Attachment 01 Past Performance Information.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FDRMC ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- N6817126RN005
About this file
This is a Past Performance Information template document required for federal contract proposal submissions. The template is designed for contractors to document and evaluate their relevant past performance on previous contracts as part of the source selection process for the FDRMC Engineering Support Services task order opportunity (Solicitation N6817126RN005) being awarded under the SeaPort NxG contract vehicle by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command.
The template requires contractors to provide detailed information on up to four reference contracts, including contract number, procuring agency, contract type, points of contact, dollar value, and period of performance. For each reference, contractors must submit a comprehensive description of work performed, confirm whether the contract was completed on time with quality conforming to requirements, document any cost growth or performance issues encountered, and describe corrective actions taken. The template also requires contractors to self-assess the relevance of each past performance example using four defined categories: Very Relevant (essentially the same scope, magnitude, and complexity), Relevant (similar scope and complexity), Somewhat Relevant (some similarity), or Not Relevant (little or no similarity). Relevance is evaluated across three dimensions: scope (range of operations), magnitude (dollar value), and complexity (degree of difficulty). This document serves as a critical evaluation tool for the government to assess contractor capability and reliability based on historical performance data.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 09 CDRL_A0003_ODC REPORT.pdf | ||
| Attachment 04 Calculation of Indirect Costs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 03 DD Form 254_ENG.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - N6817126RN005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 08 CDRL_A0002_ROSTER.pdf | ||
| Attachment 07 CDRL_A0001_CO MGMT REPORT.pdf | ||
| Attachment 06 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 02 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 10 CDRL_A0004_TRIP REPORT.pdf | ||
| Attachment 05 Support for Unloaded Labor Rates and Costs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
| Reference # |
| Reference # |
| Reference # |
| Reference # |
Contract Number
Procuring Agency
Type of Contract
Points of Contact Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
Dollar value of the contract:
Period of Performance:
Detailed Description of the work:
Clear statements describing whether the contract was completed on time, with a quality product conforming to the contract, without any degradation in the performance or customer satisfaction
Discussion of any cost growth if the contract was not completed for the original contract amount
Description on any issues during the contract performance (including the number, type, frequency, duration of issues and impact on quality, delivery or cost in performing the contract):
Corrective actions taken and effectiveness of corrective actions:
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be very relevant and why:
See definitions below
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be relevant and why:
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be somewhat relevant and why:
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be NOT relevant and why:
The definitions for “Relevant”, ”Not Relevant” “scope”, “size” and “complexity” are as follows:
Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Scope: Range of operations covered.
Magnitude: Dollar value.
Complexity: Degree of difficulty Attachment (1) Past Performance Information Source Selection Information see FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .