20R1310_Amend0002-Issued.pdf

19RXXX3

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04 EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP N62742-20-R-1310, WON 1619739, FY21 MCON P-312, DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE & WON 1590906, FY21 MCON P-804, CENTRAL

ISSUE FACILITY, JOINT REGION MARIANAS, GUAM

Amendment No. 0002 is continued on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6274220R1310

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Feb-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Mar-2020

CODE

NAVFAC PACIFIC

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BR (CODE ACQ33)

258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100

PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134

N62742 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE CODE

EMAIL: TEL:

N6274220R1310

Amendment No. 0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

DOCUMENT 00200, EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Remove Page 4 of 11 and Page 5 of 11 and replace with the attached revised Page 4 of 11 and Page 5 of 11

(Amendment No. 0002).

FY21 MCON P-312, DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE & WON 1619739

MCON P-804, CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY, 1590906

JOINT REGION MARIANAS, GUAM

RFP N62742-20-R-1310

DOCUMENT 00202

(4) single-sided pages [or, two (2) double-sided pages], 8.5”, 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. Attachment A submittals that do not comply with these requirements will not be evaluated. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

(1) Construction Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) construction projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below. If the offeror submits more than five (5) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects submitted and disregard any other project information after the first five (5). For purposes of this evaluation, the types of relevant construction projects are further defined as:

New construction of a concrete building structure comprised of a single-story or multi-story, air-conditioned commercial/industrial/warehouse storage building appropriate for hot humid climates similar to Guam. Relevant projects must be approximately $30 million in value, completed or substantially completed within the past 15 years. Renovation/alteration projects will not be considered relevant.

Substantially complete means at least 90% physically complete.

NOTES:

1. Building repair, renovation, conversion, and addition work will not be considered as relevant project.

2. For relevant projects, “concrete building structure” shall be limited to cast-in-place or precast concrete roof and exterior wall construction. Reinforced masonry construction shall not be considered “concrete building structure.”

3. A relevant construction project is further defined as a construction project performed under a single-task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

4. There is a clear distinction between “experience” and “past performance”. Experience is related to the types and amounts of projects previously accomplished. Past performance relates to how well a contractor has performed.

5. The “Offeror” is defined as the exact name in Block 14 of the Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF 1442).

If the Offeror is utilizing experience and past performance information of any entity other than (1) the

Offeror; (2) if the Offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract; or (3) a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror is not part of the Offeror, the

Offerors shall provide in its proposal a fully-executed teaming agreement or other contractual agreement.

The teaming agreement or other contractual agreement shall, at a minimum, (1) be signed by the Offeror and the other entity, (2) specifically reference this solicitation/contract, and (3) specify the work to be performed by the other entity such that it is clear that the other entity will be meaningfully involved in this contract. For item (3), clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the other entity in terms of the work it will specifically perform or manage in the performance of the contract at the worksite. Note that generalized statements concerning commitment of resources are not sufficient to demonstrate that an entity will be meaningfully involved in the performance of the contract. Examples of “generalized statements” include a commitment of resources merely based on an entity’s “access” to resources and

FY21 MCON P-312, DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE & WON 1619739

MCON P-804, CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY, 1590906

JOINT REGION MARIANAS, GUAM

RFP N62742-20-R-1310

DOCUMENT 00202

other generalized statements such as an entity will “provide support and expertise on the project.” The government will only consider information provided in the teaming agreement for the purpose of determining whether the offeror has clearly demonstrated that any entity (other than the Offeror and, if the offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract) will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. For experience and past performance information of a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is no longer a separate entity, the Offeror shall provide an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate that the predecessor firm is now part of the Offeror in Block 1 of Attachment A.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) design projects that best demonstrates design experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below. If the offeror submits more than five (5) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects and disregard any other project information after the first five (5). For purposes of this evaluation, the types of relevant design projects are further defined as:

Design new construction of a concrete building structure comprised of a single-story or multi-story, air-conditioned commercial/industrial/warehouse storage building appropriate for hot humid climates similar to Guam. Relevant projects must be approximately $30 million in value, completed or substantially completed within the past 15 years. Renovation/alteration projects will not be considered relevant. Substantially complete means at least 90% physically complete.

NOTES:

1. Building repair, renovation, conversion, and additional work will not be considered as relevant project.

2. For relevant projects, “concrete building structure” shall be limited to cast-in-place or precast concrete roof and exterior wall construction. Reinforced masonry construction shall not be considered

“concrete building structure”.

3. A relevant design project is further defined as a design-bid-build (complete, final design performed under a single task order or stand-alone A-E contract) or a complete, final design performed under a design-build construction contract. Design-build Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation document shall not be considered a relevant design project. For multiple award and indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

4. Provide a fully executed teaming agreement or other contractual agreement for the designer-of-record(s) (DOR) if the DOR(s) is not the offeror. The teaming agreement or other contractual agreement shall, comply with Construction Experience, Note 5.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.

The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.