AUP_PITS_SOW_20151028_(TFR)_(2).docx

Department of the Navy Program Executive Office PMA201 Naval Air Systems Command Patuxent River, Maryland 20670-1161

Statement of Work For Support Equipment To The A/A42R-1 Air Refueling Store Avionics Upgrade Program

Prepared by Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Code 4.8.1.3 Lakehurst, New Jersey 08733

DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO DOD COMPONENTS ONLY; CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY; AUGUST 2007. OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRAFT DIVISION, LAKEHURST, NEW JERSEY 08733-5000

WARNING – THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS TECHNICAL DATA WHOSE EXPORT IS RESTRICTED BY THE ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT (TITLE 22, U.S.C. SEC 2751 ET SEQ) OR EXECUTIVE ORDER 12470. VIOLATIONS OF THESE EXPORT LAWS ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

DESTRUCTION NOTICE FOR UNCLASSIFIED, LIMITED DOCUMENTS, DESTROY BY ANY METHOD THAT WILL PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF CONTENTS OR RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT.

Revision History

Table of Contents

NAWCADLKE MISC 4.8.1.3.00

#0206 28 October 2015

1.0 SCOPE

This Statement Of Work (SOW) identifies the Contractor’s tasks required to design, assemble, test, and produce a new TTU-571/E Power Interface Test Set (PITS) and a new Jumper Cable Assembly to support the new A/A42R-1 Air Refueling Store (ARS) configuration (herein referred to as the "upgraded ARS") that was developed as part of the Avionics Upgrade Program (AUP).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents listed below form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this document, the contents of this document shall be considered a superseding requirement with the exception of the PITS' System Specification (herein referred to as the "Specification"). Unless otherwise specified, the latest revision as of the date of the Contract shall be used for each document.

GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

STANDARDS

HANDBOOKS

NAVAIR DRAWINGS

OTHER

PMA201-XX-SPEC

System Specification for the TTU-571/E Power Interface Test Set

NON GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL

The Contractor shall develop a new PITS to operate and test the upgraded ARS on-aircraft and off-aircraft at the Organizational, Intermediate, and Depot maintenance levels. The new PITS shall retain the functional and test capabilities of the legacy PITS (P/N 3456AS300-1), with the following exceptions:

· The cavity in the top panel assembly shall support the legacy Control Panel (P/N 3959AS100-1) and new Control Panel (P/N 3959AS100-2).

· A MIL-DTL-38999 connector that can mate with the new Jumper Cable Assembly (P/N 3456AS100-3) shall be used for the J3 port.

· An indicator that shows the state of the Hi-Level switch shall be added to the top panel assembly.

PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION

For the duration of the program, the Contractor shall provide remote access to all technical documentation and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) deliverables. Unless otherwise specified, the technical documentation and CDRL deliverables shall be in a format compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 (for presentations, reports, and spreadsheets) and Microsoft Project 2010 (for schedules). All drawings shall be in their native format and Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). All documentation shall include an issue date on the cover or first page.

DETAILED TASKS

INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAMS (IPT)

The Government and Contractor shall employ the Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) methodology throughout the performance of this contract. IPPD provides a systematic approach to product development that achieves a timely collaboration of relevant stakeholders throughout the product life cycle. The Contractor shall establish one or more Integrated Product Team (IPT) at the leadership and working group level within 45 days of contract award, and shall recommend a Contractor lead for each of the IPT meetings. The IPT structure shall include subcontractors (as appropriate) and the Government. The size of an IPT shall be optimized for flexibility to adopt improved processes; to react quickly to mitigate risk; to increase efficiency in communication and coordination; and to streamline management oversight by both the Government and the Contractor. An IPT issue resolution process shall be implemented throughout this contract.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall provide overall management, technical direction, coordination, and administration necessary to ensure the successful completion of the tasks specified herein. A single program manager shall be designated as the interface with the Government.

SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall ensure that all requirements in the Specification are imposed on subcontractors, and shall be solely responsible for the performance and quality of all subcontractors' and vendors’ work performed in response to the requirements of this SOW. The Contractor shall honor all supplier warranties.

PROGRAM PLANNING

The IPT shall develop and implement a management system for planning, organizing directing and controlling internal efforts necessary to deliver the required production model test system. The IPT shall develop and maintain a Contract Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). The WBS shall include all elements (hardware, data, services, etc.) for which the IPT is responsible.

INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMS)

The IPT shall develop, implement, manage to, and control the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), which will be maintained by the Government. The Contractor shall prepare and integrate their respective schedule and WBS into the IMS that identifies and supports all the respective events associated with Program Management, Systems Engineering, Design, Development, Integration, Test, Production, and Logistics, including roles and responsibilities by the different organizations.

CDRL A022 – Integrated Master Schedule

MEETINGS AND REVIEWS

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES

The Contractor shall plan, attend, coordinate, support and conduct the engineering and logistics meetings, formal reviews, and conferences (hereinafter called "reviews"). The reviews shall be conducted at Government and/or Contractor facilities. The Contractor shall be required to participate in biweekly teleconference meetings throughout the length of the program to discuss program status, interface issues, logistics issues and other program issues or concerns. All such reviews shall be included in the IMS and may be held concurrently with the Government’s approval. The Contractor shall prepare agendas and conference presentation materials that shall be made available prior to the review, and provide minutes and action items (i.e., Minute Action and Request for Action) following each review. Updates to all meeting materials after the required posting date shall be provided at the meetings/reviews. The Government reserves the right to cancel any review or to require any review to be scheduled during the period of performance. Action item documentation, assignment of responsibility for completion and due dates shall be determined prior to adjournment of all reviews. A summary of all action items, responsible parties, and estimated completion dates shall be included with the minutes.

CDRL A001 – Meeting Agenda CDRL A002 – Meeting Minutes

POST AWARD CONFERENCE (PAC)

After contract award, a Post Award Conference (PAC) shall be held between the Contractor and Government teams to establish a common understanding of all contract requirements, and develop a schedule for near-term critical meetings/actions. The Contractor shall present their management team, key personnel, and draft WBS/IMS inputs during the PAC.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

The IPT shall follow the systems engineering process in accordance with the ARS AUP Systems Engineering Plan (SEP). The Contractor shall perform requirements and design analysis and establish an allocated baseline (ABL) at Preliminary Design Review (PDR), and a product baseline (PBL) at Critical Design Review (CDR). The Contractor shall demonstrate traceability of the requirements at each technical review and through the validation and verification of the engineering development units at Test Readiness Review (TRR), System Verification Review (SVR), and Production Readiness Review (PRR). All engineering and development, including performance, environmental, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) shall be in accordance with the Specification.

RISK MANAGEMENT

The IPT will identify, manage and assess program risks in accordance with the Contractor’s standard Risk Management Plan (RMP). The Contractor shall participate in risk management and risk mitigation activities. The Contractor shall maintain a database of the program risks and the mitigation activities for each risk. A quarterly risk assessment shall update the status of risk items, add and retire risks as appropriate and adjust risk mitigation activities and schedules as necessary. The Contractor shall participate in risk meetings and be responsible for identifying risk items and proposing and executing risk mitigation activities. Risk management activities will be in accordance with NAVAIR Instruction 5000.21, and the Contractor shall be prepared to assess the likelihood and consequence of each identified risk. Risk status shall be briefed by the Contractor at all major reviews.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REVIEWS (SETR)

All Technical reviews shall be in accordance with NAVAIR Instruction 4355.19. The Government will have an independent chair for each of the SETRs and will be the final approval authority on whether the program has successfully satisfied all entry criteria for each review. The purpose for the SETR reviews is to evaluate the progress of the system’s design or development towards meeting the requirements of the Specification. The Contractor shall be prepared to address the contract performance at the system level and at lower CWBS elements and performing organizational levels. Contractor performance discussions shall include schedule, technical performance, risk elements and assumptions, work around plans, impacts on other contract activities, anticipated problems, and estimates to complete remaining work.

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR)

The Contractor shall conduct the PDR in accordance with the approved IMS and after having met all entrance criteria for the PDR. The PDR shall include a review of the requirements for each configuration item (i.e., equipment, hardware, etc.), and related peculiar support equipment as applicable. An initial list of Critical Safety Item/Critical Application Item (CSI/CAI) components shall be presented as well as a plan detailing how the design of these components will insure safe operation at the system level. The review will evaluate the progress, technical adequacy, and risk resolution (on a technical and schedule basis) of the design and will assess the technical risk associated with the selected manufacturing (assembly) methods (processes). The PDR also shall identify all single source, sole source, and diminishing source(s). The Contractor shall provide an Engineering Design Analysis Report prior to PDR that details an engineering analysis of the Hardware and Software (if required) that will satisfy the requirements of the Specification.

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR)

The Contractor shall conduct the CDR in accordance with the approved IMS and after having met all entrance criteria for the CDR. The CDR shall present the Initial Product Baseline design that incorporates corrections for all deficiencies identified during the PDR. The CDR shall be a detailed review of the design for the support equipment and all data items required by the contract. The Contractor shall demonstrate that the design presented at CDR implements the performance requirements of the Specification and present the methods used to verify and validate the design.

CONTRACTOR TEST READINESS REVIEW (CTR)

The Contractor shall conduct a CTR in accordance with the approved IMS and after having met all entrance criteria for the CTR. The purpose of the CTR is to conduct a formal review of the Contractor’s readiness to begin testing and to establish a test baseline. As a minimum, the review shall cover any component testing completed; any pilot production unit deviations from the baseline and their potential impact on test results; an updated program risk assessment; a review of the planned testing; data to be collected and reported; Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) program; and the test schedule.

GOVERNMENT TEST READINESS REVIEW (TRR)

The TRR is conducted as a formal review to establish the IPT’s readiness to begin Government testing of the system. The Contractor shall support the TRR in accordance with the approved IMS. As a minimum, the review shall cover Contractor testing completed and the results, any changes to the test baseline as a result of Contractor testing, any deviations from the updated baseline and their potential impact on Government test results, the readiness of logistics documentation and training, and an updated program risk assessment. The TRR will also include a review of the planned testing, sites to be visited, aircraft required for interface testing, data to be collected, RADR tracking, and test schedule.

SYSTEM VERIFICATION REVIEW / PRODUCTION READINESS REVIEW (SVR/PRR)

The Contractor shall hold a SVR/PRR. The review shall be conducted in accordance with the approved IMS. The SVR/PRR shall ensure that the system under review can proceed into production within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. The full, production-configured system is evaluated to determine that it correctly and completely implements all system and ILS requirements, and whether the traceability of final system requirements to the final production system is maintained. In addition, at this review the readiness of the manufacturing processes, the Quality System, the configuration management processes, and the production planning shall also be evaluated. The Contractor shall ensure the required production delivery schedule and rate can be met, considering the overall demand for facilities and personnel from other programs. The Contractor shall:

(a) Determine the types of manufacturing processes and methods required and the associated tooling and test equipment requirements. Where required processes or equipment do not exist, the Contractor shall determine whether they will be developed or outsourced and shall identify appropriate schedules for design/purchase and installation.

(b) Identify manufacturing risks and strategies for their mitigation.

(c) Develop and set up the facility layout sufficient to ensure that machine loading, fabrication and assembly sequences, and part routings minimize part in-transit and queue time.

PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (PCA)

The Contractor shall conduct the PCA on the first production system in accordance with the approved IMS. The PCA shall ensure that the related design documentation matches the system under review. In addition to the standard practice of assuring product verification, the PCA confirms that the manufacturing processes, quality control system, measurement and test equipment, and training are adequately planned, followed and controlled. It is also used to validate many of the supporting processes used by the Contractor in the production of the item and to verify other elements of the item that may have been impacted/redesigned after completion of the SVR/PRR.

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM)

The Contractor shall develop a Configuration Management Plan (CMP) in accordance with MIL-HDBK-61 and/or EIA 649. Once the baseline has been established at CDR, the Contractor shall submit to the Government all Class I and II ECPs; and all minor, major, and critical Requests for Deviation (RFD). MIL-HDBK-61 provides guidance concerning the classification of ECPs and RFDs. The Contractor shall maintain a summary list of all major and minor product baseline changes, ECPs (Class I and II) and RFDs. Upon final delivery of the Technical Data Package, the Government will assume configuration control of the system.

CDRL A003 – Configuration Management Plan CDRL A004 – Request for Deviation CDRL A005 – Engineering Change Proposal

DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

NEW MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS

Materials and construction methods that are not considered standard must be approved by the Government before being incorporated into the design. Factors of safety and material properties for new materials must be approved by the Government prior to being incorporated into the design. The Contractor must present a trade study documenting the benefits and risks to the Government substantiating that the material/method will be acceptable for the intended operating environment throughout the intended life of the component.

CDRL A006 – Trade Study Report

INTERFACE DESIGN DESCRIPTION (IDD)

The Contractor shall develop Interface Design Descriptions which detail the system component interfaces for the new PITS.

CDRL A007 – Interface Design Description (IDD)

DESIGN ANALYSIS

The Contractor shall prepare an engineering design analysis report detailing the derived requirements and the component selection. As a minimum, this shall include, size, weight, power, EMI/EMC, processor architecture, bus architecture, data acquisition, optics, lighting, lasers, environmental drivers, and sub-system product specifications.

CDRL A008 – Engineering Design Analysis Report

TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE

The Contractor shall provide a Level 3 Technical Data Package (TDP) that includes the drawings; Interface Control Documents; and all technical data required to operate, maintain, and repair the deliverables. The Contractor shall develop editable digital versions of drawings 3456AS100 (Jumper Cable) and 3456AS300 (PITS) that show the legacy and new configurations of the Jumper Cable and PITS; and include these drawings in the TDP. The Government shall have full and unlimited rights to the TDP. Source control drawings are allowable where system integrity is critical. The source control drawings shall contain all mechanical and electrical interface data critical to the item’s function and interchangeability. Sole source back to the design activity is not acceptable without approval by the Government.

CDRL A009 – Technical Data Package

ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE CONTROL

The Contractor shall establish, implement and document an Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control program following the guidelines provided in EIA 625. The ESD protective measure shall be used in manufacturing, packaging, storing, and transportation of ESD sensitive components. The Contractor shall ensure that ESD identification markings on all ESD sensitive subassemblies are visible during equipment installation, maintenance or repair. MIL-STD-1686 may be used for guidance.

RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY (R&M) PROGRAM

The Contractor shall maintain a comprehensive Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) program to proactively influence design and logistics processes in order to achieve a high level of operational readiness for the new PITS while providing ease of maintenance, and optimizing life cycle cost. The R&M Program shall be conducted in accordance with SAE JA1000; SAE JA1000-1 Reliability Development Program Requirement R3, Activity 4.3; MIL-HDBK-470A; and MIL-HDBK-781. The Contractor shall provide an analytical Reliability Prediction Report on the new PITS in accordance with SAE JA1000-1 A.32. The report shall show the predicted reliability calculations for the new PITS when operated in a Naval Unsheltered (NU) environment. Manufacturer’s data, documented engineering analysis performed in accordance with MIL-HDBK-217F, and/or verifiable field data may be used as sources of Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) data for component parts. The initial Reliability Prediction Report shall be submitted prior to PDR and updated as necessary to reflect relevant changes to the design. The final Reliability Prediction Report shall be submitted prior to CDR.

CDRL A010 – Reliability Predictions

FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMECA)

The Contractor shall perform a hardware FMECA at the functional and physical levels of the new PITS to determine possible failure modes and criticality categorization of each failure mode utilizing SAE JA1000-1 A.10 and MIL-STD-1629 as guidance. The functional FMECA shall be performed down to the lowest functional level. The physical FMECA shall be performed down to and including failure modes of lowest replaceable hardware items at all maintenance levels. Each identified failure mode shall be evaluated in terms of the worst potential consequential effects which could result from that failure mode. The initial FMECA shall be submitted prior to PDR and updated as necessary to reflect relevant changes to the design. The final FMECA shall be submitted prior to CDR.

CDRL A012 – FMECA

FAILURE REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEM

The Contractor shall utilize a closed loop system for reporting, analyzing, and correcting failures down to the lowest replaceable assembly level that occurs throughout development, testing and production. The Contractor shall identify procedures for initiating failure reports, the analysis of failures, and feedback of corrective action into the design, manufacturing and test processes in accordance with SAE JA1000-1 Method A.11 and MIL-HDBK-2155. This system shall include provisions that ensure timely Contractor-implemented corrective actions, and that provide for follow-up audits. The audits shall review all open failure reports, failure analyses, and corrective action suspense dates. The Contractor shall notify the Government of all failures within 24 hours of occurrence.

CDRL A013 – Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) CDRL A014 – Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report

HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (HSI)

The Contractor shall apply effective Human Systems Integration (HSI) principles in accordance with MIL-STD-1472 during design, production, and integration. The Contractor shall ensure manpower, personnel, training, and human factors engineering requirements have been incorporated into the layout, design, and arrangement of equipment having an operator or maintainer interface. The Contractor shall also integrate HSI principles into its systems safety program.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining an effective Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) in accordance with National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411. In designing, manufacturing, testing, operating and maintaining the new PITS and new Jumper Cable Assembly, all forms of pollution shall be prevented or reduced whenever feasible. The emphasis shall be on eliminating or reducing hazardous materials early in the design and properly controlling hazardous materials that cannot be eliminated. The Contractor shall ensure that all vendors and suppliers including those of subcontractors provide all information to accurately and fully complete the HMMP requirements.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (HMMP) PLAN

The Contractor shall prepare a HMMP Plan. The plan shall document the Contractor’s method to identify, prohibit, restrict, eliminate, minimize, and/or control hazardous materials. The Contractor may satisfy this requirement with the submission of a plant-wide HMMP or similar previously prepared plan with any additional information added as an addendum.

CDRL A015 – Hazardous Material Management Program Plan

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT

A HMMP Report will be prepared by the Contractor in accordance with CDRL A016. The report shall contain a well-defined table that identifies and lists all HAZMAT as defined in the System Specification, contained in the delivered system and used during the manufacture, operation, or maintenance. The Contractor shall maintain and update the HMMP Report throughout the life of the contract to reflect changes in design. As a minimum the following information is required.

(a) HAZMAT nomenclature/name.

(b) Technical documentation and/or specification that require the use of the HAZMAT, if applicable.

(c) Name and Part Number of the component/part that contains the HAZMAT or is associated with the use/generation of the HAZMAT.

(d) Process associated with the use or generation of the HAZMAT.

(e) Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each HAZMAT.

(f) Chemical name(s) of hazardous component(s).

(g) Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number(s) of each hazardous component(s).

(h) Waste and disposal codes/regulations for the HAZMAT when appropriate.

(i) Quantity of HAZMAT (as Parts Per Million (PPM) or per system/component as appropriate using best engineering judgment).

(j) If the hazardous material is or contains a Targeted chemical, as defined in the specification, a trade-off analysis shall be prepared in accordance with NAS 411, paragraph 4.3.3.

CDRL A016 – Hazardous Material Management Program Report

SYSTEM SAFETY

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a System Safety Program (SSP) in accordance with MIL-STD-882 to support achievement of overall system safety objectives. The SSP shall address each unit as a whole; components and electrical interfaces. The Contractor shall be responsible for the establishment, control, incorporation, direction and implementation of the system safety program policies and shall assure that mishap risk is identified and eliminated or controlled.

CDRL A017 – System Safety Plan CDRL A018 – Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

MANUFACTURING AND INTEGRATION

QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA)

The Contractor shall establish, implement, document and maintain a quality system that ensures conformance to contractual requirements and meets the requirements of SAE AS9100, AS9102 and AS9103, ISO9001-2000 or ANSI/ASQC-Q9001. The Contractor shall provide documentation of all occurrences of non-conformance during the manufacturing. Non-conformance documentation shall describe the non-conformance and the corrective or preventative action taken to resolve the deficiency.

REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION

The Contractor’s test effort shall include a logical sequence of component, subsystem, and system level tests, which shall demonstrate adequate system integration and compliance with the performance and supportability requirements of the Specification. The Contractor shall provide all non-standard test equipment necessary to simulate all significant modes of operation and provide sufficient information to determine suitable test modes and operating environments. The Contractor is responsible for maintaining calibration of all test and measurement equipment. The Contractor shall document via test plans/procedures each test listed below. The results of each test shall be documented and submitted in the appropriate test reports.

The Contractor shall verify all requirements in the Specification. The Verification Cross Reference Matrix (VCRM) in the Specification identifies the method by which each requirement shall be verified. There are four methods identified: 1) analysis, 2) inspection, 3) demonstration and 4) test. The VCRM also identifies the test level and any special testing and examination necessary for verification of each requirement.

ANALYSIS AND INSPECTION

The Contractor shall verify all of the Specification requirements identified as having a verification method of “Analysis” or “Inspection” as defined in the VCRM. As part of the Qualification Test (QT) Report, the design verification may reference other documents/CDRLs that verify specific requirements (e.g. reliability analysis).

DEMONSTRATION AND TESTING

DEMONSTRATION AND TEST UNIT

The Contractor shall supply two PITS and two Jumper Cable Assemblies that are production representative units; and all necessary spares that will be used in the demonstration and test program to verify compliance to the requirements. The production representative units shall have passed all manufacturing acceptance testing prior to beginning the demonstration and test phase. The Contractor shall determine the most efficient use of the production representative units to accomplish successful demonstration and testing and to meet the overall program schedule. Upon successful completion of the demonstration and test phase, and IPT concurrence of all appropriate test reports, the production representative units shall be refurbished to the configuration conforming to the approved post-test product baseline and delivered to the procuring activity.

QUALIFICATION TEST PLANS AND PROCEDURES

The Contractor shall develop and execute the Qualification Test Plan and Procedure for all of the system requirements that are identified as having a verification method of “Demonstration” or “Test” defined in the Verification Cross Reference Matrix (VCRM) of the Specification. The plan shall detail the incremental build of each subassembly that supports checkout of the hardware; and address all development testing by the Contractor, integration testing both on and off the system, and all testing up to Government Acceptance Testing of the System including functional demonstration, performance testing, and environmental qualification testing. The plan shall identify the groups/individuals responsible for the implementation of the test program and describe the testing equipment, manuals, and other resources required. The plan shall also propose a methodology to address how conflicts, discrepancies, or technical problems found during all phases of the system integration testing shall be resolved. The plan shall meet the objectives and milestones of the overall program schedule and be in accordance with the approved IMS. The tests shall be conducted on the dates established by the plan. The procedures shall include a detailed description of test methods, pass/fail criteria, number of units, operating modes (powered on/off), GFE, location of test facility, etc. All tests used to verify system requirements shall be able to be witnessed by the Government. The Contractor shall develop the following test plans and procedures and include them as attachments to the Qualification Test Plan and Procedure:

Pending Government approval, the Contractor shall test the new PITS and new Jumper Cable Assembly in accordance with each Test Procedure to verify compliance with the Specification requirements. The unit under test (UUT) shall not suffer damage, deterioration, or degradation of performance during testing. Either Government or Contractor facilities may be used for conducting the tests, unless disapproved by the Government.

CDRL A019 – Qualification Test Plans and Procedures

QUALIFICATION TEST REPORTS

After completing a test procedure, the Contractor shall prepare the corresponding test report. Each report shall provide a detailed summary of the test including a description of the test setup; list of the test requirements; list of deviations or exceptions to the requirements; description and identification of the new PITS and new Jumper Cable Assembly that were tested; and the resolution/fix for each requirement for which a UUT was not in compliance. The Contractor shall include the following test reports as attachments to the Qualification Test Report:

CDRL A020 – Qualification Test Reports

PRODUCTION ACCEPTANCE TEST PROCEDURE

The Contractor shall develop a Production Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) which describes the inspection and tests required to ensure production quality of the system. The ATP shall identify the items to be tested; the test equipment and support required; the test conditions to be imposed; the parameters to be measured; and the pass/fail criteria against which the test results will be measured.

CDRL A021 – Production Acceptance Test Procedure

PROGRAM PLANNING

MANPOWER PLANNING

The Contractor shall identify the number of shop personnel required in each labor category and the skills and training required. Considering the phasing of manpower requirements and the ability to add personnel to the workforce, the manpower planning process(es) shall schedule the acquisition and training of personnel.

WORK PLANNING

The Contractor shall determine and schedule work order and purchase order releases, parts and material procurement, part/component fabrication, evaluation, assembly, test, and delivery based on lead time required delivery dates, inventory records, bills of material, and available facilities and labor.

PRODUCTION SCHEDULING AND CONTROL

The Contractor shall employ process(es) of its own design for production scheduling and control. Through the execution of its production scheduling and control process(es), the Contractor shall monitor variances between actual and planned schedules, and shall use that feedback to identify and implement necessary corrective actions and incorporate productivity improvements. The Contractor shall notify DCMC of anticipated contract delivery schedule delinquencies, production difficulties, quality problems, or delays, which may adversely affect the program.

INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT (ILS)

The Contractor shall establish, implement, and maintain an Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) program to ensure the new PITS and new Jumper Cable support equipment program meets Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) supportability needs. The Contractor’s logistic support program shall include tasks related to assembly, disassembly, training, packaging, handling, storage, transportation, inspections, installations, and existing support equipment. The Contractor shall provide source data that includes Provisioning Parts List (PPL); Allowance Parts List (APL); catalog requests for National Stock Numbers (NSNs); Maintenance and Training System Plans, training manuals, technical manuals and Special Packaging Instructions.

POTENTIAL REPAIRABLE ITEMS

Potential repairable items identified shall be defined as:

· Repairable Item. A component, sub-assembly, assembly, or End Item which can be disassembled, parts replaced, within that item and reassembled for reuse.

· Component. An assembly or any combination of parts, sub-assemblies, and assemblies mounted together normally capable of independent operation.

· Sub-assembly. Two or more parts, which form a portion of an assembly or a component replaceable as a whole, but having parts which are individually replaceable.

· Assembly. A number of parts or sub-assemblies or any combination thereof joined together to perform a specific function and capable of disassembly.

MAINTENANCE PLAN

The Contractor shall submit a maintenance plan IAW CDRL B004 for the new PITS and new Jumper Cable that will support all maintenance significant consumables within the entire end items. This deliverable shall result in two separate maintenance plan submittals, one for each end item. The Contractor will use Government Furnished Information (GFI) drawings and/or the existing PITS Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB) in NAVAIR AT-823T0-MIB-000 and Jumper Cable IPB in NAVAIR AE-ARSET-MEB-000 to develop the maintenance plan to include all maintenance significant items. If GFI drawings are available, the Government will provide them in paper or electronic format within six months of contract award. The Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability (SM&R) Code for the PITS end item shall be PEOGG. The Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability (SM&R) Code for the Jumper Cable end item shall be MGGGG.

LOGISTICS CONTROL NUMBER STRUCTURE

Supportability Analysis (SA) candidates will be assigned a Logistics Control Number (LCN) relative to their physical system/subsystem. The LCN will allow provisioning to be accomplished according to the hardware breakdown structure while allowing the SA process to be performed by physical system/subsystem/sub-subsystem to include automated maintenance plan generation at the subsystem level.

MAINTENANCE PLAN INPUT DATA

The Contractor shall provide Maintenance Plan Data Elements IAW GEIA-STD-0007-B to the Government for all SA candidates (except where specified) in order to produce a standardized maintenance plan. This data may be combined with some or all of the provisioning input data. The Maintenance Plan Data Elements shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Nomenclature, GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 2790

· Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 3270

· Demilitarization (DMIL) Code, GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 1820

· Logistics Support Analysis Control Number (LCN), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 2970

· Task Code(s), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 5110

· Maintenance Replacement Rate (MRR and MRRI), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 3060

· Support Equipment/tools required (for each Task), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 5060

· Annual Operating Requirement (in hours-end item only), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 1240

· Item Function Narrative (for A and B indentured assemblies only), GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 3510

· Shelf Life/Wearout Life, GEIA-STD-0007 DTN # 4730

The Offer shall also include National Stock Numbers (NSNs) for all parts already cataloged, and shall request and assign Navy Item Control Numbers (NICNs) to items that do not already have NSNs assigned to them.

MAINTENANCE PLAN TOOLING

The Contractor shall provide a specific list of special tools that are required to perform any maintenance action against the appropriate task.

MAINTENANCE PLAN INPUT LUBRICANTS AND COOLANTS

The Contractor shall detail the lubricants and coolants needed (as applicable) to operate the unit.

MAINTENANCE PLAN SUBMISSION

Preliminary and final maintenance plan reports shall be submitted electronically as either a MS Word or PDF documents, and also must be submitted as a database file compatible with System and Logistics Integrated Capability (SLIC2B ver. 4.0/SLICwave, or higher) and PowerLOG-J. Each maintenance plan report submittal shall consist of the following (4) four Logistics Supportability Analysis reports:

MAINTENANCE PLAN REVIEWS

The Contractor shall send at least one representative familiar with the maintenance plan, drawings and equipment to attend one preliminary and one final maintenance plan review at a location to be determined by the government. Each event will last no more than one day. The Contractor’s representative shall provide printed drawings, and printed LSA-019, LSA-024, and LSA-036 reports for each event. After each review, the Government will provide comments and the Contractor shall incorporate the comments before the next submittal.

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT / SUPPORT MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS

It is preferred that all maintenance be accomplished with standard, commercially available tools, equipment, and material piece parts (consumables). If support equipment (SE) or special tools are required, the Contractor shall identify the SE/tools and submit for approval. If consumables are used that are not already stock-listed, then the Contractor shall submit catalog data sheets when available. The Contractor shall not use their CAGE code for items that they did not manufacture. When available, the Contractor shall identify the CAGE code of the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of all SE, special tools and consumables.

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT / SUPPORT MATERIAL TOOLING

The Contractor shall identify and document any SE and/or special tool requirements that will need to be used at the Organizational, Intermediate, or Depot levels of maintenance.

CORRECTIVE & PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTATION

For each corrective and preventive maintenance task, the Contractor shall provide logistic support/documentation, including a realistic unit price.

COMMON HAND TOOLS

Common hand tools need not be individually identified. When required, they shall be documented with a single entry in the task inventory using “VARIOUS” for the reference number and “COMMON HAND TOOLS” for the Item Name.

COMMON MEASURING DEVICES

Common measuring devices, such as torque wrenches, voltmeters, etc. shall be documented by range, e.g. 0-150 ft-lbs.

PROVISIONING STATEMENT OF WORK (PSOW)

The Provisioning Statement of Work (PSOW) shall be furnished in accordance with GEIA-STD-0007 and GEIA-HB-0007. These commercial products cannot be furnished as extracts within the PSOW due to copyright infringement laws. Contract milestone dates for each event under this PSOW are contingent upon the program’s integrated master schedule. Primary provisioning milestones include the approval of the Maintenance Plan, delivery of the Provisioning Parts List, and delivery of the Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP). The Top-Down Breakdown Guidelines provides instructions for building a complete top down breakdown of the new PITS and new Jumper Cable, and can be found in Appendix (A).

The Contractor shall obtain from its vendors/subcontractors confirmation in writing when they do not intend to comply with the data requirements levied on them. All letters of refusal (from vendors/subcontractors) must clearly state these refusals and be provided immediately upon receipt to NAVSUP WSS with recommendation for alternate methods of furnishing adequate data to enable the provisioning process to be accomplished. The vendors/subcontractors may provide the data required directly to NAVSUP WSS to assure continuity of the provisioning process.

ENGINEERING DATA FOR PROVISIONING (EDFP)

The EDFP shall be submitted IAW CDRL B006 for the new PITS and new Jumper Cable. This deliverable shall result in two separate EDFP submittals, one for each end item. The EDFP shall include all items contained within the Provisioning Parts List (PPL). The exclusions for EDFP are all items that have been previously stock numbered and all items that have a government/military standard.

EDFP FOR REPAIRABLE ASSEMBLIES AND CONSUMABLES

EDFP for repairable assemblies and consumables obtained from vendors and subcontractors shall be submitted in the same manner. Consumable items will be provided without any further breakdown of the drawing package.

EDFP SUBMITTAL

The EDFP shall be submitted in PDF file format and can be delivered via Compact Disk (CD) or through an approved electronic data file transfer. Delivery method can be discussed further by contacting NAVSUP WSS 03622.27.

EDFP FILE NAMES

File names shall include the appropriate reference/part number.

EDFP REVISIONS

Revised EDFP shall be submitted for subsequent changes to the provisioned end item and include any additions, superseding, or modification of the end item or any provisioned part of the end item. The revisions are required to update the Navy SAP/ERP database and shall be used to identify changes to the original EDFP.

PROVISIONING PARTS LIST (PPL)

The PPL for the new PITS and new Jumper Cable shall be delivered IAW CDRL B009, along with the applicable EDFP, and shall be furnished IAW the Integrated Master Schedule. This deliverable shall result in two separate PPL submittals, one for each end item. The PPL shall be submitted in LSA-036 text file format. The PPL shall include all applicable items (prime, vendors, U.S. Government Standards and Industry Standards) contained in the subject equipment. The required provisioning data elements are contained in GEIA-HB-0007 Appendix D.

BASELINE PROVISIONING CHANGES

Subsequent changes to the provisioned Baseline…