specifically, an actual or perceived unequal access to information, biased ground rules, or impaired objectivity OCI(s). Any offeror with an actual or perceived OCI is to submit a mitigation plan with the proposal responsive to this solicitation. Additionally, due to the requirement that the contractor make equipment, material, and parts purchases and the possibility that these may be available through the prime contractor or its subcontractors, a conflict of interest does exist as seen by the Contracting Officer. Neither the prime contractor nor its subcontractors may participate as an offeror, subcontractor, or consultant on any procurement of equipment, material, or parts conducted by the prime Contractor or its subcontractors under this task order. When applicable, a mitigation plan addressing this conflict of interest must be submitted as well. The OCI is a responsibility determination conducted by the Contracting Officer and not an evaluation factor.

It shall be noted that offerors may reasonably expect the potential for the following changes on any subsequent task order contract:

Delays in renovation/alteration schedule.

Reasonable increases or decreases in the number of equipment items to be purchased.

This is strictly for the purpose of determining if potential changes are in or out of scope.

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. You are requested to submit a firm fixed-price proposal to perform the required services in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) AMLC Warehouse Leghorn Italy FINAL and all PWS attachments:

• Attachment A - AMLC APS-4 Bldg. 765 & 955 Price Proposal Worksheet

• Attachment B - Schedule of Values and Invoice Logic Summary – Sample

• Attachment C - MFR - IO&T MATOC Equipment Purchasing

• Attachment D - FF&E BVD Form

• Attachment E - Army Computer Ordering Guidelines (CHESS)

• Attachment F - Example Furniture Illustration Sheet-Order Form

• Attachment G - Contractor's Final Release Form

• Attachment H - Common Access Card (CAC) Request Instructions

• Attachment I - Site Visit Accident Prevention Plan (SVAPP) Template

• Attachment J - Accident Prevention Plan (APP) Template

• Attachment K - Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA) Template

• Attachment L - Eng Form 6282 Site Safety & Health Officer (SSHO)

Designation Letter

• Attachment M - Eng Form 3394 Mishap Notification & Investigation

Template

• Attachment N - Monthly Record of Work-Related Injuries-Illnesses &

Exposure

• Attachment O - Army Cybersecurity-Risk Management Framework (RMF)

Requirements

• Attachment P - Bldg. 765 Proposed Layout

• Attachment Q - Bldg. 832 (Now 765) Warehouse 100% Design Drawings

• Attachment R - Bldg. 955 As-Built Drawings

• Attachment S - Bldg. 765 & Bldg. 955 Equipment List 22Jul26

• Attachment T - Bldg. 955 Single Tier Locker Cut Sheet

2. All elements of the base MATOC IV contract will apply to the task order award issued because of this RFP. In addition to the clauses listed in the MATOC IIV base contract, the following additional clauses/provisions shall apply on this solicitation/task order:

52.217-5 Evaluation of Options - Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) to not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract – The Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within 30 calendar days before the expiration date of the contractual ordering period;

provided that the Government gives the Contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least 60 calendar days before the expiration date of the contractual ordering period.

216.505-70 Additional solicitation provisions and contract clause. (a) Insert the provisions at 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit, and 252.215-7008, Only One Offer, as prescribed at 215.271-6 and 215.110(3), respectively.

(b) Insert the clause at 252.216-7010, Post award Debriefings for Task Orders and Delivery Orders, in competitive negotiated solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when a multiple-award contract is contemplated and task orders or delivery orders placed under the contract may be valued at $15 million or more.

252.225-7059 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region–Representation - DoD may not knowingly procure any products mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor from XUAR or from an entity that has used labor from within or transferred from XUAR as part of any forced labor programs, as specified in paragraph (b) of the 252.225-7060, Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, clause of this solicitation.

By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it has made a good faith effort to determine that forced labor from XUAR will not be used in the performance of a contract resulting from this solicitation.

252.225-7060 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region

252.229-7001 Tax Relief – Basic (APR 2020)

(a) Prices set forth in this contract are exclusive of all taxes and duties from which the United States Government is exempt by virtue of tax agreements between the United States Government and the Contractor’s government.

The following taxes or duties have been excluded from the contract price:

NAME OF TAX: RATE (PERCENTAGE):

(b) Invoices submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract shall be exclusive of all taxes or duties for which relief is available.

The Contractor’s invoice shall list separately the gross price, amount of tax deducted, and net price charged.

(c) When items manufactured to United States Government specifications are being acquired, the Contractor shall identify the materials or components intended to be imported to ensure that relief from import duties is obtained.

If the Contractor intends to use imported products from inventories on hand, the price of which includes a factor for import duties, the Contractor shall ensure the United States Government’s exemption from these taxes. The Contractor may obtain a refund of the import duties from its government or request the duty-free import of an amount of supplies or components corresponding to that used from inventory for this contract.

3. The proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the proposal format described below. All submissions will be protected as procurement sensitive information. To expedite processing of your proposal, we request that you provide the following:

• Proposal Signature from Authorized Official that has authority to bind the company in an agreement with the Government.

• Provided price data shall be separate pages from the Technical Capability narrative.

The entire proposal shall not exceed 12 pages excluding PPQs, OCI Mitigation Plans, price proposal spreadsheet, personnel certifications/resumes, and cover pages. Excess pages shall be removed from the proposal by the evaluators. All proposal documents shall be formatted on 8 ½” x 11” paper using 12-point font, single spaced to include spreadsheets (with appropriate page breaks, headers and footers). The Project Schedule shall be formatted to be legible when printed on 11x17 inch paper and will not count against the page limit. All documents and spreadsheets shall include the Contractor Name, PWS Title, and Date. Ensure your proposal is submitted in PDF format.

Spreadsheets shall be submitted as unlocked Microsoft Excel documents. Tables, charts, and graphs are discouraged and will count against established proposal page limits.

4. Please identify the primary and alternate point of contacts (POCs) for this effort. Information shall include the POC names, office telephone numbers, mobile telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses.

EVALUATION

The Government intends to award a single task order contract to the contractor offering the best value to the government, including price and non-price factors. Technical factors are Schedule, Technical Solution, and Key Personnel and Management Approach. Past Performance shall be evaluated as indicated below. Price shall be analyzed for a fair and reasonable price.

The Government reserves the right to perform tradeoff analysis of the highest technically rated, higher priced proposal, to analyze and determine whether the benefits of the higher priced proposal shall merit the additional cost.

EVALUATION FACTORS

In accordance with FAR subpart 16.506, the evaluation factors are:

• Schedule

• Technical Solution

• Key Personnel and Management Approach

• Past Performance

• Price

TECHNICAL FACTORS

Technical Factors which include Schedule, Technical Solution, and Key Personnel and Management Approach, will be evaluated using the combined technical/risk ratings in the table below. The combined/technical risk rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum technical requirements through an assessment of significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of the proposal.

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Rating Description Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

Definitions:

Deficiency is defined as a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or sub factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Strength is an aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness is defined as a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

SCHEDULE

The Offeror shall describe its process for developing and maintaining a Project Schedule and demonstrate an understanding of the PWS Project Schedule requirements. The IO&T contractor should submit its most realistic schedule and achievable timeframes when submitting the proposal. Provide a schedule that meets the milestone dates identified in the PWS. Critical to this requirement is the preparation, staffing and coordination by the IO&T Contractor of a solution to meet the requirement in the most thorough and expeditious manner possible and to comply with the Government’s schedule objectives listed in PWS 8.0. The Offeror shall provide a narrative defining its plan and methodology for meeting these schedule objectives. The IO&T Contractor is required to “right size” their solution and communicate it in detail in the proposal response.

The Offeror’s proposed project schedule shall adequately demonstrate the planned approach to project execution and not consist solely of the Government provided dates. For purposes of the draft schedule assume an award date of 1 June 2026 and a 14-day Government review period of all Contractor deliverables, unless otherwise noted in the PWS. Upon award, the successful Offeror’s final schedule will be incorporated into the task order.

The schedule development will be evaluated on the overall methodology, the level of detail and comprehensiveness provided in the proposal.

TECHNICAL SOLUTION

The Offeror shall describe their technical solution and demonstrate its understanding for executing the requirements identified in the PWS. Specifically address executing the requirements of PWS section 3.0 Project Execution requirements.

If the Offeror proposes a value-added item or feature, the Offeror is required to explain the value-added nature of the item/feature. The value-added items will be incorporated into the contract if accepted by the government.

The technical solution will be evaluated on the overall methodology, the level of detail and comprehensiveness provided in the proposal.

KEY PERSONNEL & MANAGEMENT APPROACH

The Offeror shall describe in narrative form each of its key personnel to be used on this task order, their areas of responsibility, their relationship with the management structure, and experience in performing IO&T Services relevant to the effort described in the PWS. The Offeror shall submit resumes which clearly indicate that all key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications as outlined in the base contract.

The Offeror shall provide a description of the approach to managing staffing used to facilitate technical management of this task order integral with the execution of tasks as described in the PWS and the Offeror’s proposed schedule. A draft Project Phasing and Staff Mobilization Plan (see PWS 3.1.11) is due with the proposal and included in the page count. The approach should demonstrate a methodology that ensures effective, efficient, and timely completion of this effort.

The Offeror shall describe its approach to utilizing and incorporating subcontracts supporting this task order, including at a minimum, their assignments/role(s) organized by project phase.

Key Personnel and the Offeror’s approach to managing staffing and subcontracts will be evaluated on the overall methodology, the level of detail, and comprehensiveness provided in the proposal.

The Offeror shall describe its approach to Risk Management and demonstrate its knowledge and understanding of managing risks associated with IO&T services as spelled out in the PWS. The approach shall identify known or perceived task order specific risks, challenges, and problems that threaten schedule, budget, quality of services, or other aspects of the project. Risks shall include but not limited to, risks associated with schedule delays and the contractors’ mitigation strategy to mitigate the impact of the delays. With each issue specified, the Offeror shall list their proposed solution to mitigate or resolve the risk/challenge/problem. The risks and solutions developed should be grounded upon the Offeror’s accumulated knowledge of performing similar projects in the past. Risks and solutions, at a minimum, shall be provided in a bulletized and/or numbered format. A draft Risk Management Plan (see PWS 3.1.6.3) is due with proposal and included in page count. Upon award, as stated in the PWS, a more detailed Risk Management Plan will be required as a deliverable and shall be based on the approach as stated in the Offeror’s proposal.

Risk Management approach will be evaluated on the overall technical approach to risk management and mitigation as a best practice and as it applies to addressing this requirement.

PAST PERFORMANCE

The Contractor shall not submit any past performance information. The Government will evaluate the Offerors’ past performance by evaluating the information on the Task Orders under IO&T IV MATOC available in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) within the past 5 years from the date of initial issuance of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to consider any past performance in its possession based on previous task orders and contracts. Additionally, the Government may use other systems or information including, but not limited to, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and personal knowledge in evaluating Offerors’ past performance within the past 5 years from the date of initial issuance of this solicitation. In conducting its evaluation, the Government will rate the offerors’ past performance in accordance with the Table below. If an Offeror does not have any information in CPARS or other relevant past performance information within the period specified above, the Offeror’s past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably and will receive a rating of “Neutral.”

Table- Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

PRICE

The proposed price will be analyzed to determine if it is fair and reasonable. Pricing shall be based on the requirement as specified in the PWS and consistent with rates established in the Basic Contract. The proposed price shall be submitted using the Price Proposal Worksheet provided in the enclosed Excel file. The Offeror shall complete all tabs in the Excel file, “Attachment F Price Proposal Summ.” Each task identified must be separately priced using the tabs in the Excel file. Lump sum pricing without breakdowns will be considered a deficiency in the proposal.

It is the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure the entire workbook is completed in full and without error. If any one or more of the Task Order Price Proposal Worksheet forms is not completed, it will be considered a deficiency in the proposal.

Pricing will not be an adjectively rated criterion but will be evaluated for reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1.

OTHER INFORMATION

• POST AWARD VIRTUAL KICKOFF MEETING: It is currently expected that a post award kickoff meeting will be held no later than 14 days after award.

• The Offeror will be required to forward all comments and inquiries regarding this task order via email no later than 12:00pm Central Time on 26 August 2026 to the contacts provided below. Earlier questions are encouraged and will be accepted. All comments and inquiries will be addressed by the Government and responses distributed to all Offerors via email.

• Funds are presently available for this acquisition.

INVITED CONTRACTOR OR TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE STATUS UNDER

U.S. – REPUBLIC OF KOREA (ROK) STATUS OF FORCES AGREEMENT (SOFA)

Invited Contractor (IC) and Technical Representative (TR) status shall be governed by the U.S.-ROK Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) as implemented by United States Forces Korea (USFK) USFKI 4901.01, which can be found under the “publications” tab on the U.S. Forces Korea homepage at http://www.usfk.mil.

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

“U.S. – ROK Status of Forces Agreement” (SOFA) means the Mutual Defense Treaty between the Republic of Korea and the U.S. of America, Regarding Facilities and Areas and the Status of U.S. Armed Forces in the Republic of Korea, as amended

“Combatant Commander” means the commander of a unified or specified combatant command established in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 161. In Korea, the Combatant Commander is the Commander, United States Pacific Command.

“United States Forces Korea” (USFK) means the subordinate unified command through which U.S. forces would be sent to the Combined Forces Command fighting components.

“Commander, United States Forces Korea” (COMUSK) means the commander of all U.S. forces present in Korea. In the Republic of Korea, COMUSK also serves as Commander, Combined Forces Command (CDR CFC) and Commander, United Nations Command (CDR UNC).

“USFK, Office of Acquisition Management” (USFK/FKAQ) means the principal staff office to USFK for all acquisition matters and administrator of the U.S.-ROK SOFA as applied to US and Third-Country contractors under the (IC) and (TR) Program (USFKI http://www.usfk.mil/

4901.01).

“Responsible Officer (RO)” means a DoD employee (such as a military E5 and above or civilian GS-7/KGS-07 and above), appointed by the USFK Sponsoring Agency (SA), who is directly responsible for determining and administering appropriate logistics support for IC/TRs during contract performance in the ROK.

(b) IC or TR status under the SOFA is subject to the written approval from the Office of Acquisition Management, USFK (FKAQ), Unit #15289, APO AP 96271-5289.

(c) The contracting officer will coordinate with HQ USFK/FKAQ, IAW FAR 25.8, and USFKI 4901.01. FKAQ will determine the appropriate contractor status under the SOFA and notify the contracting officer of that determination.

(d) Subject to the above determination, the contractor, including its employees and lawful dependents, may be accorded such privileges and exemptions under conditions and limitations as specified in the SOFA and USFKI 4901.01. These privileges and exemptions may be furnished during the performance period of the contract, subject to their availability and continued SOFA status. Logistics support privileges are provided on an as-available basis to properly authorized individuals. Some logistics support may be issued as Government Furnished Property (GFP) or transferred on a reimbursable basis.

(e) The contractor warrants and shall ensure that collectively, and individually, its officials and employees performing under this contract will not perform any contract, service, or other business activity in the ROK, except under U.S. Government contracts IAW the SOFA.

(f) The contractor’s direct employment of any Korean-National labor for performance of this contract shall be governed by ROK labor law and USFK instruction(s) pertaining to the direct employment and personnel administration of Korean National personnel.

(g) The authorities of the ROK have the right to exercise jurisdiction over invited contractors and technical representatives, including contractor officials, employees and their dependents, for offenses committed in the ROK and punishable by the laws of the ROK. In recognition of the role of such persons in the defense of the ROK, they will be subject to the provisions of Article XXII, SOFA, related Agreed Minutes and Understandings. In those cases, in which the authorities of the ROK decide not to exercise jurisdiction, they shall notify the U.S. military authorities as soon as possible.

Upon such notification, the military authorities will have the right to exercise jurisdiction as is conferred by the laws of the U.S.

(h) Invited contractors and technical representatives agree to cooperate fully with the USFK SA and RO on all matters pertaining to logistics support and theater training requirements. Contractors will provide the assigned SA prompt and accurate reports of changes in employee status as required by USFKI 4901.01.

(i) Theater Specific Training. Training Requirements for IC/TR personnel shall be conducted in accordance with USFK Reg 350-2 Theater Specific Required Training for all Arriving Personnel and Units Assigned to, Rotating to, or in Temporary Duty Status to USFK. IC/TR personnel shall comply with requirements of USFK Reg 350-2.

(j) Except for contractor air crews flying Air Mobility Command missions, all U.S.

contractors performing work on USAF classified contracts will report to the nearest Security Forces Information Security Section for the geographical area where the contract is to be performed to receive information concerning local security requirements.

(k) IC/TR status may be withdrawn by USFK/FKAQ upon:

(1) Completion or termination of the contract.

(2) Determination that the contractor or its employees are engaged in business activities in the ROK other than those pertaining to U.S. armed forces.

(3) Determination that the contractor or its employees are engaged in practices in contravention to Korean law or USFK instructions.

(l) It is agreed that the withdrawal of IC or TR status, or the withdrawal of, or failure to provide any of the privileges associated therewith by the U.S. and USFK, shall not constitute grounds for excusable delay by the contractor in the performance of the contract and will not justify or excuse the contractor defaulting in the performance of this contract. Furthermore, it is agreed that withdrawal of SOFA status for reasons outlined in USFKI 4901.01, Enclosure A, paragraph 4 shall not serve as a basis for the contractor filing any claims against the U.S. or USFK. Under no circumstance shall the withdrawal of SOFA Status or privileges be considered or construed as a breach of contract by the U.S. Government.

(m) Support.

(1) Unless the terms and conditions of this contract place the responsibility with another party, the COMUSK will develop a security plan to provide protection, through military means, of Contractor personnel engaged in the theater of operations when sufficient or legitimate civilian authority does not exist.

(2)(i) All Contractor personnel engaged in the theater of operations are authorized resuscitative care, stabilization, hospitalization at level III military treatment facilities, and assistance with patient movement in emergencies where loss of life, limb, or eyesight could occur. Hospitalization will be limited to stabilization and short-term medical treatment with an emphasis on return to duty or placement in the patient movement system.

(ii) When the Government provides medical or emergency dental treatment or transportation of Contractor personnel to a selected civilian facility, the Contractor shall ensure that the Government is reimbursed for any costs associated with such treatment or transportation.

(iii) Medical or dental care beyond this standard is not authorized unless specified elsewhere in this contract.

(3) Unless specified elsewhere in this contract, the Contractor is responsible for all other support required for its personnel engaged in the theater of operations under this contract.

(n) Compliance with laws and directives. The Contractor shall comply with, and shall ensure that its personnel supporting U.S Armed Forces in the Republic of Korea as specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this clause are familiar with and comply with, all applicable –

(1) United States, host country, and third-country national laws;

(2) Treaties and international agreements;

(3) United States regulations, directives, instructions, policies, and procedures;

and

(4) Orders, directives, and instructions issued by the COMUSK relating to force protection, security, health, safety, or relations and interaction with local nationals.

Included in this list are force protection advisories, health advisories, area (i.e., “offlimits”), prostitution and human trafficking and curfew restrictions.

(o) Vehicle or equipment licenses. IAW USFK Regulation 190-1, Contractor personnel shall possess the required licenses to operate all vehicles or equipment necessary to perform the contract in the theater of operations. All contractor employees/dependents must have either a Korean driver’s license or a valid international driver’s license to legally drive on Korean roads, and must have a USFK driver’s license to legally drive on USFK installations. Contractor employees/dependents will first obtain a Korean driver’s license or a valid international driver’s license then obtain a USFK driver’s license.

(p) Evacuation.

(1) If the COMUSK orders a non-mandatory or mandatory evacuation of some or all personnel, the Government will provide assistance, to the extent available, to United States and third-country national contractor personnel.

(2) Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEO).

(i) The contractor shall designate a representative to provide contractor personnel and dependents information to the servicing NEO warden as required by direction of the Responsible Officer.

(ii) If contract period of performance in the Republic of Korea is greater than six months, non-emergency essential contractor personnel and all IC/TR dependents shall participate in at least one USFK sponsored NEO exercise per year.

(q) Next of kin notification and personnel recovery.

(1) The Contractor shall be responsible for notification of the employeedesignated next of kin in the event an employee dies, requires evacuation due to an injury, or is missing, captured, or abducted.

(2) In the case of missing, captured, or abducted contractor personnel, the Government will assist in personnel recovery actions in accordance with DoD Directive 2310.2, Personnel Recovery.

(3) IC/TR personnel shall accomplish Personnel Recovery/Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (PR/SERE) training in accordance with USFK Reg 525- 40, Personnel Recovery Procedures and USFK Reg 350-2 Theater Specific Required Training for all Arriving Personnel and Units Assigned to, Rotating to, or in Temporary Duty Status to USFK.

(r) Mortuary affairs. Mortuary affairs for contractor personnel who die while providing support in the theater of operations to U.S. Armed Forces will be handled in accordance with DoD Directive 1300.22, Mortuary Affairs Policy and Army Regulation 638-2, Care and Disposition of Remains and Disposition of Personal Effects.

(s) USFK Responsible Officer (RO). The USFK appointed RO will ensure all IC/TR personnel complete all applicable training as outlined in this clause.

CONTACTS

a. The contractor shall NOT engage into any form of contact with Camp Caroll installation personnel, nor any Defense Health Agency (DHA) personnel regarding this requirement prior to submission of proposal and Task Order Award with the following exception: The Contractor shall check with the local Installation Access Control Officer (IACO) for specific guidance on what is required for installation access. Any contact regarding the requirements set forth in this RFP shall only occur with the Contracting Officer. Discussions or information obtained via other sources could make you ineligible for award if deemed a Conflict of Interest or a Violation of Procurement Integrity Act.

b. Contractor questions and proposal shall be submitted to the following:

Name Email Justin Griffin Contract Specialist Justin.Griffin@usace.army.mil

Antwan Royster Contracting Officer Antwan.D.Royster@usace.army.mil mailto:Justin.Griffin@usace.army.mil

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

You are requested to furnish your proposal by electronic transmission no later than 3:00pm Central Time on 11 September 2026. All information will be protected as procurement sensitive. If you do not intend to provide a proposal, a negative response is required.

ANTWAN ROYSTER

Contracting Officer

Encls:

• Attachment A - AMLC APS-4 Bldg. 765 & 955 Price Proposal Worksheet

• Attachment B - Schedule of Values and Invoice Logic Summary – Sample

• Attachment C - MFR - IO&T MATOC Equipment Purchasing

• Attachment D - FF&E BVD Form

• Attachment E - Army Computer Ordering Guidelines (CHESS)

• Attachment F - Example Furniture Illustration Sheet-Order Form

• Attachment G - Contractor's Final Release Form

• Attachment H - Common Access Card (CAC) Request Instructions

• Attachment I - Site Visit Accident Prevention Plan (SVAPP) Template

• Attachment J - Accident Prevention Plan (APP) Template

• Attachment K - Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA) Template

• Attachment L - Eng Form 6282 Site Safety & Health Officer (SSHO)

Designation Letter

• Attachment M - Eng Form 3394 Mishap Notification & Investigation

Template

• Attachment N - Monthly Record of Work-Related Injuries-Illnesses &

Exposure

• Attachment O - Army Cybersecurity-Risk Management Framework (RMF)

Requirements

• Attachment P - Bldg. 765 Proposed Layout

• Attachment Q - Bldg. 832 (Now 765) Warehouse 100% Design Drawings

• Attachment R - Bldg. 955 As-Built Drawings

• Attachment S - Bldg. 765 & Bldg. 955 Equipment List 22Jul26

• Attachment T - Bldg. 955 Single Tier Locker Cut Sheet