24R1312 Note 2.pdf
PDF 234 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274224R1312
About this file
This document contains pre-proposal questions and answers regarding solicitation number N6274224R1312 for a FY24 MCON P-406 Recreation Center project at US NAVSUPPACT MCB Guam in Finegayan, Guam. Key details include questions from potential offerors about door materials, trash enclosure details, access panel sizes, blast analysis requirements, and telecom duct bank construction. The answers provide clarifications that certain door and enclosure materials can be altered, drawings will be revised in forthcoming amendments, and blast analysis is not required. It also defines unclear dimensions on drawings. The document aims to inform potential offerors for the solicitation through addressing specific technical queries.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 24R1312_AMD08.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD07.pdf | ||
| P-406 DRAWINGS AMD06.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD06.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 7.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 6.docx | DOCX document | |
| P-406 DRAWINGS AMD05.pdf | ||
| 241312_AMD05.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD04.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 5.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 4.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 3.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD0003.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD02.pdf | ||
| P-406 Site Visit Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| 24R1312_AMD01.pdf | ||
| 24R1312 Note 1.pdf | ||
| 3_P406 Drawings_Part2.pdf | ||
| 4_P406 Drawings_Part3.pdf | ||
| 24R1312-JA.ZIP | ZIP file | |
| 2_P406 Drawings_Part1.pdf | ||
| 1_P406 Specs.pdf | ||
| 0_24R1312-RFP.pdf |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Notice No. 2
7 November 2023
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP N62742-24-R-1312
FY24 MCON P-406 RECREATION CENTER,
US NAVSUPPACT MCB GUAM, FINEGAYAN, GUAM
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
1. As per our door supplier, Aluminum Doors 104A and 105 will not be able to meet the STC Rating. Aluminum Doors do not have soundproofing characteristics. Please consider revising it to HM Steel.
ANSWER: Doors 104A and 105 can be Hollow Metal Steel Doors. A-601 will be revise in a forthcoming amendment.
2. Drawing A3/S-551 indicates the presence of a steel ledger on the trash enclosure wall.
However, a trash enclosure roof plan is not provided to verify the dimensions of this steel ledger.
Kindly confirm whether a steel ledger is indeed necessary for the trash enclosure, and if so, please provide the required dimensions.
ANSWER: Steel ledger is not required at the trash enclosure. Detail A3/S-551 will be revised in a forthcoming amendment.
3. Drawing EP118, in sheet notes 1, calls for the installation of 22" x 22" access panels, whereas Drawing EP119 specifies 24" x 24" access panels. Please confirm what should be governed.
ANSWER: Drawing EP118 will be revised to 24"x24" access panels in a forthcoming amendment.
4. Under Spec Section 08 11 16, Aluminum Doors and Frames, Item 1.5.1, Shop Drawing, it says,” A Qualified Blast Engineer must perform testing or calculations for door system design resistance to specified blast loads.”
Please kindly advise what is the specified blast load required.
ANSWER: Blast analysis for the door system is not required. Paragraph 1.5.1 will be revised in a forthcoming amendment.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DRIVE, SUITE 100
JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR HICKAM, HAWAII 96860-3134
5. Drawing sheet ES530 detail 1 Telecom – concrete duct bank shows Concrete encasement with four #4 with #3 ties at 3’-0” O.C. Please confirm if this detail is typical for all telecom duct banks regardless of location.
ANSWER: Detail 1 on sheet ES530 shall be typical for all telecom duct banks regardless of location.
6. Reference to the door hardware schedule Set 1.1 (for doors 123, 123A and 123B) and drawing detail C5/C-502 and detail A5/C-502:
a. Door hardware schedule set 1.1 is missing a description. Door schedule table in sheet A- 601 remarks #10 says provide exit device and detail C5/C-502 shows exit device. Please confirm if the missing description is for exit device and please provide specifications.
ANSWER: Please reference Section 08 71 00, Door Hardware, Paragraph 2.3.5 Exit Device for the door hardware description.
b. Door hardware schedule set 1.1 notes specify to “Provide 1 pair of exit devices for the double door”, while detail A5/C-502 shows padlock eyes and cane bolts only. Please clarify.
ANSWER: For the double gates, detail A5/C-502 contains the note to reference the Arch Dwgs for Door Hardware Schedule, A-601. Clarification will be forthcoming in an amendment. Please provide one exit device for the active leaf door. Padlock eyes shown in detail A5/C-502 to be provided.
c. Door hardware schedule set 1.1 notes specify to “provide 1 pair of exit devices for the double door”, please clarify if the intent is to provide one-each exit device, only for the active leaf.
ANSWER: See response to Question 6b.
7. As per drawing ES121 the dimensions of the pole, please define “V”, “X”, and “Y”.
ANSWER: Notes will be provided for clarification in a forthcoming amendment.
8. As per specifications section 08 11 16 paragraph 1.5.1 “A qualified blast engineer must perform testing or calculations for door system design resistance to specified blast loads.” Please kindly advise what is the specified blast load required.
ANSWER: Blast analysis for the door system is not required. Paragraph 1.5.1 will be revised in a forthcoming amendment.
End of Notice
| DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
| JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR HICKAM, HAWAII 96860-3134 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .