PPI_Log_Amd_0002.pdf
PDF 476 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Navy Region Northwest Security Guard Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N44255-19-R-6007
About this file
This document contains responses to 206 questions regarding solicitation number N44255-19-R-6007 for security guard services at Navy installations in Washington and Idaho. Key details include:
The solicitation seeks armed and unarmed security guard services on a fixed-price basis at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Naval Magazine Indian Island, and Adak Readiness Center Bayview. Incumbent guards may qualify for transition to the new contract after completing additional training. The contractor must provide all necessary equipment, vehicles, uniforms, firearms, and planning documents. Amendments to the solicitation clarify work hours, staffing levels, and response times for various guard posts, and reduce the time for submitting pre-contract safety and emergency plans from 30 days to 15 days. Wage determinations specify applicable rates for each location based on county.
A.1 _PPI Log Amendment 0002
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PPI No. Page Section Para. QUESTION (Attachment A Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form) GOVERNMENT RESPONSE Amend
No.
1 47 On page 47 of the RFP, it states that the technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two single-sided pages. Please clarify whether data for EMR, DART, and TRC is included in the two-page limit.
Submission of EMR, DART, and TRC data is not included in the two page limit.
2 47 On page 47 of the RFP, it states that EMR, DART, and TRC data should be submitted for each offeror who is part of a partnership or joint venture. Please clarify whether data is required for major subcontractors (performing 20% or more of the contract value).
Submission of EMR, DART, and TRC data is required for each offeror who is part of the joint venture or partnership.
3 46 On page 46 of the RFP, it states that the offeror or joint venture/mentor protégé partners should demonstrate experience in
Factor 2. If the offeror’s team includes a major subcontractor performing 20% or more of the contract’s value, can corporate experience information be included for that subcontractor?
No, subcontractor experience will not be excepted. Factor 2 states "The offeror (or joint venture/mentor protégé partners that make up the offeror) shall demonstrate experience as a prime contractor…"
4 0401000 2.2.10 PWS 2.2.10 lists training requirements. Please clarify whether incumbent personnel (guards) meet these standards or should additional training, PQS documentation, oral qualification board be anticipated for transitioning incumbents to the new contract.
Most incumbent guards have equivalent training that fulfills most of the new training courses.
Incumbent guards will have 6 months after the start of the contract to be
100% trained on any missed new training per CNICINST 3502.2 NSF
TRAMAN.
5 71 Page 71 of the PWS states that a weapons list is available upon request. It also says, “see separate file named J-0200000-5 GFP.xlsx.”
We request the weapons list, as well as the named spreadsheet file if different than the list.
J-0200000-5 GFP.xlsx has been posted to www.fbo.gov with
Amendment 0001. This attachment lists all weapons.
6 81 Page 81 of the PWS states that standard operating procedures are available as a separate file on disc. We request a copy of the disc be sent to the firm, in care of the POC, listed above.
7 82 Page 82 of the PWS states that jurisdiction geographic areas are available as a separate file on disc. We request a copy of the disc be sent to the firm, in care of the POC, listed above.
J-0401000-09 has been posted to www.fbo.gov with Amendment 0001. 0001
8 42 Page 42 of the RFP states that font size should be no smaller than 11 points. Would the government allow 10 point font for figures, tables, and graphics?
Font size has been updated to no smaller than 10 point font. 0002
9 CBA Local 5 between HSSI/SPFPA. The current expiration date of this
CBA is Sept. 30, 2019. Does the government prefer bidders to use current wages as defined in CBA for 2019, or revert to wage determination since the bargaining agreement will be expired at the start of services?
Offerors shall use the current CBA wage rates.
10 69 J-0200000-05 RFP PWS Attachment J-0200000-05, page 69 of 89. Government
Furnished Equipment includes Gate/Sentry Houses in each installation. Do the Government Gate/Sentry Houses have potable water supplies that can be accessed by sentries during their shift? If not, does the Government have information on a suitable water source for security personnel on duty?
11 69 J-0200000-05 RFP PWS Attachment J-0200000-05, page 69 of 89. Government
Furnished Equipment includes NMCI Computers. Will the
Government permit contractor furnished computers to be used for contract support functions such as timekeeping, record keeping, and training? If so, will the Government provide internet access, or is the contractor expected to furnish internet access?
12 69 J-0200000-05 RFP PWS Attachment J-0200000-05, page 69 of 89. Government
Furnished Equipment includes CISCO IP Phones for Bay View, ID location. Does the customer require additional land line telephones for the Security Office and guard shack communications in Bangor and Indian Island, and are these land line telephones and user accounts expected to be furnished by the contractor?
13 0401000 2.3.3 RFP PWS Spec Item 2.3.3 describes Contractor provided Security
Vehicles. Can the customer provide information on the number of contractor-furnished vehicles currently used in each location? If not, can the government provide a map of guard mount and post locations to determine how many vehicles are required for to transport personnel from guard mount to post?
The Government cannot provide the number of contractor furnished vehicles. The Government provided scaled installation maps in
Amendment 0001 along with building numbers for all stationary posts on J-
0401000-13.
14 J-0401000-05 PWS Attachment J-0401000-05 Post Orders indicates the official Post
Orders can only be available on disc by request. Will the
Government provide access to post orders as part of procurement?
15 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 1 allocation is 10 hours per day Monday – Friday. Can the
Government define the hours of operation (ex. 0600-1600)?
16 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 8: 0530-2000. Can the Government clarify calculation of a total of 8,040 hours per year with guard mount? Given a 14.5-hour shift did the Government allocate for two shift guard mount? There is also conflict with minimum staff column (M-F) and days of operation column restating Sat/Sun holiday on page 87 for 12.5 HPD. Is this four (4) personnel working post 8 on weekends for 12.5 hours?
Total hours have been deleted from J-
0401000-13. Conflicting requirements have been corrected.
17 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 8 0530-0730 Can the Government clarify conflict between minimum staff column and days of operation column in hours of operation?
Total hours have been deleted from J-
0401000-13. Conflicting requirements have been corrected.
18 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 8 0730-2000. There is a conflict between the minimum staff column (Sat- Sun) and the days of operation column Sat, Sun, Hol).
Total calculated hours appear to be without holiday. Can the
Government confirm?
Total hours have been deleted from J-
0401000-13. Conflicting requirements have been corrected.
19 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 10 – Can the Government provide hours of operation for this post requirement (ex 0630-0930)?
20 J-0401000-13 RFP PWS Attachment J-0401000-13 Post Manning Requirements -
Post 14 and 17. Do post requirements that state an annual requirement include guard mount?
Post 14 & 17 guard mount time are included in the hours on J-0401000-
13.
21 0200000 2.9.1 Spec Item 2.9.1, Accident Prevention Plan (APP) lists the date of submission as: “No later than 30 days prior to contract start and as updated.”
Question: With an anticipated contract start date of 1 October, 2019, is it NAVFAC’s intent to issue the award with sufficient time to allow the awardee to meet this delivery? Or, are bidders to proceed “at risk” to remain compliant with this PWS requirement?
Spec Item 2.9.1 is revised in
Amendment 0002 to reflect 15 days instead of 30 days.
22 0200000 2.9.4.2 Spec Item 2.9.4.2, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Plan, lists the date of submission as: “No later than 30 days prior to contract start and as updated.”
Question: With an anticipated contract start date of 1 October, 2019, is it NAVFAC’s intent to issue the award with sufficient time to allow the awardee to meet this delivery? Or, are bidders to proceed “at risk” to remain compliant with this PWS requirement?
Spec Item 2.9.4.2 is revised in
Amendment 0002 to reflect 15 days instead of 30 days.
23 0200000 2.9.4.3 Spec Item 2.9.4.3, Emergency Response Plan, lists the date of submission as: “No later than 30 days prior to contract start and as updated.”
Question: With an anticipated contract start date of 1 October, 2019, is it NAVFAC’s intent to issue the award with sufficient time to allow the awardee to meet this delivery? Or, are bidders to proceed “at risk” to remain compliant with this PWS requirement?
Spec Item 2.9.4.3 is revised in
Amendment 0002 to reflect 15 days instead of 30 days.
24 0200000 2.10.2 Spec Item 2.10.2 Environmental Protection Plan, lists the date of submission as: “No later than 30 days prior to contract start and as updated.”
Question: With an anticipated contract start date of 1 October, 2019, is it NAVFAC’s intent to issue the award with sufficient time to allow the awardee to meet this delivery? Or, are bidders to proceed “at risk” to remain compliant with this PWS requirement?
Spec Item 2.10.2 is revised in
Amendment 0002 to reflect 15 days instead of 30 days.
25 0200000 2.11 Spec Item 2.11Contingency Plan/Disaster Preparedness, lists the date of submission as: “No later than 30 days prior to contract start and within seven calendar days of changes”
Question: With an anticipated contract start date of 1 October, 2019, is it NAVFAC’s intent to issue the award with sufficient time to allow the awardee to meet this delivery? Or, are bidders to proceed “at risk” to remain compliant with this PWS requirement?
Spec Item 2.11 is revised in
Amendment 0002 to reflect 15 days instead of 30 days.
26 L L.6 RFP Section: L.6 EVALUATION FACTORS, page number 44 of 52, paragraph 4 states the following, Note 1: A narrative limited to one double-sided page (or two single-sided pages), shall be submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience, as further discussed below:
RFP Section: Factor 2 Corporate Experience, Solicitation Submittal
Requirements: page 46 of 52 states the following, the offeror shall provide at least three (3), and no more than five (5) examples of recent relevant projects that the offer has completed or substantially completed utilizing Attachment C.
Question: Is the one double-sided page (or two single-sided pages) referenced above in addition to the Attachment C required for each
The narrative for Factor 2, Corporate
Experience is limited to one double-sided page, however the requirement for at least 3 and no more than 5 recent relevant projects (to be completed using Attachment C) is not included in the page limitation for the narrative.
27 86-89 J-0401000-13 Performance Work Statement, Section J-0401000-13 Post Manning
Requirements Summary, Page 86-89
Question: Post 15 has Min Staff of 2 (24 x 7), but the Days of
Operation calls for one armed sentry 24 hrs a day 7 days per/week.
Can the Government please clarify if one or two guards are required for Post 15?
28 86-89 J-0401000-13 RFP Reference: Performance Work Statement, Section J-0401000-13
Post Manning Requirements Summary, Page 86-89
Question: Can the Government please specify which CBA or Wage
Determination should be utilized for each post?
Wage Determinations for services at
NBK Bangor use Kitsap County, WA.
Services at NAVMAG Indian Island use
Jefferson County, WA. Services at
ARD Bayview use Kootenei County, ID. For more information on CBA and
Wage Determinations see the attachment Section H_Wage
Determinations posted with the solicitation on 10 May, 2019.
29 86-89 J-0401000-13 RFP Reference: Performance Work Statement, Section J-0401000-13
Post Manning Requirements Summary, Page 86-89
Question: The total number of hours on page 89 of 89 do not match the total number of hours on pages 86-88. Can the government please clarify the total number of hours required?
Total hours have been deleted from J-
0401000-13. Conflicting requirements have been corrected.
30 0401000 2.2.11 PWS 2.2.11 states, “The Shift Supervisor may be able to assist the motorized patrol guards listed in 0401000.” We are assuming this is limited to motorized patrols defined in J-0401000-13, Post Manning
Requirements Summary. Please clarify whether the Shift Supervisor is allowed to fulfill dual roles of guard on post and supervisor while on duty.
The PWS is revised in Amendment
0002 to state the following: "The
Shift Supervisor may be able to assist the motorized/stationary guards listed in 0401000 J-13 attachment.
31 0401000 3.4 PWS 3.4 states that the contractor will provide dispatching services at NAVMAG and ARD Bayview. Please explain dispatching for posts at
NBK Bangor.
The PWS is revised in Amendment
0002 to state the following: "The
Contractor shall provide dispatching service for security operations at ARD
Bayview to ensure calls are received, responded to, logged, and notifications completed in a timely manner." NBK Bangor and NMII dispatching services are done by the
Regional Dispatch Center and not the contractor.
32 RFP PWS, General for Insurance: Under current scope of this RFP are any guards required to transit on a marine vessel when performing work duties or transiting between posts?
There is no requirement for contractor personnel to transit on marine vessels.
33 RFP PWS, J-0401000-11, Safety Requirements, page 84. The section mandates guards at Bayview wear anti-exposure suits in certain weather conditions. Are these government provided, or contractor provided?
In accordance with Annex 2, Spec
Item 2.5, "Except for items identified as Government Furnished, the
Contractor shall provide all equipment, materials, parts, supplies, components, and facilities to perform the requirements of this contract."
Anti-exposure suits are not listed as
Government furnished.
34 J-1 – Wage Determinations and CBAs – Does the Government have seniority lists for each base location to accurately calculate CBA or
WD benefits?
The Government does not maintain a list of contractor personnel seniority. 0002
35 RFP PWS, J-0401000-13, Post Manning Requirements – Are the post types “Motorized Patrol” utilizing Government Furnished or
Contractor Furnished Vehicles?
The Government does not provide vehicles for use on this contract. 0002
36 J-0200000-05 – Government Furnished Property…, P. 69-70 – PWS, Amendment 001 deleted a significant portion of the GFE, to include office equipment and supplies. Is the contractor expected to supply this equipment?
In accordance with Annex 2, Spec
Item 2.5, "Except for items identified as Government Furnished, the
Contractor shall provide all equipment, materials, parts, supplies, components, and facilities to perform the requirements of this contract."
Office equipment and supplies are not listed as Government furnished, and shall be provided by the contractor.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .