RFP_250066_PP-APPROVED.pdf

PDF 227 KB Posted

Attached to
OCTA Preserves Property Patrol Services
Solicitation number
250066
Issued by
Orange County, California

About this file

This is a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for property patrol services. The RFP seeks qualified consultants to provide comprehensive property patrol services for OCTA facilities over a two-year contract term. The scope of work encompasses regular patrolling of OCTA properties to ensure security, safety, and maintenance of the premises. The contract budget is set at $295,000 for the full two-year period. Specific details regarding response deadlines, site visits, and bidder conferences are outlined within the proposal documents to ensure interested parties have adequate opportunity to review requirements and submit competitive bids.

The pricing structure is based on the total contract value of $295,000 allocated across the two-year service period. The RFP specifies requirements for qualified consultants with demonstrated experience in property patrol services and security operations. Any incumbent contractor information, specific performance metrics, staffing requirements, and equipment specifications are detailed in the supporting documentation. Funding for this contract is provided through OCTA's operational budget, with payment terms and conditions clearly outlined in the proposal requirements.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
OCTA_Preserves_Property_Patrol_Services_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
RFP_250066_PS.doc DOC document
RFP_250066_PP.docx DOCX document
RFP_250066_Agreement_Exhibit_C.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_Price_Summary_Sheet_Exhbit_B.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_SOW_Exhibit_A.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_Agreement_Exhibit_C_gmedits.docx DOCX document
RFP_250066_PP_gmedits.docx DOCX document
RFP_250066_PS_gmedits.doc DOC document
RFP_250066_SOW_Exhibit_A_GMEDITS.docx DOCX document
RFP_250066_SOWV.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_Form_700.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_Safety_Specifications_Exhibit_D.pdf PDF
RFP_250066_Public_Notice.doc DOC document
RFP_250066_Insurance_Indemnification_Memo.docx DOCX document
RFP_250066_ICE.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Revised: 05/09/2018

INTEROFFICE MEMO

October 13, 2025

To: Tiffany Chhan, Transportation Analyst, Project Development

From: Michael Cardozo, Contract Administrator, CAMM

Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN - RFP 250066, “Property Patrol

Services”

Please review the procurement plan for the subject RFP and advise your concurrence with the evaluation criteria and contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments.

Procurement Type: RFP IFB

Justification:

A Request for Proposals (RFP) procurement type is applicable because there are multiple factors for selection to be considered beyond cost.

Evaluation Criteria:

PROPOSAL WEIGHT

Qualifications of the Firm 30%

Staffing/Project Organization 25%

Work Plan 20%

Cost 25%

Justification: The standard 25 percent for each criterion was not used for this procurement. Qualifications of the firm is weighted at 30 percent to ensure firms have prior experience performing similar services. Staffing and project organization and cost are weighted at 25 percent as the firm must demonstrate it has the requisite personnel for this project and that rates remain competitive so OCTA receives value for the services provided. Work plan is weighted at 20 percent each as the firm must demonstrate it has the understanding associated with this project in order to complete the tasks required under the scope of work.

Contract Type: Time & Expense CTO-Based Firm Fixed Price

Justification: (Explain the rationale for using the particular contract type):

The contract type is time-and-expense because firms are requested to propose hourly rates for the services specified in the Scope of Work. The RFP

Procurement Plan, RFP 250015

Revised: 05/09/2018 does not have a specific Scope of Work detailing individual tasks. Therefore, a firm-fixed price contract cannot be used.

Retention: Yes No N/A

Prevailing Wages: Yes $ No N/A

Liquidated Damages: Yes $ No N/A

Procurement Schedule: Attached

Suggested Evaluation Team Members:

Internal Evaluators:

Tiffany Chhan, Transportation Analyst, Project Development Lauren Sato, Senior Transportation Analyst, Project Development Kameron Altar, Program Management Analyst, Security & Emergency Preparedness

Contract Term: Two (2)-year term

Funding Source: Local Measure M FTA FHWA

Dollar Amount: Term $295,000.00

Independent Cost Estimate Received: Yes No

Requisition Received: Yes Req. R000434

DBE Goal: Yes No

Project Manager Concurrence:

Tiffany Chhan, Transportation Analyst, Project Development Date

CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:

Georgia Martinez, Department Manager Contracts and Procurement Date

10/30/2025

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .