2.00a Attachment 01 Past Performance Information - Amendment 01.doc

DOC document 62 KB Posted

Attached to
FDRMC ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES
Solicitation number
N6817126RN005
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Information attachment for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee task order solicitation under the SeaPort NxG contract vehicle for FDRMC Engineering Support Services. The document serves as a template for offerors to provide past performance information demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the requested engineering support services. The attachment requires bidders to submit relevant project experience, including details on similar work performed, client references, project outcomes, and organizational performance metrics that substantiate their qualifications to support the Federal Demonstration and Research Medical Center (FDRMC) engineering requirements.

This amendment 01 attachment updates the past performance submission requirements in conjunction with modifications to the Performance Work Statement, solicitation documents, and extension of the closing date. Only active SeaPort NxG contract holders are eligible to submit proposals for this task order opportunity being conducted by the Naval Supply Systems Command under the Department of the Navy. Offerors must reference their relevant past performance in similar engineering support contexts to establish their capability and reliability for contract performance.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Reference #
Reference #
Reference #

Contract Number

Procuring Agency

Type of Contract

Points of Contact Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

Dollar value of the contract:

Period of Performance:

Detailed Description of the work:

Clear statements describing whether the contract was completed on time, with a quality product conforming to the contract, without any degradation in the performance or customer satisfaction

Discussion of any cost growth if the contract was not completed for the original contract amount

Description on any issues during the contract performance (including the number, type, frequency, duration of issues and impact on quality, delivery or cost in performing the contract):

Corrective actions taken and effectiveness of corrective actions:

Does the contractor consider their past performance to be very relevant and why:

See definitions below

Does the contractor consider their past performance to be relevant and why:

Does the contractor consider their past performance to be somewhat relevant and why:

Does the contractor consider their past performance to be NOT relevant and why:

The definitions for “Relevant”, ”Not Relevant” “scope”, “size” and “complexity” are as follows:

Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Scope: Range of operations covered.

Magnitude: Dollar value.

Complexity: Degree of difficulty Attachment (1) Past Performance Information Source Selection Information see FAR 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .