NAVMWR-25-R-0013 0006 - RFIs.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

1 5

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

00006 01 July 2025

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

N25-01/N25-08 N944

CNIC Facilities and Construction Contracting 5720 Integrity Drive, Lassen Building 457 Millington, TN 38055 alanna.g.young.naf@us.navy.mil

Hubert Stewart, Construction Contract Specialist 901-874-6554 hubert.l.stewart.naf@us.navy.mil

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NUMBER

NAVMWR-25-R-0013

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.

NAVMWR-25-R-0013

Repair Fleet Rec Center Bundle NAVSTA Everett & NAVBASE Kitsap, WA Amendment 00006

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////CONTINUED ON PAGE 2//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Alanna G. Young, Contracting Officer

NAVMWR-25-R-0013 0006 Repair Fleet Rec Center Bundle NAVSTA Everett & NAVBASE Kitsap, WA

Amendment 0006 Page 1 of 9

BLOCK 14 CONTINUED:

Request for Quote (RFQ) NAVMWR-25-R-0013_Repair Fleet Rec Center Bundle is hereby amended to incorporate the following clarifications:

CLARIFICATIONS:

Q26. RFP Section J-16 NAVBASE KITSAP DESIGN CHARRETTE NARRATIVE. This section contains much language regarding funding, costs, items to be repaired, items to be replaced, or constructed however, reads as if for reference only and not a binding scope of work. Question: Please confirm this Charrette Narrative with its various options and general discussion tone does not describe the scope of work required by this RFP and if it does, how are contractors to approach conflicts, contradictions, and omissions with various other parts of the RFP?

A26. Section C-2 states The Fleet Recreation Center, at NAVBASE Kitsap in Bremerton, WA is a multi-functional facility providing coffee bar, made to order food service, grab and go food service, dining area, laundry facilities, entertainment activities, and a training room area. The facility is a concrete structure in good repair, the systems are dated and require updating to meet current building code and design standards. There is a need for an addition to the space that will add externally accessible restrooms and an expansion of the existing atrium space. A major repair of the facility will address shortcomings in mechanical systems, security systems, fire protection, life safety, functional efficiency and provide more enhanced spaces to accommodate sailors in the future. The drawings provided are for Scheme C and should be referred to for this RFP.

Option C included the exterior restrooms and expanded atrium.

Q27. Bidders are to provide with their proposal a Design and Construction Schedule which will be the basis for the contract period of performance (PoP). The two project sites (Everett and Bremerton) could be scheduled and worked on either concurrently or in consecutive fashion, one after another. Does the government desire for the two project sites to be started and worked on simultaneously or are they to be done in consecutive fashion, one after the other? Either scenario would have the same period of closure for each facility.

A27. If the contractor has the capacity to run concurrently that is preferred.

Q28. May contractors and designers provide design submittals for each building separately or must both buildings be included in each design submittal?

Q28. We will need full designs for both buildings when the submittal is due. Can you separate them and send them in a different file?Yes, When the 50% is due, I expect both buildings. I Please ensure that all necessary specifications are included for each building to facilitate a smooth review process.

Amendment 0006 Page 2 of 9

Q29. RFP Section C, F. Environmental states that a NPDES permit is required for this project. NPDES permits are required when construction would disturb one acre or more and/or create discharge into waters of the U.S. This project does neither. It's unclear whether NPDES permits could be issued if the project doesn't meet the necessary environmental thresholds for a permit. Questions: 1) Is it even possible to obtain a NPDES permit for two recreation center remodels with little ground disruption? 2) If federal law doesn't require it, should this requirement be deleted from the RFP?

A29. The Everett project is constructed on a pier and immediately adjacent to the water on one side.

Q30. The bid documents provide no detailed information on what area(s) the contractor can potentially utilize for setting up temporary office facilities such as a job trailer/office, storage, and staging areas. Please provide site plans or similar showing the area(s) that can be used for these purposes for each site.

A30. The site immediately adjacent to the project can be used for these purposes. For Kitsap that would be the basketball court and for Everett that would be a portion of the parking area in front of the building.

Q31. Contractor parking does not appear to be adequately addressed in the bid documents. Please provide information, such as site plans or similar, that makes clear how much area/ many parking spots would be available for contractor use, and where these spots are located in reference to the construction areas. Please provide this information for both sites.

A31. The site immediately adjacent to the project can be used for these purposes. For Kitsap that would be the basketball court and for Everett that would be a portion of the parking area in front of the building.

Q32. No information appears to be provided allowing for the government to maintain usage/ occupancy of either facility during construction. Please confirm that all areas of construction at both sites will be vacant prior to mobilization and will remain vacant throughout the entire construction duration.

A32. Both facilities will be vacated during construction.

Q33. Refer to Section D.B.1.a: This paragraph is unclear on how long the contractor has to provide either the initial "50% Design Phase" submittal or the "Execution Package" submittal after an

Amendment 0006 Page 3 of 9 award is made. It appears that both of these submittals are required within 30 days of award, but this allotted time-frame is likely not adequate to prepare the required Area Use Plan(s), Safety Plan, Schedule, CQM Plan, Env. Protection Plan(s), SWPPP(s), as well as 50% bid document(s) for what is essentially two independent construction sites. Further adding to confusion, Section H calls for some of these plan submittals to be submitted at other times, such as with 100% design submittals. 90 Calendar days after award are requested for these plan submittals and the 50% design submittal.

A33. Please submit all Area Use Plan, CQM Plans and all other plans at the 50% Design phase.

Q34. The bid document time frames allowed for various pre-construction submittals (examples would be Area Use Plan…..) appear to conflict throughout the bid documents. Some of these submittals are called out in one part of the bid documents to be submitted within "x" days of the NTP, but other parts of the bid documents call out to be submitted with design submittals. Please clarify overall expectations of ALL pre construction submittals as far as when they should be submitted and how long the gov't has for review/ acceptance.

A34. Please refer to question 33 and govt review is 21 days. Acceptance doesn’t happen until after the design review meeting between the NAFI and the contractor.

Q35. Refer to Section C. Though many of the requirements detailed throughout this section that appeared to refer to a different "RV" project have been removed by addenda, some reference still remains. Should this information be removed and/ or revised by the government prior to bidding?

A35. These references were removed in the previous amendments.

Q36. Refer to Section L-19-1. The design narrative appears to reference a different pool type of project. Should this information be removed or revised by the government prior to bidding?

A36. These references were removed in the previous amendments.

Q37. Refer to Page 9 of 12 of Section C, C-4.C Site Development. Please confirm that the grading requirements only apply to any new structure constructed by the contractor as part of this contract. Please confirm that the contractor is not responsible for modifications to existing slope, drainage, and/ or grading of any of the site beyond new structure created by the contractor.

A37. This was addressed in a previous RFI.

Amendment 0006 Page 4 of 9

Q38. As called for in Section C, C-5, please confirm the contractor will be required to install temporary metering for power, water, and sanitary sewer to monitor usage throughout construction. It is understood that the contractor will not be charged for using these utilities/ services, but the government would like to monitor usage regardless, please confirm.

A38. That is correct.

Q39. Section H, H-6.B.10 (page 6 of 30) calls for any temporary barrier fence to have posts installed in the ground. Please confirm that temporary fencing can utilize a non-invasive horizontal base-type design and simply be placed on top of existing surfaces in lieu of placing posts into the ground.

A39. Non-invasive base type may be utilized.

Q40. Refer to Section H, H-14.E. Is the referenced "Public Works Department (PWD)" part of the federal government, or is the contractor to assume that the sanitary sewer work is under the jurisdiction of a local government such as the county or city? Additional design review time and permitting time may be required by such local authority having jurisdiction.

A40. The Public Works Department is permitting agency on the base for the project.

Q41. The existing floor plans for both sites show significant amounts of furniture and government property. Clearly define which of these furniture and personal property items will be the responsibility of the contractor to remove and/ or dispose of.

A41. NAFI owned furniture will be removed from the facility prior to construction by MWR personnel.

Q42. The bid documents are unclear on whether or not the contract includes the supply and installation of the new laundry washer and dryer equipment at either site. Is the contractor responsible for the supply and installation of this equipment?

A42. Fixed equipment such as kitchen equipment and laundry equipment is included in the contract. Furniture is not.

Amendment 0006 Page 5 of 9

Q43. Is it the intent that the contractor shall disconnect all existing equipment in the dishwash prep, kitchen, and POS areas, and remove said equipment? Does this removed equipment become the property of the contractor for disposal?

A43. The contractor will be responsible for the removal of existing equipment. Contractor will coordinate with the facility manager on where equipment will be removed to, and if NAFI will retain ownership of property.

Q44. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 199/200 of 322, Interior Floors. Should the flooring in the existing interior restrooms be replaced as part of the bid proposal? This flooring is called out as an alternate cost, but the bid forms do not support alternate pricing.

A44. Yes

Q45. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 201 of 322, Toilet Partitions and Toilet Accessories. Should the toilet partitions and accessories in the existing interior restrooms be replaced as part of the bid proposal?

A45. Yes

Q46. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 202/203 of 322, Fire Alarm System. Should replacement of the fire alarm system be included as part of the bid proposal, or should the existing fire alarm system remain in place and be modified as required by the space modifications?

A46. This is required by code.

Q47. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 203 of 322, Mass Notification System. Confirm that adding a new mass notification system to the facility is NOT a requirement of this project.

A47. This is required by code.

Q48. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 208 of 322, Plumbing Systems. Which fixtures should be included for replacement in the bid proposal?

A48. Alternative to be included.

Amendment 0006 Page 6 of 9

Q49. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 201 of 322, Restroom and Laundry Countertops.

Should replacement of the countertop in the laundry room be included for replacement in the bid proposal? It is called out as an alternative.

A49. Alternative to be included.

Q50. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 201 of 322, Daylighting. Should new light tubes be included in the bid proposal? If so, how many, and approximately where should they be added?

A50. No, we are adding a significant addition to the glass atrium.

Q51. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 215 of 322, Electronic Security System (ESS).

For bidding purposes, what should be assumed for the future CCTV system - 1) how many cameras, and approximately where will they go; 2) where will the DVR/ Headend for the CCTV be installed; 3)what are the rough-in requirements for this system, as far as conduit/ raceway requirements?

A51. This will need to be determined as part of the design phase of the project.

Q52. For the Bremerton Site, refer to Section J Page 215 of 322, Electronic Security System (ESS).

Should a new CCTV system be included as part of this contract, or should it be assumed as a future contract by others?

A52. This is part of the project.

Q53. Refer to FS101, Food Service Equipment Plan, for Bremerton Site. There is a sheet note "Condiment Stand with Microwave", but no equipment is called out at this location. What specific food service equipment should be included for this location?

A53. This will need to be determined as part of the design phase of the project but should include a microwave and condiment storage.

Q54. Please confirm that all of the products (product data/ cut sheets) that have been included in the RFP take precedence over potential conflicting requirements or referenced design guides as elements to be incorporated into the bid proposal.

Amendment 0006 Page 7 of 9

A54. Product data sheets and cutsheets are provided to communicate design intent and not to establish regulatory standards.

Q55. Refer to Section J-23, Kitsap Utility Map. Can the government provide as-built documentation showing the size and elevations of the existing lateral sanitary waste line that is shown on this "map"?

A55. Available documentation has been provided. Additional documentation, if it exists, will be provided after the contract award. Contractor is encouraged to coordinate a self-guided tour for additional information.

Q56. Please confirm that both the entire rear basketball court area between the streets and the building and the entire front patio area can be used by the contractor as lay-down and staging areas.

A56. Answered above.

Q57. Can the government provide any as-built documentation showing the locations, sizes, elevations, etc. of the storm drainage of the site? Such as the drain lines that carry the roof drain tie-ins, sizes of catch basins, locations and elevations of storm piping between catch basins, etc.

A57. Available documentation has been provided. Additional documentation, if it exists, will be provided after the contract award. Contractor is encouraged to coordinate a self-guided tour for additional information.

Q58. Refer to Section C.E. Permits: Please confirm that the federal government is the authority having jurisdiction for this project and that permitting will not be required by local governments.

A58. PWD is the AHJ regarding permitting. They will inform you if additional permitting is required.

Q59. To allow for the necessary coordination between the prime bidder, his AE firm, and his subcontractors/ suppliers, we request the bid date be extended by 10-days following release of RFI responses by the government. This will allow for sufficient time to properly review and account for RFI responses in the bid proposal.

A59. The bid due date will stay at July 11th.

Amendment 0006 Page 8 of 9

Q60. Refer to Section B.B-3: Please confirm that a standard CSI breakdown by lump sum will be sufficient pricing detail for the bid proposal. It is not typical to provide itemized labor, material, and equipment information in bid proposals of this type.

A60. We understand it might not be typical but an itemized pricing detail is what is needed.

Q61. Refer to Section C.F. Environmental: It appears that much of this section would apply to the Everett site, but not the Bremerton site. Can bidders assume that NPDES permitting and CATEX does not apply to the Bremerton site?

A61. This is oriented to Everett. Contractor should ensure that stormwater does not drain to the bay when considering implications on the Bremerton project site.

Q62. Refer to Section B.B-3: Please confirm that proposed overhead and profit rates will be used as a basis for any future change modifications for this contract.

A62. Yes, Overhead and Profit will be reviewed and negotiated depending on the work presented in the modification.

Q63. CATEX document for B1027 is not found in Section J. Please provide.

A63. SAR attached.

Q64. Refer to Section J-19 (NAVBASE Kitsap property record): The current PRV for Building 1027 is listed as $2,197,187. The project magnitude is $3,800,000 to $4,220,000 which means that full energy code, seismic, accessibility, and Antiterrorism Force Protection (ATFP) upgrades will be triggered. Please verify that these are, in fact, required and included in the project budget.

A64. This will be determined by the AHJ and should be considered as part of the design phase of the project.

Q65. Is a nursing and lactation room required in accordance with UFC 1-200-01 para. 1-4.2? The provided design drawings and narratives do not appear to include this.

A65. This was updated in a previous amendment.

Q66. Is investigation of microgrid feasibility required in accordance with UFC 1-200-01 para. 1-4.3?

Amendment 0006 Page 9 of 9

A66. This will be determined by the AHJ and should be considered as part of the design phase of the project.

Q67. Please provide existing as-built drawings of Building 1027/ NAVBASE Kitsap Rec Center Building.

A67. See attached.

Q68. Refer to Section J, NAVBASE Kitsap, Exterior Electrical Systems: Should the four existing 150 kVA step down transformers be replaced as part of this project? Or, should the contractor assume they are to remain as-is?

A68. The contractor should evaluate and determine if they are in good working order.

Contractor is encouraged to coordinate a self-guided tour for additional information.

Attachment 1 Page 10 of 12

ATTACHMENT 1

BUILDING 1027 AS BUILT DRAWINGS

SITE APPROVAL REQUEST

NAVAL BASE KITSAP –

BREMERTON

MSR# 25416110, REMODEL

RECREATION CENTER

BUILDING 1027, BREMERTON

SHEET TITLE:

SOURCE DATA:

PREPARED BY:

NBK PWD AM PRB12.CB

4/17/2025

Project Site

Naval Base Kitsap - Bremerton Map

Pacific NW GeoReadiness Center

NAVAL BASE KITSAP –

BREMERTON

MSR# 25416110, REMODEL

RECREATION CENTER

BUILDING 1027, BREMERTON

SHEET TITLE:

SOURCE DATA:

PREPARED BY:

NBK PWD AM PRB12.CB

M

EY

ER

S

R O

AD

Bremerton Aerial - Site Map

Google Earth imagery

4/17/2025

Project Site

WYCOFF STREET

LEGEND

Project Site

Navy Buildings

NORTH

Building 1027 Recreation Center

Building 1108 Operational Trainer (FIDE)

Building 494 General Warehouse DLA-D

Building 1019 Wendys Restaurant

NAVAL BASE KITSAP –

BREMERTON

MSR# 25416110, REMODEL

RECREATION CENTER

BUILDING 1027, BREMERTON

SHEET TITLE:

SOURCE DATA:

PREPARED BY:

NBK PWD AM PRB12.CB

Site Photo Documentation

Customer provided

4/17/2025

Addition in the south Floor Plan

Overview Southeast corner view

Attachment 2 Page 11 of 12

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING 1027 FLOOR PLANS

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text 4'

AutoCAD SHX Text 8'

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 16'

AutoCAD SHX Text

NORTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

ANNEGRET NAUTSCH

AutoCAD SHX Text

(206) 652-5080

AutoCAD SHX Text

ANNEGRETN@MAKERSARCH.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text

LASER MEASURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

CCN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

USER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

SF

AutoCAD SHX Text 74042

AutoCAD SHX Text N68436

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMUNITY REC CTR

AutoCAD SHX Text 5,527

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA

AutoCAD SHX Text

FACILITY

AutoCAD SHX Text

AE EVALUATOR:

AutoCAD SHX Text

POINT OF CONTACT:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIMENSIONS ARE VERIFIED USING

AutoCAD SHX Text

AREA CALCULATED WITH DIMENSIONS ROUNDED TO NEAREST QUARTER FOOT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOTAL AREA =

AutoCAD SHX Text

5,560 SF

AutoCAD SHX Text

1ST FLOOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

UIC:

AutoCAD SHX Text N68436

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAIN SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

28 FEB 20

AutoCAD SHX Text

MATTHEW GARVIN

AutoCAD SHX Text

(360) 476-7553

AutoCAD SHX Text

MATTHEW.GARVIN@NAVY.MIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLEET REC FACILITY

AutoCAD SHX Text

CCN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

USER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

SF

AutoCAD SHX Text 74019

AutoCAD SHX Text D64

AutoCAD SHX Text

CREDIT UNION

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS

Attachment 3 Page 12 of 12

ATTACHMENT 3

hubert.l.stewart Stamp