PP.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2026 TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
- Solicitation number
- 250015
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is a Project Description document for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in California regarding a 2026 Transit Asset Management Plan Update. The project seeks qualified consultants to develop a comprehensive transit asset management plan with a thirteen-month contract term. The scope of work requires the consultant to conduct a detailed assessment of OCTA's transit assets, including vehicles, infrastructure, and facilities, and to create a strategic management plan that aligns with federal and state requirements. The deliverables include an updated asset inventory, condition assessment data, lifecycle cost analysis, maintenance and replacement schedules, and a prioritized capital improvement strategy. The consultant must engage with OCTA staff and stakeholders throughout the planning process and provide recommendations for optimizing asset performance and financial planning.
The project budget is fixed at $250,000 for the entire thirteen-month engagement. The consultant will be responsible for all labor, equipment, and resources necessary to complete the work. OCTA will provide access to existing asset data and staff coordination to support the consultant's efforts. The selected consultant must demonstrate experience with transit asset management planning, familiarity with federal transit asset management regulations, and proven ability to manage complex data analysis and stakeholder engagement. Payment will be structured according to OCTA's standard invoicing procedures, with reimbursable expenses to be negotiated as part of the final contract agreement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2026_TRANSIT_ASSET_MANAGEMENT_PLAN_UPDATE_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_SOW.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_C_Agreement.pdf | ||
| RFP_5-4254_Exhibit_B.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_D_Safety_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_SOW_gmedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_C_Agreement_gmedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_A_idedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| PP_idedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_B_idedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| PS_idedits.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit_C_Proposed_Agreement_idedits.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_C_idedits.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_E_idedits.doc | DOC document | |
| Form_700_Review.pdf | ||
| PS.doc | DOC document | |
| Risk_Response.pdf | ||
| SOW_Verification.pdf | ||
| ICE.docx | DOCX document | |
| REQ35213.pdf | ||
| ICE_Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Procurement Plan, RFP 250015
Date: August 27, 2025
To: Charles Main, Principal Transportation Analyst, Transit Service Planning
From: Michael Cardozo, Contract Administrator, CAMM
Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN - RFP 250015, “2026 Transit Asset Management Plan Update”
Please review the procurement plan for the subject RFP and advise your concurrence with the evaluation criteria and contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments.
Procurement Type: |X| RFP |_| IFB
Justification:
A Request for Proposals (RFP) procurement type is applicable because there are multiple factors for selection to be considered beyond cost.
Evaluation Criteria:
| PROPOSAL |
| WEIGHT |
| Qualifications of the Firm |
| 20% |
| Staffing/Project Organization |
| 25% |
| Work Plan |
| 30% |
| Cost |
| 25% |
Justification: The standard 25 percent for each criterion was not used for this procurement. Qualifications of the firm is weighted at 20 percent to ensure firms have prior experience performing similar services. Staffing and project organization and cost are weighted at 25 percent as the firm must demonstrate it has the requisite personnel for this project and that firm-fixed rates remain competitive so OCTA receives value for the services provided. Work plan is weighted at 30 percent each as the firm must demonstrate it has the understanding associated with this project in order to complete the tasks required under the scope of work.
Contract Type: |_| Time & Expense |_| CTO-Based |X| Firm Fixed Price
Justification: (Explain the rationale for using the particular contract type):
The contract type is firm-fixed price because the RFP has a specific scope of work detailing specific tasks and deliverables
| Retention: |
| |X| Yes 10% |
| |_| No |
| |_| N/A |
| Prevailing Wages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
| Liquidated Damages: |
| |_| Yes |
| $ |
| |_| No |
| |X| N/A |
Procurement Schedule: |X| Attached
Suggested Evaluation Team Members:
Internal Evaluators:
Charles Main, Principal Transportation Analyst, Transportation Modeling Trevor Mathias, Business Unit Analyst, Government Relations Anthony Baruch, Section Manager, Financial Planning and Analysis
Contract Term: Thirteen (13)-month term
Funding Source: |_| Local |X| Measure M |_| FTA |_| FHWA
Dollar Amount: |X| Term $250,000.00
Independent Cost Estimate Received: |X| Yes |_| No
Requisition Received: |X| Yes Req. 35213
DBE Goal: |_| Yes |X| No
Project Manager Concurrence:
| _________________________________________ | ______________ |
| Charles Main, Principal Transportation Analyst, Transit Service Planning | Date |
CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:
| _________________________________________ | ______________ | |
| Iris Deneau, Section Manager, Procurement | Date |
Revised: 05/09/2018 Revised: 05/09/2018 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .