Amnd 0001 20R6018 Final.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Buildings 115 and 201 Repair by Replacement Solicitation N6247020R6018 Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Amendment 0001

Block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT (cont.)

A. Delete “Evaluation” language provided in RFP, and replace with the below:

Evaluation:

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value-the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with

Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

4. Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the Weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

Evaluation Factors for Award:

The proposed task order will be awarded to the responsible Offeror offering the best value to the Government. To make a determination of Best Value, the Government shall evaluate price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Solution Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Past Performance

All technical factors (Factors 1 and 2), when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating (Factor 3); and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal's superiority to the Government. In any event, award will be made to the responsible Offeror representing the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

Non-Price Evaluation Factors

Non-price Factors 1, 2 & 3:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Non-price binder: The Offeror shall submit one (1) hard copy Original, marked "Original"; one

(1) CD-ROM; and two (2) copies, marked "Copy", in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments. The Offeror may elect to provide an electronic copy of the non-price binder via email to: meghan.hislop@navy.mil and megan.villalba@navy.mil by the required time and date of proposal submission and follow-up with the hard copy original, CD-ROM, and copies via overnight mail to be received by the Government on the day following the required time and date for receipt of proposals. All hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders. All submissions shall include the following:

Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, CAGE Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;

8 ½ x 11 paper, 10-point font;

Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated; and Additionally, include an electronic version of the price and non-price proposal on one CD-

ROM.

As with the price proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies (or CD- ROM), the hard copy Original marked “Original” of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered.

Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.

Factor 1 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall provide a narrative describing its proposed technical solution for executing the project in a manner that meets the requirements of the RFP. The description shall include the following at a minimum:

- A narrative of the general concept proposed

- HVAC and Direct Digital Control (DDC) installation and performance verification plan: The narrative should address the Offeror’s plan to ensure proper design and installation of HVAC and DDC requirements, including Offeror’s proposed quality control measures and plan to ensure new DDC connects and communicates appropriately with the existing energy management control system (EMCS). Narrative should also detail Offeror’s proposed testing and balancing (TAB) and performance verification plans.

- Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing base facilities design or architectural theme

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages). Up to three (3) conceptual drawings may be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e., floor plan, exterior elevation, and site plan).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project and the capability to fulfill the solicitation requirements, with a focus on the planned execution of HVAC and DDC requirements. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the design-build team's technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP.

Factor 2 – Management Approach

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the project management approach that meets the requirements of the RFP.

Organize the narrative into three parts to address the following:

(1) Management Team

- Provide a description of the proposed team members, including a) Offeror’s key personnel and b) proposed major subcontractors and their respective experience in executing requirements similar to the RFP.

- Address plan for securing, managing, and maintaining subcontracted labor for this RFP.

- Provide a chart and accompanying narrative to demonstrate the management hierarchy (by position) to include both the design and construction teams. This narrative shall include authorities; roles; responsibilities; and a brief synopsis of the names, education, training and experience of key individuals based on the proposed management structure. (Note: key personnel may vary among Offerors based on the proposed management structure.)

(2) Safety Program

- Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

- Fully describe the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

- Describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

- Describe methodology to execute an effective safety program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(3) Schedule

- Describe the key elements of your scheduling/phasing plan to demonstrate understanding of the project requirements. The schedule and narrative shall address potential impacts of submittals, reviews, and permits and detail a logical sequence of events to accomplish the scope of work as described in the RFP.

- Address, at a minimum, the ability to complete all the work within the provided timeframe or earlier. Offerors may propose a shorter duration in their schedule; however, the proposed duration will be incorporated into the contract and liquidated damages shall start the day following the completion date included the Offeror’s proposal.

The Narrative for elements (1) Management Team and (2) Safety Program as detailed above shall not exceed four (4) double-sided pages (or eight (8) single-sided pages). Up to three (3) organizational charts may be provided to supplement the narrative. The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit (which does not include the organizational charts).

The Narrative for element (3) Schedule detailed above shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) and one (1) 11x17 sheet for the schedule.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) Management Team: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has a defined management team identified to properly manage the project. A project management approach that creatively puts people or processes in place to minimize potential construction delays may be considered more favorably. The narrative does not require the identification of specific subcontractors. However, if the Offeror identifies a specific subcontractor to perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate an acceptable technical solution under Factor 1, the proposal must provide a letter of commitment and explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Any provided letters will be exempt from the page count.

(2) Safety Program: The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which the safety management system described ensure safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(3) Schedule: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed schedule to ensure it is technically feasible within the designated construction completion date and adequately addresses significant phasing while not impacting on-going operations.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

Offerors do not need to provide any information under this factor as the Government will base the evaluation on information from the evaluation of the basic contract award.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on projects submitted for evaluation under the basic MACC award. More emphasis will be placed on projects that are more similar to the RFP. The

Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Offerors lacking past performance will receive a Neutral Confidence rating.

Price

Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The Offeror shall submit one (1) hard copy Original, marked "Original"; one (1) CD-ROM (located on the same CD-ROM as the non-price proposal); and one (1) hard copy, marked "Copy", in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments.

The Offeror may elect to provide an electronic copy of the price binder via email to:

meghan.hislop@navy.mil and megan.villalba@navy.mil by the required time and date for proposal submission, and follow-up with the hard copy original, CD-ROM, and copy via overnight mail to be received by the Government on the day following the required time and date for receipt of proposals. All hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders. All submissions shall including the following:

Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, DUNS, CAGE code, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address;

Price Proposal Form;

Acknowledged Amendments (if applicable);

Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million

In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copy (or CD-Rom), the hard copy Original marked “Original” of the proposal will govern. Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

The price proposal shall be submitted separately, but at the same time as the technical proposal.

Offerors may ship both the price proposal and the technical proposal in the same shipping container.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total lump sum price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

a. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Cost Estimate

(IGCE).

c. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

d. Comparison of market survey results.

B. All other contract terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Pg2 Amnd 0001 20R6018

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND ATLANTIC

1121 HAMMOND ROAD

CAMP LEJEUNE, NC 28547-2521

N6247020R6018 Buildings 115 and 201 Repair by Replacement, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, NC

The date and the hour for the receipt of proposals remains 31 July 2020 no later than 2:00 pm (EDT).

See continuation page(s).