N55236-21-R-0010 Amendment 0008.pdf

N55236XXXXXXXXXXXXX

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

REF: USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) FY22 DSRA RFP N5523621R0010

The purpose of this amendment is to answ er pre-proposal inquiries, to provide RFP N5523621R0010 conformed through A0008, and to provide Attachment J-3 Pricing Workbook REV5. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SEE CONTINUATION PAGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N5523621R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Sep-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Oct-2021

CODE

SOUTHWEST REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER

CODE 420A 3755 BRINSER STREET, STE 1

SAN DIEGO CA 92136

N55236 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N5523621R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

The purpose of this amendment is to:

I. Include the following Attachments:

a. RFP N5523621R0010 Conformed Through A0008

i. Interport Differential (IDP) values have been recalculated to remove Basic

Allowance for Subsistence (BAS). RFP is changed as follows:

1. Section L, paragraph V.f.

2. Section M, paragraph III.2.d.

ii. Estimated award date under Section L, paragraph I.d. is changed from 14 March 2022 to 10 April 2022.

b. Attachment J-3 Pricing Workbook REV5

i. Correction to formula for Cell B12 on “Total Evaluated Price” tab

II. Answer the following Pre-Proposal Inquiries:

Question 1:

Section M, Paragraph III. 2. d. Inter-port Differential (IPD): To assist the bidder’s understanding of the performance, financial, and schedule risks associated with the RFP, please provide the detailed derivation of the RFP Inter-port Differential value(s). Based upon the competitive nature of this RFP and to ensure that the Govt’s price evaluation includes an accurate estimate of the Availability’s total estimated cost to the Gov’t, bidder considers the detailed derivation of the RFP Inter-port Differential value(s) to be critical information required to prepare its proposal. In addition, the detailed derivation of the RFP Inter-port Differential value(s) will help confirm the RFP’s competitive fairness and equity.

Answer 1:

The IPD Memo for the USS CURTIS WILBUR is available by request. Requests shall be directed to Mercedes Cook, Contracting Officer, and Cindy Wong, Contract Specialist, at mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil and cindy.wong@navy.mil, respectively.

Question 2:

Work Item 857-11-003, Temporary Duty Section Berthing Off-Ship; provide (OPTION ITEM)

Paragraph 3.1 states, “Provide and maintain off-ship berthing facility for each duty section on a 7 days a week basis from each crew move ashore to crew move aboard.”

• Contractor notes Amendment 0004 provided Q&A response #1,

1. Work Item 857-11-003 is an option item to be priced by both out of homeport and in homeport bidders. Port and location is undetermined.

2. SWRMC does not guarantee that a barge will be available within homeport. Due to unknown availability of berthing barge, Work Item 992-11-003 will require pricing and may or may not be invoked.

• Contractor notes it is unlikely that California State and San Diego County and City Local Health and Environmental regulations will allow for usage permit for the Temporary Duty Section Berthing mailto:mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil mailto:cindy.wong@navy.mil in the Contractors Industrial (Shops, Offices and Laydown) areas of the Shipyard as directed in the statement of work in this specification as written… note these requirement are historically accomplished in the Port of San Diego CA. at contractors facilities because the Customer (Gov’t) provides a Berthing & Messing Barge that is moored in the contractor Facility and not subject to such permitting requirements.

Bidder’s Question:

1) Can the Customer confirm that under Work Item 992-11-003 a Berthing & Messing Barge is planned if this avail is awarded to a bidder in the vessels Home Port of San Diego CA?

Answer 2:

The requirements of 857-11-003 and 992-11-003 are not the same and both are required to be priced as option items by all offerors. WI 992-11-003 is support for the Navy berthing barge if one is available for the Navy to provide. In the event a Navy berthing barge is available, WI 857-11-003 Option item will not be exercised as its requirements would be satisfied by the Navy berthing barge as the duty section (as identified in WI 857-11-003) can be supported by the berthing barge. In the event a Navy berthing barge cannot be provided, WI 992-11-003 will not be exercised, but WI 857- 11-003 will be exercised as support for the duty section must be provided separately if the Navy berthing barge is not available.

Question 3:

C-217-H005 GROWTH AND NEW WORK (NAVSEA) (JAN 2019)

(a) The Contractor is required to notify the Contracting Officer via email regarding growth and new work within 30 days of discovery:

(1) of any apparent errors or omissions in the contract (SF 33, specifications, drawings, etc.); and,

(2) of any/all conflicts between the contract package and actual conditions observed during ship check(s) and/or contract execution.

(b) Growth work is synonymous with over and above work, which is described in DFARS 252.217- 7028, Over and Above Work and it provides the process for adjudication.

(c) New work is distinguished from over and above work and is outside the scope of the competitively procured requirement. New work will be approved in accordance with FAR Part 6 and associated policies and procedures.

(d) The Government will NOT negotiate modifications to increase the contract price to address errors or omissions to the contract package which were reasonably apparent to the contractor prior to proposal submission.

• Contractor has submitted pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) which have identified disparities in the Specification package and has received subsequent revisions to the specifications through Errata(s) 1 and 2. Although the deadline to submit PPIs has passed, the contractor continues to identify anomalies within the specifications and submit PPIs for correction.

Bidder’s Question: Are there any other known errors or omissions to the contract package that the Customer is aware of, as there are no others reasonably apparent to us?

Answer 3:

The Government is not aware of any other errors or omissions to the contract package.

Question 4:

Regarding Attachment J-3 Pricing Workbook REV4, the following error has been discovered;

1. “Total Evaluated Price” tab, Cell B12 references cells D6, D9 and D12 on the “Daily Extension Rate” tab and should be E6, E9, and E12. This error results in an incorrect Total Evaluated Price.

Please review and correct as soon as possible.

Answer 4:

The government concurs. Please see Attachment J-3 Pricing Workbook REV5.

Question 5:

This question is a result of answers provided in Amendment 0007 which was received after the question deadline.

Amendment 0007 answer 7 states “Work items 857-11-001 is cancelled in its entirety. See Errata 8.

Work Item 857-11-001 will not be reinstated into the J-3 pricing Workbook.”

Question #1 - How does this change the inter-port differential?

Question #2 - Since San Diego is the home port of the USS Curtis Wilbur isn’t there still a known need for this work in the event the contract is awarded to an out of homeport offeror?

Question #3 – If the answer to question #2 is “no”, is it the intent of the Government to treat this known requirement as growth after award?

Question #4 – If the answer to question #2 is “yes”, will the J-3 Pricing Workbook be revised to include item 857-11-001 as “OPTION ITEM, OUT OF HOME PORT ONLY”?

Please provide answers to all four of the questions listed above.

Answer 5:

Please request a copy of the Interport Differential (IPD) memo to review any adjustments. The government does not anticipate adding this work back into the availability.

Question 6:

This question is a result of answers provided in Amendment 0007 which was received after the question deadline.

Amendment 0007 answer 9 states “Work items 857-11-002 is cancelled in its entirety. See Errata 8.

Work Item 857-11-002 will not be reinstated into the J-3 pricing Workbook.”

Question #1 - How does this change the inter-port differential?

Question #2 - Since San Diego is the home port of the USS Curtis Wilbur isn’t there still a known need for this work in the event the contract is awarded to an out of homeport offeror?

Question #3 – If the answer to question #2 is “no”, is it the intent of the Government to treat this known requirement as growth after award?

Question #4 – If the answer to question #2 is “yes”, will the J-3 Pricing Workbook be revised to include item 857-11-002 as “OPTION ITEM, OUT OF HOME PORT ONLY”?

Please provide answers to all four of the questions listed above.

Answer 6:

Please request a copy of the Interport Differential (IPD) memo to review any adjustments. The government does not anticipate adding this work back into the availability.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment S-1 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

Attachment J-1 Work Specification Package SSP: TTPC-DDG54-SWRMC22-CN01 Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References Attachment J-3 REV5 Pricing Workbook REV5 Attachment J-4 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Attachment J-5 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates Attachment J-6 REV1 Fill-In Clauses REV1 Attachment J-7 Work Package Execution Review and Schedule Model Review Attachment J-8 Government Furnished Material (GFM) List Attachment J-9 Representations and Certifications Attachment J-10 Compartment Closeout List (NSI 009-81) Attachment J-11 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-12 Progress Payments Tracker Attachment J-13 Planning Event Readiness List (PERL) Attachment J-14 Open and Inspect (O&I) Reports

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A014;

A016-A017 (Does not include A004, A0010, A0013 or A0015) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

I. INTRODUCTION

a. This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-

Price contract to complete the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) FY22 Dry-Dock Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA).

b. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offer whose proposal represents the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation.

c. ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Linde Heinrich, Contracting Officer, linde.heinrich@navy.mil, Mercedes Cook, Procuring Contracting Officer, mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil, and Cindy Wong, Contract Specialist, cindy.wong@navy.mil, respectively. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offer pre-proposal information (PPI) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 1 October 2021 at 10:00 AM (PST). The Navy reserves the right to not answer any request received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. Solicitation questions should reference the solicitation and/or specifications page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-1) provided with this solicitation. If any Long Lead Time Material is identified by the Offeror during this period, the Offeror shall notify the Government through a PPI on or before 1 October 2021 at 10:00

AM (PST).

d. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making award on 10 April 2022.

e. Potential Prime Offerors’ Negative Response

The Government requests a negative response from any potential prime Offeror who after reviewing this solicitation does not intend on submitting a proposal. Negative responses are to be delivered to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialists listed above NLT seven (7) days after solicitation release.

II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

a. Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volume I) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 2 November 2021 at 10:00 AM (PST). Only electronic submittal of proposals via DoD SAFE will be permitted. Offerors shall notify the Contracting Officers and Contract Specialist requesting a pick-up request no later than three (3) business days (28 October 2021) prior to the proposal deadline. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered.

Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposal.

i. Offerors must provide a proposal valid for at least 150 calendar days from the proposal due date. (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

b. Proposal Submission:

a. Proposals shall be sent to the Contract Specialist via DoD SAFE only. Full contact information for inclusion on formal correspondence submitted via DoD SAFE to the Contract Specialist is:

Southwest Regional Maintenance Center Attn: Cindy Wong, C420A, Contract Specialist mailto:linde.heinrich@navy.mil mailto:mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil mailto:cindy.wong@navy.mil

3755 Brinser Street, Suite 1 San Diego, CA 92136-5023

b. Proposal volumes shall be structured as follows:

Proposal

Volume

Title

USS CURTIS

WILBUR (DDG-54)

I Price and Technical Volume

c. Directions for Electronic Submission of Proposals:

i. Offerors are instructed to submit proposals electronically via the DoD SAFE application located at https://safe.apps.mil.

ii. Offerors wishing to submit a proposal in response to this notification shall notify the Contract Specialist noted as the point of contact (POC) on this solicitation no later than three (3) business days prior to the proposal deadline of this solicitation and no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline. The Offeror shall provide its name and e-mail as contact information so the Government can generate a pick-up request from the DoD SAFE application to be sent to the Offeror, which is valid for 14 calendar days.

Upon notification from the Offeror, the Contract Specialist will send a DoD SAFE pick-up request. The Offeror shall submit its proposal and provide email confirmation of its submission to all POCs identified in I(c) above.

iii. Offerors shall address their package with the RFP number and Offeror’s company name.

Offerors shall click the “Confirm Delivery” button within the DoD SAFE app in order to receive a confirmation of pick up by the Government. The DoD SAFE system records the time that files are submitted for transmission. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that it drops off its proposals and generates a drop-off time prior to the proposal submission date and time. In the event of a dispute of proposal time submission, the pick-up email with the system-generated drop off time within the body of the e-mail shall serve as the official time that the proposal was submitted to the Government. Late proposal submissions will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

iv. Proposals must be submitted as one .zip file, formatted so that Volume I Price and Technical is submitted in a single file folder clearly marked. The Volume shall be formatted with separate files submitted for each Factor.

v. All files uploaded must be scanned to ensure that there are no computer viruses within the file. The files shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The proposal shall have separate files. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious and traceable. No fields or documents shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

III. GENERAL INFORMATION

a. Ship Checks:

i. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may schedule ship checks prior to 05

NOVEMBER 2021. If the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) is not available, a sister https://safe.apps.mil/ ship to the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) will be available for ship check in San Diego, CA prior to the proposal submission due date.

ii. To schedule a ship check, Offerors shall email a “Request for Ship Check” to Project Manager, Alma Flores, alma.flores@navy.mil (carbon copy to Linde Heinrich, linde.heinrich@navy.mil, Mercedes Cook, mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil, and Cindy Wong, cindy.wong@navy.mil, respectively). Due to the ship location, additional information will be provided upon request.

iii. Participants will be provided additional information to the ship check and will be subject to security, safety and other applicable regulations established by Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) and the Commanding Officer of the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54), or sister ship. Subject to the Commanding Officer of the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) or sister ship, final approval, photography is anticipated to be authorized.

http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/SWRMC/ https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrsw/installations/navbase_san_diego/om /force_protection/pass_an_and_decal.html

b. Specifications and associated reference documentation

i. Upon request, the Government will provide the Specification Package Work Items

(Attachment J-1) and Work Item References (Attachment J-2).

ii. Offerors may request solicitation attachments by submitting a request to:

1. Linde Heinrich at linde.heinrich@navy.mil and

2. Mercedes Cook at mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil and

3. Cindy Wong at cindy.wong@navy.mil

iii. Additional Work Item References not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available listed under FAR 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

c. Alteration of Solicitation – Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered unacceptable and thus ineligible for award.

d. Proposal Information – Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge of outside information provided in the proposal. Additionally, Offerors are advised that the statements such as “the Offeror understands”, “the Offeror “has a long history of understanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate assertions.

mailto:alma.flores@navy.mil mailto:linde.heinrich@navy.mil mailto:mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil mailto:cindy.wong@navy.mil http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/SWRMC/ https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrsw/installations/navbase_san_diego/om/force_protection/pass_an_and_decal.html https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrsw/installations/navbase_san_diego/om/force_protection/pass_an_and_decal.html mailto:linde.heinrich@navy.mil mailto:mercedes.e.cook@navy.mil mailto:cindy.wong@navy.mil https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

e. Amendments – The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing SAM.gov website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

f. Teaming Arrangements – Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), Offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

g. One-Bid Situation – If the Government receives only one bid for solicitation N55236-21-R-0010 for the availability, the Government reserves the right to require Certified Cost and Pricing Data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008. As identified by the Contracting Officer, additional cost or pricing data will be required in order to determine whether proposed pricing is fair and reasonable or to comply with the statutory requirements of Certified Cost and Pricing Data in accordance with 10 USC 2306(a) and FAR 15.403-3. The Offeror agrees to provide any additional data requested within 30 days of notification.

h. Interport Differential – If performance will be outside of the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) homeport area of San Diego, CA, the Offeror will add the applicable Interport Differential (IPD) into the provided line item of the tab entitled “Total Evaluated Price” within the J-3 Attachment.

The Government has provided the Interport Differential values in Section M, Paragraph III.2.d. For the purposes of the J-3, any out-of-homeport bidder shall use the values provided in Section M in accordance with the geographical location the contractor proposes for performance. If that geographical location is not stipulated within Section M, Paragraph III.2.d., the contractor shall submit a PPI requesting Interport Differential values for the proposed performance location.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT

a. PROPOSALS WHICH DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS

NON-RESPONSIVE AND THUS INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

b. Electronic Proposals – All proposals shall be submitted via DoD SAFE as outlined above. Pages shall be formatted to 8.5 x 11 inch paper with one inch margins. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Any revisions to the offerors’ proposals (if required) shall be submitted in two (2) forms: (1) a final clean revised document; and (2) a redlined document outlining the offeror’s changes. Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section V where required.

c. Page Limits

i. Volume I

1. Cover Letter shall not exceed three (3) pages.

2. Factor 1: Non-Price Technical Factor

a. Sub-factor A: Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA): No page limitation.

b. Sub-factor B: Proposed Dry Dock and Pier Facilities: No page limitation.

3. Factor 2: Total Evaluated Price

a. No page limitation for remainder of Volume I.

V. PROPOSAL CONTENT

https://beta.sam.gov/

Volume I shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a. Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the Offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

i. Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

ii. CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor,

iii. Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications). Note, however, that Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

iv. Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

v. For any work item (WI) with a dollar value of zero dollars proposed for either labor or material costs in the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-3) provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

1. For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

2. For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

b. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged: As part of the price proposal package, the

Offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

c. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable).

d. Factor 1 Sub-factor A: Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA): Offerors must provide a current copy of the Offeror’s current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirements of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. A prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in an MSRA..

e. Factor 1 Sub-factor B: Dry Dock and Pier Facilities: Offerors shall affirmatively state whether or not the Offeror has ownership of or committed access to dry dock(s) and pier(s) capable of berthing the DDG-54. If yes, provide the name of dry dock(s) and pier(s) and affirmatively state whether the dry dock(s) and pier(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the offeror states that a dry dock and pier are not available, provide the details of the awarded contract or dry dock and pier maintenance period that has made the dry dock and pier unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry Dock and Pier Period of Performance, Scheduled Dry Dock and Pier Maintenance Period).

In accordance with the most current version of MIL-STD-1625D, provide a current dry-dock certification applicable to the dry-dock proposed for the Availability. Certifications shall demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock.

If the proposed dry-dock is currently uncertified, or if the certification will expire prior to the end of the Offeror's proposed docking period, the Offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the dry-dock in order to remain certified throughout the proposed docking period in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-5). Recertification plan shall include timeline to complete the requirements of MIL-STD-1625D prior to certification expiration, including:

i. Contractor Navy Audit request

ii. Contractor preparation of facility spaces to be inspected. Contractor shall describe when they expect these facilities to be available to complete necessary inspections and any risks to their availability.

iii. Navy examination of the facility, facility certification report, maintenance program documentation, and operational records

iv. Navy observation of a docking or undocking operation, whenever possible. In the case of a floating dry dock, this operation shall include a submergence test to the maximum dock draft.

v. Navy evaluation of the control inspection, operating, and maintenance procedures

vi. Navy preparation of exit brief and formalized in a written report

vii. Contractor actions to resolve any identified deficiencies. Contractor shall explain the time allotted to deficiency resolution and any associated risks.

viii. Navy examination of actions to resolve deficiencies.

f. Factor 2: Shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of:

i. the Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR part 19 (large businesses only),

ii. the completed Attachment J-6 Fill-In Clauses and Attachment J-9 Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors, and

iii. the completed Attachment J-3 and Solicitation Section B carrying forward information from the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet, Attachment J-3, as applicable containing:

1. Work Item Pricing,

2. Daily Extension Rates,

3. Inter-port Differential (IPD),

4. Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor & Material Burden Rate, New Work & LOE to Completion,

5. Pricing for all Option items.

Offerors must propose on all applicable CLINs, including all base and option CLINs, complete Section B Note B “FIXED SHIP REPAIR LABOR AND MATERIAL BURDEN RATES

FOR GROWTH AND NEW WORK SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR

LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”, complete Section B Note D “SCHEDULE OF

EXTENSION DAILY RATES FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY DOCKING (FULLY

BURDENED) FOR PURPOSES OF AN EXTENSION DUE TO COMPENSABLE

DELAY”, and complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet (Attachment J-3) to be considered responsive.

The contractor must submit prices using the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-3) containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD, and Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rates in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the Section B and Attachment J-3, the CLIN price shall govern.

The Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-3) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rates and Material Burden Rate must match the rates provided in the Section B Note B “FIXED SHIP REPAIR

LABOR AND MATERIAL BURDEN RATES FOR GROWTH AND NEW WORK

SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY

BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rates and Material Burden Rates shall govern.

Offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields in the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet (Attachment J-3).

The IPD applicable to the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG 54) FY22 DSRA must be included in all offers in which performance will be outside of the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) homeport area of San Diego, CA. The IPD is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all Offerors’ price proposals to determine the Offeror’s Total Evaluated Price.

Location* Differential San Diego, CA $31,427 Seattle, WA $1,718,808 Portland, OR $3,599,140 Pearl Harbor, HI $2,070,022

An Offeror whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a PPI requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the Offeror’s proposed location for the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG 54) FY22 DSRA.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I. GENERAL

a. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract for the completion of the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG-54) FY22 DSRA to the Offeror whose proposal represents the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

b. Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (FAR 52.215-1(f)(4)). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

c. Offerors are advised that the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal, except for the following:

i. The Government reserves the right to use our own research to determine which commercial and government resources the contractor has in order to determine responsibility.

ii. The Government reserves the right to review past performance on Offerors’ ability to subcontract to small business and various small business goals. This includes, but is not limited to past ISRs.

II. BASIS FOR AWARD

a. The Government will select the best overall offer, based upon an assessment of non-price factor and price. A contract may be awarded to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, whose proposal conforms to the RFP’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and represents the best value to the Government utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA), in accordance with the evaluation criteria.

b. The best value basis for award will be based on the following evaluation factors.

Non- Price Factor

1. Factor 1: Technical Eligibility Factor

a. Sub-factor A: Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA)

b. Sub-factor B: Dry Dock and Pier Facilities

Ratings will be applied to the Non-Price Factor as follows:

Non-Price Factor 1 – Technical Eligibility in terms of acceptable or unacceptable.

The Government will initially only evaluate the Offeror with the lowest priced proposal.

Following price evaluation, the Government will then make a determination as to whether the lowest priced offeror meets the minimum technical requirements. If the lowest priced offeror is determined to be technically acceptable, no competing proposals will be reviewed. If the Government determines discussions are necessary, the Government will complete a technical eligibility evaluation of all Offerors and establish a competitive range. The SSA will base the source selection decision on an assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

Price Factor

1. Factor 2: Total Evaluated Price

III. EVALUATION FACTORS DESCRIPTION

A. Factor 1: Technical Eligibility

a. Subfactor A: Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA): Offerors must provide a current copy of their current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) in accordance with DFARS 217.71 or proof of equivalency subject to the requirements under CNRMC instruction 4280.1 in order to be eligible for award. The government will assess whether the Offeror has certifications or demonstrates full capabilities in conducting all aspects of shipboard work on naval vessels.

b. Subfactor B: Dry Dock and Pier Facilities: The Government will assess whether the Offeror has ownership or committed access to a dry dock and pier capable of berthing the vessel, in accordance with Section L. The Government will also assess if the proposed dry-dock is certified in accordance with MIL-STD-1625D, and remains certified from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete” as outlined in Attachment J-5 and should the dry-dock certification in accordance with MIL-STD-1625D lapse anytime during the proposed docking period, the Offeror has adequately described a plan for recertification.

2. Factor 2 – Total Evaluated Price

a. Total Evaluated Price for the availability shall be calculated by adding:

i. The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total evaluated price of all work items),

ii. The price for all option CLINs,

iii. The price of the Fully Burden Ship Labor Rates & Material Burden Rates for LOE to Completion CLINs (Base and Option) and New Work, and

iv. The price of the Extension Day Rates,

v. The price of the Interport Differential (as identified in Section L of this solicitation).

b. Evaluated price for Extension Day Rates and Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rates & Material Burden Rates (as applied to LOE to Completion CLINs and New Work) shall be calculated in the following manner:

i. LOE to Completion Reservation CLINs (Base and Option)

1. Multiply the proposed fully burdened ship repair labor rate by the number of hours associated with (1) each LOE to Completion CLIN and (2) New Work allocation to yield the labor hour price.

2. Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with (1) each LOE to Completion CLIN and (2) New Work allocation to yield the burdened material price.

3. Add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each LOE to Completion CLIN and New Work allocation. (Note, the offeror’s Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate as applied to New Work allocation will be included in the Total Evaluated Price for evaluation purposes only. This figure will not be incorporated into the contract at the time of award; however, the offeror’s Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor

Rate & Material Burden Rate will be utilized for pricing of New Work arising during contract execution.)

c. Extension Day Price

1. Multiply the proposed daily rate by the number of days associated with that rate to yield the evaluated price the dry dock and pier-side extension. Offerors are advised that the number of extension days used to calculate the Extension Day Price are for evaluation purposes only.

d. Inter-port Differential (IPD)

The Inter-port Differential is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the Contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel (Management Oversight, Assessment, Survey, Certification, and Ship’s Force (to include relocation, sustainment, and crew training costs)). Offerors shall enter the applicable Inter-port Differential in accordance with the values below in the appropriate section of the J-3:

Location* Differential San Diego, CA $31,427 Seattle, WA $1,718,808 Portland, OR $3,599,140 Pearl Harbor, HI $2,070,022

Offerors whose location is not listed in the table above will have the applicable Interport Differential for the appropriate area applied by the Government for evaluation purposes only. An Offeror whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a PPI requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the Offeror’s proposed location for the USS CURTIS WILBUR (DDG 54) FY22 DSRA.

IV. EVALUATION FACTOR RATINGS

The ratings will be based on what is contained in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources. The ratings are set as follows:

B. Factor 1

For Factor 1, the rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factor 1 meets or does not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any deficiencies in Offeror’s proposal. The ratings for Factor 1 are as follows:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

C. Factor 2

For Factor 2, the Government will not evaluate price adjectivally or assign strengths or weaknesses to the price proposal. The Government will analyze price proposals based on an assessment of the offeror’s total evaluated price to ensure offerors have a complete understanding of the contract requirements. Offerors shall propose labor and material burden rates in Section B. Total evaluated price shall be calculated in the following manner:

a. The evaluated price for the availability will be the sum of:

i. The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total evaluated price of all work items),

ii. The price for all option CLINs,

iii. The price of the Fully Burden Ship Labor Rates & Material Burden Rates for LOE to Completion CLINs (Base and Option) and New Work,

iv. The price of the Extension Day Rates, and

v. The price of the Interport Differential (as identified in Section L of this solicitation).

b. Offerors shall fully complete Attachment J-3 (in Microsoft Excel, including all tabs).

(End of Summary of Changes)