PWS Attachment 5 RFP 75N98020R00014.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Radiation Safety Services
- Solicitation number
- 75N98020R00014
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| PWS Attachment 5-QASP | |||||
| Required Service (Performance Requirement) | Standard (Performance Standard) | Method of Surveillance (MS) | Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) | Points for Reduction of Bonus | |
| Number of non-compliant* surveys | |||||
| A. Comprehensive, corridor, monthly, weekly, 10 CFR 35 weekly, alpha and naturally occurring alpha surveys: | 1. Surveys shall be completed during the period in which they are due. Some surveys may not be due each month (i.e. Lab clearance and weekly surveys) | Comparison of completed surveys to a list generated by the database indicating the labs required to have a survey performed for that period. | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||
| 6-10 | 10 | ||||
| 11+ | 20 | 20 | |||
| 2. Comprehensive surveys shall be completed and submitted by 4pm of the second workday following the survey. | The contractor shall permit monitoring of the time between initial survey completion and survey reporting. | 98%-100% | |||
| 96%-97.99% | |||||
| 94%-95.99% | |||||
| 90%-93.99% | |||||
| 88%-89.99% | |||||
| 85%-87.99% | |||||
| 83%-84.99% | |||||
| 80%-82.99% | |||||
| <79.99% | |||||
| 2. Survey reports shall be submitted in an acceptable format, with accurate content. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the Statement of Work. | The contractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report unacceptable survey statistics. DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking and reporting data. | 0-2 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 1 | ||||
| 4 | 2 | ||||
| 5 | 3 | ||||
| 6 | 4 | ||||
| 7-8 | 5 | ||||
| 9-10 | 10 | ||||
| 11+ | 20 | 20 | |||
| 3. All reports and supporting documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the time frames outlined in the Statement of Work. | Cotractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report data input times. DRS may spot-check entered data for timeliness and accuracy. | 0-5 | 0 | ||
| 6-10 | 2 | ||||
| 11-15 | 4 | ||||
| 16+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| 4. Data requiring database entry shall be entered completely and accurately. Utilize methods to track and report accuracy. | DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking & report completion and accuracy. | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1-2 | 5 | ||||
| 3+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| Laboratory Clearance Surveys: | 1. Surveys shall be completed during the period in which they are due. Some surveys may not be due each month (i.e. Lab clearance and weekly surveys) | Comparison of completed surveys to a list generated by the database indicating the labs required to have a survey performed for that period. | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 3 | ||||
| 3-5 | 6 | ||||
| 6+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| Major Deficiencies | 2. Survey reports shall be submitted in an acceptable format, with accurate content. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the Statement of Work. | The contractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report unacceptable survey statistics. DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking and reporting data. | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 5 | ||||
| 3-4 | 10 | ||||
| 5-6 | 15 | ||||
| 7+ | 20 | 20 | |||
| Minor Deficiencies | 2. Survey reports shall be submitted in an acceptable format, with accurate content. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the Statement of Work. | The contractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report unacceptable survey statistics. DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking and reporting data. | 0-2 | 0 | |
| 3-4 | 2 | ||||
| 5-6 | 4 | ||||
| 7-8 | 8 | ||||
| 9-10 | 12 | ||||
| 11-12 | 16 | ||||
| 13+ | 20 | 20 | |||
| 3. All reports and supporting documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the time frames outlined in the Statement of Work. | Contractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report data input times. DRS may spot-check entered data for timeliness and accuracy. | 0-2 | 0 | ||
| 3-5 | 4 | ||||
| 6-9 | 8 | ||||
| 10+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| 4. Data requiring database entry shall be entered completely and accurately. Utilize methods to track and report accuracy. | DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking & report completion and accuracy. | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1-2 | 5 | ||||
| 3+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| Number of non-compliant security checks | |||||
| B. Security Checks: | 1. Security checks shall be completed within the time frame outlined in the statement of work. ** | Review security check results for each cycle; random inspections by a member of the Division of Radiation Safety (DRS). | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||
| 3-4 | 5 | ||||
| 5 | 10 | ||||
| 6+ | 20 | 20 | |||
| 2. Results shall be completely and accurately documented. Data requiring database entry shall be entered completely and accurately. Utilize methods to track and report accuracy. | Review of lab surveillance forms. DRS oversight will apply, as DRS may spot-check the tracking and report completion and accuracy. | 0-1 | 0 | ||
| 2-3 | 1 | ||||
| 4 | 2 | ||||
| 5 | 3 | ||||
| 6 | 5 | ||||
| 7+ | 10 | 10 | |||
| 3. Unsecured radioactive materials were secured by contractor or notified DRS. | Review of lab surveillance forms. | 0 |
blade_runner: blade_runner:
| changed from 100% and <100% | 0 | |||||
| >=1 | 20 | 20 | ||||
| 4. All reports and supporting documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the time frames outlined in the Statement of Work. | The contractor shall utilize DRS database*** to track and report data input times. DRS may spot-check entered data for timeliness and accuracy. | 0-10 | 0 | |||
| 11-20 | 2 | |||||
| 21-30 | 4 | |||||
| 31+ | 10 | 10 | ||||
| Percent of non-compliant elements | ||||||
| C. Calibrations: | 1. Exposure meters calibrated within required time frame. | Spot checks by DRS | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 10 | |||||
| 2 | 20 | |||||
| 3+ | 30 | 30 | ||||
| 2. Contamination meters calibrated within required time frame. | Spot checks by DRS | 0-3 | 0 | |||
| 4-5 | 5 | |||||
| 6-10 | 10 | |||||
| 11-15 | 15 | |||||
| 16+ | 20 | 20 | ||||
| 3. Exposure meters were calibrated in accordance with the SOW. | Spot checks by DRS | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 10 | |||||
| 2 | 20 | |||||
| 3+ | 30 | 30 | ||||
| 4. Contamination meteres were calibrated in accordance with SOW. | Spot checks by DRS | 0-3 | 0 | |||
| 4-5 | 5 | |||||
| 6-10 | 10 | |||||
| 11-15 | 15 | |||||
| 16+ | 20 | 20 | ||||
| 5. Documentation is complete and accurate in accordance with the SOW. | Compare stickers to calibration sheets | >0-4% | 0 | |||
| >4-6% | 1 | |||||
| >6-10% | 5 | |||||
| >10% | 10 | 10 | ||||
| Instances of non-compliance with the statement of work | ||||||
| D. Preparation and decontamination of therapy rooms: | 1. The contractor shall prepare the I-131 Therapy rooms for occupancy as needed, within the time frame outlined in the statement of work | DRS will verify the room is prepared prior to occupancy and notify the contractor if modifications are required. | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 10 | |||||
| 2+ | 20 | 20 |
| 2. The contractor shall decontaminate, for free release all surfaces to less than 200 dpm/100cm2, as needed, within two or three days of receiving the swipe results unless instructed to do so within one day by the COR. The contractor shall decontaminate, for reset, all surfaces to less than 2000 dpm/100cm2, as needed, within one day of receiving the swipe results. | The contractor shall provide a survey report with swipe and meter results attached to demonstrate compliance. DRS staff may spot check with swipes and meters. | 1 | 5 | |
| 2+ | 10 | 10 |
E. Grounds for 100% reduction in bonus and 100% penalty: If the actions or lack of action by the contractor result in a violation of NRC regulations or conditions of NIH's NRC licenses, a 100% reduction in bonus and a 100% penalty of bonus will immediately be applied. The contractor will be responsible for paying any NRC related fines incurred due to their negligence.
| 330 | |
| Other actions resulting in Points Reduction for Bonus or Penalty |
| Causes NRC to issue a fine to NIH | 130 |
| Causes NRC to issue a NOV to NIH | 111 |
| Misuses Gvt. ID | 111 |
| Causes NRC to issue a non-cited violation to NIH | 101 |
| 1 | |
| Creates a RAM security violation: | 76 |
| Creates an Irradiator security violation: | 76 |
| Creates a High Radiation Area controls violation: | 76 |
| Causes patient care issues (Therapies) | 76 |
| Causes enforcement actions due to erroneous reports | 76 |
| Causes and/or improperly responds to contamination in unrestricted areas- Spreads contamination to unrestricted areas when avoidable: | 31 |
| Jeopardizes* NIH JHACO accreditation | 31 |
| KEY: | |
| *Contractor's fault | |
| **By floor | |
| ***If DRESS/DRS database is down, manual methods will be used as per directed by DRS. |
| Points deducted ranges | Modifier for Bonus/Penalty |
| 0-9 | 1.1 |
| 10-15 | 1.09 |
| 16-20 | 1.08 |
| 21-25 | 1.07 |
| 26-30 | 1.06 |
| 31-50 | 1.05 |
| 51-75 | 1.025 |
| 76-100 | 1 |
| 101-110 | 0.975 |
| 111-120 | 0.95 |
| 121-130 | 0.925 |
| 130+ | 0.9 |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .