Amendment_1_-_SEAM_Sec_L_-_L_16_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING AERONAUTICS AND MANUFACTURING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NNJ16567749R
About this file
Amendment 1 - SEAM Sec L - L_16_3 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NNJ16567749R Specialized Engineering, Aeronautics, and Manufacturing Section L – Amendment 1
Attachment L.16.3 - Past Performance Questionnaire
| Specialized Engineering, Aeronautics, and Manufacturing (SEAM) | |
| Solicitation No. NNJ16567749R |
Delete any capabilities tables in the Appendix for any Task Categories for which you are NOT proposing before transmitting to the reference for completion.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM:
SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
We are currently responding to NASA Johnson Space Center’s (JSC’s) Request for Proposal (RFP). This RFP requires Offerors to identify customers and solicit their response regarding our performance.
We are providing present and past performance data to NASA JSC relating to our performance on contract ___________________ (contract name/number). The RFP instructs that we provide our customers with the attached questionnaire and requests that you provide requested data and submit it by Thursday, March 31, 2016, directly to via email:
| Contract Name: Specialized Engineering, Aeronautics, and Manufacturing | |
| Attn: Portia Simone Keyes/BR | |
| NASA Johnson Space Center | |
| Email address: portia.s.keyes@nasa.gov |
The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed back to the JSC point of contact identified above. Thank you for your timely assistance.
Sincerely, (Company Official)
OFFEROR IDENTIFICATION
Please provide the following information:
1. Contractor Information Company:
Division:
Mailing Address:
2. Contract Number:
3. Contract Type:
4. Product/Service Description:
5. Contract Award Date:
6. Period of Performance (basic and any options):
7. During this contract period of performance, this firm was the:
| |_| Prime Contractor | |_| Significant Subcontractor | |_| Team Member |
| |_| Other (please describe): _____________________________ |
What percentage of the Total Contract Value for this contract did the firm perform, and what is the Total Contract Value?
Percentage of work performed by contractor ___________;
Total contract value ___________
8. Does a corporate or ownership relationship exist between the contractor being evaluated and your organization?
|_| No |_| Yes – If yes, please describe the relationship:_______________________
9. Unusual contract features or conditions: _____________________________________________________
RESPONDENT INFORMATION
1. Name of evaluator: _________________________________________________________
2. Position title: ______________________________________________________________
3. Agency/Company
| Name: | ___________________________________________________ | |
| Mailing Address: | _______________________________ | |
| _______________________________ | ||
| _______________________________ | ||
| Telephone Number:_______________________________ |
| Facsimile Number: _______________________________ | |
| E-Mail Address: | _______________________________ |
4. Your role in the program/contract:
5. Length of involvement in this program/contract: _____________________
6. Date questionnaire completed: _______________________
Past Performance Evaluation
Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following questions. It is very important to keep in mind that only performance in the past 5 years is relevant.
Please rate the contractor as described below in the following technical, schedule, contract management and cost performance, and general areas.
Excellent (E) – Of exceptional merit, exemplary performance in a timely, efficient and economical manner, very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
Very Good (VG) – Very effective performance, fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part, only minor deficiencies.
Good (G) – Effective performance, fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Satisfactory (S) – Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards, adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Poor/Unsatisfactory (P) – Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Not Applicable – Contractor not required to provide the service or product indicated.
| Technical Performance Category |
| N/A |
| P |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
1. Overall quality of technical services, products and/or support
2. Compliance with technical requirements and performance standards
3. Insight in understanding customer requirements and priorities
4. Initiative in identifying and resolving unforeseen technical and schedule problems (causes, impacts, and resolutions)
5. Surveillance, and management of major/critical subcontractors
6. Contractor’s ability to correct performance deficiencies
7. Ability to use metrics and other tools to accurately measure and track project/task
8. Record in demonstrating a thorough understanding of the nature of the work required and the disciplines required to accomplish them
9. Record in identifying and mitigating risks
10. Please give a short narrative as to why you chose the adjective you did for the 9 areas above, especially for those answers that are other than “satisfactory.”
11. Other particular strong/weak points of contractor’s technical performance.
12. Please complete the Capabilities Table provided in the Appendices. There are up to 5 task categories related to the SEAM statement of work.
| Schedule Performance Category |
| N/A |
| P |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
1. Ability to provide a qualified workforce to fulfill schedule requirements
2. Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports
3. Adherence to task schedules
4. Timeliness and accuracy of cost and business reports
5. Record in completing technical tasks/milestones, deliverables within established schedules
| Contract Management And Cost Performance |
| N/A |
| P |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
1. Adherence to estimated price/costs and contract price/cost targets
2. Ability to effectively plan efforts, provide realistic cost and schedule estimates, etc
3. Ability to forecast and control costs
4. Task order change management (discuss contractor commitment to negotiate and implement changes in a timely manner)
5. Rate the contractor’s record in effectively selecting and managing subcontractors
6. Rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction
7. Record in managing multiple and diverse projects/tasks from planning through execution phases
8. Record in adhering to or ability to meet goals for Small Business Subcontracting Goals
12. Was there a cost overrun/under-run? |_| No |_| Yes – If yes, what was the magnitude? Please explain:
13. Has the contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? |_| No |_| Yes – If yes, please explain the reason for termination (i.e., inability to meet cost or delivery schedules, performance, etc.:
| General |
| N/A |
| P |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
1. Rate the contractor’s record in recruiting, maintaining, and managing a workforce with the required skill mix:
2. Rate the contractor’s compliance with export control requirements:
3. Rate the contractor’s record in complying with safety, health, and environmental procedures/requirements:
4. Record in establishing and maintaining an effective quality assurance program and meeting quality improvement requirements:
5. Did any accidents or industrial illnesses resulting in lost time occur under this contract? |_| No |_| Yes – If yes, please provide details:
6. What practices ensure that the services provided by the offeror protect aircraft maintenance, pilots and employee safety?
7. What quality control program or other methods capable of identifying and correcting deficiencies has the offeror demonstrated?
8. Have any avionics, electronics, mechanical failures or service discrepancies resulted in loss or warranty claims by either the customer or other end user?
Past Performance Capabilities Table
In the Capabilities Table below, please indicate any skills you feel this contractor is capable of performing. Please indicate one of the following: None, Limited, or Extensive to indicate the contractor’s experience for that capability. If you have no experience with them for a skill, indicate Unkown.
Task Category A Aero Structural Engineering and Analysis
| Critical Capabilities |
| Contractor’s Ability to Perform |
| Comments |
Aircraft and Aircraft Systems flight Testing and Support, specifically:
Loads determination
Detailed stress analysis
Detailed dynamic analysis
Fatigue analysis
Random, sine, and shock analysis
Aeroelastic analysis
Damage tolerance assessment (DTA)
Computational Fluid Dynamics, specifically:
Flow simulation, visualization and loads
Testing Services, specifically:
Stress/Strain testing of mechanical of electrical systems/components
Vibration testing
Task Category B Aero Mechanical Systems
| Critical Capabilities |
| Contractor’s Ability to Perform |
| Comments |
System and component obsolescence
Sustainment, alteration and improvement of aircraft mechanical systems, specifically of:
Landing gear, tires, wheels, brakes, anti-skid
Fuel systems
Hydraulics
Air Conditioning and pressurization
Pneumatics
Flight controls
Structural and Dynamic Analysis, specifically:
Loads Determination
Detailed Stress Analysis
Damage tolerance assessment (DTA)
Instructions for continued airworthiness
Task Category C Aero Avionics, Electrical and Software
| Critical Capabilities |
| Contractor’s Ability to Perform |
| Comments |
Avionics integration
Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) design and integration
Circuit design
Wire harness design
Payload electrical interface design
Software design and integration
System and component obsolescence
Instructions for continued airworthiness
Electrical Loads Analysis
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) or Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) analysis
Troubleshooting using schematics and diagnostic equipment
Task Category D Ground Support Engineering Services
| Critical Capabilities |
| Contractor’s Ability to Perform |
| Comments |
Design modeling and drawing creation using CREO Parametric and AutoCAD software
Engineering analysis and support for mockup Center of Gravity, Center of Buoyancy, Net Buoyancy loads determination and Tip Over Analysis
Stress analysis and report generation
Hydraulic and Electro-Hydraulic systems design and integration for motion control systems
Electrical systems design and integration
Structural design including welded structures
Mechanical system design
Software design and integration
Lighting Systems design, test and integration
Reverse engineering
Manufacturing and Fabrication
Task Category E Fabrication and Provisioning
| Critical Capabilities |
| Contractor’s Ability to Perform |
| Comments |
Machining
Sheet metal work
Additive manufacturing such as ABS 3-D printing
Welding
Finishing
Soft Goods Production (sewing)
Electrical and electronics fabrication and assembly
General fabrication and assembly
Purchasing for projects as required
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .