Attachment 4 Addendum FAR 52.212-2.pdf
PDF 104 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Watch/Tank Watch
- Solicitation number
- N4215826RS001
About this file
This document is a Solicitation Evaluation Provision (52.212-2) for Commercial Products and Commercial Services dated November 2021. The government will award the contract to the lowest-priced, most advantageous responsible offeror based on three primary evaluation factors: (1) Technical Narrative, (2) Contractor Capacity, and (3) Price Reasonableness. Vendors must submit a technical narrative demonstrating their understanding of the Performance Work Statement (PWS), with technical acceptability determined by meeting all requirements. Capacity will be rated "Acceptable" if the vendor's utilization rate is at or below 75% of total capacity. Price evaluation will assess reasonableness in accordance with FAR guidelines, with prices required to be held firm for 60 days. Proposals will be evaluated and awarded based on initial submissions, so offerors are advised to provide their best terms from a cost/price perspective.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror that will be most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award based on initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost/price standpoint.
The Offeror’s proposal shall be in the form prescribed by and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the solicitation.
The award decision will be made to the Lowest Price Offeror that receives an acceptable rating in both technical capability and contractor capacity.
(1) Factor 1 - Technical Narrative
(a) Technical Narrative - Technical narrative will represent the assessment of how well you understand and propose to fulfill the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
Vendors must submit a max of sufficient narrative demonstrating their ability to successfully execute the Performance Work Statement. This document should clearly outline their understanding of the requirements, proposed execution strategies, and operational readiness.
Technical acceptability will be defined as follows:
Technical Evaluation Ratings
Contractors who fail to possess an acceptable technical narrative will not be considered for award and the other elements of their quotation will not be evaluated.
(2) Factor 2 - Capacity
(a) Capacity – Capacity proposals will be rated “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” using the ratings and descriptions outlined in Table 3. The Capacity evaluation will assess the Offeror’s available manpower to fulfill the requirements listed in the PWS. Utilization rates must not exceed 75% of total capacity.
Table 2 – Capacity Rating
Rating Description Acceptable Offeror’s utilization rate at or below 75% shall be deemed acceptable for performance considerations.
Unacceptable Offeror utilization rate exceeding 75% shall be considered unacceptable.
(3) Factor 3 - Price Reasonableness
(a) Price Reasonableness - The Government will evaluate the proposed price for reasonableness in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)Subpart 13.5 - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items and FAR 13.106-3. The estimated amount for each line item will be added together to determine the total estimated price, which will become the evaluated price.
The vendor’s proposed price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness. All prices must be considered fair and reasonable as determined by the Government. Price quote shall be held firm and valid for sixty (60) days
(End of provision)
Table 1 – Technical Narrative Rating Rating Description
Acceptable Quote meets all of the requirements identified.
Unacceptable Quote does not meet all of the requirements identified.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .