About this file

This document is an amendment to Solicitation N4008524R2531 for the design-bid-build of the P-226 Maintenance Facility and Marine Air Group Headquarters at Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina.

The key details are:

  • The proposal due date has been extended from November 19, 2024 to November 22, 2024 by 2:00 PM EST.
  • The amendment provides responses to various pre-proposal inquiries related to topics such as HVAC systems, cranes, plumbing, RF-shielding requirements, cabling, and testing.
  • The solicitation is for the construction of a maintenance facility, headquarters building, and supporting site work. The total contract value is not specified.
  • The procuring agency is the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMENDMENT 0012.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0011.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0010.pdf PDF
Amendment 0009 - JA ML-25-15 P226 Interior Finishes Redacted.pdf PDF
Amendment 0009 - JA ML-25-14 P226 Network Switches Redacted.pdf PDF
Amendment 0009 - JA ML-25-13 P226 Fire Protection Redacted.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0009.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0008.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0007.pdf PDF
Amendment 0007 - Attachment G - P226 Price Schedule_Rev3.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0006 - P226_F35 MCAS Cherry Point_HazMat Rpt.pdf PDF
Amendment 0006 - P226 F35 MCAS Cherry Point Geotech Report.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0005.pdf PDF
Amendment 0005 - 1712284 SPEC Rev.pdf PDF
Amendment 0005 - Attachment G - P226 Price Schedule_Rev2.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT 0004.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0003.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - 1712284 REGISTER.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - 1712284 SPEC.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0002.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 0001.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - Site Visit Sign-In Sheet.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - Attachment G - P226 Price Schedule_Rev1.docx DOCX document
Attachment E - Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD).docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Construction Experience Data Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1737342spc01of01.pdf PDF
Attachment G - P226 Price Schedule.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Historical Small Business Utilization.docx DOCX document
N4008524R2531.pdf PDF
Attachment H - PIEE Vendor Access Instructions.pdf PDF
Attachment F - SBSP.docx DOCX document
Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx DOCX document
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT J 1 7

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 0006 15-Nov-2024

6. ISSUED BY Code N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N4008524R2531

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Aug-2024

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning _1 _ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SOLICITATION NO. N4008524R2531 DESIGN-BID-BUILD, P-226 MAINTENANCE FACILITY & MARINE AIR GROUP

HEADQUARTERS, MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA

The proposal due date has been extended to 22 November 2024 NLT than 1400 (EST)..

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Contract POC: Brittany Cristelli; Email: brittany.n.cristelli.civ@us.navy.mil; Phone: 757-341-1978

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA mailto:brittany.n.cristelli.civ@us.navy.mil

N4008524R2531

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. Extend proposal due date to 22 November 2024 NLT 2:00PM EST.

2. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s)

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Responses:

Question # Reference

Question Government Response Page Section Paragraph

MH101

A4/M70

MALS 14. MH101 and

A4/M708. EF-5 serves Hazmat

Room 140. There is no motorized damper shown in the duct on

MH101. EF-5 is included with four other EFs in the sequence and points lists in A4/M708 including references to interlocks with AHUs, shut down, and damper closure in response to

ATFP ESS operation. Inclusion of EF-5 with those other four EFs does not seem appropriate?

Should EF-5 have a motorized damper? Does it run constantly even when ATFP ESS has been activated?

PENDING RESPONSE

41 22

13.15 41 22 13.15

Equipment-41 22 13.15-

Specification 41 22 13.15 has no mention of anti-spark requirements. Please confirm all bridge cranes do not need to meet the requirements of minimum or maximum anti-spark.

Add the minimum anti-spark requirement to the crane spec included in the contract documents

BLDG

3916, CU101

BLDG

3916, CU101

Keynote 2 calls for a sanitary sewer packaged pump station of like kind and size with PVC gravity. Please provide details for the pump station and a pipe size for the PVC gravity line.

PENDING RESPONSE

74 CSP CSP

Security-CSP-Please confirm the

CSP only applies to the MAG HQ building and site.

Confirmed.

84 A-B-101 A-B-101

Civil-A-B-101-On plan B-101, the geotechnical report summary refers to the final geotechnical engineering report dated February

10, 2023, as prepared by

AECOM. Refer to final geotechnical engineering report for additional information. Please provide the final geotechnical engineering report dated February

Geotechnical Report and

Addendum provided with

Amendment 0006.

10, 2023, as prepared by

AECOM.

01 57 19

- 1.5, 01

14 00 -

1.2

01 57 19 -

1.5, 01 14

00 - 1.2

General-01 57 19 - 1.5, 01 14 00 -

1.2-Specification 13 47 00

Section 2.1 states the Radiant

Barrier Foil is to achieve 67 dB across the frequency range of

100MHz to 10GHz. Please confirm this applies to the material only and not the RF-shield system as a whole.

PENDING RESPONSE

126 13 47 00 13 47 00

Architectural-13 47 00-

Specification 13 47 00 Section

3.2 calls for 100 meters of free space over the frequency range of

30 MHz to 6 GHz. Please clarify how much isolation (measured in decibels) is required across this frequency range. The current design has many points of failure that prevent isolation (measured in decibels) from being guaranteed across that frequency range. Please confirm that the current design does not require the contractor to guarantee RF-shielding performance.

PENDING RESPONSE

127 13 47 00 13 47 00

Architectural-13 47 00-

Specification 13 47 00 Section

3.2 calls for 100 meters of free space over the frequency range of

30 MHz to 6 GHz. Please clarify how much isolation (measured in decibels) is required across this frequency range. The current design has many points of failure that prevent isolation (measured in decibels) from being guaranteed across that frequency range. Please confirm that the current design does not require the contractor to guarantee RF-shielding performance.

PENDING RESPONSE

128 13 47 00 13 47 00

Architectural-13 47 00-Please confirm that RF-filters are not required for all copper conductors penetrating the RF-shield?

All non-fiber optic cabling exiting the Inspectable Space must use an approved isolation or filtering device. If not, it will require copper conductors if penetrating the RF-shield

129 13 47 00 13 47 00

Architectural-13 47 00-

Specifications do not appear to provide a process to validate the performance criteria for RF-shielding. Please provide the desired process to validate performance criteria.

IEEE-299 is the process to validate the performance.

130 13 47 00 13 47 00

Architectural-13 47 00-Please confirm if the contractor is expected to perform field RF-shield performance validation in accordance with IEEE-299?

Contractor is expected to perform field RF-shield performance validation in accordance with IEEE-299

132 Factor 2

General-Factor 2-The RFP requires the proposal to be uploaded via PIEE. Factor 2 requires a copy of the Project

Schedule Source File. The

Project Schedule Source File, ".xer" from Primavera P6 is not a recognized file by PIEE and cannot be uploaded. Please confirm only the Schedule Source

File can be emailed directly the

Contract Specialist by the proposal due date and time.

PENDING RESPONSE

13 47 00

- 1.5

13 47 00 -

1.5

Architectural-13 47 00 - 1.5-13

47 00, 1.5 Work Plan calls for a

“shielding expert.” Please confirm this “expert” can be employed by the shielding contractor hired to furnish and install the shielding products in

13 47 00. Also please verify who or what agency verifies this person as an “expert.” Is it a certain number of years of experience working with the product, a certain accreditation, etc.?

Expert can be employed by the shielding contractor that is hired to furnish and install the shielding. Tempest testing experience, CTP 1 or CTP 2 experience is preferred but not required.

13 40 00

- 1.5

13 40 00 -

1.5

Architectural-13 40 00 - 1.5-13

40 00, 1.5 Work Plan calls for an independent, third-party testing consultant for assembly testing.

1.1 References refers to IEEE 299

Methods for Measuring the

Effectiveness of EM Shielding

Enclosures. IEEE 299 contains many different ranges and amplitudes to test a shielded space to (Hz/DB). Please provide minimum performance levels need.

CTTA recommends testing to the baseline frequencies of the

RF product that is being installed

13 40 00

- 1.5

13 40 00 -

1.5

Architectural-13 40 00 - 1.5-13

40 00, 1.5 Work Plan calls for an independent, third-party testing consultant for assembly testing.

1.1 References refers to IEEE 299

Methods for Measuring the

Effectiveness of EM Shielding

Enclosures. From past experiences and consulting with numerous RF Shielding contractors, testing a 4-sided box, that utilizes the metal roof deck and floor slab as the fifth and sixth side of the box will yield many local failure points in the

Expect the contractors to perform the testing and provide the results confidentially to the

Government.

IEEE 299 testing tables. What has been acceptable on other projects with an “Open Storage” level of classification is to perform the testing and provide the results confidentially to the

Gov’t. This will show and identify the isolated points of weakness for information only.

However, building a shielded space that would pass all of the tables in IEEE 299, on all six sides is an extremely expensive, and incredibly sensitive and time-consuming endeavor (if not impossible). We just want to verify that the Gov’t is aware of and acceptable to the fact that the

4-sided box will yield local shielding failure points, and those will be tested and pointed out in the reports, but those won’t be able to be remedied in the field.

Please confirm the Gov’t acknowledges and is acceptable to this.

146 T-505 T-505

Electrical-T-505-Please provide a specification or manufacturers part number for the cabinets to be installed in Room 155?

Recommend using /

Manufacture Hoffman

Enclosers INC Cat #

PS1S21610B or equivalent.

They need to be able to be secured, of note they require a special outlet to be installed in order to plug them in.

147 T-505 T-505

Electrical-T-505-Do you require the cabinets to be secured to the floor beneath the raised floor?

No, the cabinets can be secured to the raised floor.

T-505

Note 1

T-505 Note

Electrical-T-505 Note 1-Note 1 states all cabling in the secure area is required to be shielded.

Please confirm NIPR cabling is to be shielded.

NIPR requires shielded cables and shield tips. (recommend

Cat 6 Shielded cable and tips /

Also this will be the same for

JWICS)

T-505

Note 1

T-505 Note

Electrical-T-505 Note 1-Note 1 states all cabling in the secure area is required to be shielded.

Please confirm SIPR cabling is to be shielded.

SIPR is requires shielded cables and shield tips. (recommend

Cat 6 Shielded cable and tips /

Also this will be the same for

JWICS)

150 T-505 T-505

Electrical-T-505-The rack layouts on T-505 show a fiber enclosure in each secure cabinet whereas the riser diagram only shows a single fiber connection. Do you require a 24-strand fiber for each of the secure cabinets?

PENDING RESPONSE

25 05 11 Please verify Risk Management

Framework (RMF) is not required for Cyber Security. It does not appear to be required per the specification provided as this is normally in UFGS 25 08 11.00

20.

PENDING RESPONSE

25 05 11 25 05 11: please verify Risk

Management Framework (RMF) is not required for Cyber Security.

It does not appear to be required per the specification provided as this is normally in UFGS 25 08

11.00 20.

PENDING RESPONSE

MALS-

14 B-

CU103

Key Note 11 calls for a 2.5"

TYPE K COPPER W/ 8" X 4"

TEE AND 4" TO 2.5"

INSULATED

ADAPTER/REDUCER. Note 11 appears to be pointing to a parking space on the left side of the plan. Please confirm the location and length of piping required.

PENDING RESPONSE

MAG-14

A-A-301

A-A-504

Sheet A-A-301 for the MAG-14 building only shows the CMU walls along Gridlines 2 and 9 extending to deck above. All other interior partitions look to terminate at 12'-8". Sheet A-A-

501 Wall Types notes for multiple walls to "extend wall construction to underside of metal deck. Please clarify which walls are to extend to metal deck. To meet STC and fire rating requirements, please confirm that a hard lid attached to the underside of the trusses will suffice. This will allow the walls to extend 12'-8"H instead of

30+'H to deck in some areas.

If confirmed, please provide a detail for the desired hard lid system.

PENDING RESPONSE

00 21 00 Specification 00 21 00 requires that we submit Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS-4212) for the 2023 filing cycle. Please confirm that this is to be the 2023 filing cycle, and not the 2024 filing cycle.

Propose per RFP.

Price

Schedule

CLIN 003 Option Item No. 2 – requires “Total of Price for the entire work for Vanpad in accordance with the RFP…”. The

B package MALS-14 site drawings do not delineate what work falls under this option. We

PENDING RESPONSE

will proceed with the understanding that the Vanpad electrical, lighting, and comms upgrades throughout the paved area depicted on B package

MALS-14 sheet ES101 will fall under Option 02, and that the new pavement doweled in to match the existing Vanpad along the

MALS-14 south elevation depicted on B package MALS-14 sheet CS106 will fall in the Base

Price to provide a complete pavement section along the

Vanpad to the new building.

Please advise if this is not correct.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Amendment 0006 – P226 F35 MCAS Cherry Point Geotech Report_02102023Signed

2. Amendment 0006 – P226_F35 MCAS Cherry Point HazMat Rpt_Fnl_013023

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 19-Nov-2024 02:00 PM to 22-Nov-2024 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.223-23 Sustainable Products and Services MAY 2024

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

The following have been added by full text:

52.236-1 Performance of Work by the Contractor (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall perform on the site, and with its own organization, work equivalent to at least 15 percent of the total amount of work to be performed under the contract. This percentage may be reduced by a supplemental agreement to this contract if, during performing the work, the Contractor requests a reduction and the Contracting Officer determines that the reduction would be to the advantage of the Government.

(End of clause)

(End of Sumary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .