20R1310_Notice3.pdf
PDF 476 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62742-20-R-1310
About this file
This document provides notice of pre-proposal questions and answers relating to solicitation number N62742-20-R-1310 from the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command. The solicitation seeks design-build proposals for projects P-312 and P-804 at Joint Region Marianas in Guam, including the design and construction of a single-story distribution warehouse and a low-rise central issue facility. The magnitude of work is estimated between $100 million to $250 million, with NAICS code 236220 and average annual receipts of $39.5 million over the past three years. The contract completion period is anticipated to be 767 calendar days. Responses address questions regarding potential organizational conflicts of interest relating to firms involved in development of the solicitation's notional design. Insufficient information was provided in the questions to make a determination, and offerors are instructed to provide additional written representations and certifications for evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 20R1310_Notice7_Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Notice6-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Amend0003-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Notice5-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Notice4-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Amend0002-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Notice2-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Amend0001-Issued.pdf | ||
| 20R1310_Notice1-Issued.pdf | ||
| !20R1310-PH1-RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DR., STE. 100
JBPHH, HI 96860-3134
RFP N62742-20-R-1310
Notice No. 3
Notice No. 3
12 Mar 2020
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP N62742-20-R-1310
WON 1619739, FY21 MCON P-312 DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE &
WON 1590906, FY21 MCON P-804 CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY,
JOINT REGION MARIANAS, GUAM
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The
RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
10. The RFP Notional Design was prepared by ASMD JV. Setiadi Architects (SA) was not involved in the RFP development, but is one of the partners of ASMD JV. Please confirm
Setiadi Architects is not conflicted out from participating in the Project.
ANSWER: Insufficient information provided for a Contracting Officer’s determination. In accordance with Document 00800, paragraph 1.2, please review FAR 9.5 and submit written representation and certification to the Contracting Officer with pertinent information that no organizational conflict of interest nor a potential for it exists. The information should be such that a determination may be made that the affected entity: 1) had no involvement in the RFP development, 2) had no access to information provided by the Government for use on the RFP, and 3) will not have any access to all such information used in the RFP development. Please provide sufficient information for a Contracting Officer’s determination.
11. The RFP Notional Design was prepared by ASMD JV. RMA Architects (RMAA) was not involved in the RFP development, but is one of the partners of ASMD JV. Please confirm
RMA Architects is not conflicted out from participating in the Project.
ANSWER: See response to Q10.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .