Attachment (1) - FY21CC IDIQ SOW - RFP Final - 8 July 2020.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

SAILOR 20205 (S2025) Fiscal Year (FY) 21 READY RELEVANT

LEARNING (RRL)

CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)

Prepared For:

Commander, United States Fleet Forces Command (CFFC)

Norfolk, VA 23551-2487

Prepared By:

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD)

12211 Science Drive

Statement of Work for the RRL FY21 Content Conversion 11 June 2020 ii

Orlando, FL 32826

DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

iii

This page intentionally left blank.

iv

REVIEWED BY: DATE: _____________

Dale Leavy

S2025 Lead Systems Engineer

NAVAIR – 5.7.7.

REVIEWED BY: DATE: _____________

Larry Beach

FY21 Content Conversion (CC) Lead Instructional System Designer

NAVAIR – 5.3.6

APPROVED BY: DATE: _______________

Eric Smith

Program Management Office

NAVAIR –

v

Change Log

Date Section

Number

Section

Title Change vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Scope

1.1 Rating Requirements

1.2 Course, Module and Lesson Structure

1.3 Content Delivery Modes and Media Types

1.4 Content Conversion Process Flows

1.4.1 Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Development Process

1.4.2 Performance Support (PS) and Structured On The Job Training (SOJT) Development

Process

1.4.2.1 PS Hosted in Training Delivery Environments 18

1.4.2.2 PS Hosted in Operational Environments 18

1.4.3 Complex Media Development Process

1.4.4 Coordination with Third-Parties

1.5 List of SOW Appendices

1.6 Terms and Definitions

1.7 Government-Furnished Information (GFI)

1.8 Government-Furnished Software, Tools and Equipment

1.9 Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

2. Applicable Documents

2.1 Government Documents

2.2 Department of Defense (DOD) Documents

2.3 Department of the Navy (DON) Documents

2.4 Sailor 2025 Documents

2.5 Authoring Instructional Materials (AIM) Documents

2.6 Industry Standards

2.7 Other Documents

3. Requirements

3.1 General Requirements

3.1.1 Program Planning

3.1.1.1 Life-Cycle Model Management 29

3.1.1.2 Infrastructure Management 29

3.1.1.3 Program Assessment and Control 29

vii

3.1.1.4 Program Decision Management 30

3.1.2 Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs)

3.1.3 Online Management System (OMS)

3.1.4 Data Library

3.1.5 Configuration Management (CM)

3.1.6 File Sharing

3.1.7 Contractor SMEs

3.1.8 Copyrights

3.1.9 Risk Management

3.1.10 Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP)

3.1.10.1 Control of GFI 32

3.1.11 Communications Plan

3.2 Security

3.2.1 Classified Processing and Access to Classified Systems

3.2.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)

3.2.3 Unclassified Contractor-Owned Network Security – Safeguarding of Unclassified

Controlled Technical Information

3.2.4 Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting

3.2.5 Access to DOD Installations, Government Information and Information Technology

(IT) Systems – Personnel Security Background Checks

3.2.6 Personnel Security – Background Checks

3.2.7 International Traffic and Arms Regulation

3.2.8 Personnel Security – Reporting of Adverse or Derogatory Information Related to

Contractors

3.2.9 Government-Issued Personal Identification Credentials

3.2.10 Contractor “Out-Processing” Policy

3.2.11 Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) For National Security Systems

3.2.12 Protection of Critical Program Information (CPI)

3.2.13 Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Via Email

3.2.14 Transmission of CUI Via Army Research Laboratory Safe Access File Exchange

(ARL SAFE)

3.3 Cybersecurity

3.3.1 Cybersecurity for Training Content Products .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3.2 Cybersecurity for Other Products ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3.3 Cybersecurity Compliance ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3.4 Cybersecurity Control Considerations ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3.5 Cybersecurity Certification and Accreditation Support ............. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3.6 Cybersecurity and Personnel Security Requirements for Accessing Government IT

Systems - Credentialing Standards ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

viii

3.3.7 Software Integrity Testing and Certification

3.3.8 Information Assurance Vulnerability Management Program (IAVMP) ............. Error!

Bookmark not defined.

3.3.9 Critical Program Information (CPI)

3.3.10 Cybersecurity Training & Certification

3.4 Management Requirements

3.4.1 Lead Integrator

3.4.2 Integrated Product Team (IPT)

3.4.3 Integrated Management Plan (IMP)

3.4.4 Work Planning and Scheduling

3.4.5 Development of the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS)

3.4.6 Subcontractor Management and Reporting

3.4.7 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA)

3.4.8 Program Progress, Tracking, and Reporting

3.4.9 Conferences, Meetings, and Reviews

3.4.9.1 Post Award Conference (PAC) 43

3.4.9.2 In-Process Review (IPR) Meetings 45

3.4.9.3 Weekly or Biweekly IPT Meetings 45

3.4.9.4 Data-Gathering Trips 45

3.5 RRL Content Conversion Requirements

3.5.1 Instructional Media Design Package (IMDP) Development

3.5.1.1 Design for Training Product Delivery Environments 47

3.5.1.1.1 Design for Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) Requirements

3.5.1.1.2 Design for Mobile Requirements

3.5.2 IMI, Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized, and Responsive Design Mobile Website

Media Types

3.5.2.1 Instructional Media Design Package (IMDP) Development (Updated Style

Guide) and Model Products (i.e., Prototypes) 48

3.5.2.2 Instructional Media Package (IMP) (Script Storyboards) 48

3.5.2.3 Instructional Media Package (IMP) (On-screen Lessons [OSLs]) 49

3.5.2.4 Courseware Reviews 49

3.5.2.5 Test Package Development (Assessments) 49

3.5.2.6 Course Testing Plan (Administration) 50

3.5.2.7 Training Conduct Support Document (TCSD) 50

3.5.2.8 Training Program Structure Documents (TPSD) 50

3.5.2.9 Training Systems Support Document (TSSD) 51

3.5.2.10 IMI Test & Evaluation (T&E) Program Components (IMI Product Acceptance) for Hosting in NeL Training Environment 51

3.5.2.10.1 NeL Contractor Testing (NeL DT-D1)

3.5.2.10.2 NeL Content Test Readiness Review (TRR) ETIM

3.5.2.10.3 NeL Government Testing (NeL DT-D2)

ix

3.5.2.10.4 NeL DT-D2 Corrections

3.5.2.10.5 Government Content Acceptance Testing (GCAT)

3.5.2.10.6 Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)

3.5.2.10.7 Instructional Media Package (CD-ROM/DVD)

3.5.2.10.8 T3 and Course Pilot Regression Testing

3.5.2.11 IMI T&E Program Components (IMI Product Acceptance Testing) for Hosting in Non-NeL Training Environments 53

3.5.2.11.1 NeL Contractor Testing (NeL DT-D1) per SOW 3.5.2.11.1

3.5.2.11.2 NeL Content TRR ETIM

3.5.2.11.3 NeL Government Testing (NeL DT-D2)

3.5.2.11.4 Non-NeL Environments Contractor Internal Testing (Non-NeL DT-D1) .. 54

3.5.2.11.5 Non-NeL Environments TRR ETIM

3.5.2.11.6 Non-NeL Environments Integrated Testing (Non-NeL IT-D1)

3.5.2.11.6.1 Non-NeL IT-D1 Entry Criteria

3.5.2.11.7 Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)

3.5.2.11.8 Instructional Media Package (CD-ROM/DVD)

3.5.2.11.9 T3 and Course Pilot Preparation

3.5.2.11.10 T3 and Course Pilot Regression Testing

3.5.3 Performance Support (PS) and Structured On-The-job Training (SOJT) Media Types

3.5.3.1 PS and SOJT Model Products (i.e. Prototypes) 57

3.5.3.2 PS and SOJT Design 58

3.5.3.3 PS Instructional Media Package (IMP) (Script Storyboards) 58

3.5.3.4 PS Instructional Media Package (IMP) (On-screen Lessons (OSLs)) 58

3.5.3.5 PS and SOJT Product Reviews 59

3.5.3.6 PS and SOJT Training Conduct Support Document 59

3.5.3.7 Acceptance Testing (for PS and SOJT products) 59

3.5.3.7.1 Government Content Acceptance Testing (GCAT) (for PS and SOJT products)

3.5.3.8 PS and SOJT Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files) 60

3.5.3.9 PS and SOJT Final Acceptance 60

3.5.3.10 Instructional Media Package-IMP (CD-ROM/DVD Inspect/Acceptance) (for PS and SOJT products) 60

3.5.4 Complex Media Types (e.g. PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and

Immersive Virtual Environment)

3.5.4.1 Systems Engineering Processes 61

3.5.4.1.1 System Requirements Definition

3.5.4.1.2 System Requirements Analysis

3.5.4.1.3 Traceability

3.5.4.1.4 System Architectural Design

3.5.4.1.5 System Implementation

3.5.4.1.6 System Integration

x

3.5.4.1.7 System Verification

3.5.4.1.8 System Transition

3.5.4.2 Engineering Technical Interface Meetings (ETIMs) 63

3.5.4.2.1 Systems Requirements Review-II/System Functional Review (SRR-II/SFR)

ETIM

3.5.4.2.1.1 SRR-II/SFR ETIM Entry Criteria

3.5.4.2.1.2 SRR-II/SFR ETIM Exit Criteria

3.5.4.2.2 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) ETIM

3.5.4.2.2.1 PDR ETIM Entry Criteria

3.5.4.2.2.2 PDR ETIM Exit Criteria

3.5.4.2.3 Critical Design Review (CDR)

3.5.4.2.3.1 CDR ETIM Entry Criteria

3.5.4.2.3.2 CDR ETIM Exit Criteria

3.5.4.2.4 Test Readiness Review

3.5.4.3 Software Engineering Processes 71

3.5.4.3.1 Software Requirements Analysis

3.5.4.3.2 Software Architectural Design

3.5.4.3.3 Software Product Design

3.5.4.3.4 Software Implementation

3.5.4.3.4.1 Software Unit Construction and Testing

3.5.4.3.5 Software Integration

3.5.4.3.6 Cold Start Process

3.5.4.3.6.1 Software Product Execution

3.5.4.3.6.2 Media and Storage Devices

3.5.4.4 Test and Evaluation (T&E) Processes 74

3.5.4.4.1 Test Planning and Procedures

3.5.4.4.2 Responsibility for Tests

3.5.4.4.3 Test Authority

3.5.4.4.4 Test Resources and Facilities

3.5.4.4.5 Test Methods

3.5.4.4.6 Verification Criteria

3.5.4.4.7 Configuration

3.5.4.4.8 Verification Log

3.5.4.4.9 Changes During Testing

3.5.4.4.10 Software Changes During Government Testing

3.5.4.4.11 Changes After Testing

3.5.4.4.12 T&E Non-Conformance Reporting System

3.5.4.4.13 Deficiency Review Board (DRB)

3.5.4.4.14 Deficiency and Discrepancy Adjudication

xi

3.5.4.5 Detailed Tasks for Complex Media (e.g. PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and Immersive Virtual Environment Blended

Approach) Courseware 78

3.5.4.5.1 Logic Tables

3.5.4.5.2 Test Package (Assessments)

3.5.4.5.3 Navy Preliminary Evaluation

3.5.4.5.4 Training Support Products

3.5.4.5.5 Complex Media (e.g. PC Simulation, AR/MR/VR, and IVE Blended

Approach) T&E Program Components

3.5.4.5.5.1 Baseline Configuration Audit

3.5.4.5.5.2 Navy Preliminary Evaluation (per increment – lessons delivered in increments)

3.5.4.5.5.3 Pre-Modification Inspection (PMI)

3.5.4.5.5.4 Contractor Internal Testing (Simulation DT-D1)

3.5.4.5.5.5 Test Readiness Review

3.5.4.5.5.6 Integrated Testing (Simulation IT-D1)

3.5.4.5.5.7 Train the Trainer for Systems Engineering and Software Engineering

Products

3.5.4.5.5.8 Course Pilot for Systems Engineering and Software Engineering

Products

3.5.5 Human Factors Engineering (HFE)

3.5.6 Gap Implementation

3.5.7 Train the Trainer (T3)

3.5.7.1 T3 Entry Criteria 86

3.5.7.2 T3 Exit Criteria 86

3.5.8 Course Pilot

3.5.8.1 Course Pilot Entry Criteria 88

3.5.8.2 Course Pilot Exit Criteria 88

3.5.8.3 Regression Testing 89

3.5.9 Final Government Inspection and Acceptance

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Rating and Classification Requirements Table 2. Content delivery modes and Media Types Table 3. Government Documents

Table 4. DOD Documents Table 5. DON Documents Table 6. Sailor 2025 Documents Table 7. AIM Documents Table 8. Industry Standards Table 9. Other Documents xii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. IMI Levels 1 – 3 (and Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized and Responsive Design

Mobile Website) Content Conversion Process

Figure 2. Training Environment and Devices Figure 3. Complex Media (e.g., PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality and

Immersive Virtual Environment) Content Conversion Process xiii

This page intentionally left blank.

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

SAILOR 2025 (S2025) FY21 READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)

CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)

1. SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the basic requirements to be performed under this Ready

Relevant Learning Fiscal Year 21 Content Conversion (RRL FY21 CC) Indefinite

Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract. The detailed requirements will be defined in this

ID/IQ SOW and each specific Delivery Order (DO). This ID/IQ documents the contractor tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products in support of the RRL FY21

Content Conversion (CC) effort (see especially Appendices C, G, H, J, L, M, N, O). The contractor shall employ innovative instructional systems design (see Appendices H, L, and M), systems engineering, and training assessment approaches in conjunction with new and modernized technologies (see Appendix G) to support specified ratings accession training while simultaneously supporting the broader S2025 overarching goal of improving Sailors’ transfer of training to the operational work environment. The following represents examples of the broader

Sailor 2025 (S2025) goals:

Converting and/or improving designated courses so they are compatible with the waterfront or shipboard environment and contribute to the acquisition of actionable knowledge (i.e., practical knowledge that will be activated by and recognized as relevant to operational work contexts and events).

Employing modernized media, instructional, and motivational strategies that are engaging (see Appendices G and H).

Scheduling the converted and/or improved content closer in time to when the training will be put into practice in the work environment.

1.1 Rating Requirements

The Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), as the RRL Training

Systems Program Manager (TSPM), is responsible for A School and accession C School content conversion in support of RRL. The contractor shall perform tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products for the ratings listed in Table 1 (highest classification is

Unclassified FOUO unless otherwise noted). The contractor shall also prepare for and conduct

Train-the-Trainer (T3) events (SOW 3.5.13) and Course Pilot events (SOW 3.5.14) as part of this effort.

Table 1. Rating and Classification Requirements

Rating

Highest

Information

Classification

Facilities

Access

Classification

When

Classification

Required

Fire Control Technician (FT) SECRET SECRET At Contract

Award

Rating

Highest

Information

Classification

Facilities

Access

Classification

When

Classification

Required

Master at Arms (MA) Unclassified Unclassified At Contract

Award

Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM) Unclassified Unclassified At Contract

Award

Electronics Technician Navigation, Submarines (ETV)

SECRET SECRET

At Contract

Award

Mineman (MN) Unclassified Unclassified At Contract

Award

Information Systems Technician

(IT)

Unclassified Unclassified

At Contract

Award

Aviation Machinist’s Mate (AD) Unclassified Unclassified At Contract

Award

1.2 Course, Module and Lesson Structure

Using the Government provided Functional Requirements Documents (FRDs) and corresponding SOW Appendix A, Knowledge Capture Reports (KCRs), Military Characteristics

Documents (MCDs), and supporting data workbooks as a basis, the contractor shall determine the course, module, and lesson structure for each course for each rating and shall design, develop, test, and deliver products meeting the specified requirements.

1.3 Content Delivery Modes and Media Types

Training products are grouped under four content delivery modes: Instructor-Facilitated

Interactive Training (IFIT), Self-Directed Interactive Training (SDIT), Structured On-The-Job

Training (SOJT), and Performance Support (PS) (see Appendices C, G, and J). Table 2 shows the four overarching content delivery modes and a high-level view of associated media types to support the RRL effort, as identified in the FRD and MCD.

NOTE: there is no traditional Instructor-Led Training Computer-Assisted

Instruction (ILT-CAI) media type or instructional strategy in the RRL Content

Conversion effort; rather, the contractor shall design and develop interactive multimedia instruction (IMI) for use as IFIT that meets the requirements for being hosted in Navy eLearning (NeL). In context for Ready Relevant Learning, “IMI” is the preferred term and shall be interpreted generically as electronic media, replacing both Interactive Courseware (“ICW”) and “ILT-CAI” as terms regardless of whether the product is instructor-led or student-led, and including considerations for software management tools (e.g. Learning Management

System, Learning Record Store).

Table 2. Content Delivery Modes and Media Types

Media

Delivery Method

IFIT SDIT

PS

SOJT In Training

Environment

In Operation

Environment

Actual Equipment X X

Augmented Reality (AR) X X

Checklist X X X

Decision Tables X X X

Demonstration Animation X X X

Demonstration Video X X X

Electronic Performance

Support System (EPSS) X X

Full System Trainer X

Hybrid Mobile App X X X X

Immersive Virtual

Environment (IVE) X X

Intelligent Tutoring System X X

Job Aid (JA) X X

Level 1 IMI X X X

Level 2 IMI X X X

Level 3 IMI X X

Mixed Reality (MR) X

Mobile Friendly/Mobile Ready

Website X X

Mobile Optimized Website X X

Mobile Web App X X X X

Native App X X X X

Paper/Paper-based X X

PC Simulation X X

Picture/Diagram X X X X

Responsive Design Website X X

Technical Training Equipment X

Training Aid X X X

Training Support Material X X X

Virtual Reality (VR) X

1.4 Content Conversion Process Flows

Depending on the specific content delivery method and media type, the contractor shall follow slightly different development process flows with different CDRL deliverables, some following traditional ISD processes, some following systems engineering processes, and some blending the two.

1.4.1 Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Development Process

The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into IMI, Mobile

Ready, Mobile Optimized, and Responsive Design Mobile Website media types detailed within the SOW (see SOW Appendices C and G). Figure 1 identifies such a high-level process.

Figure 1. IMI Levels 1 – 3 (and Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized and Responsive Design Mobile Website)

Content Conversion Process

1.4.2 Performance Support (PS) and Structured On The Job Training (SOJT)

Development Process

The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into Performance

Support (PS) and Structured On-the-job Training (SOJT) media types detailed within the SOW

(see SOW Appendices C and G). SOJT products shall be designed, developed and tested to be hosted in MyNavy Portal. The contractor shall design, develop, and test PS products to be used in both (1) a training setting and hosted in a training environment, such as NeL, and (2) an on-the-job operation setting and hosted in an operation environment, such as MyNavy Portal. Each host environment may have specific requirements that affect media development and test.

1.4.2.1 PS Hosted in Training Delivery Environments

The contractor shall create and convert PS products to be used in a training setting (i.e. training aids, training support materials, supplemental training materials), following the same general process in Figure 1, to be hosted within specific training environments (e.g. NeL). Figure 2 identifies some of the training environments and devices capable of presenting training content within the current Naval training enterprise.

Figure 2. Training Environment and Devices

1.4.2.2 PS Hosted in Operational Environments

The contractor shall create and convert on-the-job PS products to be hosted within specific workplace (operation) environments and devices capable of presenting PS content within the current Naval training enterprise (e.g. MyNavy Portal).

1.4.3 Complex Media Development Process

The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into complex media types (e.g. PC simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and Immersive Virtual

Environment (IVE)) detailed within the SOW (see SOW Appendices C and G).

Figure 3 identifies such a high-level process that blends the traditional IMI development process with the Systems Engineering Process specifically for these types of media products.

NOTE: Any reference in an FRD (and SOW Appendix A), KCR, MCD, and supporting data workbook to “VSIM” or “ICW 4” or a variant of that term shall be interpreted as complex media

(either, or a blend of, PC simulation, Augmented/ Mixed/Virtual Reality, or Immersive Virtual

Environment (see SOW Appendix C)).

Figure 3. Complex Media (e.g., PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality and Immersive Virtual

Environment) Content Conversion Process

1.4.4 Coordination with Third-Parties

As required, the contractor shall coordinate with the Government and any third-party contractor responsible for developing complex media (e.g. PC simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual

Reality, or Immersive Virtual Environment system development (e.g. Government labs, Multipurpose Reconfigurable Training System (MRTS) 3D, PORTS, etc.)). In such cases contractor shall be required to design and develop training support materials that work together with the third-party developed system.

1.5 List of SOW Appendices

To complete this effort, the contractor shall follow the guidance and requirements in the following Content Conversion appendices to this SOW:

Appendix A (per rating): rating requirements covered by this SOW.

Appendix B: acronyms used within this SOW.

Appendix C: terms and definitions used within and outside this SOW regarding RRL

Content Conversion.

Appendix D: list of the Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) identified within this

SOW.

Appendix E: Risk Assessment Example Format.

Appendix F: descriptions of the four RRL content delivery modes.

Appendix G: operational definitions of engaging instructional strategies to be used in content development under this SOW.

Appendix H: list of Bloom’s taxonomy action verbs.

Appendix I: description of media type characteristics.

Appendix J: mobile learning roadmap.

Appendix K: Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) requirements for this

SOW.

Appendix L: guidance on Naval Educational Training Center (NETC) RRL Single User

Gaming and Simulation.

Appendix M: guidance on NETC RRL Video Streaming.

1.6 Terms and Definitions

Appendix C provides the terms definitions that are critical to this SOW. These terms and definitions supersede any similar terms and definitions that may be found in other sources. If the contractor and the Government have differences in opinion over interpreting a given term, Appendix C shall be the baseline from which a mutual agreement can be made.

1.7 Government-Furnished Information (GFI)

The Government will provide the following in as-is or currently available format:

a. Functional Requirements Document (FRD), corresponding SOW Appendix A, and corresponding supporting data workbook for each rating, at DO Award.

b. Military Characteristics Document (MCD) for each rating, as available.

c. Knowledge Capture (KC) data for each rating, if available, at DO Award.

d. Existing Trainee Guides, Lesson Plans, Training Course Control Document (TCCD), Training Project Plan (TPP), Curriculum Outline of Instruction (COI) for each rating, as available, at DO Award. Updates, if available, NLT 30 days after DO award.

e. Access to existing data for each rating in Content Planning Module/Learning Object

Module (CPM/LOM), if available, such as existing Trainee Guides, Lesson Plans, TCCD, TPP, COI, NLT 30 days after DO award.

f. Examples of existing courseware for each rating, if available, at DO Award. (For RRL the Government does not intend to provide all existing IMI or source files as GFI to discourage the contractor from simply copying and pasting content into a different format. The contractor shall plan as though no existing courseware materials are available.)

g. Applicable Style Guides, if available, at DO Award. Updates, if available, NLT 30 days after DO award.

h. Technical Publications (e.g. technical manuals) for each rating, if available, at DO

Award. Updates, if available, NLT 30 days after DO award.

These GFI are essential to the contractor being able to execute the awarded contract. Any other

GFI not listed here is ancillary and its absence does not prevent the contract from being executed.

1.8 Government-Furnished Software, Tools and Equipment

The Government will not furnish software (Microsoft [MS] Office, Adobe Acrobat, etc.) or tools. The Government will not furnish equipment, hardware, software personnel, personnel, or materials for the Contractor’s use during this effort. The Government will provide access to a test bed at NAWCTSD for TRANET-U VDI content for the Contractor to test training materials. The

Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, tools, personnel, materials, and facilities, not otherwise furnished by the Government, to perform the tasks specified by this

SOW.

1.9 Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

Government SME access will be provided on a not-to-interfere basis. The Government is sensitive to overburdening SMEs. NAWCTSD will serve as the liaison between the fleet, Type

Commander (TYCOM), Learning Centers (LCs) and/or Schoolhouses and the Contractor to coordinate access to SMEs in support of SOW activities and requirements. Location for SME support will be provided by the Government. The Government’s SMEs will be available face-to-face for key data collection activities (interviews, workshops, and reviews) and will be available for providing follow up information via phone, video-teleconference (VTC), or by Defense

Collaboration Services (DCS), whenever practical.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following represent a list of applicable guidance documents for this effort. In the event of a conflict between the SOW and the references cited herein, the contents of this SOW take first precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained. These documents will be provided to the Contractor as

GFI, if they are not readily available to the Contractor via the Internet. For all documents listed below, the latest versions apply.

2.1 Government Documents

Table 3. Government Documents

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

22 Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR), Parts 120-

Foreign Relations, Chapter 1 Department of State, Subchapter M, International Traffic in Arms Regulations

(ITAR)

National Security Agency (NSA) Configuration Guide

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E System Engineering Technical Review Process

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Special Publication (SP) 800-

Guidelines on Securing Public Web Servers

United States (U.S.) Office of Personnel Management

(OPM) Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal

Identity Verification

21 CFR 1040 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21, Part 1040, Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products

29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS)

Institute of Electrical and

Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Std. 15288-2015

Systems and Software Engineering- Systems Life Cycle

Processes

Copies of the CFR sections can be obtained from https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_homepage.

Copies of U.S. Code can be obtained from https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/content/policy/section508.aspx.

Copies of Defense Intelligence Security Agency (DISA) Configuration Guide can be obtained from http://disa.mil/.

Copies of CFR documents can be obtained from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR

Copies of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses can be obtained from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm.

Copies of NSA Configuration Guides can be obtained from http://www.nsa.gov/ia/mitigation_guidance/security_configuration_guides/index.shtml.

Copies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) documents can be obtained from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html. Copies of OSHA standards can be obtained from http://www.osha.gov.

Copies of OPM document can be obtained from http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/index.aspx.

Copies of IEEE Std 15288-2015 can be obtained from http://www.ieee.org/.

2.2 Department of Defense (DOD) Documents

Table 4. DOD Documents

DOD Document Number Document Title and/or Description

Department of Defense

Instruction (DODI) 1322.26

Distributed Learning (DL) dated 05 October 2017

(https://adlnet.gov/dodi/dodi-xapi)

DODI 5000.02 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

DODI 8500.01 Department of Defense Instruction 8500.01 Cyber Security dated 14 Mar 2014

DODI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information

Technology (IT), Change 1, dated 24 May 2016

DODI 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, dated

28 Feb 2006

DOD 8570.01-M Information Assurance (IA) Workforce Improvement Program, dated 19 Dec 2005 w/Change 4, 11/10/2015

DOD Implementation Plan for Advanced Distributed Learning

(ADL) dated 19 May 2000 https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_homepage.%20 https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_homepage.%20 https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/content/policy/section508.aspx.

https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/content/policy/section508.aspx.

http://disa.mil/ http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html http://www.osha.gov/ http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/index.aspx http://www.ieee.org/ file:///C:/Users/jeffrey.HINZY/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/DN5Z80ZY/DRAFT%20SOW%20for%20OS%20Rating%20Working%20File_03%2008%2017_LI.docx%23DIACAP_Inst_ file:///C:/Users/jeffrey.HINZY/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/DN5Z80ZY/DRAFT%20SOW%20for%20OS%20Rating%20Working%20File_03%2008%2017_LI.docx%23DOD_8570_01_M_

DOD Document Number Document Title and/or Description

Military Handbook (MIL-

HDBK)-881D

Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items

MIL-HDBK-29612-1A Department of Defense Handbook for Guidance for Acquisition of Training Data Products and Services (Part 1 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-2A Department of Defense Handbook for Instructional Systems

Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education

(Part 2 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-3A Development of Interactive Multimedia Instruction (Part 3 of

5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-4A Department of Defense Handbook Glossary for Training (Part 4 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-5A Department of Defense Handbook for Advanced Distributed

Learning (ADL) Products and Systems (Part 5 of 5)

MIL-PRF-29612B Performance Specification Training Data Products

MIL-HDBK-217F, Notice 2 Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment

MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1 Maintainability Prediction

Copies of DOD Directives and Instructions can be obtained from the DOD Issuances

Website (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/).

DOD Implementation Plan for ADL can be obtained from http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.p df.

Copies of the DOD Specifications and Handbooks can be obtained online from the DOD

Single Stock Point or from the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information

System (ASSIST) website (http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-HDBK/)

2.3 Department of the Navy (DON) Documents

Table 5. DON Documents

DON Documents Document Title and/or Description

DON Department of Defense Information Assurance

Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP)

Handbook Version 1, dated 15 July 2008

NETCINST 5510.1 Content Segmentation and Classification Guide

NETCNOTE 1500.6 Metadata Instruction

NMCI.10011.01.UA3.E Core Build Contents Version 2.3, 02 Aug 07

Copies of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) Core

Build Standard can be obtained from http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build

OPNAVINST 1500.76C Naval Training System Requirements, Acquisition, and

Management

Secretary of the Navy

Instruction

(SECNAVINST)

5000.36A

Department of the Navy Information Technology

Application and Data Management http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.pdf http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.pdf http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build

SECNAVINST 5870.4A Copyright, dated 16 Aug 2005

Secretary of the Navy

(SECNAV) M-5239.1

Department of the Navy Information Assurance

Program, Information Assurance Manual, dated Nov

SECNAV M-5510.36 Department of the Navy, Information Security Program, dated Jun 2006

Copies of the CON DIACAP Handbook can be obtained from https://www.doncio.navy.mil/tagResults.aspx?ID=96

Copies of the DON documents can be obtained online from the Navy’s Integrate Learning

Environment website: https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/Forms/AllItems.aspx

2.4 Sailor 2025 Documents

Table 6. Sailor 2025 Documents

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

Ready Relevant Learning (RRL) Analysis Standard Operating

Procedure (SOP) for Sailor 2025 (includes process flows)

2.5 Authoring Instructional Materials (AIM) Documents

Table 7. AIM Documents

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

AIM Content Planning Module (CPM) User’s Manual

AIM Learning Object Module (LOM) User’s Manual

Copies of the AIM documentation can be obtained from https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/End_to_End_Process_SOP_(7-11-14)_Final.pdf

2.6 Industry Standards

Table 8. Industry Standards

Document Owner Document Title and/or Description

ADL Co-Laboratories Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) 2004—

SCORM is a collection of standards and specifications adapted from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive suite of e-learning capabilities that enable interoperability, accessibility and reusability of Web-based learning content. SCORM documents and important information about SCORM can be obtained from: http://www.adlnet.gov/policy.

ADL Co-Laboratories SCORM 2004 Conformance Testing Tool—This is a self-testing tool downloaded from http://www.adlnet.org to verify

SCORM compliant courseware.

http://www.adlnet.gov/policy

Document Owner Document Title and/or Description

ADL Co-Laboratories The Advanced Distributed Learning Registry (ADL-R): Best

Practices for Updating Registered Content https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/confor mance/tools_scorm.asp

Experience API SCORM

Profile

Guidelines for representing SCORM data and events as xAPI

Statements. Provides a representation of the SCORM® data model as well as limited SCORM®-specific features, but uses xAPI for run time communications and tracking. The

SCORM® profile was created as a compatibility approach to xAPI. It can be used to:

create content that can track to both a Learning

Management System (LMS) and learning record store

(LRS)

convert existing SCORM® data to xAPI Statements that can be stored in an LRS track experiences from a learning record provider in a manner consistent with how they would've been tracked in SCORM®

(http://adlnet.github.io/xAPI-SCORM-Profile/) xAPI LRS Conformance

Requirements

The Experience API (xAPI)Conformance Requirements for

Learning Record Stores

(https://adl.gitbooks.io/xapi-lrs-conformance-requirements/content/) cmi5 (Case Mix Index)

Profile Specification

A profile specification for xAPI that describes packaging, launch, and important data capture concepts for traditional

LMSs that include an LRS.

(https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current)

Aviation Industry CBT Committee (AICC)

ANSI/ASQ Q9000-2000 Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary

ANSI/ASQ Q9001-2000 Quality Management Systems - Requirements

ANSI/ASQ Q9004-2000 Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Performance

Improvements

ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011) Safety Colors

ANSI Z535.2-2011 Environmental and Facility Safety Signs

ANSI Z535.3-2011 Criteria for Safety Symbols

ANSI Z535.4-2011 Product Safety Signs and Labels

ANSI Z535.5-2011 Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary Hazards)

IEEE Std. 12207-2008, 2nd

Edition

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle

Processes

Integrated Master Schedule

(IMS) Global Learning

Consortium

Question & Test Interoperability (QTI) Specification

Joint ADL Co-Lab Best Practices Guide for Design and Development of SCORM

Assessments (https://adlnet.gov/research/scorm/scorm-2004-

4th-edition/scorm-2004-4th-edition-conformance-test-suite/) https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/conformance/tools_scorm.asp https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/conformance/tools_scorm.asp http://adlnet.github.io/xAPI-SCORM-Profile/

Document Owner Document Title and/or Description

Copies of the industry standard documents can be found by visiting the web addresses indicated.

Copies of the following Industry Standards can be obtained from the American National

Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society for Quality Control (ASQC)

(http://www.ansi.org).

(Copies of the ANSI/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) documents are available from http://standards.ieee.org/ or IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-1331.)

2.7 Other Documents

Table 9. Other Documents

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

CJCSI 6510.01F IA and Computer Network Defense (CND)

Executive Order 13465 Economy and Efficiency in Government Procurement Through

Compliance with Certain Immigration and Nationality Act

Provisions and Use of an Electronic Employment Eligibility

Verification System, dated 6 June 2008 (Amendment to

Executive Order 12989 of 13 February 1996)

NMCI.10011.01.UF0.E Core Build Contents Version 7, 22 May 2012

NAVAIRINST 5000.21B Naval Systems Command (SYSCOM) Risk Management

Policy dated 24 Jan 2008

Unnumbered Document Joint ADL Co-Lab, ADL Acquisition Guidance, dated 9 Aug

NAVPERS 18068F Volume I Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards

Unnumbered Document NeL Content Hosting Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Unnumbered Document Navy Education and Training Center (NETC) Course Hosting

Process

Unnumbered Document Content Hosting and Report Management Service (CHaRMS)

Developer User Guide V2

Unnumbered Document Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Specifications Brief

Unnumbered Document VDI Risk Management Framework package

Unnumbered Document Mobile Learning & Technology Roadmap

Copies of the CJCSI document can be obtained from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/

Copies of the Presidential document can be obtained from the Federal Register at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1348.pdf

Copies of the NMCI document can be obtained from the Navy’s Integrate Learning

Environment website (https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ile/Default.aspx).

Copies of the SCORM documents can be obtained from http://www.adlnet.gov/capabilities/scorm/scorm-2004-4th#tab-resources.

Copies of the Joint ADL Co-Lab document can be obtained from https://adlnet.gov/collaboration/dadlac.

Copies of NAVAIRINST 5000.21B can be obtained from https://directives.navair.navy.mil/.

OPNAVINST 11010.20H Facilities Project Instruction

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

Copies of these instructions are available at http;//doni.daps.dla.mil

MIL-STD_130N Department of Defense (DoD) Standard Practices –

Identification Markings of U.S. Military Property

Copies of this standard is available online at: http://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsSearch.aspx

DOD 5010-12M Procedures for Acquisition Management of Technical Data

The publication shown above is available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/501012m.pdf

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) 252.211-7003

Item Identification and Valuation (August 2008)

DFARS 252.239-7001 Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification

(January 2008)

DFARS clauses are downloadable from http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

DFAR 2.101 Definitions

DFAR 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel

DFAR 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification

DFAR 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

DFAR clauses are downloadable from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm

DODD 8140.01 Cyberspace Workforce management, dated 11 August 2015

DODI 8520.02 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key (PK)

Enabling, dated 24 May 2011

NIST SP 800-53r4 National Institute of Standards and technology (NIST) –

Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, dated 22 January 2015

CNSSI 1253 Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI)

– Security Categorization and Control Selection for National

Security Systems, dated 27 March 2014

SECNAV M-5239.2 Department of the Navy Cyberspace Information Technology and Cybersecurity Workforce management and Qualification manual, dated June 2016

(The above documents are available from the following sources:

DOD Instructions, Directives, and Manuals are available at http://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/DoD-Issuances/

NIST Special Publications are available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Publications

CNSSI Instructions are available at https://www.cnss.gov

SECNAV Manuals are available at https://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/manuals-secnav.aspx)

DoN NAVEDTRA Documents

NAVEDTRA 130B (series) Task Based Curriculum Development Manual, (Volumes 1-3)

NAVEDTRA 131B (series) Personnel Performance Profile Based Curriculum

Development Manual, Volumes (1 – 3)

NAVEDTRA 132 (series) Navy School Testing Program Management Manual http://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/DoD-Issuances/ https://csrc.nist.gov/Publications https://www.cnss.gov/CNSS/issuances/instructions.cfm https://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/manuals-secnav.aspx https://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/manuals-secnav.aspx

Document Number Document Title and/or Description

NAVEDTRA 136 Naval Education and Training Command Integrated Learning

Environment Course Development and Life Cycle

Maintenance

Copies of the NAVEDTRA documents are available for download from https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/

Naval Air Systems Command Instructions (NAVAIRINST)

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E Systems Engineering Technical Reviews, dated 6 February

Copies of the NAVAIRINSTs are available for download from https://directives.navair.navy.mil

NAWCTSD Documents

NAVAIR Training Systems

Domain Guide

Naval Air Systems Command Training Systems Domain

Guide, version 1.0, dated October 2016

Security Assessment

Procedures Document

NAWCTSD Assessment Procedures for the Omnibus

Standalone-Unclassified Training Systems, dated 22

September 2016

Copies of these NAWCTSD documents will be provided as part of the contract or

Government Furnished Information (GFI)

Non-Government Documents

Industry Standards

ANSI = American National Standards Institute

ISO = International Organization for Standardization

ANSI/ASQ/ISO 9001-2015 Quality Management Systems - Requirements

Copies of the ANSI/ISO document is available from http://www.ansi.org

Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)/SAE International

SAE/EIA-649-B Configuration Management Standard

SAE/EIA-649-1 2014 Configuration Management Requirements for Defense

Contracts

SAE/EIA 748-C Earned Value Management Systems

GEIA-HB-649-A Configuration Management Standard Implementation Guide, Revision A of February 2016

Copies of the EIA/SAE documents are available from http://ansi.org

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)/ISO/International

Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

IEEE/ISO/IEC Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle

Processes

Copies of the IEEE/ISO/IEC documents are available from http://www.ieee.org

3. REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall organize, coordinate, and control program activities to ensure compliance with contract requirements and timely delivery of products specified herein.

https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/

3.1 General Requirements

The Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, personnel, supervision, management, materials, services, equipment, facilities, technical, logistics, and clerical support to perform the tasks specified in this SOW. The requirements defined herein form the basis for work performed for the Government during the entire contract. The Contractor shall meet the requirements of the SOW in accordance with (IAW) the guidance documents provided and the contents of this document.

3.1.1 Program Planning

The purpose of the program planning process is to produce and communicate effective and workable program plans. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program planning processes IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, sections 6.1.2.3.4.5, 6.3.1, and 7.1.1.3.1.

3.1.1.1 Life-Cycle Model Management

The purpose of the life cycle model management process is to define, maintain, and assure availability of policies, life cycle processes, life cycle models, and procedures for use by the program. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply life cycle model management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1. References to the organizational implementation of life cycle model management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1 shall only apply to the program.

3.1.1.2 Infrastructure Management

The purpose of the infrastructure management process is to provide the enabling infrastructure and services to the program and program objectives throughout the life cycle. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply infrastructure management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2. References to the organizational implementation of infrastructure management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2 shall apply only to the program.

3.1.1.3 Program Assessment and Control

The purpose of the program assessment and control process is to determine the status of the program and direct program plan execution. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program assessment and control IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.2.

3.1.1.4 Program Decision Management

The purpose of the decision management process is to select the most beneficial course of program action where alternatives exist. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a program decision management process IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.3.

3.1.2 Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs)

The Contractor shall update, improve, manage, and deliver acceptable contractually required data. The Contractor shall implement data management procedures and policies to provide control and configuration management (CM) of contractually required data. CDRL items shall be submitted via NAWCTSD form 4330/60 (Data Item Transmittal or Acceptance or Rejection

Sheet [DITS]). The Contractor shall:

a. Ensure data items to be delivered to the Government meet the quantity and quality requirements of the CDRL.

b. Establish data management procedures and policies to provide control and CM of contractually required data. To ensure sub-Contractors meet the contract data requirements set forth in the CDRL, the prime Contractor shall maintain control of work completed by sub-Contractors.

c. Establish and maintain data libraries consisting of technical manuals, parent system technical description, and software documentation for the work completed for academic training systems and other data pertaining to training systems.

3.1.3 Online Management System (OMS)

The Contractor shall establish, implement, and make available an OMS throughout the entire contract completion date. The Contractor shall use the OMS as a tool for communication between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor shall maintain deliverables (all versions) and corresponding Government comments on the OMS. The Contractor shall include on the OMS supporting materials, agendas, and minutes for conferences (e.g., Post Award

Conference [PAC]), meetings (e.g., Integrated Product Team [IPT]), reviews (e.g., In-Progress

Report [IPR]) and materials (presentations, agendas, etc.). The Contractor shall make available the OMS to be used at the PAC.

3.1.4 Data Library

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a data library consisting of non-proprietary documentation, data, and information. The Contractor shall record and maintain a master listing of non-proprietary contract related documentation, data, and information used, maintained, updated, and improved for use in this effort. File sharing (Section 3.1.6) between the Contractor and the Government reviewers shall be provided. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the file-sharing website

(i.e., OMS Section 3.1.3). The latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.)

shall be made available by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.

3.1.5 Configuration Management (CM)

The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a CM process. CM shall be controlled by the Contractor to ensure only files associated with a specific date, location, and rating are in the directory for those files. The Contractor shall notify the Government, via e-mail, what directories on the OMS have new or revised files by close of business each Friday.

3.1.6 File Sharing

The Contractor shall allow for file sharing between the Contractor and the Government reviewers. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the OMS (see Section 3.1.3). The Contractor shall provide the

Government notification, via e-mail, of the latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.) by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.

3.1.7 Contractor SMEs

The Contractor shall employ personnel who are recent SMEs in the domain areas specific to the applicable ratings with experience in operations and/or maintenance as required by rating. The

Government strongly encourages the Contractor to utilize SMEs (i.e., domain, Engineer and

Instructional Design) to ensure technical accuracy, data, information, and reports developed by the Contractor meet Government specification and requirements. The Contractor shall ensure personnel assigned to the contract have the appropriate security clearance necessary to access information and facilities required (see Table 1).

3.1.8 Copyrights

The Contractor shall follow Federal copyright laws and DON Instructions (Secretary of the Navy

Instruction [SECNAVINST] 5870.4A, Copyright) during the effort. Media assets, content, and files that are not expressly created or written by the Contractor shall be accompanied with copyright permission requests and copyright granted documentation. The Contractor shall cultivate and maintain a copyright database (to be included in the Software Product Design

CDRL A002) to record and track information and documentation pertaining to copyright content.

Delivery shall be in accordance with CDRL A002.

3.1.9 Risk Management

The…