Attachment 1 - 220331 P1066 Final Charrette Report.pdf

Final Charrette Report

FY 23 MCON Project P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility

MCAS Cherry Point North Carolina

Contract: N40085-19-D-9041

Delivery Order: N40085-21-F-4500 eProject Work Order No: 1684760

Date of Charrette: 8 – 10 March 2022

Date of Charrette Report: 31 March 2022

CN#9287

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjQ_5P26d_QAhVEyyYKHRlmDmgQjRwIBw&url=https://twitter.com/navfacmidlant&psig=AFQjCNGCerJ_DIx1zTuN2QYaU-4O0IfzOQ&ust=1481122630282245

Meeting Minutes

Agenda:

See Agenda, attachment (a)

Attendees:

See Attendance List, attachment (b)

Presentation and Discussion Items:

See presentation and discussion items, attachment (c)

Cost & Schedule Risk (CSRA):

See CSRA Report, attachment (d)

Action Item List:

See Action Item List, attachment (e)

Appendices:

See List of Appendices at end of Report

Executive Summary:

A Charrette is normally an iterative process with a concept being presented the first day and then being improved through subsequent discussions among the Stakeholder group during the remainder of the session. The primary goal is to complete the Charrette with an agreed upon Site

Plan, Floor Plan and Building Aesthetics. The group discovered during the initial presentation for

P1066, that the procurement of the test stands for the various gearboxes had not yet been completed. It was noted that as currently projected, the award of the contract for the test stand procurement would not be completed until the design reaches the Prefinal stage. As part of the test stand procurement, the RFP is allowing both Mechanical Closed-Loop (Regenerative) Test

Stands and Electrical Closed-Loop (Regenerative) Test Stands. The differences in these two test systems - Mechanically, Electrically and from a size perspective must be known to accurately design the facility to house them. Waiting until the design is at the Prefinal stage is too late to incorporate any major changes. The Charrette continued for the full 3 days and the stakeholder group identified as many design features as possible and these were incorporated into the floor plan as part of the process. Courses of Action for the design were discussed as follows:

• Continue the current design schedule

• Slow the design and wait for the test stand RFP to catch up

• Accelerate the test stand procurement RFP solicitation

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Project: P1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Date: March 8 - 10, 2022 Comm #: 9287

Purpose: Project Charrette

Prepared by: Steven R Bennett, PE

These were discussed during the week and a combination was agreed to be the best approach.

The design would continue the current schedule to the 50% submittal while an attempt was made to accelerate the test stand procurement. There is risk involved in all of these scenarios as the operational need date for the facility is dictated by a Command Directive.

Purpose:

The purpose of this meeting was to examine project functions, validate project requirements and analyze alternate design concepts. The summary of those discussions is contained in these minutes.

Architectural Compatibility Statement:

The project is located within the Hancock Village are of MCAS Cherry Point and will be designed / constructed adhering to the vernacular of the materials, colors and forms of the existing surrounding buildings.

Exterior envelope materials will primarily consist of brick veneer to a specified height and prefinished metal panels above the brick up to roof eaves. The brick veneer will be running bond pattern with appropriate detailing, such as soldier coursing, etc. The brick will be smooth finish, modular size and red in color. Prefinished metal panel exterior cladding above the brick veneer will be finish / color to match adjacent facilities. Roof eaves and standing seam metal roofing will be the same color as the wall panels.

The building massing and forms will be similar to the existing surrounding (& planned) buildings in the immediate area. This will include some high bay spaces resulting in high walls and lower portions in areas of the building where there is not a high bay requirement. Building forms will be thoughtful and relative to the scale of the building. The roof forms will be curved to match the consistent theme in this portion of the base.

Fenestration in the exterior envelope will be clear anodized aluminum storefront and aluminum framed translucent wall panels. Ground floor windows, glazed doors, and clerestory windows will be provided to maximize daylighting / views. Louvers will be colored to match the adjacent wall material to blend with the field material.

Environmental Summary:

The project exceeds one acre of disturbed area and therefore will require permitting from the

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). To obtain coverage under the

North Carolina NPDES permit for Construction Activities, Sediment and Erosion Control plans and

Stormwater management plans will be submitted to MCAS Cherry Point Environmental Affairs

Department (EAD) and NCDEQ for review and approval.

In terms of stormwater management, the project will utilize existing drainage patterns in the area.

The drainage area outlet features a stormwater pond that is not permitted and has not been evaluated in over 15 years. Pond rehabilitation is a strong consideration as it will be used by many projects in the coming years.

Discussion Items:

Meeting took place as a hybrid in-person (Havelock Tourist Center) and Teams Meeting call on 8 through 10 March 2022, starting at 0900 each day. The agenda for the Charrette is provided as attachment (a). Attendees included Clark Nexsen, NAVFAC MIDLANT, FRC East and MCAS Cherry

Point personnel and are included as attachment (b). The discussion generally followed the Agenda with introductions followed by the stakeholders stating project goals and team expectations. The primary objectives for the Charrette were to establish an agreed upon site plan and an agreed upon floor plan, building aesthetics and roof plan. Clark Nexsen then made a presentation that was generally based on the design as it existed following the completion of the PDA. The presentation, as well as all the items displayed during the Charrette are included in attachment (c). The items in attachment (c) are organized and noted by the day in which they were discussed. The presentation also outlined information needed from the stakeholder group during the meeting so that the design could start expeditiously following the Charrette. After the presentation, there was general discussion and the following items of discussion are noted:

• A question was asked whether the gear box included any magnesium. A statement was made that the gear box was aluminum.

• It was confirmed that there was no requirement for backup generator power.

• UPS will be provided for the workstation terminals.

• Test stand procurement RFP has not been released yet. Anticipated award date for the test stand procurement was estimated to September 2022 which would coincide with the

Prefinal submittal of the design documents. This generated much discussion as design parameters needed to reach Prefinal design will not be available. While consensus was not reached on 8 Mar 2022, the optimum course of action appears to be to proceed to 50% design and reassess test stand procurement at that time. If the procurement status has not changed, then pausing the design to let the procurement of the test stands catch up would seem prudent.

• A Mechanical breakout session was held and minutes from that session are included as attachment (c), Day 1.

Detailed site discussions took place after lunch. A Plan of Hancock Village development was used to help facilitate the discussion and is included as attachment (c), Day 1. The following items of discussion are noted:

• The layout of the S-curve to the northeast of the Gearbox facility was discussed as not an optimal solution. The layout of that curve has been submitted for approval so will be left as is for the P1066 design.

• Stormwater discussions centered around FRCE currently exploring an option for a master planned stormwater approach for the Hancock Village site. After discussing, it was agreed that each project has stormwater management as part of the project, and each would need to stand on its own.

• P1066 is utilizing existing drainage patterns in the area and will not have an individual

BMP on site.

• In order for accommodation of the curved roadway to the Northeast of the project site, an agreement was made to mirror the site plan to focus the building and parking entrance in the Northwest corner of the site.

• Hazardous waste storage was discussed and again it was determined that each project would handle its own in drums. Within FRCE, per Vicki Lewis, Hazardous Material storage is typically contained within the building in industrial drums. If not possible, lockers can be placed on-site in a location dictated by the fire department.

• Water connection:

o Preferred connection method is to connect into a main within Fontana Blvd/US Rt

101; larger size main owned by Craven County // 12” or 14” main owned by the City of Havelock o FRCE will be paying for the service, negotiated with a contract o City will provide a water meter o Will this connection serve the whole complex? Only to provide potable water to the site o Where are the fire hydrants being connected? Clark Nexsen to track the separation between fire and potable water o FRCE and MCAS (T Spellman Powell) will contact the City of Havelock to initiate and agreement for a connection.

o A connection will be set within the City of Havelock to provide service to P1066 and a set a tee for future connections.

o T Spellman Powell will provide estimated square footage of each project in the

Hancock Village Plan and C Mitchell will size water lines based on this information

• Sanitary Sewer Connection:

o MCAS to confirm the connection location on base o Sanitary ties into a pump station via gravity.

o The existing pump station is not in a building. This project will demolish that pump station and replace it with a pump station of larger capacity.

• Natural gas connection point of connection needs to be established with the local utility, Piedmont Gas. T Spellman Powell will provide a Piedmont point of contact.

• ATFP was discussed. The Building is considered to be an uninhabited facility; ~800 sqft per person. MCAS and NAVFAC agreed that parking within the typical 33’ ATFP is acceptable

• From Mike Rice: “Crane lift will require heavy duty pavement in the most likely set-up point for the crane. 50-ton lift might require 200-ton crane.” Heavy duty pavement will be provided for all industrial access points to the building.

Architectural discussions centered around the following:

• The roof openings for removal for removing the gear do not have to be as large as shown in the presentation. Additionally, the Nose and Intermediate gear do not need a roof opening.

Only the Main Gear comes out vertically.

• Observation windows in the test cells should be replaced with closed circuit TV.

• Test cell walls need to be ballistically rated. T Winstead agreed to provide any standards for the ballistic design.

• Sound level is a consideration for design. The test cell output sound level is 110 decibels.

The maximum allowed sound level outside the test cells is 84 decibels.

• T Spellman Powell agreed to provide design drawings for the H1 test cell building.

• Louvers will need to be provided in the test cell walls for intake air. The exhaust air will be released through a second set of louvers.

• J Higgins agreed to provide drawings of the H-53E test equipment.

On the morning of Day 2 of the Charrette the design team visited the H-53E facility, the H-1

Facility and the P1066 site. The site visit wrapped up just after noon and the team returned to the meeting location at 1300. The afternoon discussion was primarily to discuss Architectural confirmations of the floor plan. There was a great deal of discussion and the changes requested by the user group and the results of these discussions are included as attachment (c), Day 2.

There was a brief discussion regarding Acoustics of the test cells and limiting the sound transfer to below 84 decibels. It was noted that acoustic rated louvers are typically twice the size of non-acoustic louvers. An acoustic study of the effects on the facilities around the P1066 facility will be provided as part of the design.

Following this there was a discussion of the ERGO stands to be used in the Assembly and

Disassembly rooms. The desire is to have 6 ERGO 750 and 2 ERGO 3000 stands in the Assembly

Room and 4 ERGO 750 and 2 ERGO 3000 stands in the Disassembly room. The session ended with a quick overview of what was to be discussed during the morning session of Day 3. There was a request for Clark Nexsen to provide a room layout of the Assembly and Disassembly rooms with the ERGO stands laid out.

The morning of Day 3 was taken up with a detailed room-by-room discussion, the results of which are included in attachment (c), Day 3. During these discussions, it was noted that due to its’ span, the bridge crane in the Main Gear Test Cell would need to have Navy Crane Center involvement.

During Day 3, an investigation of the existing stormwater pond intended for use as a discharge outlet took place. Stan Kegley with the environmental Affairs Division of MCAS informed us that the pond is not currently permitted or evaluated (hasn’t been in 10-15 years). EAD at this time does not know if the pond or the conveyance system can be used by this project. If a decision to use the pond by multiple projects is made, then the pond would have to be rehabilitated because it is not operating condition at this time. To be used, the pond will most likely need to be evaluated by

NCDEQ.

Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA) was discussed during the afternoon session with the group reviewing and updating the Risk Register. The revised CSRA documentation is included as attachment (d). The final item of business was to summarize the 3 day effort and to review the

Action Item List, attachment (e).

There were several items not discussed during the Charrette. These are included as part of this report as appendices. Please see the list of appendices below. The Cost Estimate is being provided only to NAVFAC MIDLANT per the scope of services.

The meeting concluded at approximately 1600. Please provide any comments or questions to S

Bennett at sbennett@clarknexsen.com, (757) 351-1159.

Steve Bennett PE

Senior Project Manager

Appendices:

1. P1066 Charrette Electrical Meeting Minutes

2. P1066 TISD Comments

3. P1066 Updated Charrette Civil Drawings mailto:sbennett@clarknexsen.com

Agenda

Call-In Number: (757) 828-4575, 664466293#

Tuesday 08 March 2022

0900 – 0930 Project Team Introductions / General Discussion / Expectations

• NAVFAC MIDLANT

• MCAS Cherry Point Project Stakeholders

• Facility Users

• Clark Nexsen

0930 – 1200 Clark Nexsen Presentation with Group Discussion

1200 – 1300 Lunch

1300 – 1630 Detailed Site Discussion with Input From:

• Civil Engineers

• Base Utilities

• Base Environmental

• ATFP

• Base Public Works

Breakout Sessions if/as identified in Morning Session

1630 – 1700 Day 1 Review and Wrap-Up, Assign Action Items & Breakout Results

Wednesday 09 March2022

0900 – 1100 Site Visit

1100 – 1200 Group Discuss Site Visit and Potential Impacts if Any

1200 – 1300 Lunch

1300 – 1430 Detailed Architectural Discussion – Space Types & Adjacencies

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

P: 757.455.5800 F: 757.455.5638

Project:

P1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Date: 08 – 10 March 2022 Comm #: 9287

Time:

0900 – 1700 Daily

Project Charrette

Location: Havelock Tourist & Event Center

Attachment (a)

Agenda

1430 – 1630 Interiors Room-By-Room FF&E Discussions

1630 – 1700 Day 2 Review and Wrap-Up, Assign Action Items & Breakout Results

Thursday 10 March 2022

0900 – 1200 Clark Nexsen Presentation of Revised Concept with Group Discussion

1200 – 1300 Lunch

1300 – 1500 CSRA Conference

1500 – 1530 Day 3 Review and Wrap-Up, Assign Action Items & Breakout Results

Name: Organization: Role/ Area of Responsibility: Phone: Email: Attend

Tracy Spellman Powell FRC East PM for FRC East 252-464-5018 tracy.r.spellman.civ@us.navy.mil X

Marc Patricelli COMNAVAIRSYSCOM Engineering Lead for Support Equipment marc.patricelli@navy.mil

William Gainey FLTREADCEN ECP NC Installation 1391 Development william.n.gainey@navy.mil X

Todd Winstead NAVAIRWARCENACDIV MD

PMA 261 Facilities Technical Lead - Primary Facilities - Manage technical documentation for testing facility michael.t.winstead.civ@us.navy.mil X

Tahir Shah NAWCAD NJ tahir.shah@navy.mil

Richard Finn PEOASWASM PAX MD richard.c.finn@navy.mil X

Neil Taylor FRCE Cherry Point Test Equipment Engineering - Team Leads 252-464-6359 neil.t.taylor@navy.mil

John Hinson FRC East Test Equipment Engineering Branch Head 252-464-8430 john.l.hinson@navy.mil

Patrick Townsend FRC East Division Head for Support and Test patrick.townsend@navy.mil

Joshua Guthrie USN Test Equipment Engineering - Team Leads joshua.guthrie@navy.mil

Robert Elfers USN FLTREADCEN ECP

Ancillary Equipment Support (Hydraulics, pneumatics, anything not specifically test equiopment) robert.elfers@navy.mil

Jordan Barns FRC East jordon.barnes@navy.mil

Erik Lewis FRC EAST Facilities Branch Head - Originator of the 1391 for the project erik.lewis@navy.mil

Ruby McDuffie FRC EAST Architecture ruby.mcduffie@navy.mil X

John Currie FRC East Physical Security Special/ 252-720-2559 john.currie@navy.mil

Vicki Lewis FRC East Environmental Planning vicki.l.lewis12.civ@us.navy.mil X

Stanley Kegley MCAS Cherry Point Environmental Planning stanley.kegley@usmc.mil

(Mary) "Christina" Hearn COMFRC COMFRC MILCON Lead (301)757-8209 mary.hearn@navy.mil

Brandee Ridway MCAS Cherry Point MCAS CHPT-Station Fire Inspector brandee.ridgway@usmc.mil

Elora Love FRCE Facilities Electrical Engineer 252-464-8831 elora.love@navy.mil X

Ken Wetherington FRC East Mechanical/HVAC 252-464-7817 kenneth.a.wetheringt@navy.mil

John Huber FRC East Security Operations Division - Branch Head john.d.huber@navy.mil

Angelo Owens FRC East Plant Safety Director angelo.owens@navy.mil

Annette Perry PMA H-53 Maintenance Program Coordinator (301) 757-2057 annette.perry@navy.mil

Ann Deans PMA 261 Industrial Program Coordinator/Depot Stand-up 252-241-1398 ann.deans@navy.mil X

Michael Rice FRC East Civil Engineer michael.l.rice@navy.mil X

Juan Padro Octaviani FRC East Mechanical HVAC juan.padrooctaviani@navy.mil X

Ryan Bass FRC East Safety ryan.bass@navy.mil

Thomas Brock FRC East Safety Office

Rodney Troup FRC East Safety

Travis Lowe FRC East Industrial Engineer

Al Wiebel CHPT - USMC Mission Assurance alan.b.weibel@usmc.mil X

Steven Miller CHPT - USMC Physical Security steven.p.miller4@usmc.mil

William "Terry" Kite CHPT - USMC william.kite@usmc.mil

Alvin Jonville CHPT - USMC Utilities alvin.fonville@usmc.mil X

Michelle Saczynski CHPT - USMC Civil Engineering michelle.saczynski@usmc.mil

Nicholas Hall CHPT - USMC Mechanical Engineering nicholas.a.hall@usmc.mil X

Nature of Meeting:

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

7 - 10 Mar 2022

Design Charrette

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

Virginia Beach, VA 23462

P: 757.455.5800

F: 757.455.5638

Date of Meeting:

Project Meeting Attendee List

FY23 MCON Projet P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox FacilityProject Name & Number:

Project Name & Number:

Attachment (b) mailto:marc.patricelli@navy.mil mailto:william.n.gainey@navy.mil mailto:michael.t.winstead.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:tahir.shah@navy.mil mailto:richard.c.finn@navy.mil mailto:neil.t.taylor@navy.mil mailto:patrick.townsend@navy.mil mailto:joshua.guthrie@navy.mil mailto:robert.elfers@navy.mil mailto:jordon.barnes@navy.mil mailto:vicki.l.lewis12.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:kenneth.a.wetheringt@navy.mil mailto:alan.b.weibel@usmc.mil

Nature of Meeting:

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

7 - 10 Mar 2022

Design Charrette

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

Virginia Beach, VA 23462

P: 757.455.5800

F: 757.455.5638

Date of Meeting:

Project Meeting Attendee List

FY23 MCON Projet P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox FacilityProject Name & Number:

Project Name & Number:

Philip Lawrence MCAS Cherry Point MCAS CHPT-Station Fire Inspector phillip.lawrence@usmc.mil

Heather Perry Cherry Point Architecture heather.perry@usmc.mil

Brian Cousert COMFLTREADCEN H53 Gearbox Shop Supervisor brian.cousert@navy.mil X

Ashley Dixon works with Brian Cousert X

Ralph Merrill FRC East Electrical Engineer 252-464-5845 ralph.merrill.ctr@navy.mil X

David Girard FRCE Cybersecurity Branch Command Information Systems Security Manager - Cybersecurity POC 252-464-7242 david.girard@navy.mil

Curtis Haney FRCE Cybersecurity 252-464-5614 curtis.haney@navy.mil

George Cronk Station TISD S-6 Communications Director 252-466-4301 george.cronk@usmc.mil

Nicholas Hall FCRE Facilities Engineer 252-466-4723 X

Andrew Miller FCRE 252-466-2396

Allen McDonald NAVFAC MIDLANT Project Manager 757-642-7561 kenneth.a.mcdonald18.civ@us.navy.mil X

Bimal Shrestha NAVFAC MIDLANT Strucural Engineer / Design Manager 757-341-0339 bimal.shrestha.civ@navy.mil X

Lara Patton NAVFAC MIDLANT Geotechnical lara.patton.ctr@navy.mil X

Angela Jones NAVFAC MIDLANT Environmental Design Specialist 757-341-0142 angela.jones1@navy.mil

Justin Urquhart NAVFAC MIDLANT Electrical justin.urquhart@navy.mil X

Ralph (Kelsey) Foster NAVFAC MIDLANT Fire Protection Engineer 803-528-1373 ralph.foster.ctr@navy.mil X

Bruce Schlesier NAVFAC MIDLANT Cost Engineer 757-384-6119 bruce.e.schlesier.ctr@us.navy.mil X

Marshall Crow NAVFAC MIDLANT Architecture marshall.crow@navy.mil

Gyasi Cooke NAVFAC MIDLANT Archtecture X

Rachel Martin NAVFAC MIDLANT Structural rachel.a.martin@navy.mil

Alisa Parker NAVFAC MIDLANT Mechanical 757-341-2072 alisa.parker@navy.mil X

Amy Ballard NAVFAC MIDLANT Civil - Primary 757-589-4863 amy.ballard.ctr@navy.mil

Ann Perry NAVFAC MIDLANT Interior Design 757-341-0141 virginia.perry@navy.mil X

Avery Long NAVFAC MIDLANT ATFP / Fall Protection 757-341-2029 avery.b.long@navy.mil X

Amy McKay NAVFAC MIDLANT Landscape Architect 757-341-0141 amy.mckay@navy.mil

Will Speidel NAVFAC MIDLANT Landscape Architect 757-341-0164 william.l.speidel.civ@us.navy.mil

Mary Ann DuRant NAVFAC MIDLANT Civil - Assisting 757-636-9097 maryann.durant@navy.mil X

Steve Wells NAVFAC MIDLANT Mechanical Supervisor steven.c.wells1@navy.mil X

Sam Estep Clark Nexsen Managing Principal 757-961-7892 sestep@clarknexsen.com

Steve Bennett Clark Nexsen Project Manager 757-351-1159 sbennett@clarknexsen.com

Chase Beshore Clark Nexsen Senior Architect / Discipline Lead 757-961-7707 cbeshore@ClarkNexsen.com X

Dan Hansinger Clark Nexsen Architecture / Design Manager 757-961-7761 dhansinger@clarknexsen.com X

Melodi E. Terhune Clark Nexsen Interior Design 757.961.7748 mterhune@clarknexsen.com X

Chrisa Mitchell Clark Nexsen Civil 757-961-7958 cmitchell@clarknexsen.com X

Courtney Barrett Clark Nexsen Civil 757.961.7715 Courtney.Barrett@clarknexsen.com X

Erin Horton Clark Nexsen Landscape 757-961-7927 ehorton@clarknexsen.com X

Tyler Robinson Clark Nexsen Structural 919-576-2086 trobinson@clarknexsen.com X

Ron Keller Clark Nexsen Electrical 757-961-7889 rkeller@clarknexsen.com X

Jackie Eury Clark Nexsen Electrical 757-961-7981 jeury@clarknexsen.com X

William Castelvecchi Clark Nexsen Mechanical 757-961-7783 wcastelvecchi@clarknexsen.com X mailto:heather.perry@usmc.mil mailto:david.girard@navy.mil mailto:bimal.shrestha.civ@navy.mil mailto:bruce.e.schlesier.ctr@us.navy.mil mailto:alisa.parker@navy.mil mailto:amy.ballard.ctr@navy.mil mailto:virginia.perry@navy.mil mailto:avery.b.long@navy.mil mailto:amy.mckay@navy.mil mailto:william.l.speidel.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:sestep@clarknexsen.com mailto:sbennett@clarknexsen.com mailto:cbeshore@ClarkNexsen.com mailto:dhansinger@clarknexsen.com mailto:mterhune@clarknexsen.com mailto:cmitchell@clarknexsen.com mailto:Courtney.Barrett@clarknexsen.com mailto:ehorton@clarknexsen.com mailto:trobinson@clarknexsen.com mailto:rkeller@clarknexsen.com mailto:jeury@clarknexsen.com mailto:wcastelvecchi@clarknexsen.com

Nature of Meeting:

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

7 - 10 Mar 2022

Design Charrette

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

Virginia Beach, VA 23462

P: 757.455.5800

F: 757.455.5638

Date of Meeting:

Project Meeting Attendee List

FY23 MCON Projet P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox FacilityProject Name & Number:

Project Name & Number:

Melissa Durrant Clark Nexsen Plumbing 757-961-7734 melissa.durrant@clarknexsen.com X

Tom Jackson Clark Nexsen Fire Protection 757.351.1201 thomas.jackson@clarknexsen.com X

Chris Born Clark Nexsen Fire Protection 757-961-7933 cborn@clarknexsen.com X

Jerry Stalls GET Solutions, Inc. Geotechnical 757-518-1703 bspiro@getsolutionsinc.com

Ryan Leech Crawford Consulting Cost Estimating 412-823-0400 x244 rleech@crawfordcs.com X

Tom Wiggins Crawford Consulting Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA) 404-723-2021 twiggins@crawfordcs.com

Jeff Kwolkoski Wave Engineering Acoustical Design Services 720-446-9283 JeffK@waveengineering.us X

Ben Seep Wave Engineering Acoustical Design Services bens@waveengineering.us

James Chen Coffman Engineers Cybersecurity X

Donte Johnson donte.r.johnson@usmc.mil

Cliff Games CHPT Engineering Supervisory (252) 464-5504 clifton.game@navy.mil

Autumn Williams CHPT Civil Engineer (252) 464-5176 autumn.l.williams@navy.mil

Jay Mixon CHPT Asset Manager 252-466-2378 james.mixon@us.navy.mil

Meri Hancock

Elmore Thornton

William Wescott CHPT EAD NEPA Coordinator 252-466-5870 william.g.wescott@usmc.mil X

Tommy Lamm FRC East Business Office 252-464-5060 tommy.e.lamm@us.navy.mil X mailto:melissa.durrant@clarknexsen.com mailto:thomas.jackson@clarknexsen.com mailto:cborn@clarknexsen.com mailto:bspiro@getsolutionsinc.com mailto:rleech@crawfordcs.com mailto:bens@waveengineering.us mailto:donte.r.johnson@usmc.mil mailto:clifton.game@navy.mil mailto:autumn.l.williams@navy.mil mailto:james.mixon@us.navy.mil mailto:william.g.wescott@usmc.mil mailto:tommy.e.lamm@us.navy.mil

Charrette Day 1

FY23 P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility FDA

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina

N40085-19-D-9041, eProjects WON 1684760

08 March 2022

WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS

Jacqueline Eury PE, LC

Electrical Engineer jeury@clarknexsen.com

Ron Keller Senior Electrical Designer rkeller@clarknexsen.com

Pete Allen PE, SE, LEED AP BD+C

Senior Structural Engineer pallen@clarknexsen.com

Dan Hansinger Senior Architectural Designer dhansinger@clarknexsen.com

Steve Bennett PE

Senior Project Manager sbennett@clarknexsen.com

Chris Born PE, LEED AP

Senior Fire Protection Engineer cborn@clarknexsen.com

Erin Horton PLA, ASLA, LEED AP BD+C

Senior Landscape Architect ehorton@clarknexsen.com

Chrisa Mitchell PE, PACP

Senior Civil Engineer cmitchell@clarknexsen.com

Sam Estep PE, LEED AP

Managing Principal sestep@clarknexsen.com

Chase Beshore AIA, GGP, GPCP, LEED AP BD+C

Design Manager / Senior Architect cbeshore@clarknexsen.com

Melodi Terhune CID, ASID, LEED AP BD+C

Senior Interior Designer mterhune@clarknexsen.com

Will Castelvecchi PE, GPCP, LEED GA

Mechanical Engineer wcastelvecchi@clarknexsen.com

Clark Nexsen P1066 Project Team P ro je ct

L e ad e rs h ip

P ro je ct

T e am

ALL PROJECT CORRESPONDENCE GOES THROUGH PM & DM

Courtney Barrett Civil Engineer Graduate courtney.barrett@clarknexsen.com

Tom Jackson EIT

Fire Protection Engineer EIT thomas.jackson@clarknexsen.com

Melissa Durrant Plumbing Designer melissa.durrant@clarknexsen.com mailto:cmitchell@clarknexsen.com mailto:rkeller@clarknexsen.com mailto:pallen@clarknexsen.com mailto:cmitchell@clarknexsen.com mailto:bsnyder@clarknexsen.com mailto:cborn@clarknexsen.com mailto:tdalton@clarknexsen.com mailto:cmitchell@clarknexsen.com mailto:sestep@clarknexsen.com mailto:cbeshore@clarknexsen.com mailto:sdrew@clarknexsen.com mailto:sbeccia@clarknexsen.com mailto:Courtney.barrett@clarknexsen.com mailto:Thomas.jackson@clarknexsen.com mailto:melissa.durrant@clarknexsen.com

MEETING PURPOSE & GOALS

Project Goals and Team Expectations

Project Goals

• Clearly understand project Users & understand the Mission

• Create a facility that supports the Users & the Mission

• Identify risks & anticipate action items before they become critical

• Encourage in-depth collaboration

Team Expectations

• Timely communication

• Effective preparation

• Mutual respect

Charrette Objectives

• Confirm all Program information necessary to move to detailed design

• Confirm workflow within the facility and relationships to other functions / facilities on base

• Confirm site conditions

• Confirm information on all building equipment and workflows

• Confirm locations of existing infrastructure and tie-in points

• Understanding of building functions and programming requirements

• Confirm building systems requirements, i.e., mechanical system, electrical system, UPS / backup systems, fire protection systems, security requirements, etc.

• Agreed upon site plan

• Agreed upon floor plans, exterior aesthetics, roof design

OVERVIEW & OPENING COMMENTS

SCOPE & BUDGET

Project Overview

Project - Per 14 Dec 2021 Contract

SAES

• Facility Size: 31,624 SF

• Project Budget: $37,020,000

• ECC: $33,350,000

• Design-To ECC: $30,015,000

A/E Scope:

Completion of design from PDA 15% design to Final design

Including:

Plans & Specifications

Basis of Design

Cost Estimate

Calculations & Design Analysis

Meetings & Field Investigation

Engineering Services

DISCIPLINE OVERVIEWS

Civil & Landscape

Project Location

1. P1066 H53 Gearbox Facility

2. P991 Gearbox Facility

3. P974 Engineering Support Building

4. P990 VLF Test Facility

5. P995 Maintenance Facility

NC 101 / Fontana Blvd.

Project Site

1. P1066 H53 Gearbox Facility

2. P991 Gearbox Facility

3. P974 Engineering Support Building

Site Plan

Site Plan

Civil / Site

Items to Confirm

• Hazardous Material Storage

• Parking within the ATFP limits

• Exterior Site Activities

• Utility Connection Points and Capacity

• Domestic Water

• Connect on MCAS with the addition of a booster & dosing station OR Connect to the City of Havelock within Fontana Blvd

• Size of line connection to City/County main

• Sanitary Sewer

• Pump station replacement to be sized for future complex

Architecture / Interior Design

P991–Gear Box Repair Facility

Pump House

P990–Vertical Lift Fan Test Facility

Architectural / Interior Design

Discussion Items

• Confirm adjacencies and workflow within the facility

• Discuss test cell openings in building

• Room-by-room discussion to follow

• Confirm finishes

• Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E)

• Validate items, quantity, location and layout

• Clarify what is FF&E, GFGI, GFCI, CFCI

Test Equipment

Gearbox Test Stands

Main Gear Box (MGB) Test Stand

** Notional figures taken from Piasecki Feasibility Study for CH-53K Drive System Gearbox Production Testing, dated 17 November 2014

Tail / Intermediate (T / I-GB) Gear Box Test Stand

** Notional figures taken from Piasecki Feasibility Study for CH-53K Drive System Gearbox Production Testing, dated 17 November 2014

Nose Gear Box (NGB)

** Notional figures taken from Piasecki Feasibility Study for CH-53K Drive System Gearbox Production Testing, dated 17 November 2014

Structural

• Risk Category II; Wind 139mph, Seismic B

• Framing Systems

• Steel roof framing (deck, joists)

• Removeable hatches

• 12” CMU walls, grouted

• Foundation/Slab Systems

• Preliminary Geotech

• Anticipate shallow foundations

• Anticipate slab-on-grade

• Typically 8” thick, (4” to 12” range)

• Overhead Bridge Cranes

• (2) 2-ton, (3) 5-ton

• Steel runway beams, supported by steel columns / haunches

• Stabilized by main roof diaphragm

• Required hook heights?

• Coverage extents

• Test Cell Requirements - INFO NEEDED

• Anchorage requirements

• Rigidly anchored?

• Anchor rods, Soleplates?

• Vibration tolerances?

• Foundation Mats (“Inertia Bases”)

• ~5’ thick isolated MGB mat?

• NGB and T/I-GB mats – similar?

• Pile-supported?

• Roof Hatches size/locations?

• Wall Performance needs?

• Acoustical performance

• Impact/ballistic protection?

Fire Protection

• Facility construction type, fire ratings, occupant load, and egress shall comply with the requirements of:

• UFC 1-200-01

• UFC 3-600-01

• 2018 International Building Code

• 2018 NFPA 101

• Facility will be protected by wet-pipe sprinkler system (supplied by local fire pump and tanks)

• Facility to be provided with a combined fire alarm and mass notification system in accordance with UFC 3-600-01, UFC 4-021-01, & NFPA 72

• Items to confirm:

• Decision of removable roof panels – impact to sprinkler system

• Existing pump house serving dedicated fire water loop

Plumbing

Plumbing

• Applicable Criteria:

• 2018 IPC

• NFPA 54-2018 National Fuel Gas Code

• UFC 1-200-02 High Performance Sustainable Building

• UFC 3-420-01 Plumbing Systems

• UFC 3-420-02FA Compressed Air

• Sustainable Design:

• Low flow EPA WaterSense labeled fixtures

• Specialty Systems:

• Compressed air system

Mechanical

Mechanical Design Considerations

• Equipment Location

• Dedicated Outdoor Air Unit, Pumps, Boilers, in the mechanical room

• Fan Coil Units located throughout the space.

• Air-cooled chiller located outside on pad.

• Sustainability & Energy Efficiency

• Guiding principles

• Third Party Certified – compliance method?

Mechanical Scope

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

• 4 systems analyzed:

•Direct Expansion Split System with Gas Heat

•Water Source Heat Pump with DOAS and local closed-circuit coolers

•Fan Coil Units with DOAS and water-cooled chiller

•Fan Coil Units with DOAS and air-cooled chiller

•Selected option 4, FCU with DOAS and air-cooled chiller

•Energy Efficient

•System common on base

Continuous exhaust of test cell rooms during testing

Mechanical Zone Diagram

HVAC

• Questions:

• Process load cooling design scoping

• Base-specific design requirements, mechanical design preferences

• Other discussion topics:

• Cybersecurity system security rating

• AT / FP

• Corrosion protection for outdoor equipment

• Commissioning / OPR’s

• Base DDC monitoring requirements beyond UFC

• Advanced metering infrastructure

• Base water quality and water treatment for process cooling towers

Electrical

Electrical Site

Electrical Power Main Power Sources

• Utility voltage is 12.47kV

• Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI Meter) at the utility service transformer(s)

• The facility will include transformers and switchgear compatible with utility provisions. Power would be distributed via a main distribution panel (MDP), and with distribution sub-panels (DP) throughout the building. Each test stand area would have a separate distribution service (DS) for operational equipment. The test stand contractor would extend their requirements from the

DS.

Design Based on Guiding Principles

• Power Density

• Voltage Drop

• Equipment Efficiency

• Lighting Controls

• Special Equipment Requirements

Main Building Power Distribution

• Voltage for main building loads would be at 480y/277v, 3 phase, 4 wire

• Dry Type Step Down Transformers will be utilized for 208v and 120v loads respectively

Special Equipment

• Overhead Crane(s)

• Test Stands

Test Stands

Main Gearbox

Nose Gearbox

Intermediate/Tail Gearbox

Dimensions L/W/H (ft) 28/20/18 12/15/8 12/24/9

Weight (lb) 360,000 54,000 82,000

Concrete Pad Thickness (ft) 5 5 2

Electrical Power (VAC/KVA) 480/3600 480/1600 480/700

Process Cooling Water (GPM) 530 170 115

Cooling Air Capacity (KW) 220 100 40

Main Gearbox

Nose Gearbox

Intermediate/Tail Gearbox

Dimensions L/W/H (ft) 38/24/24 20/20/12 15/15/14

Weight (lb) 315,000 125,000 125,000

Concrete Pad Thickness (ft) 5 2 2

Electrical Power (VAC/KVA) 4160/2500 4160/2500 4160/2500

Process Cooling Water (GPM) 215 56 31

Cooling Air Capacity (KW) 15-45C Cell Ambient Temp

Mechanical Regenerative Test Stands Electrical Regenerative Test Stands

** Notional figures taken from Piasecki Feasibility Study for CH-53K Drive System Gearbox Production Testing, dated 17 November 2014

Lighting

Interior Areas

• All lights will be LED (Interior and exterior)

• Bi-Level Switching and automatic controls in areas where it is applicable and controls in accordance with UFC 3-530-01 design criteria

• Daylighting dimming controls in applicable areas

Emergency Lighting

• Unit battery powered lighting fixtures along the paths of egress per 101 Life Safety Code

Exterior Lighting

• Site lighting covering paved areas within the facilities site boundaries

• Building mounted perimeter lighting and covered canopy lighting

Grounding

Facility Grounding and Surge Protection

• Power premise wiring will be provided with equipment grounding conductor(s).

• SPD (Surge Protection Device) and Ground Fault Protection will be provided at the service entrance.

• SPD (Surge Protection Device) will be provided at the distribution/branch panels feeding sensitive electronic equipment and lighting panels feeding exterior loads.

• Telecom equipment and associated cable tray(s) will be bonded/grounded to a dedicated communications grounding bus.

Lightning Protection System

• A complete UL Master Label lightning protection system will be provided conforming to NFPA 780 and UFC 3-575-01, Which will include an exterior building perimeter counterpoise.

Telecommunications and Electronic Security Systems

Telecommunications

• Service the facility will be (1) 12 strand SM outside plant fiber and (1) 25 pair outside plant copper to a dedicated telecommunications room

• Building outlets are to receive (2) NIPRNet CAT6 data jacks and

(2) CAT6 voice jacks for horizontal every drop

• Confirm no other special communications related system is required, i.e. WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) coverage, etc.

Confirmation of Systems Required

Confirmation for the following systems:

• ESS (Electric Security System)

• Infrastructure for GFGI devices

• ACS (Access Control System)

• Confirm not required.

• IDS (Intrusion Detection System)

• Confirm not required.

• CCTV (Closed Circuit Television)

• Remote monitoring from Control Rooms?

• CATV (Cable Access Television)

• Interior infrastructure for future local provider service.

Cybersecurity

Design Criteria

• UFC 4-010-06 Cybersecurity of Facility-Related Control Systems

• Other Governing documents, i.e., local regulations?

Anticipated facility-Related Control Systems (FRCS)

• Applicable FRCS

• System Owner (SO)

• Authorizing Officer (AO)

• Existing ATO status

Assignment of Confidentiality, Integrity & Availability (C-I-A) impact ratings by AO

Develop Control Correlation Identifier (CCI) List for each FRCS per UFC 4-010-06

Cybersecurity

Deliverables:

• Cybersecurity Basis of Design, including FRCS, C-I-A Impact ratings and CCI Lists

• Specification 25 08 11 (RMF?)

• Specification 25 05 11.xx

Open Discussion

Cost Estimating

Cost Estimating

Full Cost Estimate in MII software

Basis of Cost Estimate Description

Construction Schedule

CSRA

Proposed Schedule

Design Schedule

Kickoff Meeting (phone): 01 Mar 2022

Charrette & CSRA Conference: 8 – 10 Mar 2022

Draft Charrette Report: 17 Mar 2022 with Government Review complete 24 Mar 2022

Final Charrette Report: 31 Mar 2022

DD (50%) Design Submittal: 16 May 2022 with Govt Review complete 6 Jun 2022

DD (50% Design Review Meeting: 8 Jun 2022

Prefinal (100%) Design Submittal: 8 Sep 2022 with Govt Review complete 30 Sep 2022

Prefinal (100%) Design Review Meeting: 4 Oct 2022

Final Design Submittal: 21 Oct 2022 with Govt Review complete 11 Nov 2022

Final Review Meeting: 9 Nov 2022

IFC Submittal: 2 Dec 2022

Schedule Breakout Sessions

Thank you!

© 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS

P-1061, P-987, P-1060, P995, P-1066, P-992, P-990, DLA

Hancock Village P-990, P-993, P-1055, P-1066, P-1100, 1 inch = 360 feet

28 February 2022

5R

P-1100

FY21

4933 4932

P-993

FY25

P-990

FY21

4852 4853

NF20-0219

FY22

P-1066

FY23

P-992

FY29

P-993

FY25

NF20-0219

FY22

P-1060

FY27

P-987

FY29

P-993

FY25

P-1055

FY27

P-1061

FY28

DLA

FY25

P

P-995

FY24

NEW PERIMETER FENCE

COORDINATED WITH

P-993. P1060 WILL

NEED TO REVISE

THIS WILL BECOME

SHARED 20' DRIVEWAY

FOR P-1060

PURPLE OUTLINE

SHOWS APPROX.

PROJECT LIMITS (NOT

INCLUDING UTILS)

MINOR COORD.

REQUIRED B/W P-1066

AND P-993 ROAD AND

PARKING.

NEW LOCATION FOR

P-992. ADJUST

SQUARE FOOTAGE TO

INDICATE A 2-STORY

BUILDING (HALF

FOOTPRINT SIZE)

REVISED PER P-995 CDW

Attachment (c), Day 1

4,472 SF

ASSEMBLY

1,246 SF

MECHANICAL

ROOM

1,244 SF

TOOL ROOM

4,704 SF

MAIN AISLE

639 SF

FLUSHING

AREA

426 SF

MAINTENANCE

STORAGE

1,683 SF

NGB TEST

CELL

289 SF

T/I-GB

CONTROL

ROOM

1,682 SF

T/I-GB TEST

CELL

4,140 SF

MGB TEST

CELL

299 SF

MGB

CONTROL

ROOM

1,211 SF

STAGING

ADMIN

ASSEMBLY

CIRCULATION/STAGING

DISASSEMBLY

FLUSHING AREA

PROD.CTRL/CLN. PARTS

STORAGE

SUPPORT

TEST CELLS

1 2

A

B

5 - TON O.H. CRANE

250'-0"

8'

-0

1,700 SF

PRODUCTION

CONTROL

CLEAN

PARTS

2,305 SF

DISASSEMBLY

391 SF

ELEC

96 SF

COMM

5 - TON O.H. CRANE

2 - TON O.H. CRANE2 - TON O.H. CRANE 5 - TON O.H. CRANE

543 SF

BREAK

ROOM

211 SF

WOMEN

212 SF

MEN

30 SF

JANITOR

280 SF

OFFICE

305 SF

SUPERVISOR

OFFICE

80 SF

VESTIBULE

178 SF

CORRIDOR

142 SF

MEN

LOCKER

ROOM

103 SF

WOMEN

LOCKER

ROOM

'-4

4"

257 SF

NGB

CONTROL

ROOM

AE301

AE301

'-0

'-0

15'-0" 12'-0"

12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0"

'-4

12'-4" 12'-4"

'-1

0"

'-0

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

DES DRW CHK

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

D E

P A

R T

M E

N T

O F

T H

E N

A V

Y N

A V

A L

F A

C

IL

IT

IE

S E

N G

IN

E

E R

IN

G

S Y

S T

E M

S C

O M

M A

N D

DRAWFORM REVISION: 25 AUGUST 2020

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

N A

V A

L F

A C

IL

IT

IE

S

E N

G

IN

E E

R

IN

G S

Y S

T E

M S

C O

M M

A N

D

M

ID

-A T

LA

N

T

IC

N A

V A

L S

T A

T

IO

N

N O

R F

O L

K

N O

R F

O L

K

AS NOTED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

U N

C

LA

S S

IF

IE

D

REVISED FINAL

PDA

SUBMISSION

24 MARCH 2021

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 757.455.5800

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

AE101

P H

G

E A

R B

O X

F A

C

IL

IT

Y

F

IR

S T

F

LO

O R

P

LA

N

CheckerDesigner Author

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

, N C

M C

A S

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

3/32" = 1'-0"

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

TOTAL GSF: 31627 SF

ROOM SCHEDULE

NAME Area

ASSEMBLY 4,472 SF

BREAK ROOM 543 SF

CANOPY 42 SF

CANOPY 35 SF

CANOPY 276 SF

CANOPY 80 SF

CANOPY 33 SF

COMM 96 SF

CORRIDOR 178 SF

DISASSEMBLY 2,305 SF

ELEC 391 SF

FLUSHING AREA 639 SF

JANITOR 30 SF

MAIN AISLE 4,704 SF

MAINTENANCE STORAGE 426 SF

MECHANICAL ROOM 1,246 SF

MEN 212 SF

MEN LOCKER ROOM 142 SF

MGB CONTROL ROOM 299 SF

MGB TEST CELL 4,140 SF

NGB CONTROL ROOM 257 SF

NGB TEST CELL 1,683 SF

OFFICE 280 SF

PRODUCTION CONTROL CLEAN

PARTS

1,700 SF

STAGING 1,211 SF

SUPERVISOR OFFICE 305 SF

T/I-GB CONTROL ROOM 289 SF

T/I-GB TEST CELL 1,682 SF

TOOL ROOM 1,244 SF

VESTIBULE 80 SF

WOMEN 211 SF

WOMEN LOCKER ROOM 103 SF

S Y

M D

E S

C R

IP

T

IO

N

D A

T E

A P

P R

12'-4"

33'-4 1/2"

84 db max can emit from this area

84 db max can emit from this area

84 db max can emit from this area mirror building

1 2

A

B

REMOVABLE ROOF PANELS

AE301

AE301

REMOVABLE ROOF PANELS

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

DES DRW CHK

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

D E

P A

R T

M E

N T

O F

T H

E N

A V

Y N

A V

A L

F A

C

IL

IT

IE

S E

N G

IN

E

E R

IN

G

S Y

S T

E M

S C

O M

M A

N D

DRAWFORM REVISION: 25 AUGUST 2020

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

N A

V A

L F

A C

IL

IT

IE

S

E N

G

IN

E E

R

IN

G S

Y S

T E

M S

C O

M M

A N

D

M

ID

-A T

LA

N

T

IC

N A

V A

L S

T A

T

IO

N

N O

R F

O L

K

N O

R F

O L

K

AS NOTED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

U N

C

LA

S S

IF

IE

D

REVISED FINAL

PDA

SUBMISSION

24 MARCH 2021

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 757.455.5800

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

AE102

P H

G

E A

R B

O X

F A

C

IL

IT

Y

R O

O F

P

LA

N

CheckerDesigner Author

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

, N C

M C

A S

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

3/32" = 1'-0"

ROOF PLAN

S Y

M D

E S

C R

IP

T

IO

N

D A

T E

A P

P R

Discussion of building mechanical systems and process cooling needs for the test stand equipment.

Discussion Items:

Compressed air system:

~30 total drops per building; 5-6 per test/assembly/disassembly room

1-2 connections in a manifold per drop

Need to have a conversation about the natural gas point of connection.

PDA identified the Piedmont Gas main along Fontana Blvd

Confirmed by Alvin to be the best point of connection

DDC System:

Similar to other FRC buildings

Focus on dehumidification

All coil temperatures

Additional point space for test cell cooling system monitoring

Room by room requirement review for cooling needs in test cells. Do the test cells need to be cooled when not in use? Or only heated and ventilated?

Test stand manufacturer will handle the design of the process load cooling system.

Test stand heat load information is needed to design the exhaust/ventilation system for cooling the stands while in operation.

Will Castelvecchi PE, GPCP, LEED Green Associate

Mechanical Engineer

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400

Project: P1066 H-53K Gearbox Facility

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Date: March 8 - 10, 2022 Comm #: 9287

Purpose: Mechanical Breakout Session Minutes

Prepared by: Will Castelvecchi

4,472 SF

ASSEMBLY

1,246 SF

MECHANICAL

ROOM

1,244 SF

TOOL ROOM

4,704 SF

MAIN AISLE

639 SF

FLUSHING

AREA

426 SF

MAINTENANCE

STORAGE

1,683 SF

NGB TEST

CELL

289 SF

T/I-GB

CONTROL

ROOM

1,682 SF

T/I-GB TEST

CELL

4,140 SF

MGB TEST

CELL

299 SF

MGB

CONTROL

ROOM

1,211 SF

STAGING

ADMIN

ASSEMBLY

CIRCULATION/STAGING

DISASSEMBLY

FLUSHING AREA

PROD.CTRL/CLN. PARTS

STORAGE

SUPPORT

TEST CELLS

1 2

A

B

5 - TON O.H. CRANE

250'-0"

8'

-0

1,700 SF

PRODUCTION

CONTROL

CLEAN

PARTS

2,305 SF

DISASSEMBLY

391 SF

ELEC

96 SF

COMM

5 - TON O.H. CRANE

2 - TON O.H. CRANE2 - TON O.H. CRANE 5 - TON O.H. CRANE

543 SF

BREAK

ROOM

211 SF

WOMEN

212 SF

MEN

30 SF

JANITOR

280 SF

OFFICE

305 SF

SUPERVISOR

OFFICE

80 SF

VESTIBULE

178 SF

CORRIDOR

142 SF

MEN

LOCKER

ROOM

103 SF

WOMEN

LOCKER

ROOM

'-4

4"

257 SF

NGB

CONTROL

ROOM

AE301

AE301

'-0

'-0

15'-0" 12'-0"

12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0"

'-4

12'-4" 12'-4"

'-1

0"

'-0

SATISFACTORY TO DATE

APPROVED

ACTIVITY

FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC

SEAL

A/E INFO

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

A

B

C

D

SCALE:

CONSTR. CONTR. NO.

SHEET

NAVFAC DRAWING NO.

DES DRW CHK

OF

EPROJECT NO.:

D E

P A

R T

M E

N T

O F

T H

E N

A V

Y N

A V

A L

F A

C

IL

IT

IE

S E

N G

IN

E

E R

IN

G

S Y

S T

E M

S C

O M

M A

N D

DRAWFORM REVISION: 25 AUGUST 2020

PM/DM

BRANCH MANAGER

CHIEF ENG/ARCH

FIRE PROTECTION

N A

V A

L F

A C

IL

IT

IE

S

E N

G

IN

E E

R

IN

G S

Y S

T E

M S

C O

M M

A N

D

M

ID

-A T

LA

N

T

IC

N A

V A

L S

T A

T

IO

N

N O

R F

O L

K

N O

R F

O L

K

AS NOTED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

U N

C

LA

S S

IF

IE

D

REVISED FINAL

PDA

SUBMISSION

24 MARCH 2021

4525 Main Street, Suite 1400 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 757.455.5800

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

AE101

P H

G

E A

R B

O X

F A

C

IL

IT

Y

F

IR

S T

F

LO

O R

P

LA

N

CheckerDesigner Author

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

, N C

M C

A S

C H

E R

R Y

P O

IN

T

3/32" = 1'-0"

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

TOTAL GSF: 31627 SF

ROOM SCHEDULE

NAME Area

ASSEMBLY 4,472 SF

BREAK ROOM 543 SF

CANOPY 42 SF

CANOPY 35 SF

CANOPY 276 SF

CANOPY 80 SF

CANOPY 33 SF

COMM 96 SF

CORRIDOR 178 SF

DISASSEMBLY 2,305 SF

ELEC 391 SF

FLUSHING AREA 639 SF

JANITOR 30 SF

MAIN AISLE 4,704 SF

MAINTENANCE STORAGE 426 SF

MECHANICAL ROOM 1,246 SF

MEN 212 SF

MEN LOCKER ROOM 142 SF

MGB CONTROL ROOM 299 SF

MGB TEST CELL 4,140 SF

NGB CONTROL ROOM 257 SF

NGB TEST CELL 1,683 SF

OFFICE 280 SF

PRODUCTION CONTROL CLEAN

PARTS

1,700 SF

STAGING 1,211 SF

SUPERVISOR OFFICE 305 SF

T/I-GB CONTROL ROOM 289 SF

T/I-GB TEST CELL 1,682 SF

TOOL ROOM 1,244 SF

VESTIBULE 80 SF

WOMEN 211 SF

WOMEN LOCKER ROOM 103 SF

S Y

M D

E S

C R

IP

T

IO

N

D A

T E

A P

P R

18' wide X 14' high overhead panel door

18' wide X 14' high sliding door

12' wide X 14' high sliding door

12' wide X 14' high sliding door

15'w X 14h vertical lift panel door

15'w X 14h vertical lift panel door15'w X 14h vertical lift panel door

12' wide X 14' high vertical lift panel door align doors across where possible small gearbox staging

18' wide X 14' high vertical lift panel door

76'-9 3/4"

'-1

45'-8"

'-5

15' wide X 14' high

12' wide X 14' high 12' wide X 14' high

Production control, E & E, clean parts

35' hook height/40' +/-clear to structure

76'-5 1/2"

'-1

25' hook height/30' +/-clear to structure

25' hook height/30' +/-clear to structure

20' hook height/25' +/-clear to structure

20' hook height/25' +/-clear to structure

Attachment (c), Day 2

Room by Room Review P-1066 H-53K Gearbox Facility

MCAS Cherry Point, NC

(CN 9287)

March 10, 2022

P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility

P-1066 H-53K Gearbox Facility Floor Plan

See P1066_Furniture Plan_Day 3_with notes (attached) for additional comments and information on floor/furniture plan layouts

P-1066 CH-53K Gearbox Facility Floor Plan

Entry and Break Room

Vestibule

Corridor

• RECESSED ENTRY MAT

• EPOXY PAINTED CMU WALLS AND GYPSUM

CEILING

• NON-SLIP DECORATIVE EPOXY RESINOUS

FLOORING

• PAINTED CMU WALLS AND GYPSUM CEILING

• COMMAND BOARD

Break Room

• NON-SLIP DECORATIVE EPOXY RESINOUS

FLOORING or LVT?

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• INCLUDING ACCENT

• SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING

• LAMINATE CASEWORK WITH SOLID SURFACE

COUNTERTOPS

• FULL HEIGHT DECORATIVE TILE

BACKSPLASH

• SOLID SURFACE WINDOWSILLS

Not required

Decorative flake - monolithic

Decorative flake - monolithic

Entry and Break Room– Concept Items

WALL CLOCK4

WASTE/RECYCLING53 SQUARE TABLE2 CHAIR

1 COMMAND BOARD Not required flip/nest if possible

50/50 arms/armless confirmed dual compartment confirmed no time zone clocks are needed

Restrooms and Offices

Restrooms/Locker Rooms

Janitor

• PORCELAIN TILE FLOOR AND WALLS (FULL

HEIGHT)

• EPOXY PAINTED GYPSUM CEILING

• HDPE TOILET PARTITIONS AND LOCKERS

• SOLID SURFACE SHOWER RECEPTORS AND

WALLS

• SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOPS

• NON-SLIP EPOXY RESINOUS FLOORING

• FRP WALL PANELS, FULL HEIGHT

• TERRAZZO MOP SINK WITH STAINLESS STEEL

SURROUND

• EPOXY PAINTED GYPSUM CEILING

Offices

• NON-SLIP DECORATIVE EPOXY RESINOUS

• CONSIDER HYBRID RESILIENT/CARPET

PRODUCT SUCH AS J&J KINETIX?

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• INCLUDING ACCENT

• SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING

• SOLID SURFACE WINDOWSILLS

Decorative flake epoxy floors

Offices– Concept Items

TASK CHAIR2 LATERAL FILE AND/OR STORAGE CABINETS3

L-SHAPED DESK

• LOW STORAGE OR WORKSURFACE HT RETURN?

• OVERHEAD STORAGE (WHERE POSSIBLE)

• CONFIRM IF DESKS ARE FIXED OR

SIT TO STAND?

• TACKBOARD/WHITEBOARD

• MONITOR ARM

• KEYBOARD TRAY

• TASK LIGHT

MEETING TABLE AND CHAIRS4

This concept is well liked, but desk should be sit to stand

Main Aisle, Staging, Tool Room, Support spaces

Main Aisle and Staging

Mechanical, Electrical Comm

• NON-SLIP EPOXY RESINOUS FLOORING

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• PAINTED EXPOSED CEILING

• SEALED CONCRETE

• ANTISTATIC FOR COMM

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• PAINTED EXPOSED CEILING

Tool Room

• NON-SLIP EPOXY RESINOUS FLOORING

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING

Tool Room – Concept Items

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

CABINET

5FLAMMABLES STORAGE

CABINET

COMMERCIAL REACH-IN FREEZER2

HEAVY DUTY SHELVING3

ROLLING TOOL CABINET1

VIDMARs will be FF&E, tool boxes are GFGI

All hazmat cabinets indicated should be flammable cabinets

Single door, sub zero Todd will provide cutsheet

Assembly / Disassembly

Finishes

• NON-SLIP EPOXY RESINOUS FLOORING

• SOLID OR DECORATIVE FLAKE?

• PAINTED CMU WALLS

• PAINTED EXPOSED CEILING

Equipment

• CONFIRM LARGE AND SMALL ERGO STANDS

• CONFIRM PRESS REQUIREMENTS

• CONFIRM OVEN REQUIREMENTS

White

Todd to follow up with additional information

Assembly / Disassembly – Concept Items

TECH WORKBENCH1

• CLARIFY POWER AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS

Power will be required. Discussion occurred regarding toolboxes below workbenches.

Wo…