ATTACH L-7 Q_A - Government Responses.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6134026R1010-1
About this file
This is a Government Responses to Questions and Answers (Q&A) document for the P-8A Operational Flight Trainer (OFT) Projection System Upgrade contract solicitation (N6134026R1010-1). The Department of the Navy Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division is seeking contractors to design, fabricate, install, integrate, test, and deliver a projection system upgrade for both United States Navy and Royal Australian Air Force operational flight trainers. This is a Small Business Set-Aside Commercial Competition with an anticipated 24-month Period of Performance from contract award. Government Furnished Information will be provided after contract award, including existing Visual Display System data per PRF 260087 and the existing Aechelon pC-Nova Nucleus 10.X Image Generator specification.
Key technical clarifications include: projector performance is 60Hz with no additional thresholds specified; the existing alignment system was provided by Rockwell Collins (Christie Alignment Software), not Scalable; current projectors do not simulate infrared spectrum; power requirements include 110V, 60Hz for USN and 230-240V, 50Hz for RAAF via the OFT's main power distribution panel protected by UPS; and existing ethernet cables run approximately 230 feet from the computer room to the furthest OFT. The contractor is responsible for disposing of excess trainer hardware impacted by the projector upgrade scope. Submission requirements include Volume 1 Technical Narrative limited to 20 pages addressing four specified elements, with all graphics and tables included within the page limit; Volume 2 Past Performance using attachments L-2, L-3, and L-4 as independent files; and Attachment L-1 Cross Reference Matrix excluded from page counts. All proposal files must be submitted in separate folders per volume with no zip files allowed, and live hyperlinks or cross-references between proposal sections are prohibited.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Attach - P8A OFT Projection DRAFT SOW_08APR2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| Industry Day Attach 2 - OFT Projection_Contractor_Question_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACH L-3 PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| DRAFT P-8A OFT Projection System Upgrade Sec L_and_M.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Attachment - Data Item Transmittal (DIT) Form.pdf | ||
| DRAFT Solicitation - N6134026R1010.pdf | ||
| ATTACH L-5 RIPP.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACH L-2 OST.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACH L-1_CRM.docx | DOCX document | |
| Industry Day Attach 1 - Conference Attendance N6134026R1010.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Exh A-E -OFT Projection DRAFT CDRL_23MAR2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Attach - P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| Industry Day Notice_OFT Projection System Upgrade_FINAL.pdf | ||
| ATTACH L-7 Q_A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACH L-4 PPCS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACH L-6 Price_Section-B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Subject | Reference (i.e. RFP, SOW, Specs, Attachment, etc.) | Specific Question | Government Response | |
| 1 | Data Package for Visual Display System | ||||
| SOW, Para. 3.2.2 | Please provide a data package of the existing VDS with the Final solicitation. | SOW, Para. 3.2.2 referenced the PRF 260087, which is the VDS specification and it's included in the RFP package. All requested VDS data will be provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI) after contract award. | |||
| 2 | Information/Data About Existing Image Generator | SOW, Para. 3.2.2 | Please provide information/data about the existing Image Generator with the Final solicitation. | Aechelon pC-Nova Nucleus 10.X | |
| 3 | Hyperlinks | Section L, para. 2.1.2, pg. 3 of 26 | Comment: By definition a hyperlink is a link in a proposal volume to another location (e.g. another proposal volume or website. | ||
| Question: Are live cross references from one section to another section within the same proposal volume permissible? MS Word provides the cross reference functionality; it is not in any way linked to an outside document or website. | Hyperlinks are not allowed as stated in section L, para. 2.1.2. | ||||
| 4 | Volume 1 Technical Page Count | Section L, para. 2.1.5, Table G-2, Suggested Pages | Question #1: If the total page count for Vol 1 TE is 30 pages, yet the page count shown for the narrative is 10 pages, are Offerors limited to 10 pages only for narrative descriptions under each of the 4 technical elements? |
Question #2: Why is Vol 1 TE to submitted as a separate file from Vol 1 Narrative?
Question #3: Are Offerors to assume the remaining 20 pages are designated for graphs, illustrations, or tables only? Q1. The RFP has been updated to remove the total page count of 30 pages for Volume 1 Technical Evaluation (TE). Sections L&M now require a Technical Narrative limited to 20 pages, which shall address the four specified elements.
Q2. The RFP has been updated to remove the Vol 1 TE. Section 2.1.5 of the Section L&M stated "The Offeror shall provide one folder for each volume, containing all electronic files requested within the volume . Zip files are not allowed".
Q3. With the updated page count for Volume 1 Technical, all graphs, illustrations, and tables must be included within the Technical Narrative and are subject to the 20-page limit.
| 5 | Volume 1 Technical Page Count | Section L, para. 2.1.5, Table G-2, Suggested Pages | Question: Is Attachment L-1 Cross Reference Matrix intended to be integrated into the body of Vol 1 TE? If so, is it exempt from the volume page count, or is it part of the 30-page count for Vol 1 TE? | All Attachments are excluded from the page count of each Volume. Attachment L-1 is just the Reference Matrix, which the Offeror to indicate where each technical element from section L is addressed in their proposal. The attachment will not be counted toward the Narrative page limit. | |
| 6 | Volume 1 Technical Page Count | Section L, para. 2.1.5, Table G-2, Suggested Pages | Is Att. L-1 CRM to be submitted as a standalone attachment with Vol 1 TE?? | The contractor shall submit one folder for each volume, containing all electronic files requested for that volume. Attachments will be treated as independent files within the folder. | |
| 7 | Volume 2 Past Performance | Section L, para. 2.1.5, Table G-2 | Question: Does the Government intend for Offerors to conform Att. L-2, L-3, L-4 into one contiguous document, or should these attachments be submitted as standalone files or both? | The contractor shall submit one folder for each volume, containing all electronic files requested for that volume. Each attachment will be treated as an independent file within the folder. | |
| 8 | Volume 1 Technical | Section L, para 1 | Comment: List of Attachments for Technical Volume 1 calls out "Attachment 1 Volume 2 Table T-1 CRM" | ||
| Question: Should this attachment be submitted with Vol 1 or Vol 2? | The RFP has been updated to remove Volume 2 Table T-1. The attachment should be submitted with Vol 1 | ||||
| 9 | Volume 1 Technical | Section L, para 1 | DUPLICATE of ^^^ |
Question: List of Attachments for Technical Volume 1 calls out "Attachment 1 Volume 2 Table T-1 CRM"
| Question: Should this attachment be submitted with Vol 1 or Vol 2? | Volume 1. | ||||
| 10 | Existing Image Generator | SOW, Para. 3.2.2. | Question: Can the offerors assume the existing Image Generator meets the performance specifications provided in the SPEC? | Yes, the IG meets the performance specifications, devices are operational. | |
| 11 | Projector Lens Type | What is the throw ration of the installed lens? | The data is not in the government's possession | ||
| 12 | Display Screens | Is there any intent to change screens in conjunction with the projector replacement? | No. | ||
| 13 | PoP | What is the Period of Performance? | As this is a FFP Hardware Procurement and not a Service, the final delivery date will be anticipated 24 months from time of award. | ||
| 14 | Visual System | Can you provide specifications on Back Projection screen? Example: Screen Gain, Half Angle screen coating paint versus fabric? | The data is not in the government's possession | ||
| 15 | Drawings and CAD Models | Can you provide 2D drawings of visual system? Such as size/shape of back projection screen, projector distance to screen, projector layout, and projector stands, etc.? |
Can you provide 2D schematics of system? For example, cable routing to projectors from IG?
Can you provide a 3D CAD models of visual system, projector stands? Q1. Yes, the mechanical drawings in our possession can be provided as a PDF, including projector layout and projector stands Q2. The government do not have 2D schematics of the system.
Q3. No, 3D models will not be provided.
| 16 | Load Management | PRF Section 3.1.29 | Load management is an IG function. Does it still belong in the spec for projector replacement? | Replacing the projectors will not impact the IG’s load management capability. The PFR has been updated to remove the load management requirement and are reflected in the final RFP package. | |
| 17 | Transport Delay | PRF Section 3.1.30 | Transport Delay involves many systems beyond projection. Do we know the amount already used by existing I/O, host, and IG functions? i.e. - How much transport delay the projection system can have? | The government will conduct the transport delay test and provide the resulting data prior to the PMI. During the PMI, the contractor will also be required to perform the transport delay test and the government will determine the appropriate path forward at that time. | |
| 18 | Collimation Performance Verification | Collimation performance is a measure of the optics of the mirrors and back projection screen. Projectors do not affect this testing. Should this section be removed from the specification since only projector replacement is being performed? | The government confirms that the projectors do not affect the collimation performance. However, the collimation requirement remains in the specification as part of the Visual Display System (VDS). This requirement will be assessed during SR TIM and the government will determine the path forward at that time. | ||
| 19 | Visual Display System Specifications | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 – paragraph 3.1 & all subsections, page 1 thru 6 | Are the specifications called out in the Draft Specification the existing VDS requirements, or is the USG seeking to increase the fidelity of the existing OFT? | the Government confirms that the specifications called out the existing VDS requirements and the contractor shall meet the specifications in the final RFP. | |
| 20 | Projector Performance Threshold | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 – paragraph 3.1 & all subsections, page 1 thru 6 | Does the USG have a performance threshold for the projectors (e.g. 4k at 60 Hz)? | The Government confirms that the projectors performance is 60Hz. The USG has no other performance thresholds. | |
| 21 | Ethernet Cable from Computer Room to OFT | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 | How many feet of ethernet cable does it currently take to convey data from the computer room to the furthest OFT? | Current cables are approximately 70 meters/230 feet long. | |
| 22 | Schedule Coordination | GENERAL | 1. How will the offeror coordinate schedules with the Navy to identify when each OFT will be available for Projection System refresh & testing? | ||
| 2. | How far in advance can OFTs be scheduled for maintenance/refresh? | ||||
| 3. | What happens if the onsite customer changes the maintenance/refresh schedule? | ||||
| 4. | Will the OFTs (and facilities) be available for refresh during non-duty hours, weekends, and holidays? | Q1: The contractor will require to coordinate with government program management. Please refer to SOW section 3.1.1.2, which specifies that the contractor shall actively participate in Management/Technical IPT and Technical Working Group meetings to support program coordination, schedule planning, and execution. |
Q2: Depends on the workload and locations, we will advise during the Post Award Conference (PAC) Q3: Once the device is allocated for the retrofit it will remain offline, thus, not available for training. Turning over the device for retrofit will be recoreded via form DD-1149.
Q4: Yes, work can be performed during non-duty hours, weekends, and holidays.
23 Power Requirements P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 Must all components (including projectors) be capable of running on 230V power? • there is service outlets provided just below the projector deck on the left-hand side for maintenance. USN: 110V, 60Hz and RAAF 230-240V, 50Hz
• Emergency Power Off (EPO) switches are located at the projector maintenance deck, among other key locations, to ensure safety and rapid shutdown in emergencies.
The projectors and associated visual system components are powered via the OFT’s main power distribution panel, which is protected by UPS for orderly shutdown during power loss (excluding the motion system). It's 220-230V, 60Hz
| 24 | Existing Alignment System | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 | Was the existing alignment system provided by Scalable? If not, what alignment system is currently is use for the OFTs? | No, the current alignment system was provided by Rockwell Collins (Christie Alignment Software). | |
| 25 | Existing Alignment System | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 | DUPLICATE of ^^^ | ||
| Was the existing alignment system provided by Scalable? If not, what alignment system is currently is use for the OFTs? | No, the current alignment system was provided by Rockwell Collins (Christie Alignment Software). | ||||
| 26 | Infrared Spectrum | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT Spec_26MAR2026 | Do the current projectors simulate/emulate the infra-red (IR) spectrum? | No, not a feature on the current projectors. | |
| 27 | Disposition of Cabling and Components | P8-A OFT Upgrade DRAFT SOW, paragraph 3.8 | Will the contractor be required to dispose of residual cabling and components. | ||
| 1. | If so, does this system clean-up include the removal of cabling in the IG cabinet and visual display system that is no longer in use? There appear to be numerous cables in the IG racks that were previously connected to components that are longer in the racks. These cables appear to be no longer needed and could/should be removed to facilitate ease of maintenance and troubleshooting.) | ||||
| 2. | Can the USG declare all cabling and items other than the existing projectors to be classified as scrap, and issue a Letter of Abandonment? This would greatly simplify the disposition effort for this obsolete equipment and reduce costs for the USG.? | Yes, as stated in SOW section 3.8.6 (Excess Trainer Material Disposal) the contractor is resposible for the disposal of all excess trainer hardware impacted by this scope of work. |
Q1. As described above contractor is resposible for the disposal of components that were impacted by the projector system upgrade.
Q2. This is not required.
| 28 | Existing ATO & Related Technical Data | GENERAL | Can the USG provide the Equipment Inventory Report (EIR), wiring diagrams & lists, PEDDAL, and technical data used as part of the existing ATO? | Yes, all technical data can be provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI). Projector system upgrade scope does not impact the ATO. |
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 35 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 42 | ||||
| 43 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
| 45 | ||||
| 46 | ||||
| 47 | ||||
| 48 | ||||
| 49 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 51 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 55 | ||||
| 56 | ||||
| 57 | ||||
| 58 | ||||
| 59 | ||||
| 60 | ||||
| 61 | ||||
| 62 | ||||
| 63 | ||||
| 64 | ||||
| 65 | ||||
| 66 | ||||
| 67 | ||||
| 68 | ||||
| 69 | ||||
| 70 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 72 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 74 | ||||
| 75 | ||||
| 76 | ||||
| 77 | ||||
| 78 | ||||
| 79 | ||||
| 80 | ||||
| 81 | ||||
| 82 | ||||
| 83 | ||||
| 84 | ||||
| 85 | ||||
| 86 | ||||
| 87 | ||||
| 88 | ||||
| 89 | ||||
| 90 | ||||
| 91 | ||||
| 92 | ||||
| 93 | ||||
| 94 | ||||
| 95 |
Attachment L-7 &"-,Bold"USN/ RAAF Operational Flight Trainer (OFT) Projection System Upgrade - Question & Answer Form &K000000N61340-26-R-1010
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .