1734893dwg04of07GEOTECHNICAL.pdf

B-101

FAD

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T

O F

TH

E

N

AV

Y

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

N

AV

AL

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S

EN

G

IN

EE

R

IN

G

S

YS

TE

M

S C

O M

M

AN

D

DES DRW

M

AR

K D

ES

C

R

IP

TI

O

N D

AT

E

DRAWFORM REVISION: 14 SEP 2023

CHK

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

LEGEND: ANALYTICAL LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY:

GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUMMARY:

†after Terzaghi and Peck, 1968 ‡after D. U. Deere, 1963, 1967

Resistance of a standard 2-inch O.D., 1.375-inch I.D. split spoon sampler driven by a 140 pound hammer free-falling 30 inches.

HARDNESS WEATHERING

Very Hard - Breaking specimens requires several hard hammer blows

- Hard hammer blow required to detach specimensHard⛐

- Light hammer blow required to detachModerately Hard specimens

- May be scratched 1/16" deep by a knife or nail, breaksMedium into several pieces by light hammer blow

- Can be gouged readily by knife or nail, corners and edgesSoft broken by finger pressure

- May be carved with a knife and readily broken by fingerVery Soft pressure

Fresh - Fresh rock, bright crystals, no staining

- Minimum stainaing and discoloration, open joints containSlight clay

- Significant portions of rock shows staining andModerate discoloration, strong rock fragments

- All rock shows staining, rock fabric evident but reducedSevere strength

- All rock shows staining, rock mass effectivelyVery Severe reduced to soil with strong rock fragments remaining

- Rock reduced to soil with rock fabric not discernableComplete

DIAGNOSTIC

DESCRIPTION

Very Poor Poor Fair

Good Excellent

ROCK PARAMETER

FIELD/LAB RATIO

0.15 0.20 0.25

0.30 to 0.70

0.70 to 1.00

SPACING

Less than 2" 2" to 1' 1' to 3' 3' to 10'

More than 10'

ROCK QUALITY‡

FRACTURES, JOINT SPACING AND BEDDING

RQD (%)

0 - 25 25 - 50 50 - 75 75 - 90 90 - 100

JOINTS

Very Close Close Moderately Close Wide Very Wide

BEDDING

Very Thin Thin Medium Thick Very Thick

CORRELATION OF RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY

WITH STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) RESISTANCE (ASTM D1586)§

FIELD MEASURED SPT RESISTANCE (N) IN BLOWS PER FOOT OR PER 0.3 m

0 - 4 5 - 10 11 - 30 31 - 50

51 +

RELATIVE DENSITY†

SAND & GRAVEL

Very Loose Loose Firm

Dense Very Dense

0 - 2 3 - 4 5 - 8

9 - 15 16 - 30 31 - 50

51 +

CONSISTENCY†

SILT & CLAY

Very Soft Soft Firm Stiff

Very Stiff Hard

Very Hard

SPT

N

SPT

N

KEY TO DRILLING SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Undisturbed Sample (ASTM D1587)

Split Spoon Sample(ASTM D1586)

Water Table after Stabilization Period

Water Table at Time of Drilling

PP Pocket Penetrometer (tsf)

M.R. Mud Rotary Wash Drilling

H.S.A. Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

Loss of Drilling Fluid

Boring Cave In

Seepage into Borehole Rock Coring (ASTM D2113)

Core Recovery (%)REC

Rock Quality Designator (%)RQD

Weight of Hammer (N = 0)W.O.H.Approximate Strata Change Depth Different Soil Classification Type

Approximate Strata Change Depth Similar Soil Classification Type

COARSE

GRAINED

SOILS

MORE THAN 50%

OF MATERIAL

IS LARGER

THAN NO. 200

SIEVE SIZE

FINE

GRAINED

SOILS

OTHER

SOILS

MORE THAN 50%

OF MATERIAL

IS SMALLER

THAN NO. 200

SIEVE SIZE

GRAVEL

AND

GRAVELLY

SOILS

MORE THAN 50%

OF COARSE

FRACTION

RETAINED ON

NO. 4 SIEVE

SAND

AND

SANDY

SOILS

MORE THAN 50%

OF COARSE

FRACTION

PASSING ON

NO. 4 SIEVE

SILTS

AND

CLAYS

HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS

UNCONTROLLED FILLS

DECOMPOSED OR PARTIALLY

WEATHERED ROCK

CLEAN

GRAVELS

(LITTLE OR NO

FINES)

GRAVELS

WITH FINES

(APPRECIABLE

AMOUNT OF FINES)

CLEAN SANDS

(LITTLE OR NO

FINES)

SANDS WITH

FINES

(APPRECIABLE

AMOUNT OF FINES)

LOW PLASTICITY

LIQUID LIMIT

LESS THAN

HIGH PLASTICITY

LIQUID LIMIT

GREATER THAN

WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,

GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES,

LITTLE OR NO FINES

POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS,

GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES,

LITTLE OR NO FINES

SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -

SAND - SILT MIXTURES

CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -

SAND - CLAY MIXTURES

WELL-GRADED SANDS,

GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR

NO FINES

POORLY-GRADED SANDS,

GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR

NO FINES

SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT

MIXTURES

CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY

MIXTURES

INORGANIC SILTS, CLAYEY SILTS,

SILT-VERY FINE SAND MIXTURES,

ROCK FLOUR

INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO

MEDIUM PLASTICITY,

GRAVELLY, SANDY, SILTY, &

LEAN CLAYS

ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC

CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY

INORGANIC SILTS AND MICACEOUS,

DIATOMACEOUS AND ELASTIC

SILTY SOILS

INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH

PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS

ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO

HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC

SILTS

PEAT, HUMUS, MUCK, SWAMP SOILS

WITH VERY HIGH ORGANIC

CONTENTS

TRANSITIONAL MATERIAL BETWEEN SOIL AND

ROCK WHICH MAY RETAIN THE RELICT

STRUCTURE OF THE PARENT ROCK

DISTURBED SOILS WITH POSSIBLE DEBRIS

AND RUBBLE, OLD CONSTRUCTION

WASTES, NON-ENGINEERED BACKFILLS

MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS

GRAPH LETTER

TYPICAL

DESCRIPTIONS

GW

GP

GM

GC

SW

SP

SM

SC

ML

CL

OL

MH

CH

OH

PT

PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) RELATIVE TO SWELL POTENTIAL

0 - 4 4 - 15

15 - 30 31+

None Slight or Low

Medium to High High to Very High

ADDITIONAL RELATIVE DESCRIPTIVE VALUES

Trace < 10% Little 10 - 20%

Some 20 - 30% Modifier > 30%

4.75 mm to 19.0 mm (#4 - 0.75 in.)

PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATIONPLASTICITY CHART (ATTERBERG LIMITS)

BOULDERS:

COBBLES:

GRAVEL: Coarse - Fine -

SANDS: Coarse - Medium - Fine -

SILTS & CLAYS:

Greater than 300 mm (12 in.)

75 mm to 300 mm (3 - 12 in.)

19.0 mm to 75 mm (0.75 - 3 in.)

2.00 mm to 4.75 mm

0.425 mm to 2.00 mm

0.075 mm to 0.425 mm

Less than 0.075 mm

BORING LOG GENERAL NOTES

LABORATORY TESTING NOTES

TESTING LOCATION PLAN:

NA

VA

L F

AC

ILI

TI

ES

E

NG

IN

EE

RI

NG

S

YS

TE

MS

C

OM

MA

ND

~M

ID

LA

NT

N

AV

AL

S

TA

TI

O

N N

O R

FO

LK

N O

R

FO

LK

, V

A

M C

B C

AM

P

LE

JE

U N

E

JA

C

KS

O N

VI

LL

E, N

C

P

U

P A

R A

C H

U

TE

T O

W E

R R

O A

D

12/04/2023

KDB/KJY

EJA

DSN

1734893

Approved by Sofia Schwartz, Asset Management Branch Director, PWD G-F, MCIEAST-MCB Camp Lejeune, via Email.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RECORDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

FAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AS SHOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text 12894952

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

GER

AutoCAD SHX Text

GER

AutoCAD SHX Text

1. THE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS REPRESENT THE SUBSURFACE SOIL THE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS REPRESENT THE SUBSURFACE SOIL PROPERTIES ENCOUNTERED AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS. ANTICIPATE THAT SOIL PROPERTIES AND CONDITIONS BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE INDICATED. 2. GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS: D1140, D1883, D2216, D2435, D2487, D4318, AND D6913. TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON SMALL GRAB SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM THE SOIL BORINGS AND ON BULK SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM HAND EXCAVATED PITS. 3. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON SOIL SAMPLES ANALYTICAL LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON SOIL SAMPLES COMPOSITED FROM THE UPPER 4 FEET IN THE SOIL BORINGS INDICATED. 4. NUTRIENT LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON SOIL SAMPLES NUTRIENT LABORATORY TESTS WERE PERFORMED ON SOIL SAMPLES COMPOSITED FROM THE TOP 4 INCHES AT EACH OF THE PB- SERIES BORING LOCATIONS.

AutoCAD SHX Text

1. THE SOIL BORING RECORDS REPRESENT THE GEOTECHNICAL THE SOIL BORING RECORDS REPRESENT THE GEOTECHNICAL HE SOIL BORING RECORDS REPRESENT THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S INTERPRETATION OF THE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATIONS AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD EXPLORATION BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE FIELD SAMPLES OBTAINED AND LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION TESTING ON SELECTED SAMPLES. 2. LINES DESIGNATING THE INTERFACE BETWEEN VARIOUS STRATA ON LINES DESIGNATING THE INTERFACE BETWEEN VARIOUS STRATA ON THE BORING RECORDS REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE INTERFACE LOCATION. THE ACTUAL TRANSITION BETWEEN STRATA MAY BE MORE GRADUAL THAN INDICATED. THE BORING RECORDS MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MATERIAL CHARACTER AND STRATA THICKNESS OVER THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION AREA. 3. WATER LEVELS SHOWN ON THE BORING RECORDS AND IN THE WATER LEVELS SHOWN ON THE BORING RECORDS AND IN THE GROUNDWATER LEVEL OBSERVATION TABULATIONS REPRESENT THE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD EXPLORATION AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT GROUNDWATER LEVELS THAT WILL BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANTICIPATE THAT GROUNDWATER LEVELS WILL FLUCTUATE DUE TO SEASONAL VARIATIONS AND OTHER FACTORS. 4. APPROXIMATE TESTING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. APPROXIMATE TESTING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. TESTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. STRATA ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO EXISTING SURFACE ELEVATIONS WHERE THE BORINGS WERE MADE. 5. BORINGS WERE ADVANCED USING AUGERING AND MUD ROTARY BORINGS WERE ADVANCED USING AUGERING AND MUD ROTARY DRILLING METHODS AS NOTED. 6. REFER TO THE BORING LOG LEGEND FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THE REFER TO THE BORING LOG LEGEND FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THE SYMBOLS USED. 7. BORINGS AND TESTING PERFORMED BY GEOENVIRONMENTAL BORINGS AND TESTING PERFORMED BY GEOENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC. (GER) AND REPORTED IN GER'S GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 24, 2023.

B-102

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T

O F

TH

E

N

AV

Y

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

N

AV

AL

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S

EN

G

IN

EE

R

IN

G

S

YS

TE

M

S C

O M

M

AN

D

DES DRW

M

AR

K D

ES

C

R

IP

TI

O

N D

AT

E

DRAWFORM REVISION: 14 SEP 2023

CHK

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T

O F

TH

E

N

AV

Y

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

N

AV

AL

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S

EN

G

IN

EE

R

IN

G

S

YS

TE

M

S C

O M

M

AN

D

DES DRW

M

AR

K D

ES

C

R

IP

TI

O

N D

AT

E

DRAWFORM REVISION: 14 SEP 2023

CHK

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

BORING RECORDS:

NA

VA

L F

AC

ILI

TI

ES

E

NG

IN

EE

RI

NG

S

YS

TE

MS

C

OM

MA

ND

~M

ID

LA

NT

N

AV

AL

S

TA

TI

O

N N

O R

FO

LK

N O

R

FO

LK

, V

A

M C

B C

AM

P

LE

JE

U N

E

JA

C

KS

O N

VI

LL

E, N

C

P

U

P A

R A

C H

U

TE

T O

W E

R R

O

EJA

DSN

1734893

Approved by Sofia Schwartz, Asset Management Branch Director, PWD G-F, MCIEAST-MCB Camp Lejeune, via Email.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RECORDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

FAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AS SHOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text 12894953

B-103

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T

O F

TH

E

N

AV

Y

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

N

AV

AL

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S

EN

G

IN

EE

R

IN

G

S

YS

TE

M

S C

O M

M

AN

D

DES DRW

M

AR

K D

ES

C

R

IP

TI

O

N D

AT

E

DRAWFORM REVISION: 14 SEP 2023

CHK

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

BORING RECORDS:

LABORATORY NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS:

NA

VA

L F

AC

ILI

TI

ES

E

NG

IN

EE

RI

NG

S

YS

TE

MS

C

OM

MA

ND

~M

ID

LA

NT

N

AV

AL

S

TA

TI

O

N N

O R

FO

LK

N O

R

FO

LK

, V

A

M C

B C

AM

P

LE

JE

U N

E

JA

C

KS

O N

VI

LL

E, N

C

P

U

P A

R A

C H

U

TE

T O

W E

R R

O

EJA

DSN

1734893

Approved by Sofia Schwartz, Asset Management Branch Director, PWD G-F, MCIEAST-MCB Camp Lejeune, via Email.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RECORDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

FAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AS SHOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text 12894954

B-104

D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T

O F

TH

E

N

AV

Y

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

N

AV

AL

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S

EN

G

IN

EE

R

IN

G

S

YS

TE

M

S C

O M

M

AN

D

DES DRW

M

AR

K D

ES

C

R

IP

TI

O

N D

AT

E

DRAWFORM REVISION: 14 SEP 2023

CHK

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

PAVEMENT CORING RECORDS:

NA

VA

L F

AC

ILI

TI

ES

E

NG

IN

EE

RI

NG

S

YS

TE

MS

C

OM

MA

ND

~M

ID

LA

NT

N

AV

AL

S

TA

TI

O

N N

O R

FO

LK

N O

R

FO

LK

, V

A

M C

B C

AM

P

LE

JE

U N

E

JA

C

KS

O N

VI

LL

E, N

C

P

U

P A

R A

C H

U

TE

T O

W E

R R

O

EJA

DSN

1734893

Approved by Sofia Schwartz, Asset Management Branch Director, PWD G-F, MCIEAST-MCB Camp Lejeune, via Email.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RECORDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CFC

AutoCAD SHX Text

FAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AS SHOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text 12894955