NP DEWA 10(6) 218(2)_4320-041P10750_Bridge_Insp_Rpts.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area
Solicitation number
693C73-24-B-000014
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Vancampens Glen Bridge located in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area in New Jersey. The bridge is a concrete-encased steel multi-beam structure built in 1953 that is in fair condition overall. The primary issues include ongoing paint failure, rusting, and deterioration of the concrete deck and beams. Other identified problems include channel bank erosion, approach pavement issues, and debris accumulation. The report provides detailed condition assessments of the bridge's deck, superstructure, substructure, and channel, and includes recommendations and estimated costs for rehabilitation and reconstruction work. The total preliminary cost estimate for the recommended improvements is $604,000.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Project NP DEWA 10(6), 218(2), Solicitation Number 693C73-24-B-000014. The project consists of the replacement of Dingmans Falls Access Bridge #1 and the rehabilitation of the Vancampens Glen Bridge. The total project cost is expected to range from $2,000,000 to $5,000,000. Bid documents are scheduled to be issued on or about June 13, 2024. Small business participation requirements and other standard federal contracting terms and conditions are specified in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

VANCAMPENS GLEN BRIDGE

OLD MINE ROAD OVER VANCAMPENS BROOK

DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 1/16/2024

WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration FLH Office of Bridges and Structures Bridge Inspection Program 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, Building E2, Suite 200 Ashburn, VA 20147 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

VANCAMPENS GLEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 01/16/2024

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 42.0 FT (12.8 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 35 FT (10.7 M)

0 - NONE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 29.3 FT (8.9 M)

CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE: .................... 11 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

2000-UNDERSIDE OF BEAMS PAINTED, NEW RETAINING WALL, NEW APPROACH

GUARDRAILS, NEW DOWNSPOUTS FOR DECK DRAINS.

LOCATION

DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: .. .00 (KM PT 0)

STATE: .............................. 342 - NEW JERSEY LOCATION: .... AT VANCAMPENS GLEN RECREATION

SITE.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... OLD MINE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: VANCAMPENS BROOK

INSPECTION TEAM: D. Barber, M. Coen

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

David Barber 2624700309

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/11/2024

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete-encased steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The primary issue is ongoing paint failure and rusting of the exposed bottom flanges of the beams. Additionally, the concrete deck is exhibiting cracking and delamination on the top surface, as well as cracking, delamination, and spalling with exposed rebar on the underside. The road grade at the north approach causes severe ponding which is accelerating bridge deterioration.

Additional problems include severe sloughing along the south downstream channel bank behind the wingwall;

moderate sloughing along the south upstream channel bank, that has undermined several trees; heavy debris accumulation along the curblines; and minor to moderate settlement, cracking, and breaking up of the approach pavement.

Note that a maintenance request was made on 11/2/2021 to address vehicular hazards present due to erosion at

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

the southeast approach and up to 4" of settlement at the approach transitions.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

VANCAMPENS GLEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 01/16/2024

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7

ROUTINELY REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES

AND CLEAN DECK DRAINS. 1 LS 1000 1000

222.7

INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE

CORNERS. 4 EA 250 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

61.2,58.3 REPAIR SLOUGHING ALONG SOUTH CHANNEL

BANKS WITH SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES. 1 LS 20000 20000

58.1 DECK REPLACEMENT WITH WATERPROOF

MEMBRANE. 1 LS 200000 200000

58.4,222.

4,222.6

REPAVE APPROACHES. REGRADE NORTH

APPROACH TO STOP PONDING AT THIS

LOCATION.

1 LS 50000 50000

59.2,59.7 CLEAN AND PAINT BOTTOM FLANGES OF

ENCASED BEAMS. 1 LS 27000 27000

60.5,60.6, 60.9,222.

5,223.4

REPAIR EMBANKMENT EROSION AT END OF

NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL WITH

ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

1 LS 105000 105000

.59.2,.59.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 200000 200000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 602000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

VANCAMPENS GLEN BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 01/16/2024

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

604000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

F

N

F

P

G

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

P

N

G

G

N

F

F

G

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

G

F

F

F

G

N

G

N

N

F

G

F

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE P

N 8 FT

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.0

SILT, GRAVEL

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS 03 - CONCRETE FTG G

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

ABUTMENTS

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14.PILE BENTS

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE ABRASION AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE. MINOR TO MODERATE EDGE SPALLING ALONG DECK ENDS. MINOR TO MODERATE DELAMINATION AND MINOR SPALLING OF DECK SURFACE, PRIMARILY IN NORTHBOUND LANE. CONCRETE DISINTEGRATION UP TO 1" HIGH ALONG CURBLINES DUE TO SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION. LANE

STRIPING IS ABSENT ON DECK.

DECK SURFACE AND STRIPING NOT VISIBLE AT TIME OF 2024 INSPECTION DUE TO SNOW COVER.

LIGHT GROOVES IN CONCRETE SURFACE DUE TO PAVEMENT MILLING (SEE 58.3). TWO TRANSVERSE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN

DECK SURFACE; NOT SEALED WITH ISOLATED MINOR EDGE SPALLING ALONG JOINTS.

MODERATE DELAMINATION, SPALLS WITH EXPOSED AND CORRODED REINFORCEMENT (APPROXIMATELY12 SF), AND TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH LEAKAGE AND EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREAS ARE DELAMINATED AND BEGINNING TO SPALL. MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE THROUGH DECK

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.

58.4 SEE 222.4,6.

58.6 CRACKING AND SPALLING, WITH EXPOSED REBAR (1 FT) OF PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREAS ON WEST RAILING. BOTTOM RAIL IN

NORTH SECTION ADDITIONALLY HAS FULL LENGTH X 1/8" WIDE CRACK IN TOP FACE.

MINOR MAP CRACKING OF EXTERIOR AND TOP FACE OF EAST RAIL. INSIGNIFICANT LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AT EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST RAILING AT MIDSPAN. MINOR SCALING THROUGHOUT RAILS. MINOR MOSS

GROWTH ON RAILINGS.

58.7 HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES; DRAINS COMPLETELY BLOCKED. SEVERE PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH

TRANSITION DUE TO GRADE. TELESCOPING DOWNSPOUTS FOR DECK DRAINS.

59.2 CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL BEAMS. CONCRETE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGE AND STEEL HAS BEEN PAINTED. THERE ARE FULL HEIGHT X INSIGNIFICANT VERTICAL CRACKS IN WEB OF CONCRETE ENCASEMENT TYPICALLY SPACED AT 4'; CONCRETE CHAMFER ALONG BOTTOM OF SEVERAL BEAMS HAS SPALLED OFF; SEVERAL OTHERS HAVE CRACKS DEVELOPING INTO SPALLS. INSIGNIFICANT FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ALONG TOP OF ENCASMENT.

MODERATE CORROSION WITH RUST SCALE AND MINOR SECTION LOSS (UP TO 1/8") ON BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS WHERE PAINT IS FAILING, PRIMARILY ALONG EXTERIOR BEAMS AND NEAR ABUTMENTS.

59.2

59.7

PAINT ON BOTTOM FLANGES IS FAILED ALLOWING DETERIORATION OF BOTTOM FLANGES, PRIMARILY ON EXTERIOR BEAMS

AND NEAR ABUTMENTS.

60.1

60.6

60.4

EXPOSED AND CORRODED FORM TIES ON BREASTWALLS. MINOR SCALING OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT UPSTREAM END AT WATERLINE. INSIGNIFICANT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. HEAVY WATER LEAKAGE AT NORTH ABUTMENT PRIMARILY AT WEST HALF AND AT

EAST END.

FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK, UP TO 0.016" WIDE BELOW BAY #4 IN SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.5

60.6

60.9

MINOR EROSION BEHIND SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR SCOUR, UP TO 1'-4" HIGH, AT EAST END OF NORTH

ABUTMENT AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

60.6

223.1

60.9

MINOR SPALLING OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL AT JUNCTION WITH RETAINING WALL. MINOR SCALING OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

AND RETAINING WALL IN NORMAL WATER ZONE.

60.11

61.3

RIPRAP ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT AND WINGWALLS AND NORTH UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK. MINOR MISSING RIPRAP AT EAST

END OF NORTH ABUTMENT.

61.1

61.3

STREAM FLOWS AGAINST NORTH UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK, NORTHEAST WINGWALL AND RETAINING WALL, AND SOUTH ABUTMENT DURING PERIODS OF HIGH FLOW. UPSTREAM CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST ROADWAY EMBANKMENT.

61.2

61.3

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.2

61.4

SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG SOUTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK AT WINGWALL END; MODERATE BEYOND. MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG SOUTH UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK HAS UNDERMINED SEVERAL TREES WHICH ARE LEANING OVER

CHANNEL.

222.3

36.B

36.D

MINOR CHECKS AND SURFACE DECAY AT TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS. POST 1 AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL IS MODERATELY LEANING. STEEL-BACKED TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS ARE NOT ATTACHED TO BRIDGE RAILS. SOUTHEAST

APPROACH GUARDRAIL NOT TERMINATED SAFELY.

222.4

222.6

222.5

UP TO 4" OF SETTLEMENT ALONG BOTH APPROACH TRANSITIONS. 2'-6" WIDE X 2'-2" LONG X 1'-2" HIGH EROSION AT EAST END OF SOUTH APPROACH TRANSITION. SEVERE PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH TRANSITION. PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES DO NOT EXTEND TO FULL WIDTH OF DECK, WITH APPROAXIMATELY 2'-6" UNPAVED AT EACH SIDE. MODERATE MAP CRACKING OF

PAVEMENT AT SOUTH APPROACH. LANE STRIPING IS SEVERELY FADED AT BOTH APPROACHES.

PAVEMENT NOT VISIBLE AT TIME OF 2024 INSPECTION DUE TO SNOW COVER.

NOTE: MAINTENANCE REQUEST WAS MADE ON 11/2/2021 TO IMMEDIATELY ADDRESS VEHICULAR HAZARDS DUE TO PRESENT

DEFECTS.

222.5

223.4

36.D

MODERATE EMBANKMENT EROSION AT NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL END; SOME RIPRAP IS PRESENT.

222.7

223.4

NO OBJECT MARKERS ARE PRESENT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 11 10 20 18

HS 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3 14 13 25 23

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 23 21 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/30/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: STEEL BEAM DIMENSIONS ARE UNKNOWN. RATING BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR

BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE).

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (1) STATE:............................................ 342 - NEW JERSEY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............VANCAMPENS GLEN BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 34037 SUSSEX

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........4320-041 P (4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................(205) NPS REGION:........................ 1 6 0 00000 0

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:.......0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... VANCAMPENS BROOK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. (7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... OLD MINE ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. 4320041P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes (9) LOCATION:..................................... AT VANCAMPENS GLEN

RECREATION SITE.

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... (11) MILE POINT:................................. .00 (KM PT: 0 )

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............35 FT ( 10.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 42.0 FT ( 12.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 19.1

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 01/16/2024 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-041P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 41° 03'29.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 26.0 FT ( 7.9 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 75°00 '04.30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 29.3 FT ( 8.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 4 MI ( 6 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 4.0 FT ( 1.2 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 4.0 FT ( 1.2 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............139 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 11 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2022 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................167 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 26 FT ( 7.9 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2042 (50) CURB OR SIDEWALK WIDTHS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0.0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 RIGHT:.................................. 0.0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3.50 FT ( 1.07 M)

(56) LEFT:.................................0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................7 (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 0 1 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 602000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:.......35.0 FT ( 10.7 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2000-UNDERSIDE OF BEAMS PAINTED, NEW RETAINING WALL, NEW APPROACH GUARDRAILS, NEW DOWNSPOUTS FOR DECK DRAINS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://LENGTH:

https://03'29.10

Inspector: David Barber Structure Number: 4320041P0000000

Inspection Date: 01/16/2024 Facility Carried: OLD MINE ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD MILLBROOK VILLAGE; NOTE SNOW COVERED

ROADWAY/DECK

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description SETTLEMENT UP TO 1 INCH AT SOUTH APPROACH

PHOTO 6

Description FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN NORTH END OF WEST BRIDGE RAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description CRACKS AND SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR OF PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREAS ON

WEST BRIDGE RAIL

PHOTO 8

Description SPALLS IN EAST CURB NEAR MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 10

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE LEAKAGE STAINS ON ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL DELAMINATION OF BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES, BEAM #1 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR MIDSPAN OF BAY #1

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL RUST ON BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES, NORTH END OF BEAM #2 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #4; NOTE CRACKS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO 16

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR

MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description DELAMINATION AND SPALLS IN PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREAS ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN

BAY #5

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL CORROSION AND EDGE SPALLS ALONG BOTTOM STEEL FLANGES, EAST SIDE

SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 20

Description EROSION BEHIND END OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT CONNECTION BETWEEN NORTH ABUTMENT AND

NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 24

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .