Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 88 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair NPS Dorms Gutters and Windows
- Solicitation number
- FA301025R0027
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation No. FA301025R0027, issued by the 81st Contracting Squadron at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. The solicitation is for replacing windows and gutters of NPS Dorms located at Keesler AFB. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance feedback from a previous contractor reference, with submission required by 11:00 AM CST on 15 September 2025 directly to the Contracting Officer via corporate or government email.
The evaluation form includes comprehensive performance rating sections covering quality, schedule, management, and regulatory compliance. Ratings range from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory across categories such as work quality, timeliness, work management, and regulatory adherence. The form provides space for detailed comments and requires the reference to assess the contractor's overall performance, with specific evaluation definitions provided to guide the assessment process. The completed questionnaire will be used as part of the proposal evaluation for the window and gutter replacement project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation No. FA301025R0027
Please complete this questionnaire and email to: jamey.bankston@us.af.mil
We are currently preparing our proposal for the 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS, Solicitation Number: FA301025R0027 for replace windows and gutters of the NPS Dorms located at Keesler AFB, MS. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous or ongoing contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
This Questionnaire is due to Jamey Bankston no later than 11:00 AM CST on 15 September 2025. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting OƯicer from a corporate or government email account.
If you will be unavailable on 15 September 2025, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting OƯicer to contact.
Thank you.
POC/Alternate POC Name:
POC/Alternate POC Phone Number:
POC/Alternate POC Email Address:
Name of OƯeror:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
CONTRACT REFERENCED
Contract Number (including Task Order number if applicable):
Contract Value (including all modifications):
Period of Performance:
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
Brief Description of Work Required in the Referenced Contract:
EVALUATION
Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives giving specific details would be appreciated. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Evaluation Definitions:
The following definitions should be used in assessing Contractor performance.
Exceptional: Performance EXCEEDS MANY contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly eƯective.
Very Good: Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were eƯective.
Satisfactory: Performance MEETS contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. Performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginal eƯective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory: Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. Performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineƯective.
Not Applicable (N/A): Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUALITY
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet work requirements and the overall quality of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Work
Comments:
SCHEDULE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide end-products timely?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
MANAGEMENT
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage all aspects of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Managing Work Aspects
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet all regulatory requirements? Examples would include safety regulations, Davis-Bacon Act and other labor standards.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Complying with Regulations
OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance on the contract being assessed.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .